Journal of Business Ethics

, 90:187 | Cite as

Corporate Governance and Codes of Ethics

  • Luis Rodriguez-Dominguez
  • Isabel Gallego-Alvarez
  • Isabel Maria Garcia-Sanchez
Article

Abstract

As a result of recent corporate scandals, several rules have focused on the role played by Boards of Directors on the planning and monitoring of corporate codes of ethics. In theory, outside directors are in a better position than insiders to protect and further the interests of all stakeholders because of their experience and their sense of moral and legal obligations. Female directors also tend to be more sensitive to ethics according to several past studies which explain this affirmation by early gender socialization, the fact that women are thought to place a greater emphasis on harmonious relations and the fact that men and women use different ethical frameworks in their judgments. The goal of this paper is to determine the influence of these characteristics of the Board in terms of promoting and hindering the creation of a code of ethics. Our findings show that a greater number of female directors does not necessarily lead to more ethical companies. Moreover, within Europe as a continent, board ownership leads to an entrenchment of upper-level management, generating a divergence between the ethical interests of owners and managers. In light of this situation, the presence of independent directors is necessary to reduce such conflicts.

Key words

codes of ethics business ethics corporate social responsibility corporate governance Board of Directors 

References

  1. Adam, M.A. and D. Rachman-Moore: 2004, ‹The Methods Used to Implement and Ethical Code of Conduct and Employee Attitudes,’ Journal of Business Ethics 54, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldama, E.: 2003, ‹Report by the Special Commission to Foster Transparency and Security in Markets and in Listed Companies’, Special Report, Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (http://www.cnmv.es), Madrid, Spain
  3. Allen, J. and D. Davis: 1993, ‹Assessing Some Determinant Effects of Ethical Consulting Behavior: The Case of Personal and Professional,’ Journal of Business Ethics 12 (6), 449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argandoña, A.: 1998, ‹The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good,’ Journal of Business Ethics 17 (9/10), 1093–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arjoon, S.: 2005, ‹Corporate Governance: An Ethical Perspective,’ Journal of Business Ethics 61 (4), 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) Corporate Governance Council: 2003, Principles of Good Corporate Governance and Best Practice Recommendations (Sydney: Australian Stock Exchange).Google Scholar
  7. Berenbeim, R.: 2000, ‹Global Ethics,’ Executive Excellence 17 (5), 7.Google Scholar
  8. Berenbeim, R. E. and J. M. Kaplan: 2004, Ethics Programs… The Role of the Board: A Global Study (Report R-1344, The Conference Board)Google Scholar
  9. Bernardi, R.A., S.M. Bosco and K.M. Vassil: 2006, ‹Does female representation on boards of director associate with Fortune’s 100 Best Companies to work for list?,’ Business and Society 45, 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bondy, K., D. Matten. and J. Moon: 2004, ‹The Adoption of Voluntary Codes of Conduct in MNCs: A Three-Country Comparative Study,’ Business and Society Review, 109 (4): 449–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonn, I. and J. Fisher: 2005, ‹Corporate Governance and Business Ethics: Insights from the Strategic Planning Experience,’ Corporate Governance: An International Review 13 (6), 730–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boo, E.H. and H.C. Koh: 2001, ‹The influence of organizational and code-supporting variables on the effectiveness of a code of ethics,’ Teaching Business Ethics 5, 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brickley, J., R. Lease and C. Smith: 1988, ‹Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments,’ Journal of Financial Economics 20 (1/2), 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, W. O. and M. T. Maloney: 1999, Exit, Voice, and the Role of Corporate Directors: Evidence from Acquisition Performance (Claremont Colleges Working Paper)Google Scholar
  15. Carasco, E.F. and J.B. Singh: 2003, ‹The Content and Focus of the Codes of Ethics of the World’s Largest Transnational Corporations,’ Business and Society Review 108 (1), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll, A. B.: 1991, ‹The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’,’ Business and Society 34 (4), 39–48.Google Scholar
  17. Carter, D.A., Simkins, B.J. and Simpson, W. G.: 2003, ‹Corporate Governance, Board Diversity and Firm Value, ‹ The Financial Review 38, 33–53. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cleek, M.A. and S.L. Leonard: 1998, ‹Can Corporate Codes Ethics Influence Behavior?,’ Journal of Business Ethics 17 (6), 619–630.Google Scholar
  19. Cressey, D. and C.A. Moore: 1983, ‹Managerial Values and Corporate Codes of Ethics,’ California Management Review 25 (53), 53–57.Google Scholar
  20. Cuervo, A.: 2002, ‹Corporate Governance Mechanisms: A Plea for Less Code of Good Governance and More Market Control,’ Corporate Governance 10 (2), 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deegan, C., M. Rankin and J. Tobin: 2002, ‹An Examination of the Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997: A Test of Legitimacy Theory,’ Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15, 312–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dillard, J. and K. Yuthas: 2002, ‹Ethical Audit Decision: A Structuration Perspective,’ Journal of Business Ethics 36 (1/2), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Enderle, G.: 1996, ‹FOCUS: A Comparison of Business Ethics in North America and Continental Europe,’ Business Ethics: A European Review 5 (1), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fama, E.: 1980, ‹Agency Problem and the Theory of the Firm,’ Journal of Political Economy 88, 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Farrell, B. and D. Cobbin, 1996: ‹A Content Analysis of Codes of Ethics in Australian Enterprises,’ Journal of Management Development 15 (1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Farrell, B., D. Cobbin and H. Farrell: 2002, ‹Can Codes of Ethics Really Produce Consistent Behaviors?,’ Journal of Managerial Psychology 17 (6), 468–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fernández, C. and Arrondo, R.: 2005, ‹Alternative Internal controls as Substitutes of the Board of Directors, ‹ Corporate Governance: an International Review 13 (6), 856–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fleege, E. and E. Adrian: 2004, ‹The Implementation of Corporate Ethics: A Comparative Study between Motorola and Ericsson,’ UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research 7, 1–9.Google Scholar
  29. García Lara, J.M. and A. Mora: 2004, ‹Balance Sheet versus Earnings Conservatism in Europe,’ European Accounting Review 13 (2), 261–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gibson, K.: 2000, ‹The Moral Basis of Stakeholder Theory,’ Journal of Business Ethics 26, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goldberg, A.J.: 1979, ‹Some Observations on the Effectiveness of Outside Directors,’ Journal of Contemporary Business 8 (1), 33–40.Google Scholar
  32. Guillén, M., D. Melé and P. Murphy: 2002, ‹European vs. American Approaches to Institutionalization of Business Ethics: the Spanish Case,’ Business Ethics: A European Review 11 (2), 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haniffa, R.M. and Cooke, T.E.: 2005, ‹The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting,’ Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 24, 391–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harrington, S.J.: 1996, ‹The Effect of Codes of Ethics and Personal Denial of Responsibility on Computer Abuse Judgements and Intentions,’ MIS Quarterly 20 (3), 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harris, H.: 2004, ‹Performance Measurement for Voluntary Codes: An Opportunity and a Challenge,’ Business and Society Review 109 (4): 549–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hasnas, J.: 1998, ‹The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed’, Business Ethics Quarterly 8, 19–42Google Scholar
  37. Healy, M. and J. Isles: 2002, ‹The Establishment and Enforcement of Codes,’ Journal of Business Ethics 39 (1), 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heidrick & Struggles, Lore International Institute, Neisendorf & Associates, Inc.: 2004, Assuring Ethical and Responsible Leadership: How to Meet the Challenge.Google Scholar
  39. Helin, S. and J. Sandström: 2007, ‹An Inquiry into the Study of Corporate Codes of Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 75, 253–271Google Scholar
  40. Higgs, D.: 2003, Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-Executive Directors (London: Department of Trade and Industry).Google Scholar
  41. Ibrahim, N.A. and J.P. Angelidis: 1995, ‹The Corporate Social Responsiveness Orientation of Board Members: Are there Differences between Inside and Outside Directors?,’ Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5), 405–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ibrahim, N.A., D.P. Howard and J.P. Angelidis: 2003, ‹Board Members in the Service Industry: An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Directorial Type,’ Journal of Business Ethics 47 (4), 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Independent Directors Association and The Russian Institute of Directors: 2004, Business Ethics (Guidelines for Russian Companies, IDA and Rid, Moscow).Google Scholar
  44. International Federation of Accountants: 2007, International Good Practice Guidance. Defining and Developing an Effective Code of Conduct for Organizations (IFAC, Professional Accountants in Business Committee)Google Scholar
  45. Investment and Financial Services association Limited: 2003, Corporate governance: A Guide for Fund Managers and Corporations (3rd edn. Sydney: IFSA).Google Scholar
  46. Jennings, M.: 2003, Business Ethics (West Legal Studies in Business).Google Scholar
  47. Jensen, M. C. and W.H. Meckling: 1976, ‹Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,’ Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jones, I. and M. Pollitt: 1999, The Development of Ethical Issues Facing Boards of Directors: A Model with Implications (Working Paper No. 151, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge)Google Scholar
  49. Kaptein, M.: 2004, ‹Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What Do They Say?,’ Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1), 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaptein, M. and M.S. Schwartz: 2008, ‹The Effectiveness of Business Codes: A Critical Examination of Existing Studies and the Development of an Integrated Research Model,’ Journal of Business Ethics 77, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kaptein M. and J. Wempe: 1998, ‹Twelve Gordian Knots When Developing and Organizational Code of Ethics,’ Journal of Business Ethics 17 (8), 853–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kedia, B. and E. Kuntz: 1981, The Content of Social Performance: An Empirical Study of Texas Banks, in Preston (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (JAI Press, Greenwich CT).Google Scholar
  53. Kesner, I.F., B. Victor. and B. LaMont: 1986, ‹Board Composition and the Commission of Illegal Acts: An Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies,’ Academy of Management Journal, 29, 789–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. KPMG Belgium: 2002, Business Codes in Belgium 2002 (KPMG, Brussels).Google Scholar
  55. La Porta, R., López-de-Silanes. F. and Shleifer, A.: 1999, ‹Corporate Ownership around the World,’ Journal of Finance 54, 471–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lane, J.C.: 1995, ‹Ethics of Business Students: some Marketing Perspectives,’ Journal of Business Ethics 14, 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Langlois, C.C. and B. Schlegelmilch: 1990, ‹Do Corporate Codes of Ethics Reflect National Character? Evidence from Europe and the United States,’ Journal of International Business Studies 21 (4), 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lefebvre, M. and R J.B. Singh: 1996, ‹A Comparison of the Contents and Foci of Canadian and American Corporate Codes of Ethics,’ International Journal of Management 13 (2), 156–170.Google Scholar
  59. Loe, T., L. Ferrell and P. Mansfield: 2000, `A Review of Empirical Studies. Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business', Journal of Business Ethics 25(3), 185–204.Google Scholar
  60. Long, B.S. and C. Driscoll (2008), “Codes of Ethics and the Pursuit of Organizational Legitimacy: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions,” Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2), 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mathews, M. C.: 1987, ‹Codes of Ethics: Organizational Behavior and Misbehavior’, in W. C. Fredrick (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance, Vol. 9 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 107–130Google Scholar
  62. McKendall, M., B. DeMarr and C. Jones-Rikkers: 2002, ‹Ethical Compliance Programs and Corporate Illegality: Testing the Assumptions of the Corporate Sentencing Guidelines,’ Journal of Business Ethics 59, 55–67.Google Scholar
  63. Melé, D., P. Debeljuh and M.C. Arruda: 2006, ‹Corporate Ethical Policies in Large Corporations in Argentina, Brazil and Spain,’ Journal of Business Ethics 63 (1), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Melle M.: 1999 ‹El Gobierno de Empresas Cotizadas: Código de Buen Gobierno y Reglamento Tipo del Consejo de Administración,’ Papeles de Economía Española 78–79, 282–289.Google Scholar
  65. Morck R., A. Sheleifer and R.W. Vishny: 1988, ‹Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis,’ Journal of Financial Economics 20, p. 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. New York Stock Exchange: 2003, ‹Corporate Governance Rules, New York’, http://www. nyse.com/pdfs/finalcorpgovrules.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2007.
  67. O’Dwyer, B and G. Madden: 2006, ‹Ethical Codes of Conduct in Irish Companies: A survey of Code Content and Enforcement Procedures,’ Journal of Business Ethics 63 (3), 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. OECD: 2004, ‹Corporate Governance, Frequently Asked Questions about the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance’, http://www.oecd.org/faq/. 15 June 2007.
  69. O’Neill, H., H. C. Saunders and A. McCarthy: 1989, Board Members’ Background Characteristics and their Level of Corporate Social Responsiveness: A Multivariate Investigation. Proceeding of the Academy of Management Best Papers, pp. 32–36Google Scholar
  70. Payne, D., C. Raiborn and J. Askvik: 1997, ‹A Global Code of Business Ethics,’ Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1727–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Peterson, D.: 2002, ‹The Relationship Between Unethical Behavior and the Dimensions of the Ethical Climate Questionnaire,’ Journal of Business Ethics 41, 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pierce, M.A and J. W. Henry: 1996, ‹Computer Ethics: The Role of Personal, Informal and Formal Codes,’ Journal of Business Ethics 15 (4), 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rose, C.: 2007, ‹Does Female Board Representation Influence Firm Performance? The Danish Evidence, ‹ Corporate Governance: An International Review 15, 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sanderson, G.R. and I. Varner: 1984, ‹What’s wrong with Corporate Codes of Conduct?,’ Management Accounting 66 (1), 28–32.Google Scholar
  75. Schlegelmilch, B. and J. Houston: 1989, ‹Corporate Codes of Ethics in Large U.K. Companies: An Empirical Investigation of Use, Content and Attitudes,’ European Journal of Marketing 23 (6), 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schwartz, M. S.: 2001, ‹The Nature of the Relationship between Corporate Codes of Ethics and Behavior,’ Journal of Business Ethics 32 (3), 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schwartz, M.S.: 2002, ‹A Code of Ethics for Corporate Code of Ethics,’ Journal of Business Ethics 41 (1/2), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schwartz, M.S. and A.B. Carroll: 2003, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach,’ Business Ethics Quarterly 13, 503–530.Google Scholar
  79. Schwartz, M.S., T.W. Dunfee. and M.J. Kline: 2005, ‹Tone at the Top: An Ethics Code for Directors?,’ Journal of Business Ethics 58, 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Singh. J., E. Carasco., G. Svensson., G. Word and M. Callaghan: 2005, ‹A Comparative Study of the Contents of Corporate Codes of Ethics in Australia, Canada and Sweden,’ Journal of World Business, 40, pp. 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Snell, R.S., A.M.K. Chak and J.W.H. Chu: 1999, ‹Codes of Ethics in Hong Kong: Their Adoption and Impact in the Run-up to the 1997 transition of Sovereignty to China,’ Journal of Business Ethics 22 (4), 281–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Snell, R.S. and N.C. Herndon, Jr.: 2000, ‹An Evaluation of Hong-Kong’s Corporate Code of Ethics Initiative,’ Asia Pacific Journal of Management 17, 493–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Spiller, R.: 2002, `Ethical Business and Investment: A Model for Business and Society', Journal of Business Ethics 27(1/2), 149–160.Google Scholar
  84. Stevens, B.: 1994, ‹An Analysis of Corporate Ethical Codes Studies: Where do we go from here?,’ Jounal of Business Ethics 30 (2), 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stevens, B.: 1996, ‹Using the Competing Values Framework to Assess Corporate Ethical Codes,’ Journal of Business Communication 33 (1), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stevens, B.: 2004, ‹The Ethics of the US Business Executive: A Study of Perceptions,’ Journal Business Ethics 54, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stevens, B.: 2008, ‹Corporate Ethical Codes: Effective Instruments for Influencing Behavior,’ Journal of Business Ethics 78, 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Svensson, G., G. Wood and M. Callaghan: 2006, ‹Codes of Ethics in Corporate Sweden,’ Corporate Governance 6, 547–566.Google Scholar
  89. Tsoutsoura, M.: 2004, Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance (Working Paper, Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley)Google Scholar
  90. Valentine, S. and T. Barnett: 2002, ‹Ethics Codes and Sales Professionals Perceptions of Their Organizations Ethical Values,’ Journal of Business Ethics 40 (3), 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vogel, D.: 1993, ‹Differing National approaches to Business Ethics,’ Business Ethics: A European Review 13, 63–69.Google Scholar
  92. Waddock, S., C. Bodwell and S. Graves: 2002, ‹Responsibility: The New Business Imperative,’ Academy of Management Executive 16, 132–147.Google Scholar
  93. Waddock, S. A. and S.B. Graves.: 1997, ‹The Corporate Social Performance Financial Performance Link,’ Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wang, J. and B.S. Coffey: 1992, ‹Board Composition and Corporate Philanthropy,’ Journal of Business Ethics, 11 (10), 771–778).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Webb, E.: 2004, ‹An Examination of Socially Responsible Firms’ Board Structure,’ Journal of Management and Governance 8, 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. White, B.J. and B.R. Montgomery: 1980, ‹Corporate Codes of Conduct,’ California Management Review 23 (2), 80–87.Google Scholar
  97. Williams, R.J.: 2003, ‹Women on Corporate Boards of Directors and their Influence on Corporate Philantropy,’ Journal of Business Ethics 42 (1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wood, G. and M. Callaghan: 2003, ‹Communicating the Ethos of Codes of Ethics in Corporate Australia, 1995–2001: Whose Rights, Whose Responsibilities?,’ Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 15 (4), 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zyglidopoulos, S.C.: 2003, ‹The Issue Life-cycle: Implications for Reputation for Social Performance and Organizational Legitimacy,’ Corporate Reputation Review 6, 70–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis Rodriguez-Dominguez
    • 1
  • Isabel Gallego-Alvarez
    • 1
  • Isabel Maria Garcia-Sanchez
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SalamancaSalamancaSpain

Personalised recommendations