Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 85, Supplement 2, pp 285–301 | Cite as

Assessing the Prerequisite of Successful CSR Implementation: Are Consumers Aware of CSR Initiatives?



As a reflection of the values and ethics of firms, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has received a large amount of research attention over the last decade. A growing area of this research is the CSR–consumer relationship. Results of experimental studies indicate that consumer attitudes and purchase intentions are influenced by CSR initiatives – if consumers are aware of them. In order to create this awareness, business is increasingly turning to ‹pro-social’ marketing communications, but such campaigns is met with scepticism and their effectiveness are therefore uncertain. Consequently, researchers in the field (for example, Maignan, 2001; Mohr et al., 2001) have called for empirical studies to determine the level of actual consumer awareness of CSR initiatives. This study examines the Australian banking sector, which engages in and promotes its CSR activities, to help fill this gap. Results from our qualitative study with bank managers, and our quantitative study with consumers, indicate low consumer CSR awareness levels. Consumer understanding of many of the social issues banks engage with is also low. While CSR is effective in eliciting favourable consumer attitudes and behaviour in theory, CSR has not proven its general effectiveness in the marketplace. The low consumer awareness of the various social issues in which firms engage with their CSR programs suggests that firms may need to educate consumers, so they may better contextualise CSR initiatives communicated. However, better context may amount to little if claimed CSR initiatives are perceived as inconsistent with other facets of the business that reflect its values and ethics.


banks communication consumer awareness corporate social responsibility 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This study was completed with assistance of a Faculty of Research Grant from the Faculty of Commerce, University of Wollongong, Australia. Preliminary results have been presented that the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference in 2007.


  1. Anand P., Sternthal B. 1989, Strategies for Designing Persuasive Messages: Deductions from the Resource Matching Hypothesis. in Cafferata P., Tybout A. M. (eds) Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising. Lexington Books, Lexington, 135–159Google Scholar
  2. Auger P., Burke P. F., Devinney T. M., Louviere J. J. 2003, What will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features?. Journal of Business Ethics 42(3), 281–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhattacharya C. B., Sen S. 2003, Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies. Journal of Marketing 67, 76–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya C. B., Sen S. 2004, Doing Better at Doing Good: Whey, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review 47(1), 9–24Google Scholar
  5. Brown T., Dacin P. A. 1997, The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses. Journal of Marketing 61(1), 68–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrigan M. 1997, The Great Corporate Give-Away: Can Marketing do Good for the “Do-Gooders”?. European Business Journal 9(4), 40–46Google Scholar
  7. Carroll A. B. 1991, The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards the Moral Management of Organisational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cone Inc.: 2004, Cone Corporate Citizenship Study., accessed May 2006
  9. Creyer E. H., Ross W. T. Jr., 1997, The Influence of Firm Behavior on Purchase Intention: Do Consumers Really Care About Business Ethics?. Journal of Consumer Marketing 14(6), 421–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawkins, J.: 2004, ‹The Public’s Views of Corporate Responsibility 2003’, White Paper Series, MORI. Available from, accessed 31 May 2006
  11. Drumwright M. E. 1996, Company Advertising with a Social Dimension: The Role of Noneconomic Criteria. Journal of Marketing 60(4), 71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Environics: 1999, The Millennium Poll., accessed May 2006
  13. Ettenson R., Klein J. G. 2003, The Fallout from the French Nuclear Testing in the South Pacific. International Marketing Review 22(2), 199–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, New York Times Magazine 33(September 13), 122–126Google Scholar
  15. Friestad M., Wright P. 1994, The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts. Journal of Consumer Research 21(1), 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen U., Schrader U. 1997. A Modern Model of Consumption for a Sustainable Society. Journal of Consumer Policy 20(4), 443–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoeffler S., Keller K. L. 2002, Building Brand Equity Through Corporate Societal Marketing. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 21(1), 78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joyner B. E., Payne D. 2002, Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 41(4), 297–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keller P. A., Block L. G. 1997, Vividness Effects: A Resource Matching Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. King, D. S. and A. Mackinnon: 2002, ‹Who Cares? Community Perceptions in the Marketing of Corporate Citizenship’, in A. Jörg, S. Waddock, B. Husted and S. Sutherland Rahman (eds.), Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking, Chapter 12 (Greenleaf Publishing Limited, Sheffield)Google Scholar
  21. Kohler, A.: 2003, ‹Party’s over, Bank on It’, The Sydney Morning Herald, 20 September 2003,, accessed January 2007
  22. Kotler P., Brown L., Adam S., Burton S., Armstrong G. 2006, Marketing. 7th Edition, Pearson, Prentice Hall, Frenchs ForestGoogle Scholar
  23. Lovelock C. H. 1983, Classifying Services to Gain Strategic Marketing Insights. Journal of Marketing 47(3), 9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lovelock, C., P. Patterson and R. Walker: 2004, Services Marketing, an Asia-Pacific and Australian Perspective, 3rd Edition, Chapter 2 (Pearson Prentice Hall, Frenchs Forest)Google Scholar
  25. Maignan I. 2001, “Consumers” Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibilities: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Business Ethics 30(1), 57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maignan I., Ferrell O. C. 2001, Corporate Citizenship as a Marketing Instrument – Concepts, Evidence, and Research Directions. European Journal of Marketing 35(3–4), 457–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McWilliams A., Siegel D. 2001, Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. The Academy of Management Review 26(1), 117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mintzberg H. 1983, The Case for Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Strategy 4(2), 3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mohr L. A., Webb D. J., Harris K. E. 2001, Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs 35(1), 45–72Google Scholar
  30. Morsing M.: 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility as Strategic Auto-Communication: On the Role of External Stakeholders for Member Identification. Business Ethics: A European Review 15(2), 171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morsing M., Schultz M. 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Stakeholder Information, Response and Involvement Strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review 15(4), 323–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Obermiller C., Spangenberg E. R. 1998, Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Scepticism Toward Advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology 7(2), 159–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Orlitzky M., Schmidt F. L., Rynes S. L. 2003, Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Organization Studies 24(3), 403–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pomering, A. and S. Dolnicar: 2007, ‹Consumer Response to Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives: An Investigation of Two Necessary Awareness States’, Conference Proceedings, ANZMAC, University of OtagoGoogle Scholar
  35. Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. 2002, The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review 80(12), 56–68Google Scholar
  36. Price L. L., Feick L. F., Higie R. A. 1987, Information Sensitive Consumers and Market Information. Journal of Consumer Affairs 21(2), 328–341Google Scholar
  37. Public Relations Watch: 2006,, accessed May 2006
  38. Roberts, J. A.: 1996, ‹Will the Real Socially Responsible Consumer Please Step Forward?’, Business Horizons 39, 79–83Google Scholar
  39. Schultz, M. and M. Morsing: 2003, ‹The Catch 22 of Integrating CSR and Marketing: Findings from a Reputation Study of Danish Companies’, Conference Proceedings, MSI, Boston University, 17–19 September 2003Google Scholar
  40. Sen S., Bhattacharya C. B. 2001, Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 38(2), 225–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Webb D. J., Mohr L. A. 1998, A Typology of Consumer Responses to Cause-Related Marketing: From Skeptics to Socially Concerned. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 17(2), 226–238Google Scholar
  42. Work Foundation: 2004,, accessed December 2004
  43. World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Cross Cutting Themes – Corporate Responsibility: 2004,, accessed May 2004

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management and MarketingUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Personalised recommendations