Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 87, Issue 3, pp 401–414 | Cite as

Assessing Freeman’s Stakeholder Theory

  • James A. Stieb


At least since the publication of the monumental Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1984), the “stakeholder theory” originated by R. E. Freeman has engrossed much of the business ethics literature. Subsequently, some advocates have moved a bit too quickly and without proper definition or argument. They have exceeded Freeman’s intentions which are more libertarian and free-market than is often thought. This essay focuses on the versions of stakeholder theory directly authored or coauthored by Freeman in an effort to recover (1) Freeman’s intentions and (2) the argumentative justification of stakeholder theory. It then argues that Freeman’s appeal to legal, economic, and ethical constraints ultimately produce arguments that are invalid. One can thoroughly support legislation constraining corporations or seeking to prevent age discrimination, market monopolies, and externalities and regret the extent that capitalism is heir to such shortcomings without it following that (1) business beneficiaries should be changed from stockholders to stakeholders and (2) the latter should be given serious decision-making power. Further, stakeholder theory neither defines nor battles any obvious opposition. Hence, it is difficult to see what it changes about business management. In short, stakeholder theory either changes too much about business, or nothing important at all (depending on one’s interpretation). Efforts to supplant or improve the reigning theory of capitalism will have to do better.


R. E. Freeman Milton Friedman libertarianism stakeholder theory stakeholder management stockholder theory 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aristotle: 1985, Nichomachean Ethics, trans T. Irwin (Hackett, Indianapolis, IN)Google Scholar
  2. Beauchamp, T., & Bowie, N. 2004, Ethical Theory and Business Seventh Edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  3. Berle, A., & Means, G. 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Commerce Clearing House, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Carrol, A.B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268–295. doi: 10.1177/000765039903800303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chesher, J. E. and T. Machan: 1999, The Business of Commerce: Examining an Honorable Profession (Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, CA)Google Scholar
  6. Conover, C. J.: 2004, ‹Health Care Regulation: A $169 Billion Hidden Tax’, Policy Analysis no. 527. The Cato Institute. Accessed 30 July 2008
  7. Corporate Scandals: 2005, NOW website. Public Broadcasting Station. Accessed 30 July 2008.
  8. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 1(20), 65–91. doi: 10.2307/258887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donaldson, T. and P. Werhane (eds.): 2008, Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 8th Edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)Google Scholar
  10. Donaldson, T., P. Werhane and M. Cording (eds.): 2002, Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 7th Edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)Google Scholar
  11. Dunham L., R. E. Freeman and J. Leidtka: 2006, ‹Enhancing Stakeholder Practice: A Particularized Exploration of Community’ Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1), 23–42. .Google Scholar
  12. Freeman, R.E. 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pittman, Marshfield, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Freeman, R. E.: 2002, ‹Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation’, in T. Donaldson and P. Werhane (eds.),␣Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 7th Edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp.␣38–48Google Scholar
  14. Freeman, R.E. 2008, “Managing for Stakeholders”. In: T. Donaldson, P. Werhane (eds), Ethical Issues in Business; A Philosophical Approach, 8th edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 39–53.Google Scholar
  15. Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., & Wicks, A.C. 2007, Managing for Stakeholders; Survival Reputation and Success. Yale U. Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  16. Freeman, R.E., & Philips, R. (2002). Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 3(12), 331–350. doi: 10.2307/3858020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedman, M. 1980, Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. Harcourt, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Friedman, M. 2002, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits,” In: T. Donaldson, P. Werhane and M. Cording (eds), Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach, 7th edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 33–38.Google Scholar
  19. Hampton, J. 1997. Political Philosophy. Westview, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  20. Heath, J.: 2006, ‹Business Ethics Without Stakeholders’, Business Ethics Quarterly 16(3), 533–557Google Scholar
  21. Huyn, I. (2001). Authentic Values and Individual Autonomy. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 35(2), 195–208. doi: 10.1023/A:1010347121641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ladd, J. 1991, “The Quest for a Code of Professional Ethics: An Intellectual and Moral Confusion,” In: D. Johnson (eds), Ethical Issues in Engineering. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. pp. 130–136.Google Scholar
  23. Nozick, R. 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia. Harper Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Rand, A. 1964, The Virtue of Selfishness. Signet, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Rawls, J. 1993, Political Liberalism. Columbia U. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Singer, M.: 2006, ‹Cutting Health-Care Costs’, Stateside Dispatch. Accessed 30 July 2008
  27. Smith, A.: 2000, ‹Of the Accumulation of Capital, or of Productive and Unproductive Labor’, in An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Accessed 30 July 2008
  28. Smith, A. 2008, “Benefits of the Profit Motive”. In: T. Donaldson, P. Werhane (eds), Ethical Issues in Business; A Philosophical Approach, 8th edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 163–167.Google Scholar
  29. Stieb, J.A. (2004). The Morality of Corporate Downsizing. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 23(3), 61–67.Google Scholar
  30. Thoreau, H. D.: 1966 [1849], Walden and Civil Disobedience, in Owen Thomas (Norton, New York). Quoted in, Accessed 20 July 2008
  31. Walsh, J. P.: 2005, ‹Book Review Essay: Taking Stock of Stakeholder Management’, Academy of Management Review 30(2), 426-438Google Scholar
  32. Winterbottom v. Wright: 1998 [1842], Transcript. Accessed 30 July 2008

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations