Advertisement

Non-Compliant Work Behaviour in Purchasing: An Exploration of Reasons Behind Maverick Buying

  • Katri KarjalainenEmail author
  • Katariina Kemppainen
  • Erik M. van Raaij
Article

Abstract

Many organisations, both public and private, have established framework agreements with selected suppliers to benefit from purchasing synergies. Compliance to such contracts throughout the organisation is crucial to achieve the expected benefits. Yet, in most organisations, the purchasing of goods and services is carried out not just by the purchasing department, but by many individuals dispersed throughout the organisation. Such a situation of scattered responsibilities can easily set the scene for different types of non-compliant behaviours in terms of an organisation’s purchasing policies. Very little research has been conducted on non-compliant purchasing behaviour, also known as “maverick buying”. In this article, we use a systematic literature review to identify different forms of maverick buying, ranging from unintentional maverick buying to straightforward sabotage. We validate these different forms of maverick buying and enrich our understanding of underlying reasons through a series of in-depth interviews with purchasing professionals. We bring forms and reasons together in a conceptual framework and propose avenues for future research.

Keywords

maverick buying deviant behaviour non-compliance contract compliance 

Abbreviations

IT

information technology

MB

maverick buying

MRO

maintenance, repair and operations

OB

organisational behaviour

OMB

organisational misbehaviour

PSM

purchasing and supply management

TCO

total cost of ownership

References

  1. Aberdeen Group: 2003, The Services Supply Chain Automation Benchmark Report: Strategies for a Buckshot Market (Aberdeen Group, Boston, MA)Google Scholar
  2. Aberdeen Group: 2006a, The Contract Management Benchmark Report Procurement Contracts–Maximizing Compliance and Supply Performance (Aberdeen Group, Boston, MA)Google Scholar
  3. Aberdeen Group: 2006b, The E-Procurement Benchmark Report (Aberdeen Group, Boston, MA)Google Scholar
  4. Aberdeen Group: 2007, Spend Analysis: Working too Hard for the Money (Aberdeen Group, Boston, MA)Google Scholar
  5. Ambrose M., M. Seabright, M. Schminke: 2002, Sabotage in the Workplace: The Role of Organizational Injustice, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89(1), 947–965. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00037-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Angeles R., R. Nath: 2007, Business-to-Business E-Procurement: Success Factors and Challenges to Implementation, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12(2), 104–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Appelbaum S., B. Shapiro: 2006, Diagnosis and Remedies for Deviant Workplace Behaviors, Journal of American Academy of Business 9(2), 14–20Google Scholar
  8. Badenhorst J.: 1994, Unethical Behaviour in Procurement: A Perspective on Causes and Solutions, Journal of Business Ethics 13(9), 739–745. doi: 10.1007/BF00881334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper R., G. Frank, R. Kemp: 2000, A Multinational Comparison of Key Ethical Issues, Helps and Challenges in the Purchasing and Supply Management Profession: The Key Implications for Business and the Professions, Journal of Business Ethics 23(1), 83–100. doi: 10.1023/A:1006279112858 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cox A., D. Chicksand, P. Ireland: 2005a, Overcoming Demand Management Problems: The Scope for Improving Reactive and Proactive Supply Management in the UK Health Service, Journal of Public Procurement 5(1), 1–22Google Scholar
  11. Cox A., D. Chicksand, P. Ireland, T. Davies: 2005b, Sourcing Indirect Spend: A Survey of Current Internal and External Strategies for Non-Revenue-Generating Goods and Services, Journal of Supply Chain Management 41(2), 39–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1055-6001.2005.04102004.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Croom S., A. Brandon-Jones: 2005, Key Issues in E-Procurement: Procurement Implementation and Operation in the Public Sector, Journal of Public Procurement 5(3), 367–387Google Scholar
  13. Croom, S. and A. Brandon-Jones: 2007, ‹Impact of E-Procurement: Experiences from Implementation in the UK Public Sector’, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 13(4), 294–303. doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2007.09.015
  14. Cuganesan S., R. Lee: 2006, Intra-Organisational Influences in Procurement Networks Controls: The Impacts of Information Technology, Management Accounting Research 17(2), 141–170. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2005.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Boer L., J. Harink, G. Heijboer: 2002, A Conceptual Model for Assessing the Impact of Electronic Procurement, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 8(1), 25–33. doi: 10.1016/S0969-7012(01)00015-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisenhardt K. M.: 1989a, Agency Theory, An Assessment and Review, Academy of Management Review 14(1), 57–74. doi: 10.2307/258191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisenhardt K. M.: 1989b, Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532–550. doi: 10.2307/258557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Faes W., P. Matthyssens, K. Vandenbempt: 2000, The Pursuit of Global Purchasing Synergy, Industrial Marketing Management 29, 539–553. doi: 10.1016/S0019-8501(00)00127-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferneley E., P. Sobreperez: 2006, Resist, Comply or Workaround? An Examination of Different Facets of User Engagement with Information Systems, European Journal of Information Systems 15(4), 345–356. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gelderman C., P. Ghijsen, M. Brugman: 2006, Public Procurement and EU Tendering Directives–Explaining Non-Compliance, International Journal of Public Sector Procurement 19(7), 702–174. doi: 10.1108/09513550610704716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harris L.: 2002, Sabotaging Market-Oriented Culture Change: An Exploration of Resistance Justifications and Approaches, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 10(3), 58–74Google Scholar
  22. Harris L., E. Ogbonna: 2002, Exploring Service Sabotage: The Antecedents, Types and Consequences of Frontline, Deviant, Antiservice Behaviors, Journal of Service Research 4(3), 163–183. doi: 10.1177/1094670502004003001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harris L., E. Ogbonna: 2006, Service Sabotage: A Study of Antecedents and Consequences, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(3), 543–558. doi: 10.1177/0092070306287324 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hornyak S.: 1999, The Big E-Payback, Management Accounting 80(8), 22–26Google Scholar
  25. Kulp S., T. Randall, G. Brandyberry, K. Potts: 2006, Using Organizational Control Mechanisms to Enhance Procurement Efficiency: How GlaxoSmithKline Improved the Effectiveness of E-Procurement, Interfaces 36(3), 209–219. doi: 10.1287/inte.1060.0209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Landeros R., R. Plank: 1996, How Ethical are Purchasing Management Professionals?, Journal of Business Ethics 15(7), 789–803. doi: 10.1007/BF00381743 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lau V., W. Au, J. Ho: 2003, A Qualitative and Quantitative Review of Antecedents of Counterproductive Behavior in Organizations, Journal of Business and Psychology 18(1), 73–99. doi: 10.1023/A:1025035004930 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liao H., A. Joshi, A. Chuang: 2004, Sticking Out Like a Sore Thumb: Employee Dissimilarity and Deviance at Work, Personnel Psychology 57(4), 969–1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00012.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lonsdale C., G. Watson: 2005, The Internal Client Relationship, Demand Management and Value for Money: A Conceptual Model, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 11(4), 159–171. doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2005.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marcus, B. and H. Schuler: 2004, ‹Antecedents of Counterproductive Behavior at Work: A General Perspective’, Journal of Applied Psychology 89(4), 647–660 Medline. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.647
  31. Michaelides Z., J. Ho, N. Boughton, D. Kehoe: 2003, The Development and Evaluation of Internet-Based Supply of Non-Production (MRO) Items, International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 6(4), 319–332Google Scholar
  32. Millington A., M. Eberhardt, B. Wilkinson: 2005, Gift Giving, Guanxi and Illicit Payments in Buyer–Supplier Relations in China: Analysing the Experience of UK Companies, Journal of Business Ethics 57(3), 255–268. doi: 10.1007/s10551-004-6712-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mount M., R. Ilies, E. Johnson: 2006, Relationship of Personality Traits and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Effects of Job Satisfaction, Personnel Psychology 59(3), 591–622. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00048.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palmer R., L. Green, M. Ventura: 1996, Are Corporate Procurement Cards for You?, Management Accounting 78(3), 22–30Google Scholar
  35. Pittaway L., M. Robertson, K. Munil, D. Denyer, A. Neely: 2004, Networking and Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Evidence, International Journal of Management Reviews 5/6(3–4), 137–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Puschmann T., R. Alt: 2005, Successful Use of E-Procurement in Supply Chains, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 10(2), 122–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Razzaque M., T. Hwee: 2002, Ethics and Purchasing Dilemma: A Singaporean View, Journal of Business Ethics 35(4), 307–326. doi: 10.1023/A:1013853021571 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roy S.: 2003, OK You are Now an Approved Supplier – but You Still do not Get Orders: Understanding the Case of the P-Card, Industrial Marketing Management 32(7), 605–613. doi: 10.1016/S0019-8501(03)00018-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smart A., A. Dudas: 2007, Developing a Decision-Making Framework for Implementing Purchasing Synergy: A Case Study, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 37(1), 64–89. doi: 10.1108/09600030710723327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spreitzer G., S. Sonenshein: 2004, Toward the Construct Definition of Positive Deviance, The American Behavioral Scientist 47(6), 828–847. doi: 10.1177/0002764203260212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tranfield D., D. Denyer, P. Smart: 2003, Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management-Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review, British Journal of Management 14(3), 207–222. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vardi Y.: 2001, The Effects of Organizational and Ethical Climates on Misconduct at Work, Journal of Business Ethics 29(4), 325–337. doi: 10.1023/A:1010710022834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vardi Y., Y. Wiener: 1996, Misbehavior in Organizations: A Motivational Framework, Organization Science 7(2), 151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wimbush J., J. Shepard: 1994, Toward an Understanding of Ethical Climate: Its Relationship to Ethical Behavior and Supervisory Influence, Journal of Business Ethics 13(8), 637–647. doi: 10.1007/BF00871811 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katri Karjalainen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katariina Kemppainen
    • 1
  • Erik M. van Raaij
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Business Technology, LogisticsHelsinki School of EconomicsHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Rotterdam School of ManagementErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations