Furthering Organizational Priorities with Less Than Truthful Behavior: A Call for Additional Tools

  • William KeepEmail author


Though codes of ethics exist in many businesses, employees still view less than truthful behaviors to be a significant ethical problem. The current study examines the related and somewhat counterintuitive issue of less than truthful behaviors intended to further organizational priorities. Such behaviors risk violating one organizational priority (e.g., adhering to a code of ethics) to achieve another. Data indicated four unique though non-mutually exclusive motivations: (1) to avoid confrontation or conflict; (2) to ensure quality in the delivery of a product or service; (3) to buy time for an organization’s strategy to play out; and (4) for self-protection or self-enhancement. The evidence further suggests that enhanced managerial training, particularly in handling confrontation and conflicts, could reduce the contradiction between stated codes of ethics and actual behaviors.


code of ethics lying conflict training organizational priorities 


  1. Bayus B. L., S. Jain, & A. G. Rao. (2001). Truth or Consequences: An Analysis of Vaporware and New Product Announcements. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 3–14. doi: 10.1509/jmkr. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop, J. D. (2000). A Framework for Discussing Normative Theories of Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(3), 563–591. doi: 10.2307/3857893 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bok, S. 1999, Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. 3rd edition (Vintage Books, New York)Google Scholar
  4. Boo E. H. Y., & H. C. Koh. (2001). The Influence of Organizational and Code-Supporting Variables on the Effectiveness of a Code of Ethics. Teaching Business Ethics, 5(4), 357–373. doi: 10.1023/A:1012270121651 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brotheridge C. M., & S. Long. (2007). The ‹Real World’ Challenges of Managers: Implications for Management Education. Journal of Management Development, 26(9), 832–842. doi: 10.1108/02621710710819320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carson, T. L. (1988). On the Definition of Lying: A Reply to Jones and Revisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(7), 509–515. doi: 10.1007/BF00382597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chisholm R. M., & T. D. Feehan. (1977). The Intent to Deceive. The Journal of Philosophy, 74(3), 143–159. doi: 10.2307/2025605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeConinck J. B., & D. J. Good. (1989). Perceptual Differences of Sales Practitioners and Students Co. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(9), 667–676. doi: 10.1007/BF00384203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ekman P., & M. O’Sullivan (1991). Who can Catch a Liar? The American Psychologist, 46(9), 913–920. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.9.913 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ekman P., M. O’Sullivan, & M. Frank. (1999). A Few can Catch a Liar. Psychological Science, 10(3), 263–266. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eng, T. (2006). An Investigation into the Mediating Role of Cross-Functional Coordination on the Linkage Between Organizational Norms and SCM Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(6), 762–773. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher R. J. (1993). Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning. The Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 303–315. doi: 10.1086/209351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geyskens I., J. E. M. Steenkamp, & N. Kumar. (1999). A Meta-Analysis of Satisfaction in Marketing Channel Relationships. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 223–239. doi: 10.2307/3152095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glaser B. G., & A. L. Strauss. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine De Gruyter, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  15. Grover, S. L. (1993). Lying, Deceit, and Subterfuge: A Model of Dishonesty in the Workplace. Organization Science, 4(3), 478–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grover, S. L. (2005). The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth: The Causes and Management of Workplace Lying. Academy of Management Executive, 19(2), 148–157Google Scholar
  17. Grover S. L., & C. Hui. (1994). The Influence of Role Conflict and Self-Interest on Lying in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(4), 295–303. doi: 10.1007/BF00871676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Helin S., & J. Sandström. (2007). An Inquiry into the Study of Corporate Codes of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 253–271. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9251-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaptein M., & S. Avelino. (2005). Measuring Corporate Integrity: A Survey-Based Approach. Corporate Governance, 5(1), 45–54. doi: 10.1108/14720700510583467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaptein M., & M. S. Schwartz. (2008). The Effectiveness of Business Codes: A Critical Examination of Existing Studies and the Development of an Integrated Research Model. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 111–127. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9305-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kassarjian, H. H. (1977). Content Analysis in Consumer Research. The Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 8–18. doi: 10.1086/208674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laczniak G. R., & P. E. Murphy. (2006). Normative Perspectives for Ethical and Socially Responsible Marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 154–177. doi: 10.1177/0276146706290924 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lere J. C., & B. R. Gaumnitz. (2003). The Impact of Codes of Ethics on Decision Making: Some Insights from Information Economics. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(4), 365–379. doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000005747.37500.c8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Long B. S., & C. Driscoll. (2008). Codes of Ethics and the Pursuit of Organizational Legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 173–189. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9307-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGrath M. A., J. F. Sherry Jr, & S. J. Levy. (1993). Giving Voice to the Gift: The Use of Projective Techniques to Recover Lost Meaning. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(2), 171–191. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp0202_04 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKinney J. A., & C. W. Moore. (2008). International Bribery: Does a Written Code of Ethics Make a Difference in Perceptions of Business Professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1–2), 103–111. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9395-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mick, D. G. (1996). Are Studies of Dark Side Variables Confounded by Socially Desirable Responding? The Case of Materialism The Journal of Consumer Research, 23(2), 106–119. doi: 10.1086/209470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mintzberg H., R. Simons, & K. Basu (2002). Beyond Selfishness. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 67–74Google Scholar
  29. Narayandas D., & V. K. Rangan (2004). Building and Sustaining Buyer–Seller Relationships in Mature Industrial Markets. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 63–77. doi: 10.1509/jmkg. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1991). Narrative and Self-Concept. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1(2–3), 135–153Google Scholar
  31. Reynolds, A. (2006). How to Spot a Liar. Supply Management, 11(1), 24–25Google Scholar
  32. Riessman, C. K. (1991). Beyond Reductionism: Narrative Genres in Divorce Accounts. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1(1), 41–68Google Scholar
  33. Sabatini, P.: 2006, ‹Fibs on Resumes Commonplace’, Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, 1Google Scholar
  34. Saxe, L. (1991). Lying: Thoughts of an Applied Social Psychologist. The American Psychologist, 46(4), 409–415. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.4.409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Selnes, F. (1998). Antecedents and Consequences of Trust and Satisfaction in Buyer–Seller Relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 32(3/4), 305–322. doi: 10.1108/03090569810204580 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sherry J. F., Jr M. A. McGrath, & S. Levy. (1993). The Dark Side of the Gift. Journal of Business Research, 28(3), 225–244. doi: 10.1016/0148-2963(93)90049-U CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strudler, A. (1995). On the Ethics of Deception in Negotiation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(4), 805–822. doi: 10.2307/3857416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tadepalli R., A. Moreno, & S. Trevino. (1999). Do American and Mexican Purchasing Managers Perceive Ethical Situations Differently? An Empirical Investigation. Industrial Marketing Management, 28(4), 369–381. doi: 10.1016/S0019-8501(98)00029-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. The Economist. (2007). Business: Bush Whacked. Corporate Scandals, 384(8538), 66Google Scholar
  40. Thompson, K. (2007). A Corporate Training View of Ethics Education: An Interview with Dov L. Seidman, CEO of LRN. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(3), 79–92. doi: 10.1177/10717919070130030701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Treaster, J. B.: 2005, ‹Insurance Broker Settles Spitzer Suit for $850 Million’, The New York Times, February 1Google Scholar
  42. Wells C. V., & D. Kipnis. (2001). Trust, Dependency, and Control in the Contemporary Organization. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15(4), 593–603. doi: 10.1023/A:1007871001157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilkes, R. E. (1978). Fraudulent Behavior by Consumers. Journal of Marketing, 42(4), 67–75. doi: 10.2307/1250088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wotruba T. R., L. B. Chonko, & T. W. Loe. (2001). The Impact of Ethics Code Familiarity on Manager Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(1), 59–69. doi: 10.1023/A:1011925009588 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. WorkUSA: 2004, An Ongoing Study of Employee Attitudes and Opinions: 2004, ‹U.S. Workers Cite Hypocrisy and Favoritism as Biggest Ethical Lapses at Work’, Watson Wyatt WorldwideGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessQuinnipiac UniversityHamdenU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations