Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A Study of Management Perceptions of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Performance in Emerging Economies: The Case of Dubai

Abstract

Although a number of studies have shown that corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities often lead to greater organisational performance in western developed economies, researchers are yet to examine the strategic value of CSR in emerging economies. Using survey data from 280 firms operating in Dubai, this study examines the link between CSR activities and organisational performance. The results show that CSR has a positive relationship with all three measures of organisational performance: financial performance, employee commitment, and corporate reputation. These results reinforce the accumulating body of empirical support for the positive impact of CSR on performance and challenge the dominant assumption that, given the weak institutional framework in emerging economies, CSR activities drain resources and compromise firms’ competitiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abott, W., & Monsen, R. (1979). On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self Reported Disclosures and a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 501–515. doi:10.2307/255740

  2. Aguilera, R., Ruth, V., Rupp, D., Williams, C., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863

  3. Albinger, H., & Freeman, S. (2000). Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 243–253. doi:10.1023/A:1006289817941

  4. Allouche, J., & Laroche, P. (2006). ‹The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: A Survey’. In: J. Allouche (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility: Performance and Stakeholders (pp. 3–40). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan

  5. Anderson, D. C. (1982). The Satisfied Consumer: Service Return Behavior in the Hospital Obstetrics Market. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 2, 25–33

  6. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, S. T. (1977). Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402. doi:10.2307/3150783

  7. Aupperle, K., Caroll, A., & Hatfield, J. (1985). An Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446–463. doi:10.2307/256210

  8. Backhaus, K., Stone, B., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness. Business & Society, 41, 292–319. doi:10.1177/0007650302041003003

  9. Bagozzi, R. P., & Lynn, P. W. (1982). Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459–489. doi:10.2307/2392322

  10. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327

  11. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108

  12. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Equation Modelling. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246 . doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

  13. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). ‹Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies’. Journal of Marketing, 67, 76–88. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.76.18609

  14. Blowfield, M., & Frynas, G. J. (2005b). Setting New Agendas: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Developing World. International Affairs, 81, 499–513. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00465.x

  15. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (New York: Wiley and Sons)

  16. Bragdon, J. H., & Marlin, J. T. (1979). Is Pollution Profitable? Risk Management, 19, 9–18

  17. Branco, C. M., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111–132. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z

  18. Budhwar, P. and K. Mellahi: 2007, ‹Introduction: Human Resource Management in the Middle East’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 18, 1–10

  19. Campbell, J. L.: 2006, ‹Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility’, The American Behavioral Scientist 49, 925–938

  20. Carroll, A. B.: 1991, ‹The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’, Business Horizons (July/August), 39–48. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

  21. Davidson, W. N., & Worrell, L. D. (1990). A Comparison and Test of the Use of Accounting and Stock Market Data in Relating Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Akron Business and Economic Review, 21, 7–19

  22. Deephouse, D. (2000). Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource: An Integration of Mass Communication and Resource-based Theories. Journal of Management, 26, 1091–1112. doi:10.1177/014920630002600602

  23. Delaney, J., & Huselid, M. (1996). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949–969. doi:10.2307/256718

  24. Deshpande, R., Farley, U. J., & Webster, E. F. (1993). Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57, 23–27. doi:10.2307/1252055

  25. Dillman, D..A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley and Sons

  26. Drawbaugh, K. (2001). Brands in the Balance: Meeting the Challenges of Commercial Identity. Edinbury Gate: Pearson Education Limited

  27. Egri, C., I. Maignan, D. Ralston, F. Bowen, J. Gond, C.␣Lo and D. Griffith: 2004, Cross-Cultural Study of Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility Practices and Benefits. Paper Presented at the Academy of Management (AOM) Conference, Social Issue Management (SIM), New Orleans

  28. Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, A. N., & Sever, M. J. (2000). The reputation quotientSM: A Multi-Stakeholder Measure of Corporate Reputation’. The Journal of Brand Management, 7, 241–255

  29. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). ‹What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy’. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258. doi:10.2307/256324

  30. Foo, L. M. (2007). Stakeholder Engagement in Emerging Economies: Considering the Strategic Benefits of Stakeholder Management in a Cross-cultural and Geopolitical Context. Corporate Governance, 7, 379–387

  31. Fornell, C., & Larcker, G. D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Errors. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312

  32. Frynas, J. (2005). The False Developmental Promise of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Multinational Oil Companies. International Affairs, 81, 581–598. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00470.x

  33. Galaskiewicz, J. (1991). ‹Making Corporate Actors Accountable: Institution-building in Minneapolis-St. Paul. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

  34. Graves, S., & Waddock, S. (1994). Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1034–1046. doi:10.2307/256611

  35. Greening, D., & Turban, D. (2000). Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce. Business & Society, 39, 254–280. doi:10.1177/000765030003900302

  36. Griffin, J., & Mahon, J. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-five Years of Incomparable Research. Business & Society, 36, 5–31. doi:10.1177/000765039703600102

  37. Hair, J. F., & Anderson, E. R. L. R. Tatham., & Black, C. W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: NJ Prentice Hall

  38. Hartman, L. P., Rubin, R. S., & Dhanda, K. K. (2007). The Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility: United States and European Union Multinational Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 373–389. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9513-2

  39. Hay, R., & Gray, E. (1974). Social Responsibility of Business Managers. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 135–143. doi:10.2307/254777

  40. Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, W. P. (2005). ‹Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility’. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33–44. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9

  41. Hu, L., & Bentler, M. P. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55

  42. Huber, G. P., & Power, J. D. (1985). Retrospective Reports of Strategic-level Managers: Guidelines for Increasing their Accuracy. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 171–180. doi:10.1002/smj.4250060206

  43. Husted, B., & Allen, D. (2000). Is It Ethical to Use Ethics as Strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 21–31. doi:10.1023/A:1006422704548

  44. Husted, B., & Allen, A. D. (2007). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Value Creation among Large Firms: Lessons from the Spanish Experience. Long Range Planning, 40, 594–610. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2007.07.001

  45. Husted, B., & Salazar, J. (2006). Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 75–91. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00583.x

  46. Jaworski, B., & Kohli, A. (1993). Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70. doi:10.2307/1251854

  47. Klein, N. (1999). No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies. New York: Picador

  48. Kolk, A. (2003). Trends in Sustainability Reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 279–291. doi:10.1002/bse.370

  49. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework. Academy of Marketing Science, 32, 3–19. doi:10.1177/0092070303258971

  50. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O., & Hult, G. (1999). Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and Business Benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 455–469. doi:10.1177/0092070399274005

  51. Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2001). People and Profits? The Search for a Link between Company’s Social and Financial Performance. New Jersey: Mahwah

  52. Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305. doi:10.2307/3556659

  53. Marom, I. Y. (2006). Toward a Unified Theory of the CSP–CFP Link. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 191–200. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9023-7

  54. McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. (2003). CEO Incentives and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 341–359. doi:10.1023/A:1024119604363

  55. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854–872. doi:10.2307/256342

  56. McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel: 2000, `Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?', Strategic Management Journal 21, 603–609. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3

  57. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127. doi:10.2307/259398

  58. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x

  59. Mellahi, K. (2007). ‘The Effect of Regulations on HRM: Private Sector Firms in Saudi Arabia’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 85–99

  60. Mellahi, K., & Wood, G. (2003). The Ethical Business: Possibilities, Challenges and Controversies. London: Palgrave-McMillan

  61. Moneva, J., Riviera-Lirio, J., & Munoz-Torres, M. (2007). The Corporate Stakeholder Commitment and Social and Financial Performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107, 84–102. doi:10.1108/02635570710719070

  62. Moore, G. (2001). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 299–315. doi:10.1023/A:1012537016969

  63. Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 72–75

  64. North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

  65. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., & Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441. doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910

  66. Parry, M., N. Arnell, M. Hulme, R. Nicholls and M. Livermore: 1998, ‹Adapting to the Inevitable’, Nature 395, 741. doi:10.1038/27316

  67. Pava, M. L., & Krausz, J. (1995). Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost. Westport, CT: Quorum Books

  68. Pedersen, E., & Huniche, M. (2006). Corporate Citizenship in Developing Countries. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press

  69. Peterson, D. (2004). The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment. Business & Society, 43, 296–319. doi:10.1177/0007650304268065

  70. Ping, R. A. (2004). On Assuring Valid Measures for Theoretical Models Using Survey Data. Journal of Business Research, 57, 125–141. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00297-1

  71. Preston, L. (1978). Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press

  72. Roberts, P., & Dowling, G. (2002). Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077–1093. doi:10.1002/smj.274

  73. Rupp, D., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R., & Williams, C. (2006). Employee Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: An Organizational Justice Framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 537–543. doi:10.1002/job.380

  74. Salzman, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability: Literature Review and Research Options. European Management Journal, 23, 27–36. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007

  75. Samiee, S., & Roth, K. (1992). The Influence of Global Marketing Standardization on Performance. Journal of Marketing, 56, 1–17. doi:10.2307/1252038

  76. Schuler, D. H., & Cording, M. (2006). A Corporate Social Performance – Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31, 540–559

  77. Shamsie, J. (2003). The Context of Dominance: An Industry-driven Framework for Exploiting Reputation. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 199–216. doi:10.1002/smj.291

  78. Slater, S. F., Olson, E. M., & Hult, T. (2006). The Moderating Influence of Strategic Orientation on the Strategy Formation Capability - Performance Relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1221–1231. doi:10.1002/smj.569

  79. Spencer, B. A., & Taylor, G. S. (1987). A Within and Between Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Akron Business and Economic Review, 18, 7–18

  80. Spicer, B. (1980). ‹Market Risk, Accounting Data and Companies’ Pollution Control Records’. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 5, 67–83. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.1978.tb00175.x

  81. Stanwick, P., & Stanwick, S. (1998). The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Size, Financial Performance and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 195–204. doi:10.1023/A:1005784421547

  82. Swanson, D. (1995). Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review, 20, 43–64. doi:10.2307/258886

  83. Swanson, D. (1999). Toward an Integrative Theory of Business and Society: A Research Strategy for Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 24, 506–521. doi:10.2307/259139

  84. Turban, D., & Greening, D. (1997). Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672. doi:10.2307/257057

  85. Vance, S. C. (1975). Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks? Management Review, 64, 19–24

  86. Vitell, S., & Paolillo, J. (2004). A Cross-cultural Study of the Antecedents of the Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 185–199. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2004.00362.x

  87. Waddock, S. and S. Graves: 1997, `The Corporate Social Performance–Financial Performance Link', Strategic Management Journal 18, 303–319. doi:10.1002/(SICI) 1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G

  88. Whitley, R. (1992). Business Systems in East Asia: Firms, Markets, and Societies. London, Newbury Park: Sage

  89. Windsor, D. (2001). The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9, 225–256. doi:10.1108/eb028934

  90. Wokutch, R., & McKinney, E. (1991). Behavioral and Perceptual Measures of Corporate Social Performance. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12, 309–330

  91. Wood, D. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718. doi:10.2307/258977

  92. Wood, D. J., & Jones, E. R. (1995). Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229–267. doi:10.1108/eb028831

  93. Wright, P. and S. Ferris: 1997, `Agency Conflict and Corporate Strategy: The Effect of Divestment on Corporate Value', Strategic Management Journal 18, 77–83. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199701)18:1<77:: AID-SMJ810>3.0.CO;2-R

  94. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Buck, T., & Bishop, K. (2003). Is Stakeholder Corporate Governance Appropriate in Russia? Journal of Management and Governance, 7, 263–290. doi:10.1023/A:1025022224413

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Kamel Mellahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rettab, B., Brik, A.B. & Mellahi, K. A Study of Management Perceptions of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Performance in Emerging Economies: The Case of Dubai. J Bus Ethics 89, 371–390 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-0005-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • corporate social responsibility
  • organisational performance
  • emerging economies
  • United Arab Emirates