Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 83, Issue 2, pp 247–263 | Cite as

Employees and the Operation of Accountability

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

This article examines a social accounting cycle in a Danish savings bank with specific focus on how employees interacted with the cycle. The case study is based on archival material and observations of employee engagement sessions that were a significant part of the cycle. The article exposes the ways in which the cycle can be understood as an initiative that prompts different forms of accountability. The cycle had the potential to bring different forms of accountability together, but the cycle also faced challenges that threatened its relevance from an employee perspective. These challenges might have implications for the way we perceive social accounting and the role of employees.

Keywords

accountability employee voice employees social accounting stakeholder engagement 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Anne Loft, Brendan O'Dwyer, Karin Jonnergård, Kim Klarskov Jeppesen and two anonymous JBE reviewers for their helpful comments. In addition, the author is grateful for Bent Hørby's and Thomas Uhlenfeldt's assistance with the empirical work.

References

  1. Account Ability: 2005, Stakeholder Engagement Standard – Exposure Draft. Institute of Social and Ethical Accountability, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. AccountAbility, UNEP and SRA: 2005, The Stakeholder Engagement Manual, Volume 2 (AccountAbility, United Nations Environment Programme, Stakeholder Research Associates Canada, London)Google Scholar
  3. Adolfsson P., E. Wikström: 2007, After Quantification: Quality Dialogue and Performance. Financial Accountability & Management 23(1), 73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baxter J. A., W. F. Chua: 1998, Doing Field Research: Practice and Meta-Theory in Counterpoint, Journal of Management Accounting Research 10, 69–87Google Scholar
  5. Bebbington J., R. Gray, D. Owen: 1999, Seeing the Wood for the Trees – Taking the Pulse of Social and Environmental Accounting, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 12(1), 47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertelsen B., H. E. Brønserud, L. Leø, K. H. Sørensen: 2004, Selvledelse [Self-management]. Forlaget Ankerhus, HinnerupGoogle Scholar
  7. Buhr N. 2001, Corporate Silence: Environmental Disclosure and the North American Free Trade Agreement, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12(4), 405–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Czarniawska-Joerges, B.: 1992, Doing Interpretive Studies of Organizations, Institute of Economic Research, Lund University, Working Paper SeriesGoogle Scholar
  9. de Colle S., C. Gonella: 2002, The Social and Ethical Alchemy: An Integrative Approach to Social and Ethical Accountability, Business Ethics: A European Review 11(1), 86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dey C.: 2007, Social Accounting at Traidcraft plc: A Struggle for the Meaning of Fair Trade, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 20(3), 423–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dixon R., J. Ritchie, J. Siwale: 2006, Microfinance: Accountability from the Grassroots, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19(3), 405–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foucault M.: 1977, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Allen Lane, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Frow N., D. Marginson, S. Ogden: 2005, Encouraging Strategic Behaviour While Maintaining Management Control: Multi-Functional Project Teams, Budgets, and the Negotiation of Shared Accountabilities in Contemporary Enterprises, Management Accounting Research 16(3), 269–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gond J. P., O. Herrbach: 2006, Social Reporting as an Organisational Learning Tool? A Theoretical Framework, Journal of Business Ethics 65(4), 359–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gray R.: 2001, Thirty Years of Social Accounting, Reporting and Auditing: What (If Anything) Have We Learnt?, Business Ethics: A European Review 10(1), 9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gray R.: 2002, The Social Accounting Project and Accounting, Organizations and Society – Privileging Engagement, Imaginings, New Accountings and Pragmatism, Accounting, Organizations and Society 27(7), 687–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray R., C. Dey, D. L. Owen, R. Evans, S. Zadek: 1997, Struggling with the Praxis of Social Accounting – Stakeholders, Accountability, Audits and Procedures, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10(3), 325–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. GRI: 2006, Sustainability Reporting Guidelines v3. Global Reporting Initiative, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  19. Hines R. D.: 1988, Financial Accounting: In Communicating Reality, We Construct Reality, Accounting, Organizations and Society 13(3), 251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hopwood A.: 1983, On trying to Study Accounting in the Contexts in Which It Operates, Accounting, Organizations and Society 8(2/3), 287–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hummels H.: 1998, Organizing Ethics: A Stakeholder Debate, Journal of Business Ethics 17(13), 1403–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ISEA: 1999, AccountAbility 1000–A Foundation Standard for Quality in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting. Institute of Social and Ethical AccountAbility, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Johansen, T. R.: Forthcoming, ‹“Blaming Oneself”: Examining the Dual Accountability Role of Employees’, Critical Perspectives on AccountingGoogle Scholar
  24. Larrinaga-Gonzalez C., J. Bebbington: 2001, Accounting Change or Institutional Appropriation? – A Case Study of the Implementation of Environmental Accounting, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12(3), 269–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laughlin R.: 1990, A Model of Financial Accountability and the Church of England, Financial Accountability & Management 5(2), 93–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lehman G.: 1999, Disclosing new worlds: A Role for Social and Environmental Accounting and Auditing, Accounting, Organizations and Society 24(3), 217–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis L., J. Unerman: 1999, Ethical Relativism: A Reason for Differences in Corporate Social Reporting?, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 10(4), 521–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Logsdon J. M., P. G. Lewellyn: 2000, Expanding Accountability to Stakeholders: Trends and Predictions, Business and Society Review 105(4), 419–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martinez Lucio M., M. Stuart: 2004, Swimming Against the Tide: Social Partnership, Mutual Gains and the Revival of “Tired” HRM, International Journal of Human Resource Management 15(2), 410–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martinez Lucio M., S. Weston: 2000, European Works Councils and “Flexible Regulation”: The Politics of Intervention, European Journal of Industrial Relations 6(2), 203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. May R. A. B., M. Pattillo-McCoy: 2000, Do You See What I See? Examining a Collaborative Ethnography, Qualitative Inquiry 6(1), 65–87Google Scholar
  32. Mouck, T.: ‹Beyond Corporate Social Responsibility: Stakeholder Politics and Corporate Accountability in a Complex Adaptive World’, Paper Presented at the 2005 Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, April 29–30, 2005, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Neu, D., E. Ocampo and M. Heincke: ‹Social Responsibility “Accounts”: Understanding World Bank Lending Practices’, Paper Presented at the 2005 Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, April 29–30, 2005, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Nørgaard, L.: 1997, ‹Building Dialogue Culture: Woyen Mølle, Norway’, in S. Zadek et al. (eds.), Building Corporate Accountability (Earthscan, London), pp. 157–170Google Scholar
  35. O’Dwyer B.: 2005, The Construction of a Social Account: A Social Account in an Overseas Aid Agency, Accounting, Organizations and Society 30(3), 279–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Osborne T., N. Rose: 1999, Do the Social Sciences Create Phenomena?: The Example of Public Opinion Research, British Journal of Sociology 50(3), 367–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Owen, D. L.: 2003, Recent Developments in European Social and Environmental Reporting and Auditing Practice – A Critical Evaluation and Tentative Prognosis, Nottingham University Business School, ICCSR Research Paper Series, 03–2003Google Scholar
  38. Owen D. L., T. A. Swift, C. Humphrey, M. Bowerman: 2000, The New Social Audits: Accountability, Managerial Capture or the Agenda of Social Champions? The European Accounting Review 9(1), 81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Owen D. L., T. A. Swift, K. Hunt: 2001, Questioning the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting, Accounting Forum 25(3), 264–282Google Scholar
  40. Parker L.: 2006, Social and Environmental Accountability Research: A View from the Commentary Box, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 18(6), 842–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. PLEON: 2005, Accounting for Good: The Global Stakeholder Report 2005 (Pleon Kohtes Klewes GmbH/Pleon b.v., Bonn/Amsterdam)Google Scholar
  42. Power M.: 2005, The Invention of Operational Risk, Review of International Political Economy 12(4), 577–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Power M., R. Laughlin D. Cooper: 2003, Accounting and Critical Theory. In: M. Alvesson, H. Willmott (Eds.), Studying Management Critically. Sage, London, pp. 132–156Google Scholar
  44. Pruzan, P.: 1997, ‹The Ethical Dimensions of Banking: Sbn Bank, Denmark’, in S. Zadek et al. (eds.), Building␣Corporate Accountability (Earthscan, London), pp. 63–83Google Scholar
  45. Rasche A., D. E. Esser: 2006, From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability, Journal of Business Ethics 65(3), 251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roberts J.: 1991, The Possibilities of Accountability, Accounting, Organizations and Society 16(4), 355–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roberts, J.: 1996, ‹From Discipline to Dialogue: Individualizing and Socializing Forms of Accountability’, in R. Munro and J. Mouritsen (eds.), Accountability – Power, Ethos & The Technologies of Managing (International Thomson Business Press, London)Google Scholar
  48. Roberts J.: 2001, Trust and Control in Anglo-American systems of corporate governance: The individualizing and socializing effects of processes of accountability, Human Relations 54(12), 1547–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roberts J.: 2003, The Manufacture of Corporate Social Responsibility: Constructing Corporate Sensibility, Organization 10(2), 249–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roberts J., R. Scapens: 1985, Accounting Systems and Systems of Accountability – Understanding Accounting Practices in their Organisational Contexts, Accounting, Organizations and Society 10(4), 443–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Skovsgaard, C. -J. and T. Christensen: 1997, ‹Co- Ordinating Expectations: Municipality of Aarhus, Denmark’, in S. Zadek et al. (eds.), Building Corporate Accountability (Earthscan, London), pp. 143–156Google Scholar
  52. SRA, UNEP, and AccountAbility: 2005, The Stakeholder Engagement Manual, Volume 1 (Stakeholder Research Associates Canada, United Nations Environment Programme, AccountAbility, Cobourg, Ontario)Google Scholar
  53. Stake R. E.: 2000, Case Studies, In: N. K. Denzin, Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 435–454Google Scholar
  54. Thomson I., J. Bebbington: 2005, Social and Environmental Reporting in the UK: A Pedagogic Evaluation, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16(5), 507–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Townley B.: 1996, Accounting in Detail: Accounting for Individual Performance, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 7(5), 565–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Unerman J., M. Bennett: 2004, Increased Stakeholder Dialogue and the Internet: Towards Greater Corporate Accountability or Reinforcing Capitalist Hegemony, Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(7), 685–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Valor C.: 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship: Towards Corporate Accountability, Business and Society Review 110(2), 191–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Willmott H.: 1996, Thinking Accountability: Accounting for the Disciplined Production of Self, In: R. Munro, J. Mouritsen (Eds.), Accountability – Power, Ethos & Technologies of Managing International Thomson Business Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Zadek S.: 1998, Balancing Performance, Ethics, and Accountability, Journal of Business Ethics 17(13), 1421–1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zadek S., Pruzan P., Evans R.: 1997, Building Corporate Accountability. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Accounting and Auditing Copenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations