Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 84, Issue 3, pp 427–456

A Genealogy of Business Ethics: A Nietzschean Perspective

Article

Abstract

This article approaches the field of business ethics from a Nietzschean vantage point, which means explaining the weakness of the field by means of providing an etiological account of the values esteemed by the decadent business ethicists therein. I argue that such business ethicists have wandered from their immanent philosophical ground to act as scientists, businesspersons, and preaching-moralists as a way of evading their human self-contradictions. In actuality, this fleeing exacerbates them into a sickness of self-idolatry and self-loathing. I bring in Nietzsche’s approach to the value of truth and his ascetic priest figure to get to the origin of this problem. Moreover, I attend throughout to delimiting the field of business ethics as that branch of ethics that can be taught in business schools. Indeed, the article itself is a movement in this direction, being inherently and intentionally philosophical.

Keywords

Christianity egoism equality justice morality Nietzsche religion science stakeholder 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Nietzsche’s works

  1. Kaufmann W. (ed.): 1968, Basic Writings of Nietzsche. (The Modern Library. NY)Google Scholar
  2. Kaufmann, W. (ed. and trans.): 1982, The Portable Nietzsche (Penguin Books, NY)Google Scholar
  3. Nietzsche, F.: 1967, Will to Power, W. Kaufmann (ed.), and R. J. Hollingdale (trans.) (Random House: NY)Google Scholar
  4. Nietzsche, F.: 1974, The Gay Science, W. Kaufmann (trans.) (Vintage Books, NY)Google Scholar
  5. Nietzsche, F.: 2005, Human, All Too Human, R. J. Hollingdale (trans.) (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge)Google Scholar

Supporting sources

  1. Abrams F. W.: 1951, Management’s Responsibilities in a Complex World, Harvard Business Review 29, 29–34Google Scholar
  2. Ackerman R. W., R. A. Bauer: 1976, Corporate Social Responsiveness: The Modern Dilemna. (Reston Publishing Co.: Reston, VA)Google Scholar
  3. Alkafaji A. F.: 1989, A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance: Managing in a Dynamic Environment. (Quorum Books: Westport, CT)Google Scholar
  4. Boatright J. R.: 1994, Fiduciary Duties and the Shareholder-Management Relation: Or, What’s So Special About Shareholders?, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowan H. R.: 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. (Harper: NY)Google Scholar
  6. Bowie N. E.: 1991, Business Ethics as a Discipline: The Search for Legitimacy In: R. E. Freeman (eds.) Business Ethics: The State of the Art (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), pp 17–41Google Scholar
  7. Brady F. N., G. E. Wheeler: 1996, An Empirical Study of Ethical Predispositions, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 927–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brummer J. J.: 1991, Corporate Responsibility and Legitimacy: An Interdisciplinary Analysis. (Greenwood Press, NY)Google Scholar
  9. Carroll A. B.: 1979, A Three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance, Academy of Management Review 4(4), 497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carroll A. B.: 1996, Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. 3 Edition (South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH)Google Scholar
  11. Chamberlain, N.: 1973, The Limits of Corporate Responsibility. (Basic Books, NY)Google Scholar
  12. Donaldson T.: 1982, Corporations and Morality. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)Google Scholar
  13. Donaldson T., L. E. Preston: 1995, The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eells R.: 1960, The Meaning of Modern Business. (Columbia University Press: NY)Google Scholar
  15. Evans, W. M. and E. Freeman: 1988, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’, in T. L. Beauchamp and N. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business, 3rd Edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 97–106Google Scholar
  16. Fraedich, J. P.: 1993, The Ethical Behavior of Retail Managers, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frederick W. C. 1991, Commentary on Business Ethics as a Discipline: The Search for Legitimacy In: R. E. Freeman (eds) Business Ethics: The State of the Art. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), pp 56–59Google Scholar
  18. Freeman R. E. 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. (Pitman: Boston)Google Scholar
  19. Freeman R. E. (ed.): 1991, Business Ethics: The State of the Art. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK)Google Scholar
  20. Freeman R. E.: 1999, Divergent Stakeholder Theory, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 233–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman R. E., D. L. Reed: 1983, Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance, California Management Review 25(3), 88–106Google Scholar
  22. Goodpaster K. E.: 1991, Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis, Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1), 53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodpaster K. E., T. E. Holloran: 1994, In Defense of a Paradox, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hegel, G. W. F.: 1953, Reason in History: A General Introduction to the Philosophy of History, Robert Hartman (trans.) (Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing, Indianapolis, IN)Google Scholar
  25. Heidegger, M.: 1962, Being and Time (Harper, NY)Google Scholar
  26. Hill C. W. L., T. M. Jones: 1992, Stakeholder-Agency Theory, Journal of Management Studies 29(2), 131–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hume D.: 1978, Treatise of Human Nature. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK)Google Scholar
  28. Hume, D.: 1988, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, E. Steinberg (ed.) (Hackett Publishing Co., Indianapolis, IN)Google Scholar
  29. Hunt S. D., S. Vitell: 1986, A General Theory of Marketing Ethics, Journal of Macromarketing, 5, 5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones T., A. Wicks: 1999, Convergent Stakeholder Theory, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 206–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Langtry B.: 1994, Stakeholders and the Moral Responsibilities of Business, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McDonald G., P. C. Pak: 1996, It’s All fair in Love, War, and Business: Cognitive Philosophies in Ethical Decision-Making, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 973–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miles R. H.: 1987, Managing the Corporate Social Environment: A Grounded Theory. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)Google Scholar
  34. Moore G. E.: 1929, Principia Ethica. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)Google Scholar
  35. Preston L. E., J. E. Post: 1975, Private Management and Public Policy: The Principle of Public Responsibility. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ). Google Scholar
  36. Reginster B.: 2006, The Affirmation of Life: Nietzsche on Overcoming Nihilism. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)Google Scholar
  37. Rhenman E.: 1968, Industrial Democracy and Industrial Management. (Tavistock Publications, Ltd., London, UK)Google Scholar
  38. Sartre, J. P.: 1992, Being and Nothingness: A Phenomenological Essay on Ontology, Hazel E. Barnes (trans.) (Washington Square Press, NY)Google Scholar
  39. Schminke M. M., L. Ambrose, T. N. Noel: 1997, The Effect of Ethical Frameworks on Perceptions of Organizational Justice, Academy of Management Journal 40(5), 1190–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wu X.: 1999, Business Ethical Perceptions of Business People in East China: An Empirical Study, Business Ethics Quarterly 9(3), 541–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations