Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 84, Issue 3, pp 367–387 | Cite as

Design and Validation of a Novel New Instrument for Measuring the Effect of Moral Intensity on Accountants’ Propensity to Manage Earnings

  • Jeanette Ng
  • Gregory P. White
  • Alina Lee
  • Andreas Moneta
Article

Abstract

The goal of this study was to construct a valid new instrument to measure the effect of moral intensity on managers’ propensity to manage earnings. More specifically, this study is a pilot study of the impact of moral intensity on financial accountants’ propensity to manage earnings. The instrument, once validated, will be used in a full-study of managers in the hotel industry. Different ethical scenarios were presented to respondents in the survey; each ethical scenario was designed in both high or low moral intensity form, to reflect the importance of the moral dilemma at hand. The results were analysed by factor analysis. The findings of this study have positively validated the instrument, with three of the five moral intensity components identified as having appropriate eigenvalues. This indicates that they have a significant influence in the study. The first factor captures the social consensus dimension and one scenario of the proximity dimension. The second factor indicates an interaction between the temporal immediacy and the magnitude of consequences dimension. The third dimension is probability of effect and one scenario of the proximity dimension. In addition, t-tests indicated that the manipulation of high and low conditions within each scenario were also successful. One limitation of the study might be the use of undergraduate accounting students as manager proxies, although prior evidence suggests use of accounting students as proxies is a valid approach in this type of study. This is a highly novel project as most prior studies have focussed on moral intensity and the general ethical decision-making process.

Keywords

ethics earnings management moral intensity factor analysis survey instrument hotel industry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajzen I. 1991, The Theory of Planned Behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. 1980, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, M. B., Ketz, J. E., Owsen, D.: 2003, Ethics Education in Accounting: Moving Toward Ethical Motivation and Ethical Behaviour, Journal of Accounting Education 21, 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett T., Valentine S.: 2004, Issue Contingencies and Marketers’ Recognition of Ethical Issues, Ethical Judgments and Behavioral Intentions, Journal of Business Research 57(4), 338–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartov, E. and P. Mohanram: 2004, ‹Private Information, Earnings Manipulations, and Executive Stock-Option Exercises’, The Accounting Review 79(4), 889–920Google Scholar
  6. Beu D., Buckley M. R.: 2001, The Hypothesized Relationship Between Accountability and Ethical Behaviour, Journal of Business Ethics 34(1), 57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowie, N. and R. Duska: 1990, Business Ethics, 2nd Edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)Google Scholar
  8. Bruns, W. J. and K. Merchant: 1989, ‹Ethics Test for Everyday Managers’, Harvard Business Review (March–April), 220–221Google Scholar
  9. Carlson D. S., Kacmar K. M., Wadsworth L. L.: 2002, The Impact of Moral Intensity Dimensions on Ethical Decision-Making: Assessing the Relevance of Orientation, Journal of Managerial Issues 14(1), 15–30Google Scholar
  10. Catell R. B.: 1966, The Scree Test for the Number of Factors, Multivariate Behavioural Research 1, 245–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chia A., Mee L. S.: 2000, The Effects of Issue Characteristics on the Recognition of Moral Issues, Journal of Business Ethics 27(3), 255–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collier P., Gregory A.: 1995, Investment Appraisal in Service Industries: A Field Study Analysis of the U.K. Hotels Sector, Management Accounting Research 6(1), 33–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Commisky, C. and E. Mulford: 2002, The Financial Numbers Game: Detecting Creative Accounting Practices (John Wiley & Sons, Canada)Google Scholar
  14. Dalbor, M. C. and W. P. Andrew: 2000, ‹Agency Problems and Hotel Appraisal Accuracy: An Exploratory Study’, International Journal of Hospitality Management 19(4), 353–360Google Scholar
  15. Davis M. A., Johnson N. B., Ohmer D. G.: 1998, Issue-Contingent Effects on Ethical Decision-Making: A Cross-Cultural Comparison, Journal of Business Ethics 17(4), 373–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dechow P. M., Sloan R. G., Sweeney A. P.: 1996, Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC, Contemporary Accounting Research 13(1), 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Douglas P. C., Wier B.: 2000, Integrating Ethical Dimensions into a Model of Budgetary Slack Creation, Journal of Business Ethics 28(3), 267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dubinsky A. J., Loken B.: 1989, Analyzing Ethical Decision-Making in Marketing, Journal of Business Research 19(2), 83–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Erickson M., Wang S.-W.: 1999, Earnings Management by Acquiring Firms in Stock for Stock Mergers, Journal of Accounting and Economics 27(2), 149–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferrell O. C., Gresham L. G.: 1985, A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision-Making in Marketing, Journal of Marketing 49(3), 87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flannery B. L., May D. R.: 2000, Environmental Ethical Decision-Making in the U.S. Metal-Finishing Industry, Academy of Management Journal 43(4), 642–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flory S. M., Phillips T. J. Jr., Reidenbach R. E., Robin D. P.: 1992, A Multidimensional Analysis of Selected Ethical Issues in Accounting, The Accounting Review 67(2), 284–302Google Scholar
  23. Frey B. F.: 2000, The Impact of Moral Intensity on Decision-Making in a Business Context, Journal of Business Ethics 26(3), 181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guilding C.: 2003, Hotel Owner/Operator Structures: Implications for Capital Budgeting Process, Management Accounting Research 14(3), 179–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham and W. C. Black: 1998, Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th Edition (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)Google Scholar
  26. Harrington S. J.: 1997, A Test of a Person – Issue Contingent Model of Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations, Journal of Business Ethics 16(4), 363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Healy, P. M.: 1985, `The Effect of Bonus Schemes on␣Accounting Decisions’, Journal of Accounting and Economics 7, 85–107Google Scholar
  28. Healy P. M., Wahlen J. M.: 1999, A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting, Accounting Horizons 13(4), 365–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Herndon, N. C.: 1966, ‹A New Context for Ethics Education Objectives in a College of Business: Ethical Decision Making Models’, Journal of Business Ethics 15(5), 501–510Google Scholar
  30. HIH Royal Commission Report: 2003, The Failure of HIH Insurance: A Corporate Collapse and Its Lessons. Retrieved 12 December 2007, from http://www.hihroyalcom.gov.au/finalreport/index.htm
  31. Hopwood A. G.: 1976, Accounting and Human Behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  32. Hunt S. D., Vitell S. J.: 1986, A General Theory of Marketing Ethics, Journal of Macromarketing 6(1), 5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling: 1976, ‹Theory of the␣Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics October 3, 305–360Google Scholar
  34. Jones T. M.: 1991, Ethical Decision-Making by Individuals in Organisations: An Issue-Contingent Model, The Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones, T. M. and L. V. Ryan: 1998, ‹The Effect of Organizational Forces on Individual Morality: Judgment, Moral Approbation and Behavior’, Business Ethics Quarterly 8(3), 431–445Google Scholar
  36. Kahneman, D., P. Slovic and A. Tversky (eds.): 1982, Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)Google Scholar
  37. Kaiser H. F.: 1960, The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis, Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Karande K., Shankarmahesh M. N., Rao C. P., Rashid Z. M.: 2000, Perceived Moral Intensity, Ethical Perception, and Ethical Intention of American and Malaysian Managers: A Comparative Study, International Business Review 9(1), 37–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Keasey K., Watson R.: 1989, Consensus and Accuracy in Accounting Studies of Decision-Making: A Note on a New Measure of Consensus, Accounting, Organizations and Society 14(4), 337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kelley P. C., Elm D. R.: 2003, The Effect of Context on Moral Intensity of Ethical Issues: Revising Jones’s Issue-Contingent Model, Journal of Business Ethics 48(2), 139–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Knouse S. B., Giacalone R. A.: 1992, Ethical Decision-Making in Business: Behavioural Issues and Concerns, Journal of Business Ethics 11(5–6), 369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Laczniak G. R., Inderrieden E. J.: 1987, The Influence of Stated Organizational Concern upon Ethical Decision-Making, Journal of Business Ethics 6(4), 297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leitsch D. L.: 2004, Differences in the Perceptions of Moral Intensity in the Moral Decision Process: An Empirical Examination of Accounting Students, Journal of Business Ethics 53(3), 313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lysonski S., Gaidis W.: 1991, A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Ethics of Business Students, Journal of Business Ethics 10(2), 141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marshall B., Dewe P.: 1997, An Investigation of the Components of Moral Intensity, Journal of Business Ethics 16(5), 521–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McMahon, J.: 2002, ‹An Analysis of the Factor Structure of the Multidimensional Ethics Scale and a Perceived Moral Intensity Scale, and the Effects of Moral Intensity on Ethical Judgment’, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  47. Merchant K.: 1985, Budgeting and the Propensity to Create Budgetary Slack, Accounting, Organizations and Society 10(2), 201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Morris S. A., McDonald R. A.: 1995, The Role of Moral Intensity in Moral Judgments: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Business Ethics 14(9), 715–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Noreen E.: 1988, The Economics of Ethics: A New Perspective on Agency Theory, Accounting Organizations and Society 13(4), 359–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Leary-Kelly A. M., Bowes-Sperry L.: 2001, Sexual Harassment as Unethical Behavior: The Role of Moral Intensity, Human Resource Management Review 11(1–2), 73–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paolillo J. G. P., Vitell S. J.: 2002, An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Selected Personal, Organizational and Moral Intensity Factors on Ethical Decision-Making, Journal of Business Ethics 35(1), 65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Randall D. M., Fernandes M. F.: 1991, The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research, Journal of Business Ethics 10(11), 805–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rest J.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Praeger. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Scott, W. R.: 2003, Financial Accounting Theory, 3rd Edition (Prentice Hall, Toronto)Google Scholar
  55. Shaub M. K.: 1997, Commentary on the Relationship Between an Individual’s Values and Perceptions of Moral Intensity: An Empirical Study, Behavioural Research in Accounting 9(Supplement), 41–49Google Scholar
  56. Shindler M. C.: 1997, The Principle of the Principal: An Examination of Hotel-Management Agreements and the Laws of Agency, The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 38(4), 4–10Google Scholar
  57. Singer M.: 1996, The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgments of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public, Journal of Business Ethics 15(4), 469–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Singer M., Mitchell S., Turner J.: 1998, Consideration of Moral Intensity in Ethicality Judgements: Its Relationship with Whistle-Blowing and Need-for-Cognition, Journal of Business Ethics 17(5), 527–541Google Scholar
  59. Singer M., Singer A. E.: 1997, Observer Judgements About Moral Agents’ Ethical Decisions: The Role of Scope of Justice and Moral Intensity, Journal of Business Ethics 16(5), 473–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Singhapakdi A., Vitell S. J., Kraft K. L.: 1996a, Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-Making of Marketing Professionals, Journal of Business Research 36, 245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Singhapakdi A., Vitell S. J., Rallapalli K. C., Kraft K. L.: 1996b, The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility: A Scale Development, Journal of Business Ethics 15(11), 1131–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stevens J.: 1986, Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Hillsdale, NH: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  63. Trevino L. K.: 1986, Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model, Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review 11(3), 601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Watts, R. L. and J. L. Zimmerman: 1986, Positive Accounting Theory (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ)Google Scholar
  65. Weber J.: 1996, Influences upon Managerial Moral Decision-Making: Nature of the Harm and Magnitude of Consequences, Human Relations 49(1), 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weber J., Gillespie J.: 1998, Difference in Ethical Beliefs, Intentions, and Behaviors, Business and Society 37(4), 447–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weber J., Wasieleski D.: 2001, Investigating Influences on Managers’ Moral Reasoning, Business and Society 40(1), 79–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wright, G. B., C. P. Cullinan and D. M. Bline: 1997, ‹The Relationship Between an Individual’s Values and Preceptions of Moral Intensity: An Empirical Study’, Behavioral Research in Accounting 9(Supplement), 26–40Google Scholar
  69. Zerbe W. J., Paulhus D. L.: 1987, Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception, The Academy of Management Review 12(2), 250–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeanette Ng
    • 1
  • Gregory P. White
    • 1
  • Alina Lee
    • 1
  • Andreas Moneta
    • 1
  1. 1.AccountingCurtin University of TechnologyPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations