Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 82, Issue 2, pp 509–524 | Cite as

Systemic Leadership and the Emergence of Ethical Responsiveness

Article

Abstract

The author of this paper argues that the responsibility to nurture and encourage a relationally responsive ethical attitude among the members of an organizational system is shared by all who participate in it. In the dynamic environment of a complex adaptive organizational system where it is impossible to anticipate and legislate for every potential circumstantial contingency, creating and sustaining relationships of trust has to be a systemic capacity of the entire organization. Leadership is socially constructed, as the need for it arises within the complex interactions between individuals and groups within organizations, and can therefore not be described as a set of traits or behaviors possessed by only certain individuals who occupy positions of authority. If the sharing of this kind of relational responsiveness to the everyday realities of organizational life is to be properly understood, it is important to consider it in its concrete institutional manifestations. The last section of this paper therefore explores how an organization, in which leadership is understood in relational terms and is shared by all, looks and functions.

Keywords

systemic leadership complexity ethical leadership 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, John: 2006, ‹The Challenge of Complexity,’ In: Frances Hesselbein and Marshall Goldsmith, (eds), The Leader of the Future 2: Visions, Strategies and the New Era (Leader to Leader Institute, Josey Bass)Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, Jon Aarum: 2005, ‹Trust in Managers: a study of why Swedish subordinates trust their managers,’ Business Ethics: A European Review 14(4): 392–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, S.E and Trevino, L.K.: 2006, ‹Ethical leadership: A review and future directions’, The Leadership Quarterly, 17 (6): 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collier, Jane and Esteban, Rafael: 2000, ‹Systemic leadership: ethical and effective, The Leadership and Organizational Development Journal,’ 21(4): 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collins, J. and J. I. Porras: 2002, Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies (HarperBusiness Essentials, New York)Google Scholar
  6. Cuilla, J.: 2004, ‹Leadership Ethics: Mapping the Territory’. In: J. Cuilla (ed). Ethics, the Heart of Leadership, Second Edition (Praeger, Westport)Google Scholar
  7. Edgeman, Rick L. & Scherer, Franz: 1999, ‹Systemic leadership via core value deployment,’ The Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 20(2): 94–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giddens, Anthony: 1990, The Consequences of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press)Google Scholar
  9. Gronn, P.: 2002, ‹Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis’, Leadership Quarterly, 13: 423–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heifetz, R. A.: 2006, ‹Anchoring Leadership in the Work of Adaptive Progress’. In: Hesselbein, F. and Goldsmith, M. (Eds.) The Leader of the Future: Visions, Strategies and the New Era (Josey Bass, San Francisco)Google Scholar
  11. Helgesen, Sally: 1995, The web of inclusion (New York: Currency/Doubleday)Google Scholar
  12. Hoffman, M. and Driscoll, D.-M.: 1999, Ethics Matters. How to Implement Values-Driven Management (Waltham, Bentley College)Google Scholar
  13. Kanji, G.K. and Moura, P: 2001, ‹Measuring leadership excellence’, Total Quality Management 12 (6): 704.Google Scholar
  14. Klenke, Karin: 2005, ‹Corporate values as multi-level, multi-domain antecedents of leader behaviors’, International Journal of Manpower 26, (1): 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knights, David and O’Leary, Majella: 2005, ‹Reflecting on corporate scandals: the failure of ethical leadership’, Business Ethics: A European Review 14 (4): 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kranz, J. (1990), ‹Lessons from the Field: An Essay on the Crises of Leadership in Contemporary Organizations’, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26 (1): 49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maak, Thomas & Pless, Nicola: 2006, ‹Responsible Leadership: A Relational Approach,’ In Maak, T. & Pless, N. (Eds.) Responsible Leadership. (London: Routledge,) 33–53Google Scholar
  18. Painter-Morland, Mollie: 2008, Business Ethics as Practice: Ethics as the everyday business of business (Cambridge University Press, London)Google Scholar
  19. Plowman, Donde Ashmos; Solansky, Stephanie; Beck, Tammy E.; Baker, LaKami Kulharni, Mukta and Travis, Deandra Villarreal: 2007, ‹The role of leadership in emergent self-organization,’ The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4): 341–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Porras, J., S. Emery and M. Thompson: 2006, Success Built to Last: Creating a Life that Matters (Wharton School Publishing, Philadelphia)Google Scholar
  21. Senge, Peter: 2006, “Systems citizenship: the leadership mandate for this millennium”, Reflections, 7 (2): 113–120.Google Scholar
  22. Senge, P. and K. H. Kaufer: 2000, ‹Communities of Leaders or No Leadership at All’, in B. Kellerman and L. R. Matusak (eds.), Cutting Edge: Leadership 2000 (James Macgregor Burns Academy, College Park, MD)Google Scholar
  23. Spillane, J.P.: 2006, Distributed Leadership (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass)Google Scholar
  24. Thomas, R. R. Jr. 2006, Diversity Management: An Essential Craft for Future Leaders. In: Hesselbein, Frances and Goldsmith, Marshall (Eds.) The Leader of the Future 2: Visions, Strategies and the New Era (San Francisco, Jossey Bass).Google Scholar
  25. Tichy, N. M. and DeRose, C. (2006) Leadership Judgment at the Front Line. In: Hesselbein, F. and Goldsmith, M. (Eds.) The Leaders of the Future 2: Visions, Strategies and the New Era (Jossey Bass, San Francisco)Google Scholar
  26. Uhl-Bien, Mary: 2006, ‹Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing’, Review issue of The Leadership Quarterly, 17: 656–676.Google Scholar
  27. Ul-Bien, Mary; Marion, Russ; and McKelvey, Bill: 2007, ‹Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era’, The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4): 298–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weick, K.: 2001, ‹The Attitude of Wisdom’, in K. Weick (ed.), Making Sense of Organizations (Blackwell, Oxford)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyDePaul UniversityChicagoU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations