Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 84, Issue 3, pp 405–416 | Cite as

Corporate Social Responsibility as Support for Employee Volunteers: Impacts, Gender Puzzles and Policy Implications in Canada



In this article, we examine an important but relatively under-researched form of corporate social responsibility, namely, employer support for employee voluntary activity. Using Canadian data, we examine two questions. First, we analyze the impacts of employer support on the total number of hours volunteered and on the voluntary activities which are undertaken. Second, we examine how employer support is distributed between male and female employees. Our results indicate that employer support is associated with a greater amount of volunteer activity by both men and women employees and in a wide range of voluntary activities. However, we also find that women are less likely to receive employer support than men and are less likely to receive support in the form of flexible work hours and time-off. These results are puzzling given that women typically face more binding time constraints than men. We conclude the paper by discussing how employer policies might be changed to address this finding.


corporate social responsibility volunteering gender human resource policies 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2001). Voluntary Work Australia 2000, Canberra: Australian Bureau of StatisticsGoogle Scholar
  2. Broomhill, R.: 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility: A Literature Review. Report prepared for the Dunstan FoundationGoogle Scholar
  3. Evans, B. M. and J. Shields: 2000, ‹Neoliberal Restructuring and the Third Sector: Reshaping Governance, Civil Society and Local Relations’, Centre for Voluntary Sector Studies, Ryerson University, Working Paper, Number 13Google Scholar
  4. Foster, M. and A. Meinhard: 2002, ‹Corporate Social Responsibility in the Canadian Context: The New Role of Corporations in Community Involvement and Social Issues’, Centre for Voluntary Sector Studies, Ryerson University, Working Paper, Number 20Google Scholar
  5. Haslam, P.: 2004, ‹The Corporate Social Responsibility System in Latin America and the Caribbean’, FOCAL Policy Paper FPP-04-1Google Scholar
  6. Heugens P., Dentchev N. (2007). Taming Trojan Horses: Identifying and Mitigating Corporate Social Responsibility Risks. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(2), 151–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lewis J. (1999). Reviewing the Relationship Between the Voluntary Sector and the State in Britain in the 1990s. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 10(3), 255–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Luffman, J.: 2003, ‹Volunteering on Company Time’, Perspectives on Labour and Income 4(4), April, 5–11Google Scholar
  9. Moser C. (1993). Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Vaillancourt F. (1994). To Volunteer or not: Canada, 1987. Canadian Journal of Economics, 27(4), 813–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Volunteer Canada.: 2001a, Volunteer Connections: The Benefits and Challenges of Employer-Supported Volunteerism, Available at
  12. Volunteer Canada.: 2001b, Volunteers at Work: How Canadian Businesses Encourage and Support Volunteerism (Volunteer Canada, Ottawa)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EconomicsUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada

Personalised recommendations