Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 87, Issue 2, pp 189–197 | Cite as

A Change in Business Ethics: The Impact on Employer–Employee Relations

  • Roger Eugene Karnes
Article

Abstract

This research explores the historical perspective of business ethics from the viewpoint of the employer–employee relationship by outlining the impact of the changing social contract between employer and employee relations from the end of World War II to the current day; provides the basic definition of the key elements of the organizational social contract and outlines the social contract in employment relations. It also provides what the author believes to be the key drivers in employer–employee relations and the benefits to good employer–employee relations for each individual within the employment relationship. The results of this research indicate a significant shift in business ethics as it relates to the employers relationship to the employee within a work environment. It further shows the state of the employment relationship prior to World War II. Written contracts were unheard of, but rather, the employment agreement was steeped in a tradition that carried the promise sealed with nothing but a handshake. Now employees have little or no rights; and the ones they are given are provided not by the employer, but by government regulation and court precedent. Issues such as time off for illness, sexual harassment, and workers’ compensation are all handled through legal or regulatory means rather than ethical considerations. The research further shows that the distinct lack of leadership within organizations play a significant role in the disintegration of employer–employee relationships. Specifically, how the lack of leadership relates to the emotional intelligence of the leader. Areas such as empathy and social skills are under trained and under developed by organizations. This research shows that the employer who is willing to give employees what they want and need are far more likely to have success, but more importantly, the organizations will be doing the right thing.

Keywords

responsibility ethics accountability corporate social responsibility living wage togetherness rewards public education empathy social skill enthusiastic employee 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to acknowledge the assistance of Suzanne Ritchie and Dr. Terri Deems, Ph.D. both of Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa for their assistance in this project.

References

  1. Burns, J. M.: 1978, Leadership (Harper Row, New York)Google Scholar
  2. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD): 2007, September, ‘CIPD – Corporate Social Responsibility’, http://www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/corpstrtgy/corpsocres/csrfact.htm. Accessed 15 April 2008, from Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development
  3. Goleman, D.: 2004, ‘What Makes a Leader?’, Harvard Business Review 82(1), 3–52Google Scholar
  4. Goleman, D., R. Boyatzis and A. McKee: 2001, ‘Primal Leadership: The Hidden Driver of Great Performance’, Harvard Business Review 79(11), 43–52Google Scholar
  5. Marre, W.: 2008, April 10, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Needs HR’, http://www.expertclick.com/NewsReleaseWire/default.cfm?Action=ReleaseDetail&ID=21045&NRWid=7290. Accessed 15 April 2008, from Newsreleasewire.com
  6. Mattox, M. A.: 2008, April 4, Human Resources Manager – Dr Pepper Snapple Group (R. E. Karnes, Interviewer)Google Scholar
  7. McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York:McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Merriam-Webster: 2008, ‘Merriam-Webster OnLine Dictionary’, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/responsible. Accessed 5 April 2008, from Merriam-Webster.Com
  9. Norman, W. and C. MacDonald: 2004, April, ‘Getting to the Bottom of “triple bottom line”’, http://www.businessethics.ca/3bl/triple_bottom_line_abstract.html. Accessed 30 April 2008, from Triple Bottom Line Critique
  10. Pinney, C. C.: 2006, March 1, ‘Center for Corporate Citizenship’, http://www.bcccc.net/index.cfm?fuseaction=Feature.showFeature&FeatureID=240&PageID. Accesssed 8 April 2008, from Boston College Carrol School of Management
  11. Redington, I.: 2005, ‘CIPD – Making CSR Happen: The Contribution of People Management’, http://www.cipd.co.uk/subjects/corpstrtgy/corpsocres/_mkngcsrhpn.htm?IsSrchRes=1. Accessed 27 April 2008, from Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development
  12. Reich, R.B. (2002). I’ll be short: Essentials for a decent working society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Riley, R.: 2008, April 1, President – Feed Energy (R. E. Karnes, Interviewer)Google Scholar
  14. Sirota, D., L. A. Mischkind and M. I. Meltzer: 2005a, The Enthusiastic Employee: How Companies Profit by Giving Workers What They Want (Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ)Google Scholar
  15. Sirota, D., L. Mischkind and M. Meltzer: 2005b, ‘33 Beliefs About Work and Workers’, http://www.enthusiasticemployee.com/_vti_bin/shtml.dll/registration.htm. Accessed 27 April 2008, from The Enthusiastic Employee
  16. Uchitelle, L.: 2007, May, ‘Employer–Employee Social Contracts, Fashioning a New Compact for Workers’, Academy of Management Perspectives 21(2), pp. 5–9.Google Scholar
  17. Vorster, G.: 2007, May 08, ‘Employer Commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility Linked to Employee Attitudes’, http://www.personneltoday.com/articles/2007/05/08/40512/employer-commitment-to-corporate-social-responsibility-linked-to-employee.html. Accessed 15 April 2008, from Personneltoday.com

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.VMK ConsultingOtleyU.S.A.
  2. 2.Drake UniversityDes MoinesU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations