Journal of Business Ethics

, 90:399 | Cite as

The Legitimacy of Loan Maturity Mismatching: A Risky, but not Fraudulent, Undertaking

  • Philipp Bagus
  • David Howden


Barnett and Block (Journal of Business Ethics, 2009) attack the heart of modern banking by claiming that the practice of borrowing short and lending long is illicit. While their claim of illegitimacy concerning fractional reserve banking can be defended, their justification lacks substance. Their claim is herein strengthened by a legal analysis of deposits and loans based on Huerta de Soto (Money, Bank Credit and Economic Cycles, 2006). A combined legal and economic analysis shows that while lending deposits can be regarded as illicit, the maturity mismatching of loans is legitimate contrary to Barnett and Block’s claim. No over-issuance of property rights is involved with this practice once the distinction between present and future goods is taken into account. However, while the practice is not illicit per se, it is greatly assisted and developed through the presence of a fractional reserve banking system, and can sometimes breed detrimental effects.


time deposits private property rights fraud maturity mismatching fractional reserve banking 


  1. Bagus, P.: 2003, ‹The Commons and the Tragedy of Banking’, Accessed 12 Nov
  2. Bagus, P. (2007). Asset Prices – An Austrian Perspective. Procesos de Mercado: Revista Europea de Economía Política, 4(2), 57–93.Google Scholar
  3. Bagus, P. (2008). Monetary policy as bad medicine: The volatile relationship between business cycles and asset prices. The Review of Austrian Economics, 21(4), 282–300. doi: 10.1007/s11138-008-0042-8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagus, P. and D. Howden: 2009, forthcoming, ‹The Subprime Solution: How Today’s Global Financial Crisis Happened, and What to do About It. By Robert J. Shiller: A Review’, Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, W. II and W. Block: 2009, ‹Time Deposits, Dimensions and Fraud’, Journal of Business Ethics Google Scholar
  6. Garrison, R.W. 1994, ‹Hayekian Triangles and Beyond ‹, in J. Birner and R. van Zijp, (eds.), Hayek, Coordination and Evolution: His Legacy in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Garrison, R.W. 2001, Time and Money: The Macroeconomics of Capital Structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Hayek, F.A. 1929, Geldtheorie und Konjunkturtheorie. Vienna: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
  9. Hayek, F.A. 1931, Prices and Production. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Hoppe, H.-H. (1994). How is Fiat Money Possible? or, The Devolution of Money and Credit. The Review of Austrian Economics, 7(2), 49–74. doi: 10.1007/BF01101942. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoppe, H.-H., with J. G. Hülsmann and W. Block. (1998). Against Fiduciary Media. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1(1), 19–50. doi: 10.1007/s12113-998-1001-8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howden, D. (2008). Stability of Gold Standard and its Selected Consequences: A Comment. Procesos de Mercado: Revista Europea de Economía Política, 5(1), 159–175.Google Scholar
  13. Huerta de Soto, J. (1995). A Critical Analysis of Central Banks and Fractional-Reserve Free Banking from the Austrian Perspective. The Review of Austrian Economics, 8(2), 25–38. doi: 10.1007/BF01102290. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huerta de Soto, J. (1998). A Critical Note on Fractional-Reserve Free Banking. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1(4), 25–49. doi: 10.1007/s12113-998-1025-0. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huerta de Soto, J. 2006, Money, Bank Credit and Economic Cycles. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Hülsmann, J.G. (1996). Free Banking and the Free Bankers. The Review of Austrian Economics, 9(1), 3–53. doi: 10.1007/BF01101880. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hülsmann, J.G. (1998). Toward a General Theory of Error Cycles. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1(4), 1–23. doi: 10.1007/s12113-998-1024-1. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hülsmann, J.G. (2000). ‹Banks Cannot Create Money’, The Independent Review. The Journal of Political Economy, 5(1), 101–110.Google Scholar
  19. Hülsmann, J.G. 2008, The Ethics of Money Production. Auburn AL: Ludwig von Mises Institue.Google Scholar
  20. Knies, K. 1876, Geld und Kredit, Vol. II. Berlin: Weidmännische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
  21. Mises, L.: 1912/1953, The Theory of Money and Credit (Yale University Press, New Haven)Google Scholar
  22. Mises, L.: 1949/1998, Human Action (Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, AL)Google Scholar
  23. Rothbard, M. N.: 1962/1991, ‹The Case for a 100 Percent Gold Dollar’, in L. B. Yeager (ed.), Search of a Monetary Constitution (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 94–136Google Scholar
  24. Rothbard, M. N.: 1962/1993, Man, Economy, and State (Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, AL)Google Scholar
  25. Rothbard, M. N.: 1963/1975, America’s Great Depression (Sheed and Ward, Kansas City)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Rey Juan CarlosMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations