Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 87, Issue 3, pp 355–377

Peculiar Strengths and Relational Attributes of SMEs in the Context of CSR

Article

Abstract

The spotlight in the CSR discourse has traditionally been focused on multinational corporations (MNCs). This paper builds on a burgeoning stream of literature that has accorded recent attention to the relevance and importance of integrating small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the CSR debate. The paper begins by an overview of the CSR literature and a synthesis of relevant evidence pertaining to the peculiarities and special relational attributes of SMEs in the context of CSR. Noting the thin theoretical grounding in the literature on offer, the paper then presents relevant CSR theoretical perspectives that could be useful in conducting further research on SMEs. In light of this framework, the paper outlines the findings of an empirical study highlighting the peculiar CSR orientations of SMEs in a developing country context in comparison to some of their MNC counterparts. The study is qualitative in nature, capitalizing on a comparative research design to highlight differences in CSR orientations between SMEs and MNCs. The findings are presented and implications are drawn regarding the peculiar relational attributes of SMEs in the context of CSR generally, and developing countries more specifically, and how this inclination can be further nurtured and leveraged.

Key words

corporate social responsibility small and medium enterprises multinational corporations developing countries Lebanon 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amaeshi, K., Adi, B., Ogbechie, C., & Olufemi, O. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in Nigeria: Western Mimicry or Indigenous Influences? Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 24, 83–99.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, A.: 2001, ‹Case Study: Methods and Analysis’, in N. Smelser and P. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Elsevier, The Netherlands), pp. 1513–1519Google Scholar
  3. Besser, T., & Miller, N. (2001). Is the Good Corporation Dead? The Community Social Responsibility of Small Business. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(3), 221–230. doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(01)00094-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlos, M., Martos, V., & Torraleja, F. (2007). Is Family Business More Socially Responsible: The Case of GRUPO CIM. Business and Society Review, 112(1), 121–136. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8594.2007.00289.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll, A.B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505. doi:10.2307/257850 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll, A.B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39–48. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castka, P., Balzarova, M., Bamber, C., & Sharp, J. (2004). How Can SMEs Effectively Implement the CSR Agenda? A UK Case Study Perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11(3), 140-149. doi:10.1002/csr.62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davenport, K. (2000). Corporate Citizenship: A Stakeholder Approach for Defining Corporate Social Performance and Identifying Measures for Assessing it. Business & Society, 20(2), 210–219. doi:10.1177/000765030003900205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeFillipi, R. J.: 1982, ‹Conceptual Framework and Strategies for Corporate Social Involvement Research’, in Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (JAI Press, Connecticut)Google Scholar
  10. Doh, J., & Guay, T. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy and NGO Activism in Europe and the US: An Institutional Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 47–66. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00582.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DTI – Department of Trade and Industry: 2002, Engaging SMEs in Community and Social Issues (DTI, London)Google Scholar
  12. Eweje, G. (2006). The Role of MNEs in Community Development Initiatives in Developing Countries. Business & Society, 45(2), 93–129. doi:10.1177/0007650305285394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finkelstein, S. and D. Hambrick: 1996, Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations (West Publishing Co., Minneapolis/St. Paul)Google Scholar
  14. Freeman, E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing, Boston.Google Scholar
  15. Fuller, T., & Tian, Y. (2006). Social and Symbolic Capital and Responsible Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Investigation of SME Narratives. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 287–304. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9185-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. 1967. Discovery of Grounded Theory Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine publishing: ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Graafland, J., Mazereeuw, C., & Yahia, A. (2006). Islam and Socially Responsible Business Conduct: An Empirical Study of Dutch Entrepreneurs Business Ethics. European Review Chichester England, 15(4), 390–406.Google Scholar
  18. Graafland, J., van de Ven, B., & Stoffele, N. (2003). Strategies and Instruments for Organizing CSR by Small and Large Businesses in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Ethics, 47, 45–60. doi:10.1023/A:1026240912016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grayson, D.: 2006, ‹Inspiring Smaller Firms With the Responsible Business Mindset’, in M. Epstein and K. Hansen (eds.), The Accountable Corporation: Corporate Social Responsibility (Praeger, London), pp. 279–298Google Scholar
  20. Hannan, M. (1998). Rethinking Age Dependence in Organizational Mortality: Logical Formulations. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 126–164. doi:10.1086/210004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hemingway, C., & Maclagan, P. (2004). Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33–44. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heugens, P., Kaptein, M., & van Oosterhout, J. (2008). Contracts to Communities: A Processual Model of Organizational Virtue. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 100–121.Google Scholar
  23. Isabella, L. (1990). Evolving Interpretations as a Change Unfolds: How Managers Construe Key Organizational Events. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 7–41. doi:10.2307/256350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: Theory and Practice in A Developing Country Context. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 243–262. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9168-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jenkins, H. (2004). A Critique of Conventional CSR Theory: An SME Perspective. Journal of General Management, 29(4), 55–75.Google Scholar
  26. Jenkins, H.: 2006, ‹Small Business Champions for Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 67, 241–256. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9182-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Longo, M., Mura, M., & Bonoli, A. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Performance: The Case of Italian SMEs. Corporate Governance, 5(4), 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luetkenhorst, W. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and the Development Agenda. Inter Economics, 39(3), 157–168. doi:10.1007/BF02933583 Google Scholar
  29. Luken, R., & Stares, R. (2005). Small Business Responsibility in Developing Countries: A Threat or an Opportunity? Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(1), 38–53. doi:10.1002/bse.427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, D., Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship Vs. Stagnation: An Empirical Comparison of Small Family and Non Family Businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51–78.Google Scholar
  31. Mitchell, C. (1983). Case and Situation Analysis. The Sociological Review, 31, 187–211.Google Scholar
  32. Murillo, D., & Lozano, J. (2006). SMEs and CSR: An Approach to CSR in Their Own Words. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 227–240. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9181-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Patton, M. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3 rd edition). Sage Publications: London.Google Scholar
  34. Perrini, F. (2006). SMEs and CSR Theory: Evidence and Implications from an Italian Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 305–316. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9186-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pinkston, T., & Carroll, A. (1996). A Retrospective Examination of CSR Orientations: Have They Changed? Journal of Business Ethics, 15(2), 199–206. doi:10.1007/BF00705587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Prahalad, C. and A. Hammond: 2002, ‹Serving the World’s Poor Profitably’, Harvard Business Review on Corporate Social Responsibility (Harvard Business School Press), pp. 1–25Google Scholar
  37. Raynard, P. and M. Forstater: 2002, Corporate Social Responsibility: Implications for Small and Medium Enterprises in Developing Countries (United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, Austria)Google Scholar
  38. Roberts, S., Lawson, R., & Nicholls, J. (2006). Generating Regional-Scale Improvements in SME Corporate Responsibility Performance: Lessons from Responsibility Northwest. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 275–286. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9184-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rose, H. 1991. ‹Case Studies’, in Handbook for Research Students in the Social Sciences, G. Allan and C. Skinner (Eds.). The Falmer Press: London, New York, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  40. Sarbutts, N. (2003). Can SMEs do CSR? A Practitioner’s View of the Ways Small and Medium Sized Enterprises are Able to Manage Reputation through Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Communication Management, 7(4), 340–347. doi:10.1108/13632540310807476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schein, E. 2004. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  42. Schrank, A.: 2006, ‹Case-Based Research’, in Perecman and Curran (eds.), A Handbook for Social Science Field Research (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California), pp. 21–44Google Scholar
  43. Strauss, A. and J. Corbin: 1998, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd Edition (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California)Google Scholar
  44. SustainAbility: 2002, Developing Value: The Business Case for Sustainability in Emerging Markets (SustainAbility, London, UK)Google Scholar
  45. Visser, W.: 2008, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries’, in A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon and D. Siegel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press), pp. 473–503Google Scholar
  46. Vives, A. (2006). Social and Environmental Responsibility in Small and Medium Enterprises in Latin America. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 39–50.Google Scholar
  47. Waddock, S., Bodwell, C., & Graves, S. (2002). Responsibility: The New Business Imperative. Academy of Management Executive, 16(2), 132–147.Google Scholar
  48. Wickham, P. 2004. Strategic Entrepreneurship: A Decision-Making Approach To New Venture Creation. FT Prentice Hall, London, pp 247–255.Google Scholar
  49. Williamson, D., Wood, G., & Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of Environmental Behavior in Manufacturing SMEs and the Implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 317–330. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9187-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Three Key Approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93–114. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00584.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wood, D. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-717. doi:10.2307/258977 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yin, R. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publication, Beverly Hills, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.American University of BeirutBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations