Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 87, Supplement 1, pp 91–109 | Cite as

Corporate Motives for Social Initiative: Legitimacy, Sustainability, or the Bottom Line?

Article

Abstract

This article presents results of exploratory research conducted with managers from over 500 Norwegian companies to examine corporate motives for engaging in social initiatives. Three key questions were addressed. First, what do managers in this sample see as the primary reasons their companies engage in activities that benefit society? Second, do motives for such social initiative vary across the industries represented? Third, can further empirical support be provided for the theoretical classifications of social initiative motives outlined in the literature? Previous research on the topic is reviewed, study methods are described, results are presented, and implications of findings are discussed. The article concludes with the analysis of study limitations and directions for future research.

Keywords

corporations social responsibility corporate citizenship motives reputation legitimacy image sustainability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aguilera R. V., Rupp D. E., Williams C. A., J. Ganapathi: 2007, Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations, Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863Google Scholar
  2. Altman B. W., D. Vidaver-Cohen: 2000, ‘A Framework for Understanding Corporate Citizenship: Introduction to the Special Edition of Business and Society Review “Corporate Citizenship for the New Millennium”‘, Business and Society Review, 105(1), 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bansal P., K. Roth: 2006, Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness, Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, M.: 2007, ‘Tarred and Untarred by the Same Brush: Exploring Interdependence in the Volatility of Stock Returns’, Corporate Reputation Review 10(1), 3–21Google Scholar
  5. Barney J. B. (1997) Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Addison-Wesly, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Beliveau B., Cottrill M., H. M. O’Neill: 1994, Predicting Corporate Social Responsiveness: A Model Drawn from Three Perspectives, Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 731–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bendell J.: 1998, Beyond Self-Regulation: An Introduction to Business-NGO Relations and Sustainable Development, Greener Management International, 24, 3–10Google Scholar
  8. Bertels, S. and J. Peloza: 2006, ‘Running to Stand Still: Managing CSR Reputation in an Era of Ratcheting Expectations’, CCGRM Working Paper, http://www.sfubusiness.ca/cibc-centre/
  9. Berthoin Antal A.: 1992, Corporate Social Performance. Westview Press, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  10. Birth, G., L. Illia, F. Lurati and A. Zamparini: 2006, ‘Communicating CSR: The Practice in the Top 300 Companies in Switzerland’, Paper Presented at The 10th International Conference on Corporate Reputation, Identity and Competitiveness, 25–28 May, NYGoogle Scholar
  11. Brønn, P. and A. Vrioni: 2001, ‘Consumer Skepticism to Cause Related Marketing’, European Marketing Academy Conference, Bergen, Norway, MayGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruni-Celli, J. and P. Marquez: 2005, ‘Belief Systems and Tangible Threats: Motivation of Latin American Firms for Social Engagement’, Paper Presented at Fourth International Iberoamerican Academy of Management Conference: Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell J. L.: 2007, Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility, Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 946–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell D., Moor G., M. Metzger: 2002, Corporate Philanthropy in the UK 1985–2000: Some Empirical Findings, Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies R.: 2003. The Business Community: Social Responsibility and Corporate Values. In: J. H. Dunning (Ed.), Making Globalization Good: The Moral Challenges of Global Capitalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp 301–319Google Scholar
  16. Davis K.: 1973, The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities, Academy of Management Journal 16(2), 312–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis K., R. L. Blomstrom: 1971, Business, Society and Environment. Social Power and Social Response, 2nd ed, New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  18. Dees, G.: 1998, ‘Enterprising Nonprofits’, Harvard Business Review 76, 55–67Google Scholar
  19. Drucker P.: 1999, Management Challenges for the 21st Century. Oxford: Butterworth HeinemannGoogle Scholar
  20. Dyllick T., K. Hockerts: 2002, Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. Business Strategy & the Environment, 11(2), 130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellen P. S., Webb D. J., L. A. Mohr: 2006, Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fombrun C. J.: 1996, Reputation, Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Fombrun, C. and M. Shanley: 1990, ‘What is in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy’, Academy of Management Journal 33(2), 233–258Google Scholar
  24. Fombrun C. F., N. A. Gardberg, M. L. Barnett: 2000, ‘Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk’, Business and Society Review 105(1), 85–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Galaskiewicz, J.: 1985, Social Organization of an Urban Grants Economy (Academic Press, Orlando, FL)Google Scholar
  26. Galaskiewicz J., M. S. Colman: 2006, Collaboration Between Corporations and Nonprofit Organizations. In: W. W. Powell, R. Steinberg (eds.) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  27. Gale B. T.: 1994, Managing Customer Value: Creating Quality and Service that Customers can See. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Gardberg, N. and C. F. Fombrun: 2006, ‘Corporate Citizenship: Creating Intangible Assets Across Institutional Environments’, Academy of Management Review 31(2), 329–346.Google Scholar
  29. Gladwin T., T. Krause, J. Kennelly: 1995, ‘Beyond Eco-Efficiency: Towards Socially Sustainable Business’, Sustainable Development 3(1), 35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grunig L. A.: (1993) Mage and Symbolic Leadership: Using Focus Group Research to Bridge the Gaps. Journal of Public Relations Research, 5(2), 95–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graafland J., B. van de Ven 2006 Strategic and Moral Motivation for Corporate Social Responsibilty. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 22, 111–123Google Scholar
  32. Hahn, T.: 2004, ‘Why and When Companies Contribute to Societal Goals: The Effect of Reciprocal Stakeholder Behavior’, Best Paper Proceedings of the 2004 Annual Conference of the Academy of Management “Creating Actionable Knowledge” in New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  33. Hahn, T. and M. Scheermesser: 2006, ‘Approaches to Corporate Sustainability Among German Companies’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 13(3), 121–181, 150–165Google Scholar
  34. Hamil, S.: 1997, ‘Corporate Community Involvement: A Critical Assessment’, Paper Presented at the British Academy of Management Annual Conference: London, September 8–10, 1997Google Scholar
  35. Herbig P., J. Milewicz 1993, The Relationship of Reputation and Credibility to Brand Success. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(3), 18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hess D., Rogovsky N., T. Dunfee: 2002, The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review, 44(2), 110–125Google Scholar
  37. Kidder, L. and C. Judd: 1986, Research Methods in Social Relations, 5th Edition (Holt, Rinehart & Winston)Google Scholar
  38. King A., Lenox M., Barnett M. (2002) Strategic Responses to the Reputation Commons Problem. In: A. Hoffman, & M. Ventresca (eds) Organizations, Policy and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives, pp 393–406. Stanford, CA, Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  39. Knox S., Maklan S., P. French: 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring Stakeholder Relationships and Programme Reporting Across Leading FTSE Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 7–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kotler P., N. Lee 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility, Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. Hoboken, NJ: WileyGoogle Scholar
  41. Logsdon, J. M. and Wood: 2002, ‘Reputation as an Emerging Construct in the Business and Society Field: An Introduction’, Business Society 41, 365–370Google Scholar
  42. Maignan I., O. C. Ferrell: 2001, Antecedents and Benefits of Corporate Citizenship: An Investigation of French Businesses, Journal of Business Research, 51, 37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Márquez A., C. J. Fombrun: 2005, Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Reputation Review, 7(4), 304–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marsden C.: 2000, The New Corporate Citizenship of Big Business: Part of the Solution to Sustainability? Business & Society Review 105(1), 9–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marshall R. S., M. Cordano, M. Silverman: 2005, ‘Exploring Individual and Institutional Drivers of Proactive Environmentalism’, Business Strategy and the Environment 14(2), 92–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Matten D.: 2006, ‘Why do Companies Engage in Corporate Social Responsibility? Background, Reasons, Basic Concepts’, in J. Henningfeld, M. Pohl, N. Tolhurst (eds.), The ICCA Handbook of CSR (John Wiley, London). pp. 3–46Google Scholar
  47. Matten, D. and J. Moon: 2008, ‘Implicit and Explicit CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review 404–424Google Scholar
  48. Mohr, A. L., D. Eroglu and S. P. Ellen: 1998, ‘The Development and Testing of a Measure of Skepticism Toward Environment Claims in the Marketers’ Communications’, The Journal of Consumers Affairs 32(1), 30–55Google Scholar
  49. Moir L., R. J. Taffler: 2004, Does Corporate Philanthropy Exist? Business Giving to the Arts in the UK, Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Naumann E. L., K. Giel: 1995, Customer Satisfaction Measurement and Management. Cincinnati, OH: Thomson Executive PressGoogle Scholar
  51. Nunnaly J. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  52. Payne A.: 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Development. Journal of Public Affairs, 6(3/4), 286–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Peloza J.: 2006, Using Corporate Social Responsibility as Insurance for Financial Performance. California Management Review, 48(2), 52–72Google Scholar
  54. Ruud, A., J. Jelstad, K. Ehrenclou and I. Vormedal: 2005, ‘Corporate Responsibility Reporting in Norway: An Assessment of the 100 Largest Firms’, Report no. 9/05, Program for Research and Documentation for a Sustainable Society (ProSus), Centre for Development and the Environment University of OsloGoogle Scholar
  55. Schnietz, K. and M. J. Epstein: 2005, ‘Exploring the Financial Value of a Reputation for Corporate Social Resonsibility During a Crisis’, Corporate Reputation Review 7(4), 327-345Google Scholar
  56. Sen S., C. B. Bhattacharya: 2001, Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 43–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sen S., C. B. Bhattacharya, D. Korschun: 2006, ‘The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships: A Field Experiment’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(2), 158–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Steurer R., Langer M. E., Konrad A., A. Martinuzzi: 2005, Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I: A Theoretical Exploration of Business-Society Relations, Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 263–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Suchman M. C.: 1995, Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches, Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tudway R., A.-M. Pascal: 2006, Corporate Governance, Shareholder Value and Societal Expectations. Corporate Governance, The International Journal of Effective Board Performance, 6(3), 305–316Google Scholar
  61. Useem M.: 1984, The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the US and UK. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  62. Utting, P.: 2000, ‘Business Responsibility for Sustainable Development’, Occasional Paper no. 2, United Nations Research Institute for Social DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  63. Vidaver-Cohen, D.: 2007, ‘Industry Legitimacy and Organizational Reputation: A Model of Reciprocal Processes’, Paper Presented at Faculty Research Colloquium, Department of Management and International Business, Florida International University, March 16Google Scholar
  64. Waddell S.: 2000, New Institutions for the Practice of Corporate Citizenship: Historical, Intersectoral, and Developmental Perspectives, Business & Society Review, 105(1), 107–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Waddock S.: 2000, The Multiple Bottom Lines of Corporate Citizenship: Social Investing, Reputation, and Responsibility Audits, Business & Society Review, 105(3), 323–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Waddock S.: 2004, ‘Parallel Universes: Companies, Academics, and the Progress of Corporate Citizenship’, Business and Society Review 109(1), 5–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Waddock, S., A. White, M. Goyder, J. Nelson, P. Lacey, J. Post: 2007, ‘Corporations and the 21st Century: How Do Today’s Companies Need to Change to Meet Tomorrow’s Needs?’, Symposium at the Academy of Management Annual meeting, August 2007, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  68. Webb J. D., L. A. Mohr: 1999, A Typology of Customers Responses to Cause Related Marketing: From Skeptics to Socially Concerned, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 226–238Google Scholar
  69. Weiss, T.: 2007, ‘World’s Most Respected Companies: Building Blocks for Success’, Forbes Magazine, May 21, 2007. www.forbes.com
  70. Wood D. J.: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Journal 16, 691–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Young D. R., D. F. Burlingame: 1996, Paradigm Lost, Research Toward a New Understanding of Corporate Philanthrophy. in: D. F. Burlingame, D. R. Young (eds.) Corporate Philanthrophy at the Crossroads, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 158–176Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian School of Management, Institute of Communication, Culture and LanguagesOsloNorway
  2. 2.Florida International UniversityMiamiU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations