Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 91, Issue 4, pp 599–614 | Cite as

Corporate Social Responsibility in the Blogosphere

Article

Abstract

This paper uses social network analysis to examine the interaction between corporate blogs devoted to sustainability issues and the blogosphere, a clustered online network of collaborative actors. By analyzing the structural embeddedness of a prototypical blog in a virtual community, we show the potential of online platforms to document corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities and to engage with an increasingly socially and ecologically aware stakeholder base. The results of this study show that stakeholder involvement via sustainability blogs is a valuable new practice for CSR communications and stakeholder engagement. It also opens new horizons for communicating CSR issues to key constituencies online.

Keywords

corporate communications corporate social responsibility corporate weblogs social networks stakeholder communication 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, R. W.: 1975, The social challenge to business (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  2. Albert, R., Jeong, H., and Barabasi, A.L.: 1999, ‘Diameter of the World-Wide Web’, Nature, 401 (9), 130-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albrycht, E.: 2006, ‘From information overload to collective intelligence: Social bookmarking, tagging and folksonomy’, Public Relations Tactics, 13 (1), 16-17.Google Scholar
  4. Alexa: 2008, ‘Alexa—The Web Information Company’, http://www.alexa.com/. Accessed 24 Mar 2008.
  5. APCO: 2004, ‘Communicating CSR: Talking to People who Listen. Global CSR Study’, www.apcoworldwide.com.
  6. Bachnik, W., S. Szymczyk, P. Leszczynski, R. Podsiadlo, E. Rymszewicz, L. Kurylo, D. Makowiec and B. Bykowska: 2005, ‘Quantitive and Sociological Analysis of Blog Networks’, Acta Physica Polonica B 36(10), 2435–2446Google Scholar
  7. Barnes, Phillip E.: 2009, ‘SUSTAINABILITY WATCH’, Business & Economic Review, 55 (2), 28-29.Google Scholar
  8. Barone, M.J., Miyazaki, A.D., and Taylor, K.A.: 2000, ‘The influence of cause-related marketing in consumer choice: does one good turn deserve another?’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2), 258-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Batagelj, V. and Mrvar, A.: 1998a, ‘Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis’, Connections, 21 (2), 47-57.Google Scholar
  10. Bavelas, A.: 1948, ‘A mathematical model for group structures’, Human Organization, 7, 16-30.Google Scholar
  11. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., and Mead, M.: 1987, ‘The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems’, MIS Quarterly, 11 (3), 369-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhattacharya, C. B. and Sen, S.: 2004, ‘Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives’, California Management Review, 47 (1), 9-24.Google Scholar
  13. Birth, G., et al.: 2008, ‘Communicating CSR: practices among Switzerland’s top 300 companies’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13 (2), 182-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blood, R.: 2004, ‘How Blogging Software Reshapes the Onlinecommunication’, Communications of the ACM, 47 (12), 53-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., and Freeman, L. C. (2002), ‘UCInet for Windows. Software for Social Network Analysis’, (6 edn.; Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies).Google Scholar
  16. Brown, T. and Dacin, P.: 1997, ‘The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses’, Journal of Marketing, 61 (1), 68-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bruns, A.: 2007, ‘Methodologies for Mapping the Blogosphere: An Exploration Using the Issue Crawler Tool’, First Monday 12(1), http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_5/bruns/index.html
  18. Burt, R. S.: 1987, ‘Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion Versus Structural Equivalence’, The American Journal of Sociology, 92 (6), 1287-335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Business for Social Responsibility (BSR): 2003, ‘Stakeholder Engagement Issue Brief’, http://www.bsr.org/insight/issue-briefdetails.cfm?DocumentID=48813. Accessed 2 April 2008
  20. Capriotti, P. and Moreno, A. : 2007, ‘Communicating corporate responsibility through corporate web sites in Spain’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12 (3), 221-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carroll, A.B.: 1979, ‘A Three Dimensional Model of Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carroll, A.B. (2007), ‘A history of corporate social responsibility. Concepts and practices’, in A. Crane, et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (New York: Oxford University Press), 19-46.Google Scholar
  23. Carson, D.: 2008, ‘The ‘blogosphere’ as a market research tool for tourism destinations: A case study of Australia’s Northern Territory’, Journal of Vacation Marketing, 14 (2), 111-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coleman, J., Katz, E., and Menzel, H.: 1957, ‘The Diffusion of an Innovation Among Physicians’, Sociometry, 20 (4), 253-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Creyer, E.H. and Ross, W.T.: 1997, ‘The influence of firm behaviour on purchase intention: do con-sumers really care about business ethics?’, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14 (6), 421-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. CSR Europe (2000a), ‘Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility’, (Brussels: CSR Europe Publications).Google Scholar
  27. CSR Europe: 2000b, The First Ever European Survey of Consumers’ Attitude on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR Europe, Brussels)Google Scholar
  28. Dawkins, J. : 2005, ‘Corporate responsibility: the communication challenge’, Journal of Communication Management, 9 (2), 108-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dearstyne, B. W.: 2007, ‘Blogs, Mashups, & Wikis Oh, My!’, Information Management Journal, 41 (4), 24-33.Google Scholar
  30. Dellarocas, C.: 2003, ‘The Digitization of Word of Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms’, Management Science, 49 (10), 1407-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dellarocas, C.: 2006, ‘Strategic Manipulation of Internet Opinion Forums: Implications for Consumers and Firms’, Management Science, 52 (10), 1577-93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eisenhardt, K. M. and Graebner, M. E.: 2007, ‘Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges’, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1), 25-32.Google Scholar
  33. Esrock, S.L. and Leichty, G.B.: 1998, ‘Social responsibility and corporate web pages: self-presentation or agenda-setting?’, Public Relations Review, 24 (3), 305-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Esrock, S.L. and Leichty, G.B.: 2000, ‘Organization of corporate web pages: Publics and functions’, Public Relations Review, 26 (3), 327-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., and Faloutsos, C. : 1999, ‘On power-law relationships of the internet topology’, Computer Communications Review, 29, 251-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fell, D.A and Wagner, A.: 2000 ‘The small world of metabolism’, Nature Biotechnoligy, 18 (11), 1121-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fieseler, C., M. Fleck and K. Stanoevska-Slabeva: 2008, ‘Corporate Blogs als Instrumente einer nachhaltigen Markenführung online. Kundendialog im Netz mt hohem Anspruch’, Marketing Review St. Gallen. Die neue Thexis – Fachzeitschrift für Marketing 4, 40–44Google Scholar
  38. Fleck, M., et al.: 2007, ‘Applications of Blogs in Corporate Communication’, Studies in Communication Sciences, 7(2): 227-246.Google Scholar
  39. Fombrun, C., Gardberg, N. A., and Barnett, M. L.: 2000, ‘Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corpo-rate citizenship and reputational risk’, Business and Society Review, 105 (1), 85-106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Frederick, W.C. (2008), ‘Corporate Social Responsibility. Deep Roots, Flourishing Growth, Promising Future’, in A. Crane, et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (New York: Oxford University Press), 522-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Freeman, L. C.: 1979, ‘Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification’, Social Networks, 1 (3), 215-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gilmor, D.: 2004, We the Media. Grassroots Journalism By the People, For the People (O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol).Google Scholar
  43. Godes, D. and Mayzlin, D.: 2004, ‘Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication’, Marketing Science, 23 (4), 545-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Griffin, C.: 2007, ‘Monitoring social media coverage’, Public Relations Tactics, 14 (11), 16-17.Google Scholar
  45. Gruhl, D., et al.: 2004, Information Diffusion Through Blogspace. In Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW’04), May 2004, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 491–501. http://people.csail.mit.edu/dln/papers/blogs/idib.pdf
  46. Guay, T., Doh, J. P., and Sinclair, G. : 2004, ‘Non-governmental Organizations, Shareholder Activism, and Socially Responsible Investments: Ethical, Strategic, and Governance Implications’, Journal of Business Ethics, 52 (1), 125-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hannemann, R.A. : 2001, Introduction to Social Network Methods (University of California, Riverside). Google Scholar
  48. Hanneman, R. A. and M. Riddle: 2005, ‘Introduction to Social Network Methods’ [online text], University of California, http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/.
  49. Herring, S. C., et al.: 2005, Conversations in the Blogosphere: An Analysis from “Bottom up”. HICSS-38, Los AlamitosGoogle Scholar
  50. Hoeffler, S. and Keller, K.L.: 2002, ‘Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing’, Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 21 (1), 77-89.Google Scholar
  51. Hoegg, R., et al.: 2006, Overview of Business Models for Web 2.0 Communities. GeNeMe, Dresden, pp. 23–37Google Scholar
  52. Huang, Chun-Yao, et al.: 2007, ‘Bloggers’ motivations and behaviors: A model’, Journal of Advertising Research, 47 (4), 472-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jackson, M. H.: 1997, ‘Assessing the structure of communication on the World Wide Web’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3(1), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue1/jackson.html
  54. Jansen, D.: 2003, Soziale Netzwerkanalyse (Leske+ Budrich, Opladen)Google Scholar
  55. Jeong, H., et al.: 2000, ‘The large-scale organization of metabolic networks’, Nature (407), 651 - 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Judd, C. M., Smith, E. R., and Kidder, L. H.: 1991, Research Methods in Social Relations (6th edn.;Harcourt Brace Jovanovic, Orlando).Google Scholar
  57. Ka Cheung, S., Junghoo, C., and Hyun-kyu, C.: 2007, ‘Efficient Monitoring Algorithm for Fast News Alerts’, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge & Data Engineering, 19 (7), 950-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Katz, L.: 1953, ‘A new status index derived from sociometric analysis’, Psychometrika, 18 (1), 39-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Katz, E. and Lazarsfeld, P. F.: 1955, Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  60. Kent, M. L.: 2008, ‘Critical analysis of blogging in public relations’, Public Relations Review, 34 (1), 32-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kirchhoff, L.: 2007, CorpBlog (1.00 edn.; St. Gallen)Google Scholar
  62. Knoke, D. and Burt, R. S. (1983), ‘Prominence’, in R.S. Burt and M.J. Minor (eds.), Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications), 195-222.Google Scholar
  63. Kolbitsch, J. and Maurer, H.: 2006, ‘The Transformation of the Web: How Emerging Communities Shape the Information we Consume’, Journal of Universal Computer Science, 12 (2), 187-213.Google Scholar
  64. Kumar, R., et al.: 2004, ‘Structure and Evolution of Blogspace.’, Communication of the ACM, 47 (12): 35-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kumar, R., et al.: 2005, ‘On the Bursty Evolution of Blogspace’, World Wide Web, 8 (2), 159-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lee, S., Hwang, T., and Lee, H. H.: 2006, ‘Corporate blogging strategies of the Fortune 500 companies’, Management Decision, 44 (3), 316-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Doo-Hee Lee, Seunghee Im Charles R. Taylor: 2008, ‘Voluntary self-disclosure of information on the Internet: A multimethod study of the motivations and consequences of disclosing information on blogs’, Psychology and Marketing, 25 (7), 692-710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lenhart, A.: 2006, ‘Bloggers: A Portrait of the Internet’s New Storytellers. Pew Internet and American Life Project’, www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/186/report_display.asp.
  69. Leskovec, J., Adamic, L.A., and Huberman, B. A.: 2007, ‘The dynamics of viral marketing’, ACM Trans. Web, 1 (1), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lewis, S. : 2003, ‘Reputation and Corporate Responsibility’, Journal of Communication Management, 7 (4), 356-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Madrigal, R.: 2000, ‘The role of corporate associations in new product evaluation’, Advances in Cosumer Research 27, 80-6.Google Scholar
  72. Maignan, I. and Ralston, D. : 2002, ‘Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US.’, Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (3), 497-514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. McAlister, D.T. and Ferrell, L. : 2002, ‘The role of strategic philanthropy in marketing strategy’, European Journal of Marketing, 36 (5/6), 689-705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. McConnell, B. and J. Huba, 2008: ‘Church of the Customer Blog’, http://www.churchofthecustomer.com/. Accessed 24 Mar 2008
  75. Moreno, J. L. and Jennings, H. H.: 1938, ‘Statistics of Social Configurations’, Sociometry, 1 (3/4), 342-74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Newman, M., Barabasi, A.L., and Watts, D.: 2006, The structure and dynamics of networks (Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  77. O’Reilly, T.: 2005, ‘What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software’, http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2007
  78. O’Reilly, T.: 2006, Web 2.0 Compact Definition: Trying Again (O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol), http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/12/web_20_compact.html. Accessed 22 Mar 2007
  79. Park, H.W. : 2003, ‘Hyperlink Network Analysis: A new method for the study of social structure in the web.’, Connections 25 (1), 49-61.Google Scholar
  80. Price, D.J.: 1965, ‘Networks of scientific papers’, Science, 149, 510-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Proctor, C. H. and Loomis, C. P.: 1951, ‘Analysis of Sociometric Data’. in M. Johoda et al. (eds) Research Methods in Social Relations. dryden, New York, 561–85.Google Scholar
  82. Rapoport, A. and Horvath, W.J.: 1961, ‘A study of a large sociogram’, Behaviorial Science, (Oct;6), 279-91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rheingold, H.: 2002, Smart mobs the next social revolution transforming cultures and communities in the age of instant access (Basic books, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  84. Rosenbloom, A.: 2004, ‘THE Blogosphere’, Communications of the ACM, 47 (12), 32-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Royle, T.: 2005, ‘Realism or idealism? Corporate social responsibility and the employee stakeholder in the global fast-food industry’, Business Ethics: A European Review, 14 (1), 42-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Schmidt, J.: 2007, ‘Blogging Practices: An Analytical Framework’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (4), 1409-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schuster, M.: 2004, Applying Social Network Theory to a small Weblog Community. Hubs, Power Laws and the Community Core. In Blogtalks 2.0 International Conference on Weblogs, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  88. Scott, J.: 2000, Social Network Analysis: A Handbook (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
  89. Shi, X., Tseng, B., and Adamic, L. (2007), Looking at the Blogosphere Typology Through Different Lenses. ICWSM, Boulder, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  90. Sifry, D.: 2007, ‘State of the Blogosphere Report April 2007’, http://www.sifry.com/alerts/archives/000493.html. Accessed 21 May 2007
  91. Smudde, P.: 2005, ‘Blogging, Ethics and Public Relations: A Proactive and Dialogic Approach’, Public Relations Quarterly, 50 (3), 34-38.Google Scholar
  92. Stuart, H. and Jones, C.: 2004, ‘Corporate branding in the online marketspace’, Corporate Reputation Review, 7 (1), 84-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Technorati: 2008, ‘State of the Blogosphere/2008’, http://technorati.com/blogging/state-of-the-blogosphere/. Accessed 24 Mar 2008
  94. Trufelman, L. P.: 2005, ‘Consumer-generated media – challenges and opportunities for public relations’, Public Relations Tactics, 12 (5), 17-27.Google Scholar
  95. Viney, L. L.: 1983, ‘The assessment of psychological states through content analysis of verbal communications’, Psychological Bulletin, 94 (3), 542-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wartick, S. L. and Cochran, P. L. : 1985, ‘The evolution of the corporate social performance model’, Academy of Management Review, 10, 758-69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wasserman, S. and K. Faust.: 1994, Social network analysis methods and applications (paperback edn., Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. XXXI, 825Google Scholar
  98. Wood, D. J.: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, The Academy of Management Review, 16 (4), 691-718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Worldbank: 2008, ‘PSD-Blog. Private Sector Development Blog’, http://psdblog.worldbank.org/. Accessed 24 Mar 2008
  100. Yin, R. K.: 2003, Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  101. Zeleny, L. D.: 1940, ‘Measurement of Social Status’, The American Journal of Sociology, 45 (4), 576-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zerfass, A. and Boelter, D.: 2005, Die neuen Meinungsmacher Weblogs als Herausforderung für Kampagnen, Marketing, PR und Medien (Nausner & Nausner, Graz).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Fieseler
    • 1
  • Matthes Fleck
    • 1
  • Miriam Meckel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Media and Communications ManagementUniversity of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations