Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 86, Supplement 1, pp 127–149

Assessing the Impact of Fair Trade Coffee: Towards an Integrative Framework

Article

Abstract

This article presents an impact assessment framework that allows for the evaluation of positive and negative local-level impacts that have resulted from “responsible trade” interventions such as fair trade and ethical trade. The framework investigates impact relating to (1) livelihood impacts on primary stakeholders; (2) socio-economic impacts on communities; (3) organizational impacts; (4) environmental impacts; (5) policies and institutional impacts; and (6) future prospects. It identifies relevant local-level stakeholders and facilitates the analysis of conflicting interests. The framework was developed in the context of, and is applied in this article to, the fair trade coffee industry in northern Nicaragua. It was designed, however, so that it can be applied across commodity sectors and responsible trade initiatives. It is able to do this by accommodating for differences in the social, environmental, political and institutional contexts of different areas, and by taking into account the distinct nature of an initiative’s overall objectives, different levels of intervention, and the full range of stakeholders involved.

Keywords

impact assessment responsible trade ethical trade fair trade livelihoods conflicts of interest smallholders coffee Nicaragua 

Abbreviations

ATC

Asociación de Trabajadores del Campo (Association of Rural Workers)

CAFENICA

Asociación de Cooperativas de Pequeños Productores de Café en Nicaragua (Association of Co-operatives of Small Coffee Producers of Nicaragua)

CECOCAFEN

Cooperativas Cafetaleras del Norte (Coffee Co-operatives Central in the Northern Region)

COSATIN

Cooperativa de Servicios Agropecuarios Tierra Nueva (New Earth Farmer’s Co-operative)

DFID

Department for International Development

FAO

Food and Agriculture Organization

FTO

Fairtrade Labelling Organization International

PRODECOOP

Promotora de Desarollo Cooperativo de Las Segovias (Promoters of Cooperative Development)

PROCOCER

La Cooperativa Multisectorial de Productores de Café Orgánico Certificado (Co-operative Producers of Certified Organic Coffee)

SL

sustainable livelihoods

SOPPEXCCA

Sociedad de Pequenos Productores, Exportadores y Compradores de Café (Society of Small Coffee Producers, Exporters and Buyers)

SWOT

strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis

TNC

transnational corporation

UNDP

United Nations Development Programme

WB

World Bank

WCED

World Commission on Environment and Development

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bacon C.: 2001, Cupping What You Grow: The Story of Nicaragua’s Quality Improvement Project. (Draft Project Evaluation, USAID/Thanksgiving Coffee Company, Santa Cruz)Google Scholar
  2. Bacon C.: 2005a, Confronting the Coffee Crisis: Can Fair Trade, Organic and Speciality Coffees Reduce Small-Scale Farmer Vulnerability in Northern Nicaragua. World Development 33, 497–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacon C.: 2005b, From Coffee Crisis and Vulnerability Toward Empowerment? Nicaraguan Smallholders use Cooperative, Fair Trade and Organic Coffee Networks to Sustain Rural Livelihoods. (Department for Environmental Studies, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz)Google Scholar
  4. Bandana, R. and R. Allgood: 2001, ‘Nicaraguan Coffee: The Sustainable Crop’, Managua, Unpublished PaperGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney I., A. B. Ota, B. Pandey, R. Puranik: 2001, Engaging Stakeholders: Lessons from Three Eastern India Business Case Studies, Issue Paper 1. (Resource Centre for the Social Dimensions of Business Practice, London)Google Scholar
  6. Barrientos, S.: 2003, `Labour Impact Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities of a Learning Approach', Paper Presented at the EDIAIS Conference at the University of Manchester, November 2003Google Scholar
  7. Barrientos S.: 2005, Impact Assessment and Labour: Developing a Learning Approach. Journal of International Development 17(2), 259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bebbinton A.: 2000, Re-Encountering Development: Livelihood Transitions and Place Transformations in the Andes. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90(3), 495–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bird P.: 2002, Learning Together: An Exploration of Market Access and Livelihoods by Tradecraft and DFID’s Sustainable Livelihoods Support Office. (Department for International Development, London)Google Scholar
  10. Blowfield, M.: 2003, Ethical Trade: The Negotiation of a Global Ethic, Thesis, DPhil (International Relations, University of Sussex, Sussex)Google Scholar
  11. Blowfield M., S. Gallat: 1998, Volta River Estates Fairtrade Bananas Case Study. (Natural Resources Institute, London)Google Scholar
  12. Broad, R.: 2002, Global Backlash: Citizen Initiatives for a Global Economy. (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Md.)Google Scholar
  13. Burns M., M. Blowfield: 2000, Approaches to Ethical Trade: Impact and Lessons Learned. (Natural Resources Institute, Chatam)Google Scholar
  14. Carney, D. (ed.): 1998, ‘Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: What Contribution can We Make?’, Paper Presented at the DFID Natural Resources Advisers’ Conference, July 1998, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Chambers, R. and G. Conway: 1992, Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century, IDS Discussion Paper 296 (IDS, Brighton)Google Scholar
  16. Comision Economica para America Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL): 2002, ‘Centroamérica: el impacto de la caldea de los precios del café’, LC/MEXL.517 (CEPAL, “Mexico DF”)Google Scholar
  17. Curtis M.: 2001, Trade for Life: Making Trade Work for Poor People. (Christian Aid, London)Google Scholar
  18. Department for International Development (DFID): 1999, Sustainable Livelihood Guidance Sheet. (DFID, London)Google Scholar
  19. Department for International Development (DFID): 2002, The Challenges of Assessing the Poverty Impact of Ethical Trading: What can be Learnt from Fair Trade Initiatives and the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach?. (DFID, London)Google Scholar
  20. Golding K., K. Peattie: 2005, In Search of a Golden Blend: Perspectives on the Marketing of Fair Trade Coffee. Sustainable Development 13, 154–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenfield, G.: 2002, ‘Vietnam and the World Coffee Crisis: Local Coffee Riots in a Global Context’, available online at: http://www.vicofa.org.vn. Accessed on 18 December 2005
  22. Grimble R.: 1998, Stakeholder Methodologies in Natural Resource Management: Socio-Economic Methodologies Best Practice Guidelines. (Natural Resource Institute, Chatham)Google Scholar
  23. Hopkins, R.: 2000, Impact Assessment Study of Oxfam Fair Trade, Final Report (Oxfam, Oxford)Google Scholar
  24. International Coffee Organization (ICO): 2006, ‘Coffee Prices’, available online at: www.ico.org/coffee_prices.asp. Accessed on 25 July 2006
  25. International Coffee Organization (ICO): 2007a, ‘Field Processing’, available online at: www.ico.org/field_processing.asp. Accessed on 20 June 2007
  26. International Coffee Organization (ICO): 2007b, ‘Industry Processing: Roasting’, available online at: http://www.ico.org/roasting.asp. Accessed on 20 June 2007
  27. Mayoux, L.: 2001a, Impact Assessment of Fair Trade and Ethical Enterprise Development (DFID Enterprise Development Impact Assessment Information Service [EDIAIS], Manchester), available online at: http://www.enterprise-impact.org.uk/word-files/IAofFairTrade-1ContentsSummaryandIntroduction.doc. Accessed on 7 May 2006
  28. Mayoux, L.: 2001b, ‘Participatory Methods’, available online at: www.enterprise-impact.org.uk. Accessed on 1 July 2005
  29. Mayoux, L.: 2003, ‘Trickle-Down, Trickle-Up or Puddle? Participatory Value Chain’, (DFID Enterprise Development Impact Assessment Information Service [EDIAIS]), available online at: http://www.enterprise-impact.org.uk/informationresources/toolbox/valuechainsanalysis.shtml. Accessed on 18 December 2005
  30. Meinzen-Dick R., M. Adato: 2001, Applying the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework to Impact Assessment in Integrated Natural resource Management. (International Food Policy Research Institute [IFPRI], Washington, DC)Google Scholar
  31. Mendez, E.: 2002, ‘Fair Trade Networks in Two Coffee Cooperatives of Western El Salvador: An Analysis of Insertion Through a Second Level Organization’, available online at: http://www.colostate.edu/Depts/Sociology/FairTradeResearchGroup/doc/elsal.pdf. Accessed on 18 December 2005
  32. Mendoza-Vidaurre R.: 2002, La paradoja del café: el gran negocio mundial y la peor crisis campesina. (La Ed, Managua and Nitlapan)Google Scholar
  33. Moore, G.: 2003, ‘The Fair Trade Movement: Parameters, Issues and Future Research’, Working Paper, available online at: http://www.fairtraderesource.org. Accessed 23 July 2004
  34. Murray D., L. Raynolds: 2000, Alternative Trade in Bananas: Obstacles and Opportunities for Progressive Social Change in the Global Economy. Agriculture and Human Values 17, 65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson V., A. Martin, J. Ewert: 2002, Methodological Challenges for Assessing the Social Impact of Codes of Practice. (Warwick Annual Conference on Corporate Social Citizenship, Warwick)Google Scholar
  36. Odero K.: 2003, Extending the Sustainable Livelihood Framework. (Department of Rural and Urban Planning, University of Zimbabwe, Harare)Google Scholar
  37. Parrish B., V. Luzadis, W. Bentley: 2005, What Tanzania’s Coffee Farmers can Teach the World: A Performance-Based Look at the Fair Trade-Free Trade Debate. Sustainable Development Journal 13, 177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pearson R.: 2005, The Social is Political: Towards the Re-Politicising of Feminist Analysis of the Global Economy. (Centre for Development Studies, POLIS, University of Leeds, Leeds)Google Scholar
  39. Ponte S.: 2002, Standards, Trade and Equity: Lessons from the Specialty Coffee Industry. (Centre for Development Research, Copenhagen)Google Scholar
  40. Raynolds L.T.: 2002, Consumer/Producer Links in Fair Trade Coffee Networks. Sociologia Ruralis 42, 389–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roche C.: 1999, Impact Assessment for Development Agencies, Learning to Value Change. (Oxfam and Novib, Oxford)Google Scholar
  42. Ronchi, L.: 2002a, ‘The Impact of Fair Trade on Producers and Their Organizations: A Case Study with Coocafé in Costa Rica’, PRUS Working Paper 11 (Poverty Research Unit at Sussex, Sussex)Google Scholar
  43. Ronchi, L.: 2002b, ‘Monitoring Impact of Fair Trade Initiatives: A Case Study of Kuapa Kokoo and the Day Chocolate Company’ (Twin, London), available online at: http://www.twin.org.uk/resources.html. Accessed on 20 June 2007
  44. Scoones, I.: 1998, ‘Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis’, Working Paper 72 (Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton), available online at: http://www.ntd.co.uk/idsbookshop/details.asp?id=419. Accessed 20 June 2007
  45. Tallontire A.: 2001, Challenges Facing Fair Trade: Which Way Now?. (Natural Resources and Ethical Trade Programme, Natural Resources Institute, London)Google Scholar
  46. Urban Capacity Building Network: 2005, ‘Defining Capacity Building’, available online at: http://www.gdrc.org/uem/capacity-define.html. Accessed on 3 September 2005
  47. Utting K.: 2005, Does Fair Trade Make a Difference: The Case of Small Coffee Producers in Nicaragua. Development in Practice 15, 584–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Varagis, P., P. Siegel, D. Giovannucci and B. Lewin: 2003, ‘Dealing with the Coffee Crisis in Central America: Impacts and Strategies’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2993 (World Bank, Washington, DC)Google Scholar
  49. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED): 1987, Food 2000: Global Policies for Sustainable Agriculture. Report of the Advisory Panel on Food Security, Agriculture, Forestry and Environment to␣the World Commission on Environment and Development (London, Zed Books)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Miami BeachU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations