Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 84, Issue 4, pp 479–495 | Cite as

Governing Corporate Social Responsibility: An Assessment of the Contribution of the UN Global Compact to CSR Strategies in the Telecommunications Industry

  • Hens RunhaarEmail author
  • Helene Lafferty
Article

Abstract

CSR has become an important element in the business strategy of a growing number of companies worldwide. A large number of initiatives have been developed that aim to support companies in developing, implementing, and communicating about CSR. The Global Compact (GC), initiated by the United Nations, stands out. Since its launch in 2000, it has grown to about 2900 companies and 3800 members in total. The GC combines several mechanisms to support CSR strategies: normative principles, networks for learning and co-operation, and communication and transparency about CSR activities. However, up to now only a few empirical evaluations of the contribution of the GC to CSR strategies have been conducted that however have not differentiated between different types of companies (regarding type of industry or regarding the maturity of CSR). This paper aims to partly fill this knowledge gap by a case study examination of three frontrunner companies in the telecommunications industry. The results show that the GC is only one of the many initiatives that these companies employ in shaping, implementing, and reporting about their CSR strategies, and that its role is at most modest. There are two important reasons. One is that many of the CSR issues that these companies deal with are industry specific and are hence addressed in specific networks. The second reason is that the GC principles are perceived as minimum requirements that do not provide many incentives to the three case study companies to perform better. A differentiation of norms for GC members is expected to enhance the contribution of the GC to CSR strategy employment, not only for frontrunner companies but as well for other categories of companies.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) United Nations Global Compact telecommunications industry business strategy governance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank professor William M. Lafferty for his useful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

  1. Alston K., J. P. Roberts: 1999, Partners in New Product Development: SC Johnson and the Alliance for Environmental Innovation. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 6(2), 110–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caroll A. B.: 1999, Corporate Social Responsibility, Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society 38(3), 268–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cetindamar, D. and K. Husoy: 2007, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmentally Responsible Behavior: The Case of the United Nations Global Compact’, Journal of Business Ethics (Published Online: 14 February 2007)Google Scholar
  4. Doh J. P., T. R. Guay: 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy, and NGO Activism in Europe and the United States: An Institutional-Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Management Studies 43(1), 47–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dummett K.: 2006, Drivers for Corporate Environmental Responsibility (CER). Environment, Development and Sustainability, 8(3), 375–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DJSI: 2006, ‘DJSI World 2006/2007 (By Sector)’, Dow Jones Sustainability Index, Zurich (Available from www.sustainability-indexes.com/djsi_protected/djsi_world/components/DJSIWorld_Sector_Rev2006.pdf, Viewed January 20, 2007)
  7. ETNO: 2006, ‘The Sustainability Charter of the ETNO’, European Telecommunications Network Operators’ Association, Brussels (Available from www.etno.be/Default.aspx?tabid=1283, Viewed December 19, 2006)
  8. Fox, T., H. Ward and B. Howard: 2002, ‘Public Sector Roles in Strengthening Corporate Social Responsibility: A Baseline Study’, World Bank, Washington (Available from www.ecodes.org/documentos/archivo/Public%20policies%20CSR-World%20bank.pdf, Viewed December 19, 2006)
  9. Garriga E., D. Melé: 2004, Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics 53(1–2), 51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. GeSI: 2007, ‘What we Stand for’, Global e-Sustainability Initiative, Paris (Available from www.gesi.org/stand.htm, Viewed February 13, 2007)
  11. Gouldson A., J. Bebbington: 2007, Corporations and the Governance of Environmental Risk. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25(1), 4–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hartman C. L., E. R. Stafford: 1997, Green Alliances: Building New Business with Environmental Groups. Long Range Planning 30(2), 184–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes, K. and R. Burge: 2003, ‘Coltan Mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo: How Tantalum-Using Industries can Commit to the Reconstruction of the DRC’, Fauna and Flora International, Cambridge (Available from www.gesi.org/docs/FFI%20Coltan%20report.pdf, Viewed February 7, 2007)
  14. Heap S.: 2000 NGOs Engaging with Business: A World of Difference and a Difference to the World. The International Non-governmental Organisation Training and Research Centre (INTRAC), OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Hemming C., S. Pugh, G. Williams, D. Blackburn: 2004 Strategies for Sustainable Development: Use of a Benchmarking Tool to Understand Relative Strengths and Weaknesses and Identify Best Practice. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 11(2), 103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hemphill T. A.: 2005, The United Nations Global Compact: The Business Implementation and Accountability Challenge. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1(4), 303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hughes S., R. Wilkinson, D. Humphreys, T. Macmillan, I. D. Rae: 2001, The Global Compact: Promoting Corporate Responsibility? Environmental Politics 10(1), 155–177Google Scholar
  18. Kell G.: 2005, The Global Compact. Selected Experiences and Reflections. Journal of Business Ethics 59(1–2), 69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knoepfel I.: 2001, Dow Jones Sustainability Group Index: A Global Benchmark for Corporate Sustainability. Corporate Environmental Strategy 8(1), 6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kohna P. T. B.: 2004, Implementing Global Standards – the Emerging Role of the Non-State Actor. Environmental Policy and Law 34(6), 260–265Google Scholar
  21. Kuper A.: 2004, Harnessing Corporate Power: Lessons from the UN Global Compact. Development 47(3), 9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lafferty, H.: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in the Telecommunications Industry. An Assessment of CSR Strategies and the Role of the UN Global Compact’, Unpublished Master Thesis (Sustainable Development Master Programme), Utrecht University, Utrecht (Available from www.sum.uio.no/publications/pdf_fulltekst/prosusrep2006_03.pdf, Viewed February 12, 2007)
  23. Ligteringen, E. and S. Zadek: 2005, ‘The Future of Corporate Responsibility Codes, Standards and Frameworks’, Global Reporting Initiative/AccountAbility, Amsterdam/London (Available from www.accountability21.net/uploadstore/cms/docs/Landscape%20Paper.pdf, Viewed December 14, 2006)
  24. McKinsey and Company: 2004, ‘Assessing the Global Compact’s Impact’, May 11 (Available from www.wbcsd.ch/web/projects/advocacy/imp_ass.pdf, Viewed December 12, 2006)
  25. McWilliams A., D. Siegel: 2001 Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review 26(1), 117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Monks R., A. Miller, J. Cook: 2004, Shareholder Activism on Environmental Issues: A Study of Proposals at Large US Corporations (2000–2003). Natural Resources Forum 28(4), 317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Plepys A.: 2002, The Grey Side of ICT. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 22(5), 509-523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. PricewaterhouseCoopers: 2002, Barometer Surveys – Management Barometer, PricewaterhouseCoopers, New York (Available from www.barometersurveys.com/production/barsurv.nsf/vwAllnewsbyDocID/5642B345FBBCD49085256C3E00658E18?Open-Document, Viewed February 20, 2007)
  29. Ruggie J. G.: 2001 global_governance.net: The Global Compact as Learning Network. Global Governance 7(4), 371–378Google Scholar
  30. Runhaar, H.: 2002, ‘Freight Transport: At Any Price? Effects of Transport Costs on Newspaper and Book Supply Chains in the Netherlands’, Ph.D. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Delft University Press, DelftGoogle Scholar
  31. Runhaar, H., C. Tigchelaar and W. J. V. Vermeulen: 2006, ‘Environmental Leaders: Making a Difference. A Typology of Environmental Leaders and Recommendations for a Differentiated Policy Approach’, Business Strategy and the Environment 17(3), 160–178Google Scholar
  32. Sachs S., M. Maurer, E. Rühli, R. Hoffmann: 2006 Corporate Social Responsibility from a “Stakeholder View” Perspective: CSR Implementation by a Swiss Mobile Telecommunication Provider. Corporate Governance 6(4), 506–515Google Scholar
  33. Stafford E. R., M. J. Polonsky, C. L. Hartman: 2000 Environmental NGO-Business Collaboration and Strategic Bridging: A Case Analysis of the Greenpeace-Foron Alliance. Business Strategy and the Environment 9(2), 122–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Timberlake L.: 2002 The Business Case for Sustainable Development: Making a Difference Towards the Earth Summit 2002 and Beyond. Corporate Environmental Strategy 9(3), 226–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. UNGC: 2006a, ‘About the Global Compact: The Ten Principles’, UN Global Compact Office, New York (Available from www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/index.html, Viewed December 14, 2006)
  36. UNGC: 2006b, ‘The Global Compact Network: Participants and Stakeholders’, UN Global Compact Office, New York (Available from www.unglobalcompact.org/ParticipantsAndStakeholders/index.html, Viewed December 14, 2006)
  37. UNGC: 2006c, ‘Partnerships for Development’, UN Global Compact Office, New York (Available from www.unglobalcompact.org/Issues/partnerships/index.html, Viewed December 18, 2006)
  38. UNGC: 2006d, ‘Networks Around the World’, UN Global Compact Office, New York (Available from www.unglobalcompact.org/NetworksAroundTheWorld/index.html, Viewed December 21, 2006)
  39. UNGC: 2007a, ‘Participants and Stakeholders, the Global Compact Network’, UN Global Compact Office, New York (Available from www.unglobalcompact.org/ParticipantsAndStakeholders/index.html, Viewed February 20, 2007)
  40. UNGC: 2007b, ‘Participants and Stakeholders, Participant Search’, UN Global Compact Office, New York (Available from www.unglobalcompact.org/ParticipantsAndStakeholders/search_participant.html?submit_x=page, Viewed February 20, 2007)
  41. UNSD: 2004, ‘Meeting of the Technical Subgroup of the Expert Group on International Economic and Social Classifications, New York, October 2004, Classifying Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Services’, United Nations Statistics Division, New York (Available from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/class/intercop/techsubgroup/04-10/papers/18-cpc2-ICT-services.pdf, Viewed December 18, 2006)
  42. Utting P.: 2005 Corporate Responsibility and the Movement of Business. Development in Practice 15(3–4), 375–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van Marrewijk M.: 2003, Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2–3), 95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vormedal, I.: 2005, ‘Governance Through Learning: The UN Global Compact and Corporate Responsibility’, Report No. 7/05, Center for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo, Oslo (Available from www.prosus.uio.no/publikasjoner/Rapporter/2005-7/report_7.pdf, Viewed December 12, 2006)
  45. Waddock S.: 2004, Creating Corporate Accountability: Foundational Principles to Make Corporate Citizenship Work. Journal of Business Ethics 50(4), 313–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. WEMOS: 2004, ‘Goede Bedoelingen met Bijwerkingen. Informatie over Publiek-Private Initiatieven voor Gezondheid’ (Public–private partnerships for health; in Dutch), WEMOS Health for all Foundation, Amsterdam (Available from www.euforic.org/docs/200409061007215386.pdf?&username=guest@euforic.org&password=9999&groups=EUFORIC&workgroup=, Viewed December 13, 2006)
  47. Whitehouse L.: 2003 Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Citizenship and the Global Compact: A New Approach to Regulating Corporate Social Power? Global Social Policy 3(3), 299–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development and InnovationUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Independent Consultant Sustainable DevelopmentNairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations