Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 86, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

Collectivism, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Resource Advantages in Retailing

  • Yu-Chiang HuEmail author
  • Chia-Ching Fatima Wang
Article

Abstract

Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) linked to performance-related instrumentality or real moral concerns? Does CSR create resource advantages? Reasons for and results of CSR remain unclear. We choose a leading retail company in a Confucian, collectivist, and high power distance society and ask whether managers are naturally oriented toward societal actions. We study managerial perceptions regarding the importance and the performance of CSR in relation to other management factors. Drawing on Hunt’s (2000, A General Theory of Competition: Resources, Competences, Productivity, Economic Growth (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)) resource advantage theory, we find that the perceived importance of CSR is only fair vis-à-vis other management factors, but its high performance makes it a core resource for the company.

Keywords

corporate social responsibility collectivism resource advantage retailing performance measurement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the support of the E.S.R.C. Postdoctoral Fellowship carried out in the University of Cambridge, the College of Humanities and Social Science, Management School and Economics at the University of Edinburgh as well as the Overseas Research Students Awards Scheme (ORSAS). We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments.

References

  1. Baron D. P.: 2001. Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility and Integrated Strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10, 7–45. doi: 10.1162/105864001300122548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattacharya C. B., S. Sen: 2004. Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review 47(1), 9–24Google Scholar
  3. Child J.: 2002. The International Crisis of Confidence in Corporations. Academy of Management Executive 16(3), 145–147Google Scholar
  4. Dawar N., P. Parker: 1994. Marketing Universals: Consumers’ Use of Brand Name, Price, Physical Appearance, and Retailer Reputation as Signals of Product Quality. Journal of Marketing 58(2), 81–95. doi: 10.2307/1252271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DiCicco, J. M.: 2003, ‹The Development of Leaders in Ancient China, Rome, and Persia’, Public Administration Quarterly 27(Spring), 6–40Google Scholar
  6. Dickson P. R.: 1996. The Static and Dynamic Mechanics of Competition: A Comment on Hunt and Morgan’s Comparative Advantage Theory. Journal of Marketing 60(4), 102–106. doi: 10.2307/1251904 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Donaldson T., L. P. Preston: 1995, The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91. doi: 10.2307/258887 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drumwright M. E.: 1994, Socially Responsible Organizational Buying: Environmental Concern as a Noneconomic Buying Criterion, Journal of Marketing 58, 1–19. doi: 10.2307/1252307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freeman R. E.: 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Grant R. M.: 1991, The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation, California Management Review 33(3), 114–133Google Scholar
  11. Grewal D., R. Krishnan, J. Baker, N. Borin: 1998, The Effect of Store Name, Brand Name and Price Discounts on Consumers’ Evaluations and Purchase Intentions, Journal of Retailing 74(3), 331–352. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80099-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hillman, A. J. and G. D. Keim: 2001, ‹Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s The Bottom Line?’, Strategic Management Journal 22(2), 125–139. doi :10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-HGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofstede G.: 1984. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage, Beverly Hills, CAGoogle Scholar
  14. Hofstede G., M. H. Bond: 1988, The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth, Organizational Dynamics 16(4), 4–21. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. House R. J., P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, V. Gupta: 2004, Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  16. House R. J., M. Javidan, P. Dorfman: 2001, Project GLOBE: An Introduction, Applied Psychology: An International Review 50(4), 489–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Husted B. W., J. D. J. Salazar: 2006, Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance, Journal of Management Studies 43(1), 75–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00583.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunt S. D.: 2000, A General Theory of Competition: Resources, Competences, Productivity, Economic Growth. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunt S. D., D. B. Arnett: 2003, Resource-Advantage Theory and Embeddedness: Explaining R-A Theory’s Explanatory Success, Journal of Marketing, Theory and Practice 11(1), 1–17Google Scholar
  20. Hunt S. D., R. M. Morgan: 1997, Resource-Advantage Theory: A Snake Swallowing Its Tail or a General Theory of Competition?, Journal of Marketing 61(4), 74–82. doi: 10.2307/1252088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Merrilees B., D. Miller: 1996, Retailing Management: A Best Practice Approach. RMIT, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  22. McGoldrick P. J.: 2002, Retail Marketing. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel: 2000, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?’, Strategic Management Journal 21(5), 603–609. doi :10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3Google Scholar
  24. McWilliams A., D. Siegel: 2001, Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective, Academy of Management Review 26(1), 117–127. doi: 10.2307/259398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McWilliams A., D. Siegel, P. M. Wright: 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications, Journal of Management Studies 43(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitchell R. K., B. R. Agle, D. J. Wood: 1997, Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts, Academy of Management Review 22 (4), 853–886. doi: 10.2307/259247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mohr L. A., D. J. Webb: 2005, The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Price on Consumer Responses, Journal of Consumer Affairs 39(1), 121–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nader R.: 1984, Reforming Corporate Governance, California Management Review 26(4), 126–132Google Scholar
  29. Purohit D., J. Srivastava: 2001, Effect of Manufacturer Reputation, Retailer Reputation, and Product Warranty on Consumer Judgments of Product Quality: A Cue Diagnosticity Framework, Journal of Consumer Psychology 10 (3), 123–134. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1003_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Richardson P. S., A. S. Dick, A. K. Jain: 1994, Extrinsic and Intrinsic Cue Effects on Perceptions of Store Brand Quality, Journal of Marketing 58(4), 28–36. doi: 10.2307/1251914 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sanchez R., A. Heene: 1997, Reinventing Strategic Management: New Theory and Practice for Competence-Based Competition, European Management Journal 15(3), 303–317 doi: 10.1016/S0263-2373(97)00010-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sweeney J. C., G. N. Soutar, L. W. Johnson: 1999, The Role of Perceived Risk in the Quality-Value Relationship: A Study in a Retail Environment, Journal of Retailing 75(1), 77–105. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80005-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Teece, D. J., G. Pisano and A. Shuen: 1997, ‹Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management’, Strategic Management Journal 18(7), 509–533. doi :10.1002/(SICI) 1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO; 2-ZGoogle Scholar
  34. Trompenaars F., C. Hampden-Turner: 1997, Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business. Nicholas Brealey, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Vitell S. J., J. G. P. Paolillo, J. L. Thomas: 2003, The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility: A Study of Marketing Professionals, Business Ethics Quarterly 13(1), 63–86Google Scholar
  36. Waldman D. A., M. S. Luque, N. Washburn, R. J. House, et al.: 2006, Cultural and Leadership Predictors of Corporate Social Responsibility Values of Top Management: A GLOBE Study of 15 Countries, Journal of International Business Studies 37(6), 823–837. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walters D., J. Hanrahan: 2000, Retail Strategy: Planning and Control. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Wong K. C.: 2001, Chinese Culture and Leadership, International Leadership in Education 4(4), 309–319. doi: 10.1080/13603120110077990 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wood S. L.: 2002, Future Fantasies: A Social Change Perspective of Retailing in the 21st Century, Journal of Retailing 78(1), 77–83. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00069-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yin R. K.: 2003, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd Edition. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Global Financial Risk ManagementBarclays CapitalLondonU.K.
  2. 2.Judge Business SchoolUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeU.K.

Personalised recommendations