Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 87, Issue 4, pp 573–588 | Cite as

The Performance of European Socially Responsible Funds

  • Maria Ceu Cortez
  • Florinda Silva
  • Nelson Areal
Article

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed an increasing growth in mutual funds that invest according to social criteria. As a consequence, the financial performance of these portfolios has attracted the interest of academics and practitioners. This paper investigates the performance of a sample of socially responsible mutual funds from seven European countries investing globally and/or in the European market. Using unconditional and conditional models, we assess the performance of these funds in comparison to conventional and socially responsible benchmark portfolios. The results show that European socially responsible funds present in general neutral performance in relation to both conventional and socially responsible benchmarks. However, performance estimates seem to be slightly higher when funds are evaluated in relation to socially responsible indices. Our results also show that socially responsible funds are more exposed to conventional than to socially responsible indices. Furthermore, conventional benchmarks are better able to explain fund returns than socially responsible benchmarks. These findings are robust to both unconditional and conditional models of performance. We also observe that conditional models lead to a slight improvement of performance estimates and to the explanatory power of the models, both when conventional and socially responsible benchmarks are considered. This is consistent with most previous empirical findings on conditional performance evaluation. Our results show that investors who wish to hold European funds can add social screens to their investment choices without compromising financial performance.

Keywords

fund performance evaluation socially responsible mutual funds socially responsible investing socially responsible indices general market indices 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the financial support of FCT, POCTI and the European Communitarian Fund FEDER. The authors are also grateful for helpful comments from Dean Paxson, Chris Adcock and participants in the Workshop “Socially Responsible Investing and Financial Performance”, as well as participants in the EBEN Research Conference 2007.

References

  1. Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Otten, R. (2007). The ethical mutual fund performance debate: new evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 111–124. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9099-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund Performance and Investment Style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.06.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer, R., Otten, R., & Rad, A.T. (2006). Ethical investing in Australia: Is there a financial penalty? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 14(1), 33–48. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bello, Z.Y. (2005). Socially responsible investing and portfolio diversification. Journal of Financial Research, 28(1), 41–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6803.2005.00113.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernhardt, I., & Jung, B.S. (1979). The interpretation of least squares regression with interaction or polynomial terms. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(3), 481–483. doi: 10.2307/1926085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breusch, T.S., & Pagan, A.R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica, 47, 1287–1294. doi: 10.2307/1911963 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carhart, M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–83. doi: 10.2307/2329556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christopherson, J., Ferson, W., & Glassman, D. (1998). Conditioning manager alphas on economic information: another look at the persistence of performance. Review of Financial Studies, 11(1), 111–142. doi: 10.1093/rfs/11.1.111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cribari-Neto, F. (2004). Asymptotic inference under heteroskedasticity of unknown form. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 45, 215–233. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00366-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J., & Blake, C.R. (1996). The persistence of risk-adjusted mutual fund performance. Journal of Business, 69(2), 133–157. doi: 10.1086/209685 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fama, E.F., & French, K.R. (1989). Business conditions and expected returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1), 23–49. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(89)90095-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fama, E. F. and K. R. French: 1993, `Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds', Journal of Financial Economics 33(1), 3–56Google Scholar
  13. Ferson, W., Sarkissian, S., & Simin, T. (2003). Is stock return predictability spurious? Journal of Investment Management, 1(3), 1–10.Google Scholar
  14. Ferson, W., & Schadt, R. (1996). Measuring fund strategy and performance in changing economic conditions. The Journal of Finance, 51(2), 425–461. doi: 10.2307/2329367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldreyer, E.F., & Diltz, J.D. (1999). The performance of socially responsible mutual funds: incorporating sociopolitical information in portfolio selection. Managerial Finance, 25(1), 23–36. doi: 10.1108/03074359910765830 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregory, A., Matatko, J., & Luther, R. (1997). Ethical unit trust financial performance: small company effects and fund size effects. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24(5), 705–725. doi: 10.1111/1468-5957.00130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gregory, A., & Whittaker, J. (2007). Performance and performance persistence of Ethical unit trusts in the UK. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(7/8), 1327–1344. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02006.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guerard, J.B. (1997). Is there a cost to being socially responsible in investing? Journal of Investing, 6(2), 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffin, J.J., & Mahon, J.F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Business & Society, 36(1), 5–31. doi: 10.1177/000765039703600102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grossman, B.R., & Sharpe, W.F. (1986). Financial implications of South African divestment. Financial Analysts Journal, 42, 15–29. doi: 10.2469/faj.v42.n4.15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamilton, S., Jo, H., & Statman, M. (1993). Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 49(6), 62–66. doi: 10.2469/faj.v49.n6.62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jensen, M. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. The Journal of Finance, 23, 389–416. doi: 10.2307/2325404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keim, D.B., & Stambaugh, R.F. (1986). Predicting returns in the stock and bond markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2), 357–390. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(86)90070-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kreander, N., Gray, R.H., Power, D.M., & Sinclair, C.D. (2005). Evaluating the performance of ethical and non-ethical funds: a matched pair analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(7/8), 1465–1493. doi: 10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00636.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurtz, L., & DiBartolomeo, D. (1996). Socially screened portfolios: an attribution analysis of relative performance. Journal of Investing, 5(3), 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luther, R.G., & Matatko, J. (1994). The performance of ethical unit trusts: choosing an appropriate benchmark. The British Accounting Review, 26(1), 77–89. doi: 10.1006/bare.1994.1007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luther, R. G., J. Matatko and D. C. Corner: 1992, ‹The Investment Performance of UK Ethical Unit Trusts’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 5(4), 57–70. doi: 10.1108/09513579210019521
  28. Mallin, C.A., Saadouni, B., & Briston, R.J. (1995). The financial performance of ethical investment funds. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22(4), 483–496. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1995.tb00373.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305. doi: 10.2307/3556659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McGuire, J.B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872. doi: 10.2307/256342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 71–75.Google Scholar
  32. Newey, W.K., & West, K.D. (1994). Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(4), 631–653. doi: 10.2307/2297912 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. doi: 10.1177/0170840603024003910 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reyes, M.G., & Grieb, T. (1998). The external performance of socially-responsible mutual funds. American Business Review, 16(1), 1–7Google Scholar
  35. Roll, R. (1977). A critique of the asset pricing theory’s tests Part I on past and potential testability of the theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(2), 129–176. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(77)90009-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roll, R. (1978). Ambiguity when performance is measured by the Securities Market Line. The Journal of Finance, 33(4), 1051–1064 doi: 10.2307/2326939 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sauer, D.A. (1997). The impact of social-responsibility screens on investment performance: evidence from the Domini 400 Social Index and Domini equity mutual fund. Review of Financial Economics, 6(2), 137–149. doi: 10.1016/S1058-3300(97)90002-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scholtens, B. (2005). Style and performance of Dutch social responsible investment funds. Journal of Investing, 14(1), 63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schröder, M. (2004). The performance of socially responsible investments: investment funds and indices. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 18(2), 122–142. doi: 10.1007/s11408-004-0202-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Statman, M. (2000). Socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(3), 30–39 doi: 10.2469/faj.v56.n3.2358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Statman, M. (2006). Socially Responsible Indexes: Composition, Performance and Tracking Error. Journal of Portfolio Management, 32(3), 100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Treynor, J.L., & Mazuy, K. (1966). Can mutual funds outguess the market? Harvard Business Review, 44, 131–136Google Scholar
  43. Waddock, S. A. and S. B. Graves: 1997, ‹The Corporate Social Performance – Financial Performance Link’, Strategic Management Journal 18(4), 303–319. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-GGoogle Scholar
  44. White, H. (1980). A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 149–170 doi: 10.2307/1912934 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wood, D. 1987. “Ethics in Finance”, In D. Paxson and D. Wood (eds), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Finance Blackwell Business, Oxford, UK, pp. 59–62Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Ceu Cortez
    • 1
  • Florinda Silva
    • 1
  • Nelson Areal
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations