Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 89, Issue 3, pp 331–349 | Cite as

Gender and Perceived Fundamental Moral Orientations: An Empirical Study of the Turkish Hotel Industry

  • Michael K. McCuddy
  • Musa Pinar
  • Ibrahim Birkin
  • Metin Kozak
Article

Abstract

Recent history is replete with scandalous acts and charitable acts within the business community. Unfortunately, scandalous acts seem to occur with greater frequency than charitable acts – at least as reported in the broadcast and print media. An interesting corollary to the incidence of scandalous and charitable acts is the apparent differential involvement of men and women, particularly in scandals. This article explores a possible explanation for the apparent gender differential in involvement in scandals and acts of charity. Drawing on a conceptual framework of three Fundamental Moral Orientations (FMOs) – selfishness, self-fullness, and selflessness – and relevant literature on gender effects, this article explores whether men and women are perceived as differing fundamentally in how they approach moral dilemmas. This phenomenon is examined with a sample of personnel (n = 682) from the hotel industry in Turkey. Results of the study indicate that gender has some effect on the perceived adoption of FMOs, and that these gender effects are generally consistent across age, educational level, and organizational rank categories. Implications of the findings are discussed.

Keywords

charitable acts gender differences gender effect moral orientation scandalous acts selfishness self-fullness selflessness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archer, J., & Coyne, S. (2005). An Integrated Review of Indirect, Relational, and Social Aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 212–230 . doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arsu, S.: 2005, ‹World Briefing, Europe: Turkey: Ex-Premier on Trial’, The New York Times Archives, http://www.nytimes.com. Accessed 5 Nov 2007
  3. Ball, D. A., McCulloch, W. H., Jr., Frantz, P. L., Geringer, J. M., & Minor, M. S. (2002). International Business: The Challenge of Global Competition, 8th ed. (McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York, NY).Google Scholar
  4. Baron, J. N., & Pfeffer, J. (1994). The Social Psychology of Organizations and Inequality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(3), 190–209. doi:10.2307/2786876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BBC News: 2001, ‹Turkey Hopes for $25bn Loan’, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/1194496.stm. Accessed 5 Nov 2007
  6. Beu, D. S., Buckley, R. M., & Harvey, M. G. (2003). ‹Ethical Decision-Making: A Multidimensional Construct’, Business Ethics. European Review (Chichester, England), 20(1), 88–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne, D. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, D., & Neuman, J. H. (1992). ‹The Implications of Attraction Research for Organizational Issues’. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Issues, Theory, and Research in Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (Elsevier, New York, NY), 29–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64–73. doi:10.2307/3150876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Churchill, G. A., Jr., & Iacobucci, D. (2005). Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations, 9th ed. (Thomson/South-Western, Cincinnati, OH).Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, J., Plant, L., & Sharp, D. (1998). Are Women Held to a Higher Moral Standard than Men? Gender Bias among University Students. Teaching Business Ethics, 2(2), 197–209. doi:10.1023/A:1009797124068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, D. (2000). The Quest to Improve the Human Condition: The First 1,500 Articles Published in Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(1), 1–73. doi:10.1023/A:1006358104098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crick, N., & Grotpeter, J. (1995). Relational Aggression, Gender, and Social-Psychological Adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710–722 . doi:10.2307/1131945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawson, L. (1995). Women and Men, Morality and Ethics. Business Horizons, 38(4), 61–68. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(95)90010-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawson, L. M. (1997). Ethical Differences Between Men and Women in the Sales Profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(11), 1143–1152. doi:10.1023/A:1005721916646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eagly, A., & Steffen, V. (1986). Gender and Aggressive Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Social Psychological Literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 309–330 . doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elm, D. R., Kennedy, E. J., & Lawton, L. (2001). Determinants of Moral Reasoning: Sex Role Orientation, Gender, and Academic Factors. Business & Society, 40(3), 241–265. doi:10.1177/000765030104000302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender Differences in Personality: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429–456 . doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  20. Gilligan, C., & Attanucci, J. (1988). ‹Two Moral Orientations’. In C. Gilligan, J.V. Ward & J.M. Taylors (Eds.), Mapping the Moral Domain (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  21. Graves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1995). ‹The Effect of Sex Similarity on Recruiters’ Evaluations of Actual Applicants: A Test of the Similarity Attraction Paradigm’. Personnel Psychology, 48(1), 85–98. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01747.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoffman, J. (1998). Are Women Really More Ethical Than Men? Maybe It Depends on the Situation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10, 60–73.Google Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY).Google Scholar
  24. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  25. Hopkins, M. M., & Bilimoria, D. (2004). Care and Justice Orientations in Workplace Ethical Dilemmas of Women Business Owners. Group & Organization Management, 29(4), 495–516. doi:10.1177/1059601103257424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hyde, J. (2005). The Gender Similarities Hypothesis. The American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592 . doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnston, D. K.: 1985, Two Moral Orientations – Two Problem-Solving Strategies: Adolescents’ Solutions to Dilemmas in Fables. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
  28. Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(3), 185–204. doi:10.1023/A:1006083612239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mason, E. S., & Mudrack, P. E. (1996). Gender and Ethical Orientation: A Test of Gender and Occupational Socialization Theories. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 599–604. doi:10.1007/BF00411793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCabe, A. C., Ingram, R., & Dato-on, M. C. (2006). The Business of Ethics and Gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 101–116. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-3327-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCuddy, M. K. (2005). Linking Moral Alternatives and Stewardship Options to Personal and Organizational Outcomes: A Proposed Model. Review of Business Research, 5(1), 141–146.Google Scholar
  32. McCuddy, M. K. (2006). The Aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: A Moral Analysis of Human Responses to a Disaster. Proceedings of the American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 1348–1360.Google Scholar
  33. McCuddy, M. K., & Peery, B. L. (1996). ‹Selected Individual Differences and Collegians’ Ethical Beliefs’. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 261–272. doi:10.1007/BF00382952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McDonald, G., & Pak, P. C. (1996). ‹It’s All Fair in Love, War, and Business: Cognitive Philosophies in Ethical Decision Making’. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(9), 973–996. doi:10.1007/BF00705577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McNeilly, K. M., & Russ, F. (2000). Does Relational Demography Matter in a Personal Selling Context? Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 20(2), 279–288.Google Scholar
  36. McNeilly-Choque, M., Hart, C., Robinson, C., Nelson, L., & Olsen, S. (1996). Physical and Relational Aggression on the Playground: Correspondence Among Different Informants. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 11(1), 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Messick, D. M., & Mackie, D. M. (1989). Intergroup Relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45–81 . doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Narver, J., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The Effects of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54, 20–35. doi:10.2307/1251757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parker, M.: 1998, ‹Moral Development’ in R. Chadwick (Ed.-in-Chief), Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Vol. 3 (Academic Press San Diego, CA), pp. 267–273.Google Scholar
  40. Peter, E., & Gallup, R. (1994). The Ethic of Care: A Comparison of Nursing and Medical Students. Image, 26(1), 47–51.Google Scholar
  41. Pinar, M., J. E. Nisolle and M. K. McCuddy: 2007a, ‹Examining the Gender Effect on Recruitment and Earning Potential for Salespeople in a Developing Country: A Study of Tajik Students’ Perceptions’, Perspectives on Business and Management, Vol. 2: Selected Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Business, Management, and Economics, 291–314.Google Scholar
  42. Pinar, M., Nisolle, J. E., & McCuddy, M. K. (2007b). Investigating the Impact of Gender on Managing a Sales Force in a Developing Country: An Exploratory Study in Tajikistan. The Business Review, Cambridge, 8(1), 209–215.Google Scholar
  43. Robin, D., & Babin, L. (1997). Making Sense of the Research on Gender and Ethics in Business: A Critical Analysis and Extension. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(4), 61–90. doi:10.2307/3857209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rothbart, M. K., Hanley, D., & Albert, M. (1986). Gender Differences in Moral Reasoning. Sex Roles, 15, 645–653. doi:10.1007/BF00288220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roxas, M. L., & Stoneback, J. Y. (2004). The Importance of Gender Across Cultures in Ethical Decision-Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(2), 149–165. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000022127.51047.ef.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sims, R. L. (1999). The Development of Six Ethical Business Dilemmas. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 20(4), 189–197. doi:10.1108/01437739910276993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith, J. B. (1998). Buyer-Seller Relationships: Similarity, Relationship Management, and Quality. Psychology and Marketing, 15, 3–21. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199801)15:1<3::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith, P. L., & Oakley, E. F., III. (1997). Gender-Related Differences in Ethical and Social Values of Business Students: Implications for Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(1), 37–45. doi:10.1023/A:1017995530951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  50. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). ‹The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior’. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Nelson-Hall, Chicago, IL), 7–24.Google Scholar
  51. Thoma, S. (1986). Estimating Gender Differences in the Comprehension and Preference of Moral Issues. Developmental Review, 6(22), 165–180. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(86)90010-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Turner, J. C. (1982). Toward a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, 12, 15–40.Google Scholar
  53. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social Categorization and the Self-Concept: A Social-Cognitive Theory of Group Behavior. Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research, 2, 77–121.Google Scholar
  54. Valentine, S. R., & Rittenberg, T. L. (2007). The Ethical Decision Making of Men and Women Executive in International Business Situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(2), 125–134. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9129-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walker, L. J. (1984). Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Critical Review. Child Development, 55, 677–691. doi:10.2307/1130121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walker, L. J. (1986). Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Rejoinder to Baumrind. Child Development, 55, 522–526. doi:10.2307/1130607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walker, L. J., deVries, B., & Trevethan, S. D. (1987). Moral Stages and Moral Orientations in Real Life and Hypothetical Dilemmas. Child Development, 55(3), 842–858. doi:10.2307/1130221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walters, A. E., Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Meyer, L. L. (1998). Gender and Negotiator Competitiveness: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(1), 1–29 . doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wiggins, J. S. (1982). ‹Circumplex Models of Interpersonal Behavior in Clinical Psychology’. In P.C. Kendall & J.N. Butcher (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology. Wiley: New York, NY. 183–221.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael K. McCuddy
    • 1
  • Musa Pinar
    • 1
  • Ibrahim Birkin
    • 1
  • Metin Kozak
    • 1
  1. 1.Valparaiso UniversityValparaisoU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations