Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 83, Issue 3, pp 365–368 | Cite as

Interpreting Structural Equation Modeling Results: A Reply to Martin and Cullen

Article

Abstract

This article briefly review the fundamentals of structural equation modeling for readers unfamiliar with the technique then goes on to offer a review of the Martin and Cullen paper. In summary, a number of fit indices reported by the authors reveal that the data do not fit their theoretical model and thus the conclusion of the authors that the model was “promising” are unwarranted.

Keywords

SEM modeling fit indices ethical climate theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Byrne B. M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concept, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  2. Martin K. D., Cullen J. B. (2006). Continuities and Extensions of Ethical Climate Theory: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Business Ethics 69:175–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Susquehanna UniversitySelinsgroveU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations