Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 84, Issue 3, pp 325–339 | Cite as

Philanthropy, Integration or Innovation? Exploring the Financial and Societal Outcomes of Different Types of Corporate Responsibility

  • Minna Halme
  • Juha Laurila


This article argues that previous research on the outcomes of corporate responsibility should be refined in two ways. First, although there is abundant research that addresses the link between corporate responsibility (CR) and financial performance, hardly any studies scrutinize whether the type of corporate responsibility makes a difference to this link. Second, while the majority of CR research conducted within business studies concentrates on the financial outcomes for the firm, the societal outcomes of CR are left largely unexplored. To tackle these two deficiencies, this article extends the different conceptualizations of corporate responsibility and elaborates both the financial and the societal outcomes of different types of CR.


corporate responsibility corporate social responsibility financial performance corporate social performance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aguilera R., V. Ruth, D. Rupp, C. Williams, J. Ganapathi: 2007, Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review 32(3), 836–863Google Scholar
  2. Aragon-Correa J. A., S. Sharma: 2003, A Contingent Resource-Based View of Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy. Academy of Management Review 28(1), 71–88Google Scholar
  3. Barnett M.: 2007, Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review 32(3), 794–816Google Scholar
  4. Barnett M., R. Salomon: 2006, Beyond Dichotomy: The Curvilinear Relationship Between Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal 27, 1101–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendell J., W. Visser: 2005, World Review. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 17, 5–20Google Scholar
  6. Blowfield M., J. Frynas: 2005, Setting New Agenda: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility. International Affairs, 81(3), 499–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke L., J. Logsdon: 1996, How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off. Long Range Planning 29(4), 495–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll A.: 1979, A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review 4(4), 497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll A.: 1996, Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management. (International Thomson Publishing, Cincinnati)Google Scholar
  10. DesJardins J.: 1998, Corporate Environmental Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 825–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunphy D., A. Griffiths, S. Benn: 2003, Organizational Change for Corporate Sustainability. (Routledge, London)Google Scholar
  12. Easterly W.: 2006, The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest have Done so much Ill and So Little Good. (Penguin Press, New York)Google Scholar
  13. Ferraro F., J. Pfeffer, R. Sutton: 2005, Economics Language and Assumptions: How Theories can Become Self-Fulfilling. Academy of Management Review 30(1), 8–24Google Scholar
  14. Fox T.: 2004, Corporate Social Responsibility and Development. Development 47(3), 29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frynas J.: 2005, The False Developmental Promise of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Multinational Companies. International Affairs 81(3), 581–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garriga E., D. Melé: 2004, Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics 53, 51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghoshal S.: 2005, Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education 4(1), 75–91Google Scholar
  18. Global Market Insite: 2005, ‘Consumer Survey Finds Doing Good is Good for Business’,, Accessed on Dec 1, 2005
  19. Godfrey P.: 2005, The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective. Academy of Management Review 30(4), 777–798Google Scholar
  20. Goll, I. A. Rasheed: 2004, ‘The Moderating Effect of Environmental Munificence and Dynamism on the Relationship between Discretionary Social Responsibility and Firm Performance’ Journal of Business Ethics 49, 41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guimaraes T., K. Liska 1995, Exploring the Business Benefits of Environmental Stewardship. Business Strategy and the Environment 4, 9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halme M., M. Anttonen, M. Kuisma, N. Kontoniemi, E. Heino: 2007, Business Models for Material Efficiency Services: Conceptualization and Application. Ecological Economics 63, 126–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Halme M., J. Niskanen: 2001, Does Corporate Environmental Protection Increase or Decrease Shareholder Value? The Case of Environmental Investments. Business Strategy and the Environment. 10(4), 200–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hart S.: 2005, Capitalism at the Crossroads: The Unlimited Business Opportunities in Solving the World’s Most Difficult Problems. (Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ)Google Scholar
  25. Hart, S. and C. Christensen: 2002, ‘The Great Leap: Innovation from the Base of the Pyramid’, MIT Sloan Management Review (Fall), 51–56Google Scholar
  26. Hillman A., G. Keim: 2001, Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues. What’s the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal 22, 125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Husted B., J. De Jesus Salazar: 2006, Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance. Journal of Management Studies 43(1), 75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jenkins R.: 2005, Globalization, Corporate Social Responsibility and Poverty. International Affairs 81(3), 525–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Korten D.: 1995, When Corporations Rule the World. (Earthscan, London)Google Scholar
  30. Lankoski, L.: 2000, Determinants of Environmental Profit: An Analysis of Firm-Level Environmental Performance and Economic Performance, Doctoral dissertations 2000/1, Helsinki University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  31. Lankoski, L.: 2007, ‘Differential Economic Impacts of Corporate Responsibility Issues’, Business & Society Prepublished October, 26, 2007, doi: 10.1177/007650307306635
  32. Lovins A., L. Lovins, P. Hawken: 1999, A Road Map to Natural Capitalism. Harvard Business Review 77(3), 145–158Google Scholar
  33. Margolis J., J. Walsh: 2003, Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48, 268–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McWilliams A., D. Siegel: 2000, Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification. Strategic Management Journal 21, 603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McWilliams A., D. Siegel, P. Wright: 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies 43(1), 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meehan J., K. Meehan, A. Richards: 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility: The 3C-SR Model. International Journal of Social Economics 33(5/6), 386–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Merck: 2005, A Roof over One’s Head., Accessed on March 16
  38. Midttun A, K. Gautesen, M. Gjolberg: 2006, The Political Economy of CSR in Western Europe. Corporate Governance 6(4), 369–385Google Scholar
  39. Mirvis P., B. Googins: 2006, Stages of Corporate Citizenship. California Management Review 48(2), 104–126Google Scholar
  40. Nakao Y., A. Amano, K. Matsamura, K. Kenba, M. Nakano: 2007, Relationship Between Environmental Performance and Financial Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Japanese Corporations. Business Strategy and the Environment 16(2), 106–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nevell P.: 2005, Citizenship, Accountability and Community: The Limits of CSR Agenda. International Affairs 81(3), 541–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Orlitzky M., F. Schmidt, S. Rynes: 2003, Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Organization Studies 24(3), 403–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Porter M., M. Kramer: 2002, The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review 80(12), 57–68Google Scholar
  44. Porter M., M. Kramer: 2006, Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84(12), 78–92Google Scholar
  45. Porter M., C. van der Linde: 1995, Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review 73(5), 120–134Google Scholar
  46. Post J., B. Altman: 1992, Models of Corporate Greening: How Corporate Social Policy and Organizational Learning Inform Leading Edge Environmental Management. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 13, 3–29Google Scholar
  47. Prahalad C.: 2005, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits. (Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ)Google Scholar
  48. Prahalad C. K., A. Hammond: 2002, Serving the World’s Poor, Profitably. Harvard Business Review 80(9), 48–57Google Scholar
  49. Prahalad C. K., S. Hart: 2002, The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Strategy+Business 26, 1–15Google Scholar
  50. Reinhardt F. 1999, Bringing Environment Down to Earth. Harvard Business Review 77(4), 149–157Google Scholar
  51. Rocha H., S. Ghoshal: 2006, Beyond Self-Interest Revisited. Journal of Management Studies 43(3), 585–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Salzmann O., A. Ionescu-Sommers, U. Steger: 2005, The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: Literature Review and Research Options. European Management Journal 23(1), 27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schaltegger S., F. Figge: 2000, Environmental Shareholder Value: Economic Success with Corporate Environmental Management. Eco-Management and Auditing 7, 29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scherer A., G. Palazzo: 2007. Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective. Academy of Management Review 32 (4), 1096–1120Google Scholar
  55. Simpson, W. G. and T. Kohers: 2002, ‘The Link Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the banking Industry ’, Journal of Business Ethics 35, 97–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stiglitz J.: 2002, Globalization and Its Discontents. (W.W. Norton & Co, New York)Google Scholar
  57. Waddock S.: 2004, Parallel Universes: Companies, Academics and the Progress of Corporate Citizenship. Business and Society Review 109(1), 5–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Windsor D.: 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility: Three Key Approaches. Journal of Management Studies 43(1), 93–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wood D.: 1991, Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review 14(4), 691–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. WBCSD 2004, Doing Business with the Poor: A Field Guide. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  61. Zadek S. 2004, The Path to Corporate Responsibility. Harvard Business Review 82(12), 125–132Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marketing and ManagementHelsinki School of EconomicsHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of ManagementTurku School of EconomicsTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations