Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 88, Issue 2, pp 351–366

Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings by Spanish Listed Firms

Article

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze whether a number of firm and industry characteristics, as well as media exposure, are potential determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure practices by Spanish listed firms. Empirical studies have shown that CSR disclosure activism varies across companies, industries, and time (Gray et al., Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal8(2), 47–77, 1995; Journal of Business Finance & Accounting28(3/4), 327–356, 2001; Hackston and Milne, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal9(1), 77–108, 1996; Cormier and Magnan, Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting1(2), 171–195, 2003; Cormier et al., European Accounting Review14(1), 3–39, 2005), which is usually justified by reference to several theoretical constructs, such as the legitimacy, stakeholder, and agency theories. Our findings evidence that firms with higher CSR ratings present a statistically significant larger size and a higher media exposure, and belong to more environmentally sensitive industries, as compared to firms with lower CSR ratings. However, neither profitability nor leverage seem to explain differences in CSR disclosure practices between Spanish listed firms. The most influential variable for explaining firms’ variation in CSR ratings is media exposure, followed by size and industry. Therefore, it seems that the legitimacy theory, as captured by those variables related to public or social visibility, is the most relevant theory for explaining CSR disclosure practices of Spanish listed firms.

Keywords

corporate social responsibility disclosure Spain 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, C.A., Hill, W.Y., & Roberts, C.B. (1998). Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe: Legitimating Corporate Behaviour. The British Accounting Review, 30(1), 1–21. doi:10.1006/bare.1997.0060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adrem, A. H.: 1999, Essays on Disclosure Practices in Sweden – Causes and Effects (Lund University Press)Google Scholar
  3. Archel, P. (2003). La divulgación de la información social y medioambiental de la gran empresa española en el período 1994–1998: situación actual y perspectivas. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 117, 571–601.Google Scholar
  4. Archel, P., & Lizarraga, F. (2001). Algunos determinantes de la información medioambiental divulgada por las empresas españolas cotizadas. Revista de Contabilidad, 4(7), 129–153.Google Scholar
  5. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736. doi:10.2307/1556363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belkaoui, A., & Karpik, P.G. (1989). Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Disclose Social Information. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2(1), 36–51. doi:10.1108/09513578910132240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bewley, K., & Li, Y. (2000). Disclosure of Environmental Information by Canadian Manufacturing Companies: A Voluntary Disclosure Perspective. Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 1, 201–226. doi:10.1016/S1479-3598(00)01011-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blacconiere, W.G., & Northcut, W.D. (1997). Environmental information and market reactions to environmental legislation. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 12(Spring), 149–178.Google Scholar
  10. Blacconiere, W.G., & Patten, D.M. (1994). Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs and changes in firm value. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18(3), 357–377. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(94)90026-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowen, F. (2000). Environmental visibility: a trigger of green organizational response? Business Strategy and the Environment, 9(2), 92-107. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(200003/04)9:2<92::AID-BSE230>3.0.CO;2-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2008). Factors Influencing the Quality of Corporate Environmental Disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 120–136. doi:10.1002/bse.506 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information –a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Review, 29(1), 21–41.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, D.J. (2000). Legitimacy Theory or Managerial Reality Construction? Corporate Social Disclosure in Marks and Spencer, Plc Corporate Reports 1969–1997. Accounting Forum, 24(1), 80–100. doi:10.1111/1467-6303.00030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carmona, S. and F. Carrasco: 1988, ‹Información de contenido social y estados contables: Una aproximación empírica y algunas consideraciones teóricas’, Actualidad Financiera noviembre, 2175–2192Google Scholar
  16. CEC: 2001, Green Paper: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (COM), 366 finalGoogle Scholar
  17. Clarke, J., & Gibson-Sweet, M. (1999). ‹The Use of Corporate Social Disclosures in the Management of Reputation and Legitimacy: A Cross Sectoral Analysis of UK Top 100 Companies’, Business Ethics. European Review (Chichester, England), 8(1), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooke, T.E. (1989). Voluntary Corporate Disclosure by Swedish Companies. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 1(2), 171–195. doi:10.1111/j.1467-646X.1989.tb00009.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2003). Environmental Reporting Management: A Continental European Perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(1), 43–62. doi:10.1016/S0278-4254(02)00085-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cormier, D., Gordon, I.M., & Magnan, M. (2004). ‹Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Contrasting Management’s Perceptions with Reality’. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(2), 143–165. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000015844.86206.b9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cormier, D., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental Disclosure Quality in Large German Companies: Economic Incentives, Public Pressures or Institutional Conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3–39. doi:10.1080/0963818042000339617 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cowen, S.S., Ferreri, L.B., & Parker, L.D. (1987). The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(2), 111–122. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(87)90001-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cullen, L., & Christopher, T. (2002). Governance Disclosures and Firm Characteristics of Listed Australian Mining Companies. International Journal of Business Studies, 10(1), 37–58.Google Scholar
  24. Deegan, C. (2002). The Legitimising Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures –A Theoretical Foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311. doi:10.1108/09513570210435852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deegan, C., & Gordon, B. (1996). A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporations. Accounting and Business Review, 26(3), 187–199.Google Scholar
  26. Deegan, C., & Rankin, M. (1996). ‹Do Australian Companies Report Environmental News Objectively? An Analysis of Environmental Disclosures by Firms Prosecuted Successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority’. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(2), 50–67. doi:10.1108/09513579610116358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. DiMaggio, P.J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). ‹Organisational legitimacy: Social values and organisational behaviour’, Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.Google Scholar
  29. García-Ayuso, M., & Larrinaga, C. (2003). Environmental disclosure in Spain:corporate characteristics and media exposure. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 115, 184–214.Google Scholar
  30. Giner, B. (1997). The influence of company characteristics and accounting regulation on information disclosed by Spanish firms. European Accounting Review, 6(1), 45–68. doi:10.1080/096381897336863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Godfrey, P.C., & Hatch, N.W. (2007). Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87–98. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9080-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Graham, A., Maher, J., & Northcut, W.D. (2000). Environmental liability information and bond ratings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 15(2), 93–116.Google Scholar
  33. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting: A Review of the Literature and A Longitudinal Study of UK Disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77. doi:10.1108/09513579510146996 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gray, R.H., Owen, D., & Adams, C.(1996). Accounting and Accountability. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  35. Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D.M., & Sinclair, C.D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: a research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28(3/4), 327–356. doi:10.1111/1468-5957.00376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. (1989). Corporate social reporting: a rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Review, 19(3), 343–352.Google Scholar
  37. Hackston, D., & Milne, M.J. (1996). Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(1), 77–108. doi:10.1108/09513579610109987 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hamid, F.Z.A. (2004). ‹Corporate social disclosure by banks and finance companies: Malaysian evidence’. Corporate Ownership & Control, 1(4), 118–130.Google Scholar
  39. Haniffa, R.M., & Cooke, T.E. (2005). ‹The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting’. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Henriques, I. and P. Sadorsky: 1996, ‹The Role of Information in Coordinating Environmental Issues’, in Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings (Cincinnati, OH), pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  41. Hoffman, A.J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371.Google Scholar
  42. Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management: New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1/2), 55–68. doi:10.1023/A:1006400707757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hossain, M., Tan, L.M., & Adams, M. (1994). Voluntary disclosure in an emerging capital market: Some empirical evidence from companies listed on Kuala Lumpur stock exchange. The International Journal of Accounting, 29(4), 334–351.Google Scholar
  44. Hossain, M., Perera, M.H.B., & Rahman, A.R. (1995). ‹Voluntary Disclosure in the Annual Reports of New Zealand Companies’. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 6(1), 69–87. doi:10.1111/j.1467-646X.1995.tb00050.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hutchings, G. and D. W. Taylor: 2000, ‹The Intra-Industry Capital Market and Corporate Reporting Effects of the BHP Ok Tedi Environmental Event’, Asian Review of Accounting 8(Special Issue), 33–54Google Scholar
  46. Ismail, K.N., & Chandler, R. (2005). Disclosure in the quarterly reports of Malaysian companies. Financial Reporting. Regulation and Governance, 4(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  47. Jenkins, H.M., & Yakovleva, N. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3–4), 271–284. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jennings, P.D., & Zandbergen, P.A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: an institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 1015–1052. doi:10.2307/258964 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Knox, S., Maklan, S., & French, P. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring Stakeholder Relationships and Programme Reporting across Leading FTSE Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 7–28. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-0303-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kolk, A. (2003). ‹Trends in sustainability reporting by the Fortune Global 250’. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(5), 279–291. doi:10.1002/bse.370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Line, M., Hawley, H., & Krut, R. (2002). Development in global environmental and Social reporting. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 9(1), 69–78. doi:10.1016/S1066-7938(01)00159-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). ‹Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance’. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872. doi:10.2307/256342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Milne, M.J. (2002). Positive Accounting Theory, Political Costs and Social Disclosure Analyses: A Critical Look. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(3), 369–395. doi:10.1006/cpac.2001.0509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Moneva, J. M. and F. Llena: 1996, ‹Análisis de la información sobre responsabilidad social en las empresas industriales que cotizan en Bolsa’, Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad XXV(87), 361–401Google Scholar
  57. Moneva, J.M., & Llena, F. (2000). Environmental disclosures in the annual reports of large companies in Spain. European Accounting Review, 9(1), 7–29. doi:10.1080/096381800407923 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Morris, S.: 1997, ‹Environmental Pollution and Competitive Advantage: An Exploratory Study of U.S. Industrial-Goods Manufacturers’, in Academy of Management Conference Proceedings, 1997 (Academy of Management, New York)Google Scholar
  59. Nasi, J., Nasi, S., Phillips, N., & Zyglidopoulos, S. (1997). ‹The Evolution of Corporate Social Responsiveness’. Business & Society, 36(3), 296–321. doi:10.1177/000765039703600305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ness, K., & Mirza, A. (1991). Corporate Social Disclosure: A Note on the Test of Agency Theory. The British Accounting Review, 23, 211–217. doi:10.1016/0890-8389(91)90081-C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00008-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ng, E.J., & Koh, H.C. (1994). An Agency Theory and Profit Analytic Approach to Corporate Non-Mandatory Disclosure Compliance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting, 1(1), 29–44.Google Scholar
  63. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. doi:10.2307/258610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Patten, D.M. (1991). Exposure, Legitimacy, and Social Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297–308. doi:10.1016/0278-4254(91)90003-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Patten, D.M. (2002a). Give or Take on the Internet: An Examination of the Disclosure Practices of Insurance Firm Web Innovators. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 247–259. doi:10.1023/A:1014009229437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Patten, D.M. (2002b). Media Exposure, Public Policy Pressure, and Environmental Disclosure: An Examination of the Impact of Tri Data Availability. Accounting Forum, 26(2), 152–171. doi:10.1111/1467-6303.t01-1-00007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Perrow, C. 1970, Organizational analysis: A sociological view, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  68. Pirsch, J., Gupta, S., & Landreth-Grau, S. (2007). A framework for understanding corporate social responsibility programs as a continuum: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 125–140. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9100-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Prencipe, A. (2004). Proprietary Costs and Determinants of Voluntary Segment Disclosure: Evidence from Italian Listed Companies. European Accounting Review, 13(2), 319-340. doi:10.1080/0963818042000204742 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Purushothaman, M., Tower, G., Hancock, R., & Taplin, R. (2000). Determinants of Corporate Social Reporting Practices of Listed Singapore Companies. Pacific Accounting Review, 12(2), 101-133.Google Scholar
  71. Richardson, A.J., & Welker, M. (2001). Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of capital. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7/8), 597–616. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00025-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Robb, S.W.G., Single, L.E., & Zarzeski, M.T. (2001). Nonfi nancial disclosures across Anglo-American countries. Journal of International Accounting, 10(1), 71–83.Google Scholar
  73. Roberts, R.W. (1992). ‹Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application of stakeholder theory’. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595–612. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Scott, W.R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493–511. doi:10.2307/2392880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Simon FL. 1992. Marketing green products in the triad. Columbia Journal of World Business 27(3,4): 268–285Google Scholar
  76. Singhvi, S. and H. Desai 1971. An Empirical Analysis of the Quality of Corporate Financial Disclosure.’’ Accounting Review, January 46(1): 129–138.Google Scholar
  77. Ullmann, A.A. (1985). ‹Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms’. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540–557. doi:10.2307/258135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Watts, R. L. and J. L. Zimmerman: 1986, Positive Accounting Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)Google Scholar
  79. Woodward, D.G., Edwards, P., & Birkin, F. (1996). ‹Organizational Legitimacy and Stakeholder Information Provision’. British Journal of Management, 7, 329–347. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00123.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Woodward, D., Edwards, P., & Birkin, F. (2001). Some evidence on executives’ views of corporate social responsibility. The British Accounting Review, 33(3), 357–397. doi:10.1006/bare.2001.0165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical University of CartagenaCartagenaSpain

Personalised recommendations