Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 82, Issue 2, pp 369–378 | Cite as

CSR Information Disclosure on the Web: A Context-Based Approach Analysing the Influence of Country of Origin and Industry Sector

  • Lilian Soares Outtes Wanderley
  • Rafael Lucian
  • Francisca Farache
  • José Milton de Sousa Filho
Article

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become a much-discussed subject in the business world. The Internet has become one of the main tools for CSR information disclosure, allowing companies to publicise more information less expensively and faster than ever before. As a result, corporations are increasingly concerned with communicating ethically and responsibly to the diversity of stakeholders through the web. This paper addresses the main question as whether CSR information disclosure on corporate websites is influenced by country of origin and/or industry sector. Analysing the websites of 127 corporations from emerging countries, such as Brazil, Chile, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Thailand and South Africa, it becomes evident that both country of origin and industry sector have a significant influence over CSR information disclosure on the web (CSRIDOW). Based on the data studied, country of origin has a stronger influence over CSRIDOW than industry sector.

Key Words

corporate social responsibility (CSR) CSR communication CSR information disclosure on the web corporate website cross-country study emerging countries 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akatu, Instituto para o Consumo Consciente: 2006, Responsabilidade social das empresas: percepção do consumidor brasileiro – Pesquisa 2005 (São Paulo, Brasil)Google Scholar
  2. Altheide, D. L.: 1996, Qualitative Media Analysis (Sage, Newbury Park)Google Scholar
  3. Azevedo, M. T.: 2004, ‹Publicidade cidadã: como comunicar responsabilidade social empresarial’, in Responsabilidade social das empresas: a contribuição das universidades 3, 334–384 (Peirópolis, São Paulo)Google Scholar
  4. Bondy, K., D. Matten and J. Moon: 2004, ‹The adoption of voluntary codes of conduct in MNCs: a three-country comparative study’, Business and Society Review 109(4), 449–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen, H. R.: 1953, Social responsibilities of the businessman (Harper & Row, New York)Google Scholar
  6. Branco, M. C. and L. L. Rodrigues: 2006, ‹Communication of corporate social responsibility by portuguese banks: a legitimacy theory perspective’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal 11(3), 232–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll, A. B.: 1979, ‹A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance’, Academy of Management Review 4, 17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapple, W. and J. Moon: 2005, ‹Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting’, Business and Society 44(4), 415–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christmann, P. and G. Taylor: 2001, ‹Globalization and the environment: determinants of firm self-regulation in China’, Journal of International Business Studies 32(3), 439–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawkins, J.: 2004, ‹Corporate responsibility: the communication challenge’, Journal of Communication Management 9(2), 108–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Decarlo, S.: 2006, ‹The World’s 2000 Largest Public Companies’, Forbes Special Report. http://www.forbes.com/lists/2006/03/29/06f2k_worlds-largest-public-companies_land.html. Accessed 28 Jan 2007
  12. Esrock, S. L. and G. B. Leichty.: 1998, ‹Social responsibility and corporate web pages: self-presentation or agenda-setting?’, Public Relations Review 24(3), 305–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Esrock, S. L. and G. B. Leichty.: 2000, ‹Organization of corporate web page: publics and functions’, Public Relations Review 26(3), 327–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farache, F., K. Perks and A. Berry: 2007, ‹Corporate social responsibility communication: how corporations in the oil industry publicise their actions in the UK and Brazil’, International Journal of Business Research 7(2), 25–34Google Scholar
  15. Farache, F., L. S. O. Wanderley, K. Perks and J. M. Sousa Filho: 2007, ‹Responsabilidade social empresarial na web: estratégias de divulgação adotadas pelas maiores empresas francesas no Brasil e na Franca’, Revista Gestao.Org 5(3), 414–435Google Scholar
  16. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic management: a stakeholder approach (Pitman, Boston)Google Scholar
  17. Friedman, M.: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom (University of Chicago, Chicago)Google Scholar
  18. Goodman, M. B.: 1998, Corporate communications for executives (State University of New York Press, Albany)Google Scholar
  19. Hirschland, H. M.: 2006, ‹A BSR Benchmarking: The Goldilocks Conundrum: Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility’, in Corporate Responsibility and Global Business: Implications for Corporate and Marketing Strategy Conference (London), 13–14 July 2006Google Scholar
  20. Holme, R. and P. Watts: 2000, ‹Corporate social responsibility: making good business sense’, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunter, T. and P. Bansal: 2007, ‹How standard is standardized MNC global environmental communication?’, Journal of Business Ethics 71(1), 135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hutton, J. G.: 2001, ‹Reputation management: the new face of corporate public relations?’, Public Relations Review 27(3), 247–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jamali, D.: 2007, ‹The case for strategic corporate social responsibility in developing countries’, Business and Society Review 112(1), 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jamali, D. and R. Mirshak: 2007, ‹Corporate social responsibility (CSR): theory and practice in a developing country context’, Journal of Business Ethics 72(3), 243–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kemp, M.: 2001, Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia: Quixotic Dream or Confident Expectation? Program Paper No. 6 (United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva, Switzerland)Google Scholar
  26. Lewis, S.: 2001, ‹Measuring corporate reputation’, Corporate Communication: An International Journal 6(1), 31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luetkenhorst, W.: 2004, ‹Corporate social responsibility and the development agenda’, Intereconomics 39(3), 157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maignan, I., and O. C. Ferrell: 2004, ‹Corporate social responsibility and marketing: an integrative framework’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 32(1), 3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malhotra, N. K.: 2006, Pesquisa de marketing: uma orientação aplicada (Bookman, São Paulo)Google Scholar
  30. Morsing, M.: 2006, ‹Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: on the role of external stakeholders for member identification’, Business Ethics: A European Review 15(2), 171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morsing, M. and M. Schultz: 2006, ‹Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies’, Business Ethics: A European Review 15(4), 323–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pollach, I.: 2003, Communicating corporate ethics on the World Wide Web: a discourse analysis of selected company web sites (Peter Lang Publishing, Frankfurt)Google Scholar
  33. Schlegelmilch, B. B. and I. Pollach: 2005, ‹The perils and opportunities of communicating corporate ethics’, Journal of Marketing Management 21(3), 267–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Snider, J., R. P. Hill and D. Martin: 2003, ‹Corporate social responsibility in the 21st century: a view from the world’s most successful firms’, Journal of Business Ethics 48(2), 175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sousa Filho, J. M. and L. S. O. Wanderley: 2007, ‹Divulgação da responsabilidade social empresarial: como os websites empresariais vêm sendo utilizados por empresas de energia e varejo’, Cadernos EBAPE 5(2)Google Scholar
  36. Sweeney, L. and Coughan J.: 2008, ‹Do different industries report corporate social responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory’, Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. WBCSD: 1999, Brazilian Stakeholder Dialogue on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) & Sustainability Through the Market (SMT) (World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lilian Soares Outtes Wanderley
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rafael Lucian
    • 3
  • Francisca Farache
    • 3
  • José Milton de Sousa Filho
    • 1
  1. 1.PROPAD, Universidade Federal de PernambucoRecife/PEBrazil
  2. 2.PROPAD, Universidade Federal de PernambucoJaboatão dos Guararapes/PEBrazil
  3. 3.Brighton Business SchoolUniversity of BrightonBrightonEngland, U.K.

Personalised recommendations