Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 91, Issue 1, pp 1–19

Do Markets Crowd Out Virtues? An Aristotelian Framework



The debate on the influence of markets on virtues has focused on two opposite hypotheses: the doux commerce thesis and the self-destruction thesis. Whereas the doux commerce hypothesis assumes that capitalism polishes human manners, the self-destruction hypothesis holds that capitalism erodes the moral foundation of society. This paper will develop a more balanced position by using the virtue ethics developed by Aristotle, which distinguishes several virtues. The research will focus on the question for which virtues the doux commerce or self-destruction thesis is likely to hold. An extensive literature survey shows that market competition tends to stimulate diligence, crowd out temperance, generosity, and sociability, and stimulate envy. The effect on other virtues – i.e. courage, high-spiritedness, justice, and prudence – is ambiguous.


Aristotle capitalism competition doux commerce thesis free market market operation self-destruction thesis virtue ethics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alesina, A. and E. La Ferrare: 2002, ‹Who trusts others?’, Journal of Public Economics 85, 207-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alpizar, F., F. Carsson and O. Johansson-Stenman: 2005, ‹How much do we care about absolute versus relative income consumption?’, Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organisation 56, 405-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aristotle: Ethica Nicomachea (Historische Uitgeverij, Groningen)Google Scholar
  4. Berggren, N.: 1999, ‹Economic freedom and equality: Friends or foes?’, Public Choice 100, 203-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berggren, N. and H. Jordahl: 2006, ‹Free to trust: Economic freedom and social capital’, Kyklos 59(2), 141-69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bizjak, John M., Brickley, James A. and Coles, Jeffrey L.: 1993, ‹Stock-based incentive compensation and investment behavior’, Journal of Accounting and Economics 16, 349-372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloom, M.: 1999, ‹The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations’, The Academy of Management Journal 42, 25-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloom, M. and J.G. Michel: 2002, ‹The relationships among organizational context, pay dispersion and managerial turnover’, Academy of Management Journal 45, 33-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bovenberg, A.L.: 2000, ‹On the cutting edge between policy and academia: challenges for public economists’, De Economist 148, 295-329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bovenberg, A.L.: 2002, ‹Norms, values and technological change’, De Economist 150, 521-553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bovenberg, L.: 2007, ‹Boekbespreking’, Christen Democratische Verkenningen 28(3), 166-70.Google Scholar
  12. Bowles, S.: 1998, ‹Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions’, Journal of Economic Literature, XXXVI, 75-111.Google Scholar
  13. Brekke, K.A. and R.B. Howarth: 2002, Status, Growth and the Environment; Goods as Symbols in Applied Welfare Economics (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham).Google Scholar
  14. Brown, Lawrence D. and Higgins, Huong Ngo: 2001, ‹Managing earnings surprises in the US versus 12 other countries’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 20, 373-398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruni, L. and L. Stanca: 2006, ‹Income aspirations, television and happiness: Evidence from the World Values Studies’, Kyklos 59, 209-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carlsson, F., O. Johansson-Stenman and P. Martinsson: 2003, Do You Enjoy Having More Than Others? Survey Evidence on Positional Goods (Goteborg University, Working Papers in Economics, no. 100)Google Scholar
  17. Carmon, Z., K. Wertenbroch and M. Zeelenberg: 2003, ‹Option attachment: when deliberating makes choosing feel like losing’, Journal of Consumer Research 30, 15-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Choo, F. and K. Tan: 2007, ‹An American dream theory of corporate executive fraud’, Accounting Forum 31, 203-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crisp, R.: 2003, ‹Equality, priority and compassion’, Ethics 113, 745-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dawson, J.W.: 1998, ‹Institutions, investment, and growth: New cross-country and panel data evidence’, Economic Inquiry XXXVI, 603-19.Google Scholar
  21. Haan, J. de and J.E. Sturm: 2000, ‹On the relationship between economic freedom and economic growth’, European Journal of Political Economy 16, 215–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Easton, Steven T., and Michael A. Walker: 1997, ‹Income, growth, and economic freedom’, American Economic Review 87(2), 328–32.Google Scholar
  23. Florida, R.: 2002, The rise of the creative class. And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  24. Frey, B.: 1998, Not Just for the Money, an Economic Theory of Personal Motivation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham).Google Scholar
  25. Frey, B. S., C. Benesch and A. Stutzer: 2005, ‹Does Watching TV Make Us Happy?, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics’, University of Zurich, Working Paper 241.Google Scholar
  26. Frey, B.S. and R. Jegen: 2001, ‹Motivation crowding theory’, Journal of Economic Surveys 15, 589-611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frey, B.S. and Oberholzer-Gee, F.: 1997, ‹The costs of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding out’, American Economic Review 87, 746-55.Google Scholar
  28. Galbraith, K: 1958, The affluent society (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston).Google Scholar
  29. Gay, C.M.: 2003, Cash values. Money and the erosion of meaning in today’s society (William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids).Google Scholar
  30. Glaeser, E.L. and D. DiPasquale: 1999, ‹Incentives and social capital: Are homeowners better citizens?’, Journal of Urban Economics 45, 354-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gneezy, U. and A. Rustichini: 2000, ‹Pay enough, or don’t pay at all’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 791-810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goette, L. and M. Lienhard: 2006, ‹Productivity and Well-being under Fixed Wages and Piece Rates’, University of Zurich. Preliminary Draft. February 14, 2006.
  33. Goldberg, P. K. and N. Pavcnik: 2007, ‹Distributional effects of globalization in developing countries’, Journal of Economic Literature XLV(March), 39-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Golden, L. and B. Wiens-Tuers: 2006, ‹To your happiness? Extra hours of labor supply and worker well-being’, The Journal of Socio Economics 35, 382-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Graafland, J.J. : 2002 ‹Sourcing ethics in the textile sector: the case of C&A’, Business Ethics: A European Review 11, 282-294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Graafland, J.J.: 2003, ‹Distribution of responsibility, ability and competition’, Journal of Business Ethics 35, 293-305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Graafland, J.J.: 2007, Economics, ethics and the market: Introduction and applications (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  38. Graafland, J.J. and H. Smid: 2004, ‹Reputation, corporate social responsibility and market regulation’, Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management XLIX (2), 269-306.Google Scholar
  39. Grant, R. and M. Visconti: 2006, ‹The strategic background to corporate accounting scandals’, Long Range Planning 39, 361-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harrison, Jeffrey S. and James O. Fiet,: 1999, ‹New CEOs Pursue Their Own Self-Interests by Sacrificing Stakeholder Value’, Journal of Business Ethics 19, 301-308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Henrich, J., R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, H. Gintis and R. McElreath: 2001, ‹Cooperation, reciprocity and punishment in fifteen small scale societies’, American Economic Review 91, 73-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hirsch, F.: 1977, Social Limits to Growth (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
  43. Hirschman, A.O.: 1982, ‹Rival interpretations of market society: Civilizing, destructive or feeble?’, Journal of Economic Literature XX, 1463-1484.Google Scholar
  44. Inglehart, R.: 2000, ‹Globalization and postmodern values’, The Washington Quarterly 23, 215-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Iyengar, S.S. and M.R. Lepper: 2000, ‹When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79, 995-1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Keil, Sev. K., Reibstein, David and Wittink, Dick R.: 2001, ‹The impact of business objectives and the time horizon of performance evaluation on pricing behavior’, International Journal of Research in Marketing 18, 67-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Klein, N.: 2002, No Logo (Lemniscaat, Rotterdam).Google Scholar
  48. Knack, S. and P. Keefer: 1997, ‹Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 1251-1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Koehn, D.: 1995, ‹A role for virtue ethics in the analysis of business practice’, Business Ethics Quarterly 5, 533-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kreps, D.M.: 1997, ‹The interaction between norms and economic incentives. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives’, American Economic Review 87, 359-364.Google Scholar
  51. Laverty, Kevin J.: 1996, ‹Economic “short-termism”: The debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research’, Academy of Management Review 21, 825-860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Layard, R.: 2003, ‹Happiness – Has social science a clue?’, Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures 2002/3, Centre for Economic Performance (London School of Economics and Political Science, London).Google Scholar
  53. Layard, R.: 2005, Happiness: Lessons from a New Science (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
  54. Lindbeck, A.: 1995, ‹Welfare State Disincentives with Endogenous Habits and Norms’, OcfEB, Research Memorandum 9505.Google Scholar
  55. Macneil, I.: 1986, ‹Exchange revisited: Individual utility and social solidarity’, Ethics 96, 567-593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Maitland, I.: 1997, ‹Virtuous markets. The market as school of virtues’, Business Ethics Quarterly 7, 17-33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Major, V.S., K.J. Klein and M.G. Ehrhart: 2002, ‹Work time, work interference with family, and psychological distress’, Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 427-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McCloskey, D. N.: 2006, Bourgeois virtues: Ethics for an age of commerce (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  59. McPherson, M., L. Smith-Lovin and M.E. Brashears: 2006, ‹Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades’, American Sociological Review 71, 353-375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Moore, G.: 2005, ‹Humanizing Business: A modern virtue ethics approach’, Business Ethics Quarterly 15, 237-55.Google Scholar
  61. Novak, M.: 1982, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism (Simon and Schuster, New York N.Y.).Google Scholar
  62. Nozick, R.: 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  63. Orlitzky, M., F.L. Schmidt and S.L. Rynes: 2003, ‹Corporate social and financial performance, A meta-analysis’, Organization Studies 24, 403-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Putman, R.: 2000, Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  65. Rappaport, A.: 2005, ‹The economics of short-term performance obsession’, Financial Analyst Journal 61, 65-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rawls, J.: 1999, A Theory of Justice (revised edition) (Harvard University Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  67. Rezaee, Z.: 2005, ‹Causes, consequences, and deterrence of financial statements fraud’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16, 277-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Richardson, Vernon J. and James F. Waegelein: 2002, ‹The Influence of Long-Term Performance Plans on Earnings Management and Firm Performance’, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 18, 161-183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schwartz, B.: 2004, The paradox of choice (HarperCollins Publishers Inc, New York).Google Scholar
  70. Scully, G.W.: 2002, ‹Economic freedom, government policy and the trade-off between equity and economic growth’, Public Choice 113, 77-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Segelod, Esbjörn: 2000, ‹A comparison of managers’ perceptions of short-termism in Sweden and the US’, International Journal of Production Economics 63, 243-254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shleifer, A.: 2004, ‹Does competition destroy ethical behavior?’, American Economic Review 94, 414-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sider, R.J. 1997. Evaluating the triumph of the market. in: H. Ucko (ed.). The Jubilee challenge. Utopia or possibility? Jewish and Christian Insights. (World Council of Churches, Geneva), 112-133.Google Scholar
  74. Solnick, S.J. and D. Hemenway: 1998, ‹Is more always better? A survey on positional concerns’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 37, 373-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Solomon, R.C.: 1992, ‹Corporate roles, personal virtues: An Aristotelean approach to business ethics’, Business Ethics Quarterly 2, 317-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Titmuss, R.: 1970, The Gift Relationship. From human blood to social policy (Allen and Unwin, London).Google Scholar
  77. Uslaner, E.M.: 2002, The moral foundations of trust (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  78. Ven, B.W. van de and R.M.J. Jeurissen: 2005, ‹Competing responsibility’, Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (2), 299-318.Google Scholar
  79. Vogel, Thomas J. and Gerald J. Lobo: 2002, ‹Impact of Adoption of Long-Term Performance Plans on Financial Analysts’ Long-Term Forecasts’, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 19, 291-306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wade, J.B., C.A. O’ Reilly and T.G. Pollock: 2006, ‹Overpaid CEO’s and underpaid managers: Fairness and executive compensation’, Organization Science 17, 527-544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Waide, J.: 1987, ‹The making of self and world in advertising’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 73-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. World Bank: 2006, World Development Report 2006 (World Bank, Washington DC).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zak, P.J. and S. Knack: 2001, ‹Trust and growth’, Economic Journal 111, 295-321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Business Administration and Faculty of HumanitiesTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations