Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 82, Issue 3, pp 755–773 | Cite as

Opportunities and Problems of Standardized Ethics Initiatives – a Stakeholder Theory Perspective

Article

Abstract

This article explains problems and opportunities created by standardized ethics initiatives (e.g., the UN Global Compact, the Global Reporting Initiative, and SA 8000) from the perspective of stakeholder theory. First, we outline differences and commonalities among currently existing initiatives and thus generate a common ground for our discussion. Second, based on these remarks, we critically evaluate standardized ethics initiatives by drawing on descriptive, instrumental, and normative stakeholder theory. In doing so, we explain why these standards are helpful tools when it comes to ‘managing’ stakeholder relations but also face considerable limitations that can eventually hamper their successful expansion. We suspect that this discussion is necessary to conduct meaningful empirical research in the future and also to provide managers with a more clear-cut picture about a successful application of such initiatives. Third, we outline possible ways to cope with the identified problems and thus demonstrate how standard-setting institutions can improve the initiatives they offer.

Keywords

accountability standards compliance corporate accountability social audits stakeholder theory stakeholder dialog ethical supply chains 

Abbreviations

FLA

Fair Labor Association

GRI

Global Reporting Initiative

ISEA

Institute for Social and Ethical Accountability

MNC

Multinational Corporation

NGO

Non-Governmental Organization

SA 8000

Social Accountability 8000

SAI

Social Accountability International

UN

United Nations

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andriof J., Waddock S., Husted B., R. S. Sutherland 2003, Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 2 – Relationships, Communication, Reporting and Performance. Sheffield: GreenleafGoogle Scholar
  2. Agle B. R., Mitchell R. K., J. A. Sonnenfeld 1999, Who Matters to CEOs – An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 507–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barney J. B. 2002, Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck M., P. Walgenbach 2005, Technical Efficiency of Adaptation to Institutional Expectations? – The Adoption of ISO 9000 Standards in the German Mechanical Engineering Industry, Organization Studies 26(6), 841–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belal A. R. 2002, Stakeholder Accountability or Stakeholder Management: A Review of UK Firms’ Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing, and Reporting (SEAAR) Practices, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9(1), 8–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berman S., Wicks A. C., Kotha S., T. M. Jones 1999, Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? – The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance, Academy of Management Journal 42(5), 488–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beschorner T. 2006, Ethical Theory and Business Practices – The Case of Discourse Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics 66(1), 127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bird F. B. 1996, The Muted Conscience – Moral Silence and the Practice of Ethics in Business. Quorum: WestportGoogle Scholar
  9. Bird F. B. 2003. The Value-Added Approach to Business Ethics, Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 4(2), 148–166Google Scholar
  10. Boatright J. R. 2000, Globalization and the Ethics of Business, Business Ethics Quarterly 10(1), 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunsson N. 1989, The Organization of Hypocrisy – Talk, Decision, and Actions in Organizations. Chichester: John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
  12. Brunsson N., B. Jacobsson 2000, The Contemporary Expansion of Standardization, in N. Brunsson, B. Jacobsson (eds.), A World of Standards Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 1–17Google Scholar
  13. Carlson P., M. S. Blodgett 1997, International Ethics Standards for Business – NAFTA, Caux Principles and Corporate Codes of Ethics, Review of Business 18(3), 20–24Google Scholar
  14. Carroll A. B. 1989, Business and Society – Ethics and Stakeholder Management. Cincinnati/OH: South-WesternGoogle Scholar
  15. Cavanagh G. F. 2004, Global Business Ethics – Regulation, Code, or Self-Restraint, Business Ethics Quarterly 14(4), 625–642Google Scholar
  16. Clarkson M. B. 1991, Defining, Evaluating, and Monitoring Corporate Social Performance – A Stakeholder Management Model, In J. E. Post (ed.) Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy. Greenwich: JAI Press, 331–358Google Scholar
  17. Clarkson M. B. 1995, A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 92–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crane A., S. Livesey 2003, Are You Talking to Me? – Stakeholder Communication and the Risks and Rewards of Dialogue, In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted, R. Sutherland (eds.) Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking 2 – Relationships, Communication, Reporting and Performance. Greenleaf: Sheffield, 39–52Google Scholar
  19. Crane A., D. Matten 2004, Business Ethics – A European Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. DeRuisseau D. 2002, Social Auditing – An Auditor’s Perspective, In A. G. Scherer, K.-H. Blickle, D. Dietzfelbinger, G. Hütter (eds.) Globalisierung und Sozialstandards Hampp: München/Mering, 223–234Google Scholar
  21. Donaldson T., T. W. Dunfee 1994, Toward a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory, Academy of Management Review 19(2), 252–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Donaldson T., L. E. Preston 1995, The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation – Concepts, Evidence, and Implications, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Evan W. M., R. E. Freeman 1988, A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation – Kantian Capitalism, In T. Beauchamp, N. Bowie (eds.) Ethical Theory and Business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 75–93Google Scholar
  24. Fair Labor Association (FLA): 2006a, Workplace Code of Conduct. http://www.fairlabor.org, Accessed: 12th June 2006
  25. Fair Labor Association (FLA): 2006b, Principles of Monitoring. http://www.fairlabor.org/all/code/FLA_PRINCIPLES_ OF_MONITORING.pdf, Accessed: 24th August 2006
  26. Freeman R. E. 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: PitmanGoogle Scholar
  27. Freeman R. E., W. M. Evan 1990, Corporate Governance – A Stakeholder Interpretation, The Journal of Behavioral Economics 19(4), 337–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Freeman R. E., D. L. Reed 1983, Stockholders and Stakeholders – A New Perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review 25(3), 88–106Google Scholar
  29. Friedman A. L., S. Miles 2002, Developing Stakeholder Theory, Journal of Management Studies 39(1), 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Friedman A. L., S. Miles 2004, Stakeholder Theory and Communication Practice, Journal of Communication Management 9(1), 89–97Google Scholar
  31. Frost R. 2005, ISO 26000 Launched, Business and the Environment 16(5), 12–13Google Scholar
  32. Fung A. 2003, Deliberative Democracy and International Labor Standards, Governance – An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 16(1), 51–71Google Scholar
  33. Gibson K. 2001, The Moral Basis of Stakeholder Theory, Journal of Business Ethics 26(3), 245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gilbert D. U. 2001, Social Accountability 8000 – Ein praktikabeles Instrument zur Implementierung von Unternehmensethik in international tätigen Unternehmen? Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 2(2), 123–148Google Scholar
  35. Gilbert D. U. 2003, Institutionalisierung von Unternehmensethik in internationalen Unternehmen – ein Ansatz zur Erweiterung der Zertifizierungsinitiative Social Accountability 8000, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 73(1), 25–48Google Scholar
  36. Gilbert, D. U. and A. Rasche: 2007, ‘Discourse Ethics and Social Accountability – The Ethics of SA 8000’, Business Ethics Quarterly 17(2), 187–216Google Scholar
  37. Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): 2002, Sustainability Reporting Guidelines on Economic, Environmental, and Social Performance. Boston: GRIGoogle Scholar
  38. Goodell E. 1999, Standards of Corporate Social Responsibility. San Francisco: Social Venture NetworkGoogle Scholar
  39. Goyder M., P. Desmond 2000, Is Ethical Sourcing Simply a Question of Good-Supply Chain Management? in Thamotheram, R. (eds.) Visions of Ethical Sourcing. London: Financial Times Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  40. Gray R. 2001, Thirty Years of Social Accounting, Reporting and Auditing: What (if anything) Have we Learnt? Business Ethics: A European Review 10(1), 9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gray R. 2002. The Social Accounting Project and Accounting Organizations and Society Privileging Engagement, Imaginings, New Accountings and Pragmatism over Critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society 27(7), 687–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Göbbels M., J. Jonker 2003, AA1000 and SA8000 Compared: A Systematic Comparison of Contemporary Accountability Standards, Managerial Auditing Journal 18(1), 54–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Habermas J. 1990, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge/MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  44. Habermas J. 1993, Justification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge/MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  45. Habermas J. 1996, Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge/MA: Blackwell PublishingGoogle Scholar
  46. Habermas J. 1999, The Inclusion of the Other – Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge/MA: Blackwell PublishingGoogle Scholar
  47. Habermas J. 2006, The Divided West. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  48. Hanock S. 1998, Fair’s Fare. Supply Management 3(22), 22–25Google Scholar
  49. Hess D. 1999, Social Reporting – A Reflexive Law Approach to Corporate Social Responsiveness, The Journal of Corporation Law 25(4), 42–84Google Scholar
  50. Hess D. 2001, Regulating Corporate Social Performance – A New Look at Social Accounting, Auditing, and Reporting, Business Ethics Quarterly 11(2), 307–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hill C. W. L., T. M. Jones 1992, Stakeholder-Agency Theory, Journal of Management Studies 29(2), 131–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hillman A. J., G. D. Keim 2001, Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues – What’s the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal 22(2), 125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hirschland, M. and L. Kantor: 2006, Supply Chain Compliance – A Decade of Experience and the Road Ahead, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  54. Institute for Social, Ethical AccountAbility: 1999, AA 1000 Framework – Standards, Guidelines and Professional Qualifications. London: ISEAGoogle Scholar
  55. Jones T. M., A. C. Wicks 1999, Convergent Stakeholder Theory, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 206–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kaler J. 2002, Morality and Strategy in Stakeholder Identification, Journal of Business Ethics 39(1–2), 91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kaler J. 2003, Differentiating Stakeholder Theories, Journal of Business Ethics 46(1), 71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kant, I.: 1788/1997, Critique of Practical Reason (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)Google Scholar
  59. Kaptein M. 2004, Business Codes of Multinational Firms – What Do They Say, Journal of Business Ethics 50(1), 13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kaptein M., R. van Tulder 2003, Toward Effective Stakeholder Dialogue, Business and Society Review 108(2), 203–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Keeley M. 1988, A Social Contract Theory of Organizations. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
  62. Kell G. 2005, The Global Compact – Selected Experiences and Reflections. Journal of Business Ethics 59(1/2), 69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kell G., D. Levin 2003, The Global Compact Network – an Historic Experiment in Learning and Action, Business and Society Review 108(2), 151–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. KPMG: 2002, International Survey of Corporate Sustainability Reporting 2002 (Druckgroep Maasland, Maasland)Google Scholar
  65. Kolk A., R. van Tulder 2004, Ethics in International Business: Multinational Approaches to Child Labor, Journal of World Business 39(1), 49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Leipziger D. 2001, SA 8000. The Definitive Guide to the New Social Standard. London et al.: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  67. Leipziger D. 2003, The Corporate Responsibility Code Book. Sheffield: GreenleafGoogle Scholar
  68. Locke, J.: 1690/1948, The Second Treatise of Civil Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)Google Scholar
  69. Lozano J. F. 2001, Proposal for a Model for the Elaboration of Ethical Codes Based on Discourse Ethics, Business Ethics: A European Review 10(2), 157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mamic I. 2005, Managing Global Supply Chain: The Sports Footwear, Apparel and Retail Sectors, Journal of Business Ethics 59(1), 81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mathews M. R. 1997, Twenty-Five Years of Social and Environmental Accounting Research: Is There a Silver Jubilee to Celebrate?, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 10(4), 481–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McIntosh M., Thomas R., Leipziger D., G. Coleman 2003, Living Corporate Citizenship – Strategic Routes to Socially Responsible Business. London et al.: FT Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  73. Mitchell R. K., Agle B. R., D. J. Wood 1997, Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts, Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nonet P, P. Selznick 1978, Law and Society in Transition – Toward Responsive Law. New York: HarperGoogle Scholar
  75. O’Dwyer B., G. Madden 2006, A Survey of Code Content and Enforcement Procedures, Journal of Business Ethics 63(3), 217–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ortmann G., H. Salzman 2002, Stumbling Giants –The Emptiness, Fullness, and Recursiveness of Strategic Management, Soziale Systeme 8(2), 205–230Google Scholar
  77. Orts E. W. 1995, Reflexive Environmental Law, Northwestern University Law Review 89(4), 1227–1340Google Scholar
  78. Owen D. L., Swift T. A., Humphrey C., M. Bowerman 2000, The New Social Audits – Accountability, Managerial Capture or the Agenda of Social Champions, European Accounting Review 9(1), 81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Owen, D. L., T. A. Swift and K. Hunt: 2001, ‘Questioning the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing and Reporting’, Accounting Forum 25(3), 264–282Google Scholar
  80. Pajunen K. 2006, Stakeholder Influences in Organizational Survival, Journal of Management Studies 43(6), 1261–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Penrose E. 1995, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford/New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  82. Phillips R. 2003, Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. Berrett-Koehler: San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  83. Phillips R., Freeman E. R., A. C. Wicks 2003, What Stakeholder Theory is Not, Business Ethics Quarterly 13(4), 479–502Google Scholar
  84. Pitelis C. N., M. W. Wahl 1998, Edith Penrose – Pioneer of Stakeholder Theory, Long Range Planning 31(2), 252–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Power M., R. Laughlin 1996, Habermas, Law and Accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society 21(5), 441–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Preston A. M., Cooper D. J., Scarbrough D. P., R. C. Chilton 1995, Changes in the Code of Ethics of the U.S. Accounting Profession, 1917 and 1988 – The Continual Quest for Legitimation, Accounting, Organizations and Society 20(6), 507–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rawls J. 1971, A Theory of Justice. Cambridge/MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  88. Rasche A., D. E. Esser 2006, From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability – Applying Habermasian Discourse Ethics to Accountability Research, Journal of Business Ethics 65(3), 251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rasche, A. et al.: 2007, ‘Corporations as Political Actors: A Report on the First Swiss Master Class in Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics, ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  90. Reed D. 1999, Stakeholder Management Theory – A Critical Theory Perspective, Business Ethics Quarterly 9(3), 453–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rohitratana K. 2002, SA 8000 – a Tool to Improve Quality of Life, Managerial Auditing Journal 17(1/2), 60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ruigrok W, H. Wagner 2003, Internationalization and Performance: an Organizational Learning Perspective, Management International Review 43(1), 63–83Google Scholar
  93. Sandberg K. 2006, Groundwork Laid for ISO 26000, Business and the Environment 17(1), 14Google Scholar
  94. Savage G. T., Nix T. W., Whitehead C. J., J. D. Blair 1991, Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders, Academy of Management Executive 5(2), 61–75Google Scholar
  95. Scherer, A. G. and G. Palazzo: 2007, ‘Towards a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 32(4), 1096–1120Google Scholar
  96. Schnebel E. 2000, Values in Decision-making Processes. Systematic Structures of J. Habermas and N. Luhmann for the Appreciation of Responsibility in Leadership, Journal of Business Ethics 27(1), 79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sethi S. P. 1999, Codes of Conduct for Multinational Corporations – An Idea Whose Time Has Come, Business and Society Review 104(3), 225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sethi, S. P.: 2003, “Global Compact is Another Exercise in Futility”, The Financial Express, 8th September 2003, 1Google Scholar
  99. Sethi S. P., O. F. Williams 2000, Creating and Implementing Global Codes of Conduct – an Assessment of the Sullivan Principles as a Role Model for Developing International Codes of Conduct: Lessens Learned and Unlearned, Business and Society Review 105(2), 169–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sharplin A., L. D. Phelps 1989, A Stakeholder Apologetic for Management, Business and Professional Ethics Journal 8(2), 41–53Google Scholar
  101. Smith D. 2002, Demonstrating Corporate Values – Which Standard for your Company? London: Institute of Business EthicsGoogle Scholar
  102. Social Accountability International: 2001, SA 8000 Guidance Document. New York: SAIGoogle Scholar
  103. Social Accountability International: 2005, About Social Accountability 8000. http://www.sa-intl.org/AboutSAI/AboutSAI.htm, Accessed: 20th December 2005
  104. Solomon R. C., L. Lewis 2002, Incentives and Disincentives for Corporate Environmental Disclosure, Business Strategy and the Environment 11(3), 154–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Stoney C., D. Winstanley 2001, Stakeholding – Confusion or Utopia? Mapping the Conceptual Terrain, Journal of Management Studies 38(5), 603–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Suchman M. 1995, Managing Legitimacy – Strategic and Institutional Approaches, Academy of Management Review 20(3), 571–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tamm-Hallström K. 2000, Organizing the Process of Standardization, in N. Brunsson, B. Jacobsson (eds.) A World of Standards. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 85–99Google Scholar
  108. Tamm-Hallström, K.: 2006, ISO Expands Its Business Into Social Responsibility (SR), Paper Presented at the Annual Colloquium of the European Group for Organization Studies (EGOS), Bergen/NorwayGoogle Scholar
  109. Teubner G. 1983, Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law, Law and Society Review 17(2), 239–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Teubner G. 1984, Autopoiesis in Law and Society – A Rejoinder to Blankenburg, Law and Society Review 18(2), 291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Thaler-Carter R. 1999, Social Accountability 8000, HR Magazine 44(6), 106–112Google Scholar
  112. Thomas T., Schermerhorn J. R., J. W. Dienhart 2004, Strategic Leadership of Ethical Behavior in Business, Academy of Management Executive 18(2), 56–66Google Scholar
  113. Thérien J.-P., V. Pouliot 2006, The Global Compact – Shifting the Politics of International Development, Global Governance 12(1), 55–75Google Scholar
  114. Tulder R. v., A. Kolk 2001, Multinationality and Corporate Ethics: Codes of Conduct in the Sporting Goods Industry, Journal of International Business Studies 32(2), 267–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Ulrich, P.: 1998, Integrative Economic Ethics – Towards a Conception of Socio-Economic Rationality. Working Paper No. 82 (University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland)Google Scholar
  116. Unerman J., M. Bennett 2004, Increased Stakeholder Dialogue and the Internet – Towards Greater Corporate Accountability or Reinforcing Capitalist Hegemony, Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(7), 685–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. United Nations: 2006, The Global Compact, http://www.unglobalcompact.org, Accessed: 7th September 2006
  118. Velasquez M. 2000, Globalization and the Failure of Ethics, Business Ethics Quarterly 10(1), 343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Waddock S. 2004, Creating Corporate Accountability – Foundational Principles to Make Corporate Citizenship Real, Journal of Business Ethics 50(4), 313–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Waddock S., N. Smith 2000, Corporate Responsibility Audits – Doing Well by Doing Good, Sloan Management Review 41(2), 75–83Google Scholar
  121. Ward, A.: 2000, ‘Companies Come Under Pressure to Alter course of Ethical Investment’, Financial Times, 8th July, 35Google Scholar
  122. Williams O. F. 2004, The UN Global Compact – The Challenge and the Promise, Business Ethics Quarterly 14(4), 755–774Google Scholar
  123. Zadek S. 2004, The Path to Corporate Responsibility, Harvard Business Review 82(12), 125–132Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EconomicsUniversity of Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Organization and LogisticsHelmut-Schmidt-University HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations