Growth via Intellectual Property Rights Versus Gendered Inequity in Emerging Economies: An Ethical Dilemma for International Business
- 367 Downloads
In this paper, we critique the emergent international normative framework of growth – the knowledge economy. We point out that the standardized character of knowledge economy’s flagship – intellectual property rights (IPRs) – has an adverse impact on women in emerging economies, such as India. Conversely, this impact on women, a significant consumer segment, has a feedback effect in terms of market growth. Conceptually, we analyze the consequences of knowledge economy and standardized IPR through a feminist lens. We extend the analyses by pointing to various contradictions surrounding growth norms; for example, there are inherent contradictions between established “formal” legalistic interpretation of IPR, “soft law” norms of corporate social responsibility, a fluid situation of moral claims of human rights, and different institutional capabilities at the international and domestic level. Consequently, we are able to demonstrate how standard IPR laws fail to deliver equity for all. We argue our case through exploring the growth aspects of the agricultural sector in India and the adverse impact of standard biopatenting on women farmers’ rights (as producers and consumers) and preservation of environment. We suggest that desired gendered equity is better achieved when there is a constellation of actors – private-sector business, the state, and civil-society leaders – working together to ensure a balanced development through tailoring of IPR to local needs.
Keywordsagricultural sector equity gender growth intellectual property rights multilayered governance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aaronson, S.A. (2007). A Match Made in the Corporate and Public Interest: Marrying Voluntary CSR Initiatives and the WTO. Journal of Trade, 41(3), 629–659.Google Scholar
- Ackerly, B. 2008a, ‘Human Rights and Social Contract Theory,’ in O’Neill, D., Shanley, M. L. & Young, I. M, (eds.) Illusion of Consent, Engaging with Carole Pateman, (The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA).Google Scholar
- Ackerly, B. 2008b, Universal Human Rights in a World of Difference, (Cambridge University Press, UK).Google Scholar
- Addison, T.: 2008, Chronic Poverty Report 2008-09: Escaping Poverty Traps (Chronic Poverty Research Center, Manchester, UK)Google Scholar
- Adi, B. (2006). ‘Intellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology and the Fate of Poor Farmers’ Agriculture,’. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 9(1), 91–112.Google Scholar
- Alvarez-Castillo, F., & Feinholz, D. (2006). Women in Developing Countries and Benefit Sharing. Developing World Bioethics, 6(3), 1471–8847.Google Scholar
- Burris, S., Hancock, T., Lin, V., & Herzog, A. (2007). Emerging Strategies for Healthy Urban Governance. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 84(1), i154–i163.Google Scholar
- Carr, M. and M. A. Chen: 2001, Globalization and the Informal Economy: How Global Trade and Investment Impact on the Working Poor (WIEGO)Google Scholar
- Center for Global Development: 2007, ‘World Agriculture Faces Serious Decline from Global Warming’, www.globaldevelopmentmatters.org. Accessed September 13
- Chekol, A. A.: 2005, Granting Intellectual Property Rights in Life Forms and Processes: Does it Ensure Food Security? A Developing Country Perspective. M.A. Thesis submitted to Faculty of Law, University of the Western CapeGoogle Scholar
- Chon, M.: 2006, ‘Intellectual Property and the Development Divide’, Cardozo Law Review 27, 2821–2912Google Scholar
- Cimoli, M., G. Dosi and E. J. Stiglitz: 2008, ‘The Future of Industrial Policies in the New Millennium: Towards a Knowledge-Centered Development Agenda’, Working Paper Series of Laboratory of Economics and Management Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, http://www.dimeeu.org./files/Cimoli-Dosi-2008-19.pdf.
- Dahlman, C. and A. Utz: 2005, ‘India and the Knowledge Economy: Leveraging Strengths and Opportunities, Overview’, in WBI Development Studies (Finance and Private Sector Development Unit, South Asia Region, The World Bank, Washington, DC)Google Scholar
- DeCecco, M, 1974, Money and Empire, Basil Blackwell, UK.Google Scholar
- DeMartino, G. 2000, Global Economy, Global Justice, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ganguly, M.: 2002, ‘Vandana Shiva: Seeds of Self-Reliance’, http://www.time.com/time/2002/greencentury/heroes/index_shiva.html. Accessed 30 Mar 2009
- Gerstetter, C., B. Gorlach, K. Neumann and D. Schaffrin: 2007, ‘The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture within the Current Legal Regime Complex on Plant Genetic Resources’, The Journal of World Intellectual Property 10, 259–283Google Scholar
- Gibb, H.: 2007, ‘Gender Dimensions of Intellectual Property and Traditional Medicinal Knowledge’, The International Working Group on Gender, Macroeconomics and International Economics (GEM-IWG), Volume–Internal GEM-IWG Working Paper Series, 07-07, http://www.siyanda.org/static/GEM-IWG_TMK.htm?em=0809&tag=QG.
- Gupta, A. 2005, WIPO-UNEP Study on the Role of Intellectual Property Rights in the Sharing of Benefits Arising from the Use of Biological Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge, WIPO-UNEP, IIM Ahmedabad, India, http://www.wipo.int/tk/en/publications/769e_unep_tk.pdf.
- Levy, D.L. (2008). Political Contestation in Global Production Networks. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 943–963.Google Scholar
- May, C. (2006). Review Essay: Social Limits to the Commodification of Knowledge: Ten Years of TRIPS. Journal of International Economics, 2(1), 91–108.Google Scholar
- O’Neill, D., Shanley, M.L., & Young, I.M, 2008, ‘Introduction,’ In O’Neill, D., Shanley, M. L. & Young, I. M, ed. Illusion of Consent, Engaging with Carole Pateman, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
- Padmanabhan, M. A.: 2005, Institutional Innovation Towards Gender Equity in Agro-Biodiversity Management: Collective Action in Kerala, South India. CAPRI Working Paper #39, International Food Policy Research Institute, June 2005Google Scholar
- Picciotto, S.: 2007, ‘The WTO as a Node of Global Governance: Economic Regulation and Human Rights Discourse’, Law, Social Justice & Global Development: An Electronic Law Journal, http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/2007_1. Accessed 19 Jan 2009
- Pionetti, C.: 2006, Seed Diversity in the Drylands: Women and Farming in South India, Gatekeeper Series 126 (International Institute for Environment and Development)Google Scholar
- Prasad, B.S., Pisani, M.J., & Prasad, R.M. (2008). New Criticisms of International Management: An Analytical Review. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 617–629.Google Scholar
- Ragavan, S., & Mayer, J. (2007). ‘Has India Addressed Its Farmers Woes? A Story of Plant Protection Issues,’ Georgetown International. Environmental Law Review, 20(97), 97–127.Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. 1999, The Law of Peoples, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. 2007, ‘Justice as Fairness: A restatement,’ in Carter, I., Kramer, M. H. & Steiner, H., (eds.), Freedom: A Philosophical Anthology, (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
- Satyanarayana, K., & Srivastava, S. (2007). Poverty, Health and Intellectual Property Rights with Special Reference to India. The Indian Journal of Medical Research, (October), 126, 390-406.Google Scholar
- Sen, A.: 2005-2006, ‘Human Rights and the Limits of Law’, Cardozo Law Review 27, 2913–2927Google Scholar
- Srinivasan, S.: 2005, ‘Pharmaceuticals, WTO/TRIPs and Women’, http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/esswpaper/id_3a267.htm.
- The Corner House: 2004, ‘Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? Political Organizing Behind TRIPS’, www.cornerhouse.org.uk. Accessed Sept 2004
- The Wall Street Journal, Economy and Politics: 2007, ‘Govt. Funds to Perk Herbal Sector,’ www.livemint.com. Accessed 29 Oct
- Wolff, F. (2004). Legal Factors Driving Agro-biodiversity Loss. Environmental Law Network International, 1, 1–11.Google Scholar