Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 84, Issue 4, pp 589–603 | Cite as

Exploring the Geography of Corporate Philanthropic Disaster Response: A Study of Fortune Global 500 Firms

Article

Abstract

In recent years, major disasters have figured prominently in the media. While corporate response to disasters may have raised corporate philanthropy to a new level, it remains an understudied phenomenon. This article draws on comparative research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate philanthropy to explore the geography of corporate philanthropic disaster response. The study analyzes donation announcements made by Fortune Global 500 firms from North America, Europe and Asia to look for regional patterns across three recent disasters: the South Asian Tsunami, Hurricane Katrina, and the Kashmiri earthquake. The results reveal inter-regional differences in the overall likelihood of donations and in their cash value, in addition to the identification of home-region- and local presence effects. Implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed.

Keywords

CSR disasters philanthropy regions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, M. and P. Hardwick: 1998, `An Analysis of Corporate Donations: United Kingdom Evidence', Journal of Management Studies 35(5), 641–654Google Scholar
  2. Amato, L. and C. Amato: 2007, ‹The Effects of Firm Size and Industry on Corporate Giving’, Journal of Business Ethics 72(3), OnlineGoogle Scholar
  3. Brammer S., A. Millington: 2004, The Development of Corporate Charitable Contributions in the UK: A Stakeholder Analysis, Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1411–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burke L., J. Logsdon, W. Mitchell, M. Reiner, D. Vogel: 1986, Corporate Community Involvement in the San Francisco Bay Area, California Management Review, 28(3), 122–141Google Scholar
  5. CAF: 2006, ‹International Comparisons of Charitable Giving’, CAF Briefing Paper, NovemberGoogle Scholar
  6. Chapple W., J. Moon: 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility in Asia: A Seven-Country Study of CSR Web Site Reporting, Business & Society, 44(4), 415–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crampton, W. and D. M. Patten: 2007, ‹Social Responsiveness, Profitability and Catastrophic Events: Evidence on the Corporate Philanthropic Response to 9/11’, Journal of Business Ethics, Early OnlineGoogle Scholar
  8. Dimaggio P., W. Powell 1983, The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egri, C., D. Ralston and Associates: 2004, ‹Managerial Perspectives on Corporate Environmental and Social Responsibilities in 22 Countries’, in Academy of Management Conference Proceedings Google Scholar
  10. Emanuel, K.: 2005, ‹Increasing Destructiveness of Tropical Cyclones over the Past 30 Years’, Nature, doi:10.1038/nature03906. Accessed January, 5 2005
  11. Fortanier, F. and A. Kolk: 2007, ‹On the Economic Dimensions of CSR: Exploring Fortune Global 500 Reports’, Business and Society 46, 457–478Google Scholar
  12. Fritz Institute: 2005, ‹Logistics and the Effective Delivery of Humanitarian Relief’, http://www.fritzinstitute.org/PDFs/Programs/TsunamiLogistics0605.pdf. Last Accessed December 22, 2005
  13. Fry L. W., G. Keim, R. Meiners: 1982, Corporate Contributions: Altruistic or For-Profit? Academy of Management Journal, 25(1), 94–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galaskiewicz J.: 1997, An Urban Grants Economy Revisited: Corporate Charitable Contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979–81, 1987–89, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 445–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galaskiewicz J., R. Burt: 1991, Interorganization Contagion in Corporate Philanthropy, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 88–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Genest C.: 2005, Cultures, Organizations and Philanthropy, Corporate Governance, 10(4), 315–327Google Scholar
  17. Gregory P., R. Stuart: 2004, Comparing Economic Systems in the Twenty-First Century. (Houghton Mifflin, New York)Google Scholar
  18. Hair J., R. Anderson, R. Tatham and W. Black: 1998, Multivariate Data Analysis, 4th Edition (Prentice Hall, NJ)Google Scholar
  19. Heher, A.: 2005, ‹Corporate Giving Grows as Hurricane Relief Picks Up Steam’, AP Newswire Report, September 1st, 2005Google Scholar
  20. Hosmer D., S. Lemeshow: 2000, Applied Logistic Regression (2nd ed.). New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  21. House R., M. Javidan, P. Hanges, P. Dorfman: 2002, Understanding Cultures and Implicit Leadership Theories Across the Globe: An Introduction to Project GLOBE, Journal of World Business, 37, 3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunter, M: 2006, ‹Deaths of Evacuees Push Toll to 1,577’, The Times-Picayune, New Orleans (May 19)Google Scholar
  23. Jose A., S.-M. Lee: 2007, Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis Based on Website Disclosures, Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 307–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Katz J., P. Swanson, L. Nelson: 2001, Culture-Based Expectations of Corporate Citizenship: A Propositional Framework and Comparison of Four Cultures, The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(2), 149–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kolk A.: 2005, Environmental Reporting by Multinationals from the Triad: Convergence or Divergence? Management International Review, 45(Special Issue 1/2005), 145–167Google Scholar
  26. Lines V. L.: 2004, Corporate Reputation in Asia: Looking Beyond Bottom-Line Performance, Journal of Communications Management, 8(3), 233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Logsdon J., D. Thomas, H. van Buren: 2006, Corporate Social Responsibility in Large Mexican Firms, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21(Spring), 51–60Google Scholar
  28. Maignan I., D. Ralston: 2002, Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from Businesses’ Self-Presentations, Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marquis C., M. A. Glynn, G. Davis: 2007, Community Isomorphism and Corporate Social Action, Academy of Management Review, 32, 925–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muller, A., G. Whiteman and J. van der Voort: 2006, ‹The Tsunami Effect: Corporate Philanthropic Response to Disasters’, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (Atlanta) 2006Google Scholar
  31. Munich Re: 2005, ‹Topics Geo Annual Review: Natural Catastrophes 2005’, Knowledge Series, Munich ReGoogle Scholar
  32. Navarro, P.: 1988, `Why Do Corporations Give to Charity?', Journal of Business 61, 66–93Google Scholar
  33. Nobes C., R. Parker: 2000, Comparative International Accounting, 6th edition. (Pearson Publishing, New York, NY)Google Scholar
  34. Pasquero, J.: 1991, ‹Trends in International Philanthropy’, in K. Paul (ed.), Contemporary Issues in Business and Society in the United States and Abroad (Edwin Mellon Press, Lewiston), pp. 225–257Google Scholar
  35. Patten, D. M.: 2007, ‹Does the Market Value Corporate Philanthropy? Evidence from the Response to the 2004 Tsunami Relief Effort’, Journal of Business Ethics, Early OnlineGoogle Scholar
  36. Post J.: 2000, Moving from Geographic to Virtual Communities: Global Corporate Citizenship in a Dot.com World. Business and Society Review, 105(1), 26–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rugman, A.: 2000, The End of Globalization. (Random House Business Books, London)Google Scholar
  38. Rugman A., A. Verbeke: 2004, A Perspective on Regional and Global Strategies of Multinational Enterprises, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rugman A., A. Verbeke: 2005, Regional Multinationals: The New Research Agenda In: P. J. Buckley (ed.) What is International Business? (Palgrave-MacMillan, Houndmills, UK), 110–132Google Scholar
  40. Ruigrok W., R. van Tulder: 1995, The Logic of International Restructuring. (Routledge, London)Google Scholar
  41. Saiia D. H., A. B. Carroll, A. K. Buchholtz: 2003, Philanthropy as Strategy: When Corporate Charity “Begins at Home”, Business and Society, 42(2), 169–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Salamon, L. M., S. W. Sokolowski and Associates: 2004, Global Civil Society. Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector (Volume Two). Published in Association with The Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project (Kumarian Press Inc., Bloomfield)Google Scholar
  43. Schlegelmilch B. B., D. C. Robertson: 1995, The Influence of County and Industry of Ethical Perspectives of Senior Executives in the US and Europe, Journal of International Business Studies, 26(4), 859–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seifert B., S. Morris, B. Bartkus: 2004, Having, Giving and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy and Firm Financial Performance, Business and Society, 43(2), 135–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shen W.: 2004 A Comparative Study on Corporate Sponsorships in Asia and Europe, Asia Europe Journal, 2(2), 283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simon F. L.: 1995, Global Corporate Philanthropy: A Strategic Framework, International Marketing Review, 12(4), 20–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. The Network for Consumer Protection: 2005; ‹Corporate Contributions in Three Recent Natural Disasters’, Occasional Paper Series, Islamabad, PakistanGoogle Scholar
  48. Trenberth K.: 2005, Uncertainty in Hurricanes and Global Warming. Science, 308, 1753–1754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. United States Department of Commerce: 2006, Hurricane Katrina Assessment Report (Silverspring, Maryland, USA)Google Scholar
  50. Useem, M.: 1988, Market and Institutional Factors in Corporate Contributions, California Management Review, 30(2), 77–88Google Scholar
  51. Waldman, D., M. Sully de Luque, N. Washburn, R. House and Associates: 2006, ‹Cultural and Leadership Predictors of Corporate Social Responsibility Values of Top Management: A GLOBE Study of 15 Countries’, Journal of International Business Studies 37, 823–837Google Scholar
  52. Webster P., G. Holland, J. Curry, H.-R. Chang: 2005, Changes in Tropical Cyclone Number, Duration, and Intensity in a Warming Environment. Science, 309, 1844–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Welford, R.: 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe, North America, and Asia: 2004 Survey Results The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 17, 33–52Google Scholar
  54. Whitley, R.: 1999, Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford University Press: OxfordGoogle Scholar
  55. Wokutch, R. E.: 1990, Corporate Social Responsibility Japanese Style, Academy of Management Executive, 4(2), 56–74Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Strategy & MarketingUniversity of Amsterdam Business SchoolAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations