Journal of Business Ethics

, 82:407 | Cite as

The Worth of Values – A Literature Review on the Relation Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance

  • Pieter van Beurden
  • Tobias Gössling


One of the older questions in the debate about Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is whether it is worthwhile for organizations to pay attention to societal demands. This debate was emotionally, normatively, and ideologically loaded. Up to the present, this question has been an important trigger for empirical research in CSR. However, the answer to the question has apparently not been found yet, at least that is what many researchers state. This apparent ambivalence in CSR consequences invites a literature study that can clarify the debate and allow for the drawing of conclusions. The results of the literature study performed here reveal that there is indeed clear empirical evidence for a positive correlation between corporate social and financial performance. Voices that state the opposite refer to out-dated material. Since the beginnings of the CSR debate, societies have changed. We can therefore clearly state that, for the present Western society, “Good Ethics is Good Business.”


Corporate social responsibility Corporate social performance Corporate financial performance Literature review Friedman 



The authors would like to thank Laura P. Hartman and an anonymous reviewer for their stimulating comments on former versions of this article. Further thanks go to Martyna Janowicz and Luc van Baest for their comments throughout the research project and to the students of Masters Circle on Corporate Social Responsibility at Tilburg University 2006/2007.


  1. Allouche, J., Laroche, P. (2005). A meta-analytical Investigation of the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines, 57(1), 8–41Google Scholar
  2. Arlow, P., Ackelsberg, R., (1991). A Small Firm Planning Survey: Business Goals, Social Responsibility, and Financial Performance. Akron Business and Economic Review 22(2), 161–172Google Scholar
  3. Balabanis, G., Philips, H.C., Lyall, J. (1998). Corporate social responsibility and economic performance in the top British companies: are they linked? European Business Review, 98(1), 25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, M.L., Salomon, R.M. (2006). Beyond Dichotomy: The Curvilinear Relationship Between Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1101–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blacconiere, W.G., Patten, D.M. (1994). Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18 (3), 357–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyle, E.J., Higgins, M.M., Rhee, S.G. (1997). Stock market reaction to ethical initiatives of defence contractors: theory and evidence. Critical perspectives on accounting, 8(6), 541–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brammer, S., Brooks, C., Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures. Financial Management, 35(3), 97–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, B. (1998). Do Stock Market Investors Reward Companies with Reputations for Social Performance?. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(3), 271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrol, A.B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carter, C. R., R. J. Auskalnis and C. L. Ketchum: 1999, `Purchasing from Minority Business Enterprises: Key Success Factors', Journal of Supply Chain Management 35(1), 28–32Google Scholar
  11. Carter, C.R., Kale, R., Grimm, C.M. (2000). Environmental Purchasing and firm performance: an empirical investigation. Transportation Research, 36(1), 219–228Google Scholar
  12. Chand, M. (2006). The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance: Industry Type as a Boundary Condition. The Business Review 5(1), 240–245Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, B. and Winn, M.I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davidson III, W.N., Worrell, D.L. (1990). A Comparison and Test of the Use of Accounting and Stock Market Data in Relating Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Akron Business and Economic Review, 21(3), 7–19Google Scholar
  15. De Bakker, F.G.A., Groenewegen, P., den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliomatric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance. Business and Society, 44(3), 283–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doane, D. (2005). The myth of CSR. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 3(3), 22–29Google Scholar
  17. Dowell, G. Hart, S., Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environment standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flew, A. (1973). Must Morality Pay or What Socrates Should Have Said to Thrasymachus. In C. L. Carter (Ed.), Skepticism and Moral Principles (pp. 21–47). Evanston: New University Press.,Google Scholar
  19. Frederick, W.C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2. Business and Society, 33(2), 150–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freedman, M., Stagliano, A.J. (1991). Differences in social-cost disclosures: A market test of investor reactions. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 4(1), 68–83Google Scholar
  21. Freeman, R. E.: 1994, `The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions', Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 409–421Google Scholar
  22. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, New York Times, 13 September 1970, pp. 122–126Google Scholar
  23. Frooman, J. (1997). Socially Irresponsible and Illegal Behavior and Shareholder Wealth. Business and Society, 36(3), 221–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garriga, E. and D. Melé: 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gauthier, C. (2005). Measuring Corporate Social and Environmental Performance: The Extended Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(1), 199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goll, I., Rasheed, A.A., (2004). The Moderating Environmental Munificence and Dynamism on the Relationship Between Discretionary Social Responsibility and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gössling, T. (2003). The price of morality. An analysis of personality, moral behaviour, and social rules in economic terms. Journal of business ethics, 45(1–2), 121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gössling, T., Vocht, C. (2007). Social Role Conceptions and CSR Policy Success. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(4), 363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Graves, S.B., Waddock, S.A. (1999). A look at the Financial-Social Performance Nexus when Quality of Management is Held Constant. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 12(1), 87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Griffin, J.J. (2000). Corporate Social Performance: Research Directions for the 21st Century. Business and Society, 39(4), 479–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Griffin, J.J., Mahon, J.F. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business and Society, 36(1), 5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guerard, J.B.Jr. (1997). Is there a cost to being socially responsible in investing? Journal of Investing, 6(2), 11–18Google Scholar
  33. Hamilton, S., H. Jo and M. Statman: 1993, ‹Doing Well While Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds’, Financial Analysts Journal 49, 62–66Google Scholar
  34. Hart, S.L., Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An emperical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. He, Y., Tian, Z., Chen, Y. (2007). Performance implications of nonmarket strategy in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(2), 151–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Herremans, I.M., Akathaporn, P., McInnes, M. (1993). An Investigation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reputation and Economic Performance. Accounting, Organazations and Society, 18(7/8), 587–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Holme, L., Watts, R. (1999). Making Good Business Sense., Geneva: The World Council for Sustainable DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  38. Hueting, R. (1990). The Brundtland report: A matter of conflicting goals. Ecological Economics, 2(2), 109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Judge, W.Q., Jr., Douglas, T.J. (1998). Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An emperical assesment. Journal of Management Studies, 35(2), 241–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klassen, R.D., McLaughlin, C.P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kumar, R., W. B. Lamb and R. E. Wokutch: 2002, ‹The End of South African Sanctions, Institutional Ownership, and the Stock Price Performance of Boycotted Firms’, Business and Society 41(2), 133–165Google Scholar
  42. Luo, X., Bhattacharya, C.B. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Margolis, J.D., Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maron, I.Y. (2006). Toward a Unified Theory of the CSP–CFP Link. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meznar, M.B., Nigh, D., and Kwok, C.C. (1994). Effect of announcements of withdrawal from South Africa on stockholder wealth. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1633–1648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miles M.B., Huberman A.M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Newbury Park, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
  48. Moore, G.M. (2001). Corporate Social Performance: An investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3–4), 299–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Orlitzky, M. (2001). Does Firm Size Confound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance? Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta Analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pava, M.L., Krausz, J., (1996). The Association Between Corporate Social-Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 321–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peinado-Vara, E. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin America. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21(1), 61–69Google Scholar
  53. Preston, L.E., O’Bannon, D.P. (1997). The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis. Business and Society, 36(4), 419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roman, R.M., Hayibor, S., Agle, R.B. (1999). The Relation Between Social and Financial Performance: Repainting a Portrait. Business and Society, 38(1), 109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ruf, B.M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R.M., Janney, J.J., Paul, K. (2001). An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2), 143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Russo, M.V., Fouts, P.A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schnietz, K.E., Epstein, M.J. (2005). Exploring Financial Value of a reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility During a Crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 7(4), 327–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schubert, A., Lang, I. (2005). The Literature Aftermath Of The Brundtland Report ‹Our Common Future’. A Scientometric Study Based On Citations In Science And Social Science Journals. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7(1), 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Seifert, B., Morris, S.A., Bartkus, B.R. (2003). Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers: Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Seifert, B., Morris, S.A., Bartkus, B.R. (2004). Having, Giving, and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance. Business and Society, 43(2), 135–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stanwick, P.A., Stanwick, S.D. (1998). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Emperical Examination. Journal or Business Ethics, 17(2), 195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stormer, F. (2003). Making the shift: Moving from “Ethics Pays” to an Inter-System Model of Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(4), 279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Suchman, M.C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. The World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future, The Brundtland Report. Oxford: Oxford Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
  65. Velde, van de, E., Vermeir, W., Corten, F., (2005). Finance and Accounting: Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vogel, D. (2005). The Market for Virtue The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  67. Waddock, S.A. (2004). Creating Corporate Accountability: Foundational Principles to Make Corporate Citizenship Real. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Waddock, S.A., Graves, S.B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance – Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wood, D.J. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wood, D. J. and R. E. Jones: 1995, `Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance', International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3(3), 229–267Google Scholar
  71. Wu, C.F. (2002). The Relationship of Ethical Decision-Making to Business Ethics and Performance in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(3), 163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wu, M.: 2006, ‹Corporate Social Performance, Corporate Financial Performance, and Firm Size: A Meta-Analysis’, Journal of American Academy of Business 8(1), 163–171Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Participation (Medezeggenschap), GITPTilburgThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department for Organisation StudiesTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations