Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 91, Issue 2, pp 167–181 | Cite as

Attitudes About Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Student Predictors

  • Robert W. KolodinskyEmail author
  • Timothy M. Madden
  • Daniel S. Zisk
  • Eric T. Henkel
Article

Abstract

Four predictors were posited to affect business student attitudes about the social responsibilities of business, also known as corporate social responsibility (CSR). Applying Forsyth’s (1980, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 175–184, 1992, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 461–470) personal moral philosophy model, we found that ethical idealism had a positive relationship with CSR attitudes, and ethical relativism a negative relationship. We also found materialism to be negatively related to CSR attitudes. Spirituality among business students did not significantly predict CSR attitudes. Understanding the relationship between CSR attitudes and the significant predictors has important implications for researchers and teachers in particular.

Keywords

ethics ethical ideologies corporate social responsibility CSR materialism relativism idealism Forsyth 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abela, A.V. (2006). Marketing and consumerism: A response to O’shaughnessy and O’shaughnessy. European Journal of Marketing, 40(1/2), 5–16. doi: 10.1108/03090560610637284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahuvia, A.C., & Wong, N.Y. (2002). Personality and values based materialism: Their relationship and origins. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(4), 389–402. doi: 10.1207/15327660260382414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, T. D.: 1995, Exploring Spirituality: The Development of the Armstrong Measure of Spirituality. Paper Presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  4. Astin, A.W. (2004). Why spirituality deserves a central place in liberal education. Liberal Education, 90(2), 34–41.Google Scholar
  5. Astin, A. W. and H. S. Astin: 2004, ‹Spirituality in College Students: Preliminary Findings from a National Study’, http://spirituality.ucla.edu/results/Findings_2003-11-21.pdf.
  6. Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136.Google Scholar
  7. Belk, R.W. (1985). Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. The Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 265–280. doi: 10.1086/208515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belk, R.W. 1987. Identity and the Relevance of Market, Personal, and Community Objects. In J. Sebeok (Ed.), Marketing and Semiotics: New Directions in the Study of Signs for Sale (151-164). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  9. Bird, R., Hall, A.D., Momente, F., & Reggiani, F. (2007). What corporate social responsibility activities are valued by the market? Journal of Business Ethics, 76(2), 189–206. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9268-1. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boli, J. and D. Hartsuiker: 2001, World culture and Transnational Corporations: Sketch of a Project. International Conference on Effects of and Responses to Globalization, Istanbul.Google Scholar
  11. Borkowski, S.C., & Ugras, Y.J. (1992). The ethical attitudes of students as a function of age, sex and experience. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(12), 961–979. doi: 10.1007/BF00871962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowen, H.R. 1953. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  13. Bowie, N. (1991). New directions in corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 34(4), 56–65. doi: 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90007-I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brickson, S.L. (2007). Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 864–888.Google Scholar
  15. Brinkmann, J., & Sims, R.R. (2001). Stakeholder-sensitive business ethics teaching. Teaching Business Ethics, 5, 171–193. doi: 10.1023/A:1011461418842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown, T.J., & Dacin, P.A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84. doi: 10.2307/1252190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burroughs, J.E., & Rindfleisch, A. (2002). Materialism and well-being: A conflicting values perspective. The Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 348–370. doi: 10.1086/344429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cable, D.M., & Judge, T.A. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294–311. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Callahan, D. 2004. The cheating culture: Why more Americans are doing wrong to get ahead. Orlando: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  20. Carroll, A.B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. doi: 10.2307/257850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carroll, A.B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. doi: 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295. doi: 10.1177/000765039903800303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chatterjee, A., & Hunt, J.M. (1996). Self-monitoring as a personality correlate of materialism: An investigation of related cognitive orientation. Psychological Reports, 79(2), 523–528.Google Scholar
  24. Christensen, L.J., Pierce, E., Hartman, L.P., Hoffman, W.M., & Carrier, J. (2007). Ethics, CSR, and sustainability education in the financial times top 50 global business schools: Baseline data and future research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 73(4), 347–368. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9211-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Comer, D.R., & Vega, G. (2008). Using the PET assessment instrument to help students identify factors that could impede moral behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 129–145. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9303-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cornelius, N., Wallace, J., & Tassabehji, R. (2007). An analysis of corporate social responsibility, corporate identity and ethics teaching in business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 117–135. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9271-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Covey, S.R. 1992. Principle-centered leadership. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  28. Creyer, E.H., & Ross, W.T. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421–432. doi: 10.1108/07363769710185999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dahlsrud, A. (2006). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social-Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1002/csr.132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Davis, M.A., Andersen, M.G., & Curtis, M.B. (2001). Measuring ethical ideology in business ethics: A critical analysis of the ethics position questionnaire. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(1), 35–53. doi: 10.1023/A:1010701417165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. doi: 10.2307/258887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–101.Google Scholar
  33. Etheredge, J.M. (1999). The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: An alternative scale structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 51–64. doi: 10.1023/A:1006077708197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fletcher, J. 1966. Situation ethics: The new morality. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.Google Scholar
  35. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258. doi: 10.2307/256324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Forsyth, D.R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.1.175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Forsyth, D.R. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5-6), 461–470. doi: 10.1007/BF00870557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Forsyth, D.R., Nye, J.L., & Kelley, K. (1988). Idealism, relativism, and the ethic of caring. The Journal of Psychology, 122(3), 243–248.Google Scholar
  39. Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  40. Freeman, R.E., Wicks, A.C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and the corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970.Google Scholar
  43. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.Google Scholar
  44. Giacalone, R.A. (2004). A transcendent business education for the 21st century. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(4), 415–420.Google Scholar
  45. Giacalone, R.A. (2006). Business ethics and social responsibility education: Shifting the worldview. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 266–277.Google Scholar
  46. Giacalone, R.A., & Jurkiewicz, C.L. (2003a). Handbook of workplace spirituality and organizational performance. Armonk, N.Y: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  47. Giacalone, R.A., & Jurkiewicz, C.L. (2003b). Right from wrong: The influence of spirituality on perceptions of unethical business activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 85–97. doi: 10.1023/A:1024767511458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Giacalone, R.A., Paul, K., & Jurkiewicz, C.L. (2005). A preliminary investigation into the role of positive psychology in consumer sensitivity to corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(4), 295–305. doi: 10.1007/s10551-004-5970-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Giacalone, R.A., & Thompson, K. (2006). Business ethics and social responsibility education: Shifting the worldview. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 266–277.Google Scholar
  50. Gilligan, C. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 6thed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  52. Henle, C.A., Giacalone, R.A., & Jurkiewicz, C.L. (2005). The role of ethical ideology in workplace deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(3), 219–230. doi: 10.1007/s10551-004-2779-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hodge, D.R. (2003). The intrinsic spirituality scale: A new six-item instrument for assessing the salience of spirituality as a motivational construct. Journal of Social Service Research, 30(1), 41–61. doi: 10.1300/J079v30n01_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M.H. (1984). Hofstede’s culture dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeach’s value survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15, 417–433. doi: 10.1177/0022002184015004003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hosmer, L.T. 2008. The ethics of management (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
  57. Inglehart, R. 1990. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Jones, T.M. (1980). Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review, 22(3), 59–67.Google Scholar
  59. Kasser, T. 2002. The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  60. Kasser, T., & Ahuvia, A.C. (2001). Materialistic values and well-being in business students: An empirical reply to Sagiv and Schwartz (2000). European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(1), 137–146. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Knights, D., & O’Leary, M. (2006). Leadership, ethics and responsibility to the other. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 125–137. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9008-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lee, M.P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00226.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lewis, D.L. 1976. The public image of Henry Ford: An American folk hero and his company. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Mackey, A., Mackey, T.B., & Barney, J.B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817–835.Google Scholar
  65. Marin, L., & Ruiz, S. (2007). “I need you too!” corporate identity attractiveness for consumers and the role of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 245–260. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9137-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. doi: 10.1037/h0054346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McKnight, R. 1984. Spirituality in the Workplace. In J. D. Adams (Ed.), Transforming work. Alexandria, VA: Miles River Press.Google Scholar
  68. Mitchell, T.R., & Scott, W.G. (1990). America’s problems and needed reforms: Confronting the ethic of personal advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 4(3), 23–35.Google Scholar
  69. Mitroff, I.I., & Denton, E.A. (1999). A spiritual audit of corporate America: A hard look at spirituality, religion, and values in the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  70. Nan, X., & Heo, K. (2007). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: Examining the role of brand-cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 63–74. doi: 10.2753/JOA0091-3367360204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. The Oxford English Dictionary.: 1989 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  72. Park, H. (2005). The role of idealism and relativism as dispositional characteristics in the socially responsible decision-making process. Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 81–98. doi: 10.1007/s10551-004-3239-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Park, H., & Stoel, L. (2005). A model of socially responsible buying/sourcing decision-making processes. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(4), 235–249. doi: 10.1108/09590550510593176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pfeffer, J. (2005). Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4), 95–108.Google Scholar
  75. Podsakoff, P.M., & Organ, D.W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. doi: 10.1177/014920638601200408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  77. Richins, M.L. 1987. Media, materialism, and human happiness. In M. Wallendorf and P. F. Anderson (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research (Volume 14: 352-356). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  78. Richins, M.L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. The Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303–316. doi: 10.1086/209304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ryan, L., & Dziurawiec, S. (2001). Materialism and its relationship to life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 55(2), 185–197. doi: 10.1023/A:1011002123169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schlenker, B.R., & Forsyth, D.R. (1977). On the ethics of psychological research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(4), 369–396. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90006-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sims, R.R., & Felton, E.L., Jr. (2006). Designing and delivering business ethics teaching and learning. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(3), 297–312. doi: 10.1007/s10551-005-3562-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S.J., Rallapalli, K.C., & Kraft, K.L. (1996). The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: A scale development. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1131–1140. doi: 10.1007/BF00412812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sparks, J.R., & Hunt, S.D. (1998). Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity: Conceptualization, measurement, and exploratory investigation. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 92–109. doi: 10.2307/1252163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tatzel, M. (2002). “Money worlds” and well-being: An integration of money dispositions, materialism and price-related behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(1), 103–126. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00069-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vitell, S.J., Nwachukwu, S.L., & Barnes, J.H. (1993). The effects of culture on ethical decision-making: An application of Hofstede’s typology. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(10), 753–760. doi: 10.1007/BF00881307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zinnbauer, B.J., Pargament, K.I., & Scott, A.B. (1999). The emerging meanings of religiousness and spirituality: Problems and prospects. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 889–919. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. Kolodinsky
    • 1
    Email author
  • Timothy M. Madden
    • 2
  • Daniel S. Zisk
    • 1
  • Eric T. Henkel
    • 1
  1. 1.James Madison UniversityHarrisonburgU.S.A.
  2. 2.University of TennesseeKnoxvilleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations