Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 87, Issue 4, pp 555–572 | Cite as

Keeping Ethical Investment Ethical: Regulatory Issues for Investing for Sustainability

  • Benjamin J. RichardsonEmail author
Article

Abstract

Regulation must target the financial sector, which often funds and profits from environmentally unsustainable development. In an era of global financial markets, the financial sector has a crucial impact on the state of the environment. The long-standing movement for ethically and socially responsible investment (SRI) has recently begun to advocate environmental standards for financiers. While this movement is gaining more adherents, it has increasingly justified responsible financing as a path to be prosperous, rather than virtuous. This trend partly owes to how financial institutions view their legal responsibilities. The business case motivations that now predominantly drive SRI are not sufficient to make the financial sector a means to sustainable development. Some modest legal reforms to improve the quality and extent of SRI have yet to make a tangible difference. A more ambitious strategy to promote SRI for environmental sustainability is possible, based on reforming the fiduciary duties of financial institutions. Such duties, tied to concrete performance standards, could make financiers invest in more ethically responsible ways. Other collateral reforms to financial markets, including improved corporate environmental reporting, are required to promote sustainability.

Keywords

financial markets ethical investment socially responsible investment sustainable development environmental law 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angel, J. and P. Rivoli.: 1997, “Does Ethical Investing Impose a Cost Upon the Firm? A Theoretical Perspective”, Journal of Investing 6(4), 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BankTrack: 2004, Principles, Profit or Just PR? (BankTrack, Nijmegen). Google Scholar
  3. Bell, S. and S. Morse: 2008, Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable (Earthscan, London).Google Scholar
  4. Birsch, D. and J. Fielder: 1994, The Ford Pinto Case: A Study in Applied Ethics, Business, and Technology (State University of New York Press, Albany).Google Scholar
  5. Brill, H., J.A. Brill, and C. Feingenbaum: 1999, Investing with Your Values: Making Money and Making a Difference (Bloomberg Press, Princeton).Google Scholar
  6. Capra, F.: 1996, The Web of Life. A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
  7. Daly, H.: 1992 Allocation, Distribution and Scale: Towards an Economics that is Efficient, Just and Sustainable. Ecological Economics 6, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daly, H.: 1997, Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (Island Press, Washington DC).Google Scholar
  9. Davis, S., J. Lukomnik and D. Pitt-Watson: 2006, The New Capitalists: How Citizen Investors are Reshaping the Corporate Agenda (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  10. Del Guercio, D., J. Hawkins 1999 The Motivation and Impact of Pension Fund Activism. Journal of Financial Economics 52, 293–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devall, B. and G. Sessions: 2001, Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered (Gibbs Smith, Layton).Google Scholar
  12. Doering, D., et al.: 2002, Tomorrow’s Markets - Global Trends and their Implications for Business (World Resources Institute, Washington DC).Google Scholar
  13. Donaldson, T. and L. Preston: 1995, “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications”, The Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Durning, A.: 1992, Guardians of the Land: Indigenous Peoples and the Health of the Earth (Worldwatch Institute, Washington DC).Google Scholar
  15. Edwards, D.: 1998, The Link Between Environmental and Financial Performance (Earthscan, London).Google Scholar
  16. Ellison, R.: 1991, “The Golden Fleece? Ethical Investment and Fiduciary Law”, Trust Law International 5(4), 157–165.Google Scholar
  17. Engel, R.: 2005, “The Moral Power of the World Conservation Movement to Engage Economic Globalization”, The George Wright Forum 22(3): 58–71.Google Scholar
  18. Eurosif: 2006, Socially Responsible Investment among European Institutional Investors (Eurosif, Paris).Google Scholar
  19. Fair Pensions: 2006, UK Pension Scheme Transparency on Social, Environmental and Ethical Issues (Fair Pensions, London),Google Scholar
  20. French, H.: 1998, Investing in the Future: Harnessing Private Capital Flows for Environmentally Sustainable Development (Worldwatch Institute, Washington DC).Google Scholar
  21. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer: 2005, A Legal Framework for the Integration of Environmental, Social and Governance Issues into Institutional Investment (UNEPFI, Geneva).Google Scholar
  22. Gillan, S. L. and L. T. Starks: 1998, ‹A Survey of Shareholder Activism: Motivation and Empirical Evidence’, Contemporary Finance Digest, Autumn, 2, 10–34Google Scholar
  23. Gilson, R. and R. Kraakman: 1991 Reinventing the Outside Director: An Agenda for Institutional Investors. Stanford Law Review 43, 863–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): 2005, Financial Services Sector Supplement: Environmental Performance Pilot Version 1.0 (GRI, Amsterdam)Google Scholar
  25. Golding, T.: 2002, The City: Inside the Great Expectation Machine (Financial Times and Prentice Hall, London).Google Scholar
  26. Government Accountability Office (GAO): 2004, Environmental Disclosure: SEC Should Explore Ways to Improve Tracking and Transparency of Information (GAO, Washington DC).Google Scholar
  27. Gray R, Owen D, Adams C (eds) (1996) Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting. Prentice Hall International, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  28. Gribben, C. and M. Gitsham: 2006, Will UK Pension Funds Become More Responsible: A Survey of Trustees (UK Social Investment Forum, London).Google Scholar
  29. Handl, G.: 2001, Multilateral Development Banking: Environmental Principles and Concepts Reflecting General International Law and Public Policy (Kluwer Law, London).Google Scholar
  30. Hardenbrook, A. 2007 The Equator Principles: The Private Financial Sector’s Attempt at Environmental Responsibility. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 40, 197–232.Google Scholar
  31. Harte, G., L. Lewis and D. Owen: 1991, “Ethical Investment and the Corporate Reporting Function”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12(3), 227–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hawken, P.: 2004, Socially Responsible Investing (Natural Capital Institute, Sausalito),Google Scholar
  33. Hawley, J., and A. Williams: 2000, The Rise of Fiduciary Capitalism (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  34. Herz, S., A. Vina, and J. Sohn: 2007, Development without Conflict: The Business Case for Community Consent (World Resources Institute, Washington DC).Google Scholar
  35. Hess, D.: 2007, ‹Public Pensions and the Promise of Shareholder Activism for the Next Frontier of Corporate Governance: Sustainable Economic Development’, Working Paper No. 1080 (Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor)Google Scholar
  36. Hudson, A.: 1999, Principles of Equity and Trusts (Cavendish, London).Google Scholar
  37. Hylton, M. O.: 1992, ‹Socially Responsible Investing: Doing Good Versus Doing Well in an Inefficient Market’, American University Law Review 42, 1–52Google Scholar
  38. Jensen, M.: 2000, A Theory of the Firm: Governance, Residual Claims, and Organizational Forms (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  39. Jeucken, M,: 2001, Sustainable Finance and Banking: The Financial Sector and the Future of the Planet (Earthscan, London).Google Scholar
  40. Keeble J., S. Topiol and S. Berkeley 2003 Using Indicators to Measure Sustainability Performance at a Corporate and Project Level. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2–3): 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. KPMG: 2005, ‹International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005’ (KPMG, London)Google Scholar
  42. Labatt, S. and R. White: 2002, Environmental Finance: A Guide to Environmental Risk Assessment and Financial Products (John Wiley and Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  43. Langbein, J.: 2005 Questioning the Trust Law Duty of Loyalty: Sole Interest or Best Interest?. Yale Law Journal 114, 929–990.Google Scholar
  44. Light A, Rolston III H (eds) (2002). Environmental Ethics: An Anthology. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Longstreth, B.: 1986, Modern Investment Management and the Prudent Man Rule (Oxford University Press, Oxford).Google Scholar
  46. Luhmann, N.: 1995 Social Systems (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto).Google Scholar
  47. Mackenzie, C.: 1998, “The Choice of Criteria in Ethical Investment”, Business Ethics 7(2): 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Makin, K.: 2007, ‹High-Stakes Battle Looms over Oil-Sands Pollution’, Globe and Mail (August 15), A1Google Scholar
  49. McBeth, A.: 2004, A Look at Corporate Code of Conduct Legislation. Common Law World Review 33: 222–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McGeachie, S., M. Kiernan and E. Kirzner: 2005, Finance and the Environment in North America: The State of Play of the Integration of Environmental Issues into Financial Research (Environment Canada, Ottawa).Google Scholar
  51. Mercer Investment Consulting: 2005, A Climate for Change – A Trustee’s Guide to Understanding and Addressing Climate Risk (Mercer Investment Consulting, Toronto)Google Scholar
  52. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board (MEAB): 2005, ‹Living Beyond Our Means: Natural Assets and Human Well-Being’, Statement from the Board (MEAB)Google Scholar
  53. Myners, P.: 2001, Institutional Investment in the United Kingdom: A Review (HM Treasury, London).Google Scholar
  54. Netwerk Vlaanderen: 2007, ‹Belgium Bans Investments in Cluster Munitions’, Press Release, 2 MarchGoogle Scholar
  55. Norton, J.: 1995, ‹Lender Liability in the United States’, in R. Cranston (ed.), Banks, Liability and Risk (Lloyds of London Press, London), p. 358Google Scholar
  56. Palmer, et al.: 2005. Socially Responsible Investment: A Guide for Pension Schemes and Charities (Haven Publications, London).Google Scholar
  57. Parliament of Ireland, Select Committee on Finance and the Public Service: 2006, ‹Parliamentary Debates’, 23 February, 44Google Scholar
  58. Quarter, J., L. Mook, and B. Richmond: 2003, What Counts: Social Accounting for Nonprofits and Cooperatives (Prentice Hall, New Jersey).Google Scholar
  59. Reich, R.B.: Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life (Borzoi Books, New York, 2007).Google Scholar
  60. Richardson, B.J.: 2002, Environmental Regulation through Financial Organisations (Kluwer Law, London).Google Scholar
  61. Richardson, B. J.: 2007a, ‹Financing Sustainability: The New Transnational Governance of Socially Responsible Investment’, in O. K. Fauchald (ed.), Yearbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press, New York), p. 73Google Scholar
  62. Richardson, B.J.: 2007b, Do the Fiduciary Duties of Pension Funds Hinder Socially Responsible Investment?. Banking and Finance Law Review 22(2), 145–201.Google Scholar
  63. Richardson, B.J.: 2008, Socially Responsible Investment Law: Regulating the Unseen Polluters (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sarra, J.: 2003, The Corporation as Symphony: Are Shareholders First Violin or Second Fiddle?. UBC Law Review 36, 403–441.Google Scholar
  65. Schmid-Schönbein, O. and A. Braunschweig: 2000, EPI-Finance 2000: Environmental Performance Indicators for the Financial Industry (E2 Management Consulting, Zurich)Google Scholar
  66. Schmidtz D, Willott E (eds) (2002) Environmental Ethics: What Really Matters. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  67. Scholtens, B.: 2005 What Drives Socially Responsible Investment? The Case of the Netherlands. Sustainable Development 13, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shepherd, J.C.: 1981 Towards a Unified Concept of Fiduciary Relationships. Law Quarterly Review 97, 51–70.Google Scholar
  69. Social Investment Forum (SIF): 2008, 2007 Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States (SIF, Washington DC),Google Scholar
  70. Soskolne C (eds) (2007) Sustaining Life on Earth. Lexington Books, New York.Google Scholar
  71. Sparkes, R.: 2001, ‹Ethical Investment: Whose Ethics, Which Investment?’, Business Ethics: A European Review 10, 194–205Google Scholar
  72. Stone, C.: 1987, Earth and Other Ethics (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
  73. Tarp, F.: 2000, Foreign Aid and Development: Lessons Learned and Directions for the Future (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
  74. Taylor, P.: 1998, An Ecological Approach to International Law: Responding to Challenges of Climate Change (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
  75. Thomas, W.: 2001 The Green Nexus: Financiers and Sustainable Development. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 13, 899–948.Google Scholar
  76. Triolo, P., M. Palmer, and S. Waygood: 2000, A Capital Solution: Faith, Finance and Concern for a Living Planet (Pilkington Press, London),Google Scholar
  77. Troyer, T., W. Slocombe, and R. Boisture: 1985 Divestment of South Africa Investments: The Legal Implications for Foundations, Other Charitable Institutions, and Pension Funds. Georgetown law Journal 74, 127–161.Google Scholar
  78. Trucost: 2007, Carbon Counts 2007: The Carbon Footprint Ranking of UK Investment (Trucost, London)Google Scholar
  79. UK, Office for National Statistics (ONS): 2007, Share Ownership: A Report on Ownership of UK Shares as at 31st December 2006 (ONS, London)Google Scholar
  80. United Nations Environment Program Finance Initiative (UNEPFI): 2004a. The Materiality of Social, Environmental and Corporate Governance Issues in Equity Pricing (UNEPFI, Geneva).Google Scholar
  81. UNEPFI: 2004b. Generation Lost: Young Financial Analysts and Environmental, Social and Governance Issues. Executive Summary (UNEPFI, Geneva).Google Scholar
  82. UNEPFI: 2006, Show Me the Money: Linking Environmental, Social and Governance Issues to Company Value (UNEPFI, Geneva).Google Scholar
  83. UNEPFI: 2007, Responsible Investment in Focus: How Leading Public Pension Funds are Meeting the Challenge (UNEPFI, Geneva).Google Scholar
  84. UNEPFI and Mercer: 2007, Demystifying Responsible Investment Performance: A Review of Key Academic and Broker Research on ESG Factors (UNEPFI, Geneva).Google Scholar
  85. Unerman, J., J. Bebbington and B. O’Dwyer (eds): 2007, Sustainability Accounting and Accountability (Routledge, New York)Google Scholar
  86. Union of Concerned Scientists: 1992, ‹World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity’, http://www.ucsusa.org/ucs/about/1992-world-scientists-warning-to-humanity.html
  87. United Nations Economic and Social Council: 2002, Implementing Agenda 21: Report of the Secretary-General, E/CN.17/PC.2/7Google Scholar
  88. Wackernagel, M. and W. Rees: 1996, Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth (New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, British Columbia).Google Scholar
  89. White, L. Jr.: 1967, ‹The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis’, Science 155, 1203–1207Google Scholar
  90. Williams, C. and J. Conley: 2007, “Triumph or Tragedy: The Curious Path of Corporate Disclosure Reform in the UK”, William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 31(2), 317–361.Google Scholar
  91. World Economic Forum (WEF): 2005, Mainstreaming Responsible Investment (WEF, Geneva).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Osgoode Hall Law SchoolTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations