Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 89, Issue 3, pp 371–390 | Cite as

A Study of Management Perceptions of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Performance in Emerging Economies: The Case of Dubai

  • Belaid Rettab
  • Anis Ben Brik
  • Kamel Mellahi


Although a number of studies have shown that corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities often lead to greater organisational performance in western developed economies, researchers are yet to examine the strategic value of CSR in emerging economies. Using survey data from 280 firms operating in Dubai, this study examines the link between CSR activities and organisational performance. The results show that CSR has a positive relationship with all three measures of organisational performance: financial performance, employee commitment, and corporate reputation. These results reinforce the accumulating body of empirical support for the positive impact of CSR on performance and challenge the dominant assumption that, given the weak institutional framework in emerging economies, CSR activities drain resources and compromise firms’ competitiveness.


corporate social responsibility organisational performance emerging economies United Arab Emirates 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abott, W., & Monsen, R. (1979). On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self Reported Disclosures and a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 501–515. doi: 10.2307/255740 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilera, R., Ruth, V., Rupp, D., Williams, C., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albinger, H., & Freeman, S. (2000). Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 243–253. doi: 10.1023/A:1006289817941 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allouche, J., & Laroche, P. (2006). ‹The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: A Survey’. In: J. Allouche (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility: Performance and Stakeholders (pp. 3–40). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillanGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, D. C. (1982). The Satisfied Consumer: Service Return Behavior in the Hospital Obstetrics Market. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 2, 25–33Google Scholar
  6. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, S. T. (1977). Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 396–402. doi: 10.2307/3150783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aupperle, K., Caroll, A., & Hatfield, J. (1985). An Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446–463. doi: 10.2307/256210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Backhaus, K., Stone, B., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness. Business & Society, 41, 292–319. doi: 10.1177/0007650302041003003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bagozzi, R. P., & Lynn, P. W. (1982). Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 459–489. doi: 10.2307/2392322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94. doi: 10.1007/BF02723327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Equation Modelling. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246 . doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). ‹Consumer–Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies’. Journal of Marketing, 67, 76–88. doi: 10.1509/jmkg. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blowfield, M., & Frynas, G. J. (2005b). Setting New Agendas: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Developing World. International Affairs, 81, 499–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00465.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (New York: Wiley and Sons)Google Scholar
  16. Bragdon, J. H., & Marlin, J. T. (1979). Is Pollution Profitable? Risk Management, 19, 9–18Google Scholar
  17. Branco, C. M., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111–132. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Budhwar, P. and K. Mellahi: 2007, ‹Introduction: Human Resource Management in the Middle East’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 18, 1–10Google Scholar
  19. Campbell, J. L.: 2006, ‹Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility’, The American Behavioral Scientist 49, 925–938Google Scholar
  20. Carroll, A. B.: 1991, ‹The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’, Business Horizons (July/August), 39–48. doi: 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
  21. Davidson, W. N., & Worrell, L. D. (1990). A Comparison and Test of the Use of Accounting and Stock Market Data in Relating Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Akron Business and Economic Review, 21, 7–19Google Scholar
  22. Deephouse, D. (2000). Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource: An Integration of Mass Communication and Resource-based Theories. Journal of Management, 26, 1091–1112. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Delaney, J., & Huselid, M. (1996). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949–969. doi: 10.2307/256718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Deshpande, R., Farley, U. J., & Webster, E. F. (1993). Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57, 23–27. doi: 10.2307/1252055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dillman, D..A. (1978). Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
  26. Drawbaugh, K. (2001). Brands in the Balance: Meeting the Challenges of Commercial Identity. Edinbury Gate: Pearson Education LimitedGoogle Scholar
  27. Egri, C., I. Maignan, D. Ralston, F. Bowen, J. Gond, C.␣Lo and D. Griffith: 2004, Cross-Cultural Study of Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility Practices and Benefits. Paper Presented at the Academy of Management (AOM) Conference, Social Issue Management (SIM), New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  28. Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, A. N., & Sever, M. J. (2000). The reputation quotientSM: A Multi-Stakeholder Measure of Corporate Reputation’. The Journal of Brand Management, 7, 241–255Google Scholar
  29. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). ‹What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy’. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258. doi: 10.2307/256324 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Foo, L. M. (2007). Stakeholder Engagement in Emerging Economies: Considering the Strategic Benefits of Stakeholder Management in a Cross-cultural and Geopolitical Context. Corporate Governance, 7, 379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fornell, C., & Larcker, G. D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Errors. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. doi: 10.2307/3151312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frynas, J. (2005). The False Developmental Promise of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Multinational Oil Companies. International Affairs, 81, 581–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00470.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Galaskiewicz, J. (1991). ‹Making Corporate Actors Accountable: Institution-building in Minneapolis-St. Paul. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Graves, S., & Waddock, S. (1994). Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1034–1046. doi: 10.2307/256611 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Greening, D., & Turban, D. (2000). Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce. Business & Society, 39, 254–280. doi: 10.1177/000765030003900302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Griffin, J., & Mahon, J. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-five Years of Incomparable Research. Business & Society, 36, 5–31. doi: 10.1177/000765039703600102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hair, J. F., & Anderson, E. R. L. R. Tatham., & Black, C. W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: NJ Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  38. Hartman, L. P., Rubin, R. S., & Dhanda, K. K. (2007). The Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility: United States and European Union Multinational Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 373–389. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9513-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hay, R., & Gray, E. (1974). Social Responsibility of Business Managers. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 135–143. doi: 10.2307/254777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, W. P. (2005). ‹Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility’. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33–44. doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hu, L., & Bentler, M. P. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55Google Scholar
  42. Huber, G. P., & Power, J. D. (1985). Retrospective Reports of Strategic-level Managers: Guidelines for Increasing their Accuracy. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 171–180. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250060206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Husted, B., & Allen, D. (2000). Is It Ethical to Use Ethics as Strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 21–31. doi: 10.1023/A:1006422704548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Husted, B., & Allen, A. D. (2007). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Value Creation among Large Firms: Lessons from the Spanish Experience. Long Range Planning, 40, 594–610. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2007.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Husted, B., & Salazar, J. (2006). Taking Friedman Seriously: Maximizing Profits and Social Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 75–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00583.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jaworski, B., & Kohli, A. (1993). Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70. doi: 10.2307/1251854 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Klein, N. (1999). No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies. New York: PicadorGoogle Scholar
  48. Kolk, A. (2003). Trends in Sustainability Reporting by the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12, 279–291. doi: 10.1002/bse.370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework. Academy of Marketing Science, 32, 3–19. doi: 10.1177/0092070303258971 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O., & Hult, G. (1999). Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and Business Benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 455–469. doi: 10.1177/0092070399274005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2001). People and Profits? The Search for a Link between Company’s Social and Financial Performance. New Jersey: MahwahGoogle Scholar
  52. Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305. doi: 10.2307/3556659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Marom, I. Y. (2006). Toward a Unified Theory of the CSP–CFP Link. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 191–200. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9023-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. (2003). CEO Incentives and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 341–359. doi: 10.1023/A:1024119604363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854–872. doi: 10.2307/256342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel: 2000, `Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?', Strategic Management Journal 21, 603–609. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3Google Scholar
  57. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127. doi: 10.2307/259398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mellahi, K. (2007). ‘The Effect of Regulations on HRM: Private Sector Firms in Saudi Arabia’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 85–99Google Scholar
  60. Mellahi, K., & Wood, G. (2003). The Ethical Business: Possibilities, Challenges and Controversies. London: Palgrave-McMillanGoogle Scholar
  61. Moneva, J., Riviera-Lirio, J., & Munoz-Torres, M. (2007). The Corporate Stakeholder Commitment and Social and Financial Performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107, 84–102. doi: 10.1108/02635570710719070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Moore, G. (2001). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 299–315. doi: 10.1023/A:1012537016969 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 72–75Google Scholar
  64. North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  65. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., & Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441. doi: 10.1177/0170840603024003910 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Parry, M., N. Arnell, M. Hulme, R. Nicholls and M. Livermore: 1998, ‹Adapting to the Inevitable’, Nature 395, 741. doi: 10.1038/27316
  67. Pava, M. L., & Krausz, J. (1995). Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost. Westport, CT: Quorum BooksGoogle Scholar
  68. Pedersen, E., & Huniche, M. (2006). Corporate Citizenship in Developing Countries. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  69. Peterson, D. (2004). The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment. Business & Society, 43, 296–319. doi: 10.1177/0007650304268065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ping, R. A. (2004). On Assuring Valid Measures for Theoretical Models Using Survey Data. Journal of Business Research, 57, 125–141. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00297-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Preston, L. (1978). Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy. Greenwich, CT: Jai PressGoogle Scholar
  72. Roberts, P., & Dowling, G. (2002). Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077–1093. doi: 10.1002/smj.274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rupp, D., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R., & Williams, C. (2006). Employee Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: An Organizational Justice Framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 537–543. doi: 10.1002/job.380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Salzman, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability: Literature Review and Research Options. European Management Journal, 23, 27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Samiee, S., & Roth, K. (1992). The Influence of Global Marketing Standardization on Performance. Journal of Marketing, 56, 1–17. doi: 10.2307/1252038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schuler, D. H., & Cording, M. (2006). A Corporate Social Performance – Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31, 540–559Google Scholar
  77. Shamsie, J. (2003). The Context of Dominance: An Industry-driven Framework for Exploiting Reputation. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 199–216. doi: 10.1002/smj.291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Slater, S. F., Olson, E. M., & Hult, T. (2006). The Moderating Influence of Strategic Orientation on the Strategy Formation Capability - Performance Relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1221–1231. doi: 10.1002/smj.569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Spencer, B. A., & Taylor, G. S. (1987). A Within and Between Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Akron Business and Economic Review, 18, 7–18Google Scholar
  80. Spicer, B. (1980). ‹Market Risk, Accounting Data and Companies’ Pollution Control Records’. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 5, 67–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1978.tb00175.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stanwick, P., & Stanwick, S. (1998). The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Size, Financial Performance and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 195–204. doi: 10.1023/A:1005784421547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Swanson, D. (1995). Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review, 20, 43–64. doi: 10.2307/258886 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Swanson, D. (1999). Toward an Integrative Theory of Business and Society: A Research Strategy for Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 24, 506–521. doi: 10.2307/259139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Turban, D., & Greening, D. (1997). Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–672. doi: 10.2307/257057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vance, S. C. (1975). Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks? Management Review, 64, 19–24Google Scholar
  86. Vitell, S., & Paolillo, J. (2004). A Cross-cultural Study of the Antecedents of the Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 185–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2004.00362.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Waddock, S. and S. Graves: 1997, `The Corporate Social Performance–Financial Performance Link', Strategic Management Journal 18, 303–319. doi:10.1002/(SICI) 1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-GGoogle Scholar
  88. Whitley, R. (1992). Business Systems in East Asia: Firms, Markets, and Societies. London, Newbury Park: SageGoogle Scholar
  89. Windsor, D. (2001). The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9, 225–256. doi: 10.1108/eb028934 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wokutch, R., & McKinney, E. (1991). Behavioral and Perceptual Measures of Corporate Social Performance. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12, 309–330Google Scholar
  91. Wood, D. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691–718. doi: 10.2307/258977 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wood, D. J., & Jones, E. R. (1995). Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229–267. doi: 10.1108/eb028831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wright, P. and S. Ferris: 1997, `Agency Conflict and Corporate Strategy: The Effect of Divestment on Corporate Value', Strategic Management Journal 18, 77–83. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199701)18:1<77:: AID-SMJ810>3.0.CO;2-RGoogle Scholar
  94. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Buck, T., & Bishop, K. (2003). Is Stakeholder Corporate Governance Appropriate in Russia? Journal of Management and Governance, 7, 263–290. doi: 10.1023/A:1025022224413 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dubai Chamber, Centre for Responsible BusinessDubaiU.A.E.
  2. 2.The University of SheffieldSheffieldU.K.

Personalised recommendations