Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 82, Issue 3, pp 527–537

Corporate Values, Codes of Ethics, and Firm Performance: A Look at the Canadian Context

Article

Abstract

In this empirical study, we present two new models that are corporate ethics based. The first model numerically quantifies the corporate value index (CV-Index) based on a set of predefined parameters and the second model estimates the market-to-book values of equity in relation to the CV-Index as well as other parameters. These models were applied to Canadian companies listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX). Through our analysis, we found statistically significant evidence that corporate values (CV-Index) positively correlated with firm performance. The results are even more significant for firms with low market-to-book values. Our empirical findings suggest that corporate ethics is vital for management, employees, shareholders, stakeholders, and the community at large. In addition, we have tested and confirmed five hypotheses that are used to illustrate corporate ethics behavior and performance.

Keywords

codes of ethics corporate values ethical values firm performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banz R.: 1981, The Relationship Between Return and Market Value of Common Stock. Journal of Financial Economics 9, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boatright J. 2000, Ethics and the Conduct of Business. Prentice Hall, NJ.Google Scholar
  3. Caracsco E. F., J. B. Singh: 2003, The Content and Focus of the Codes of Ethics of the World’s Largest Transnational Corporations, Business and Society Review 108(1), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coughlan R.: 2005, Codes, Values and Justifications in the Ethical Decision-Making Process, Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cummings L.: 2000, The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Trusts: An Australian Perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dentchev N. A.: 2004, Corporate Social Performance as a Business Strategy, Journal of Business Ethics 55, 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, The New York Times, reprinted in D. Poff (ed.), Business Ethics in Canada, 4th Edition (Pearson/Prentice Hall, Toronto, Ont.).Google Scholar
  8. Grossman S. J., O. D. Hart: 1980, Takeover Bids, the Free-rider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation, Bell Journal of Economics 11, 42–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jensen M. C.: 1986, Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers, American Economic Review 76, 323–329.Google Scholar
  10. Kaptein M.: 2004, Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What Do They Say?, Journal of Business Ethics 50, 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaptein, M. and J. Wempe: 2002, The Balanced Company (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Langlois C. C., B. B. Schlegelmilch: 1990, Do Corporate Codes of Ethics Reflect National Character? Evidence from Europe and the United States, Journal of International Business Studies, 21, 519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lere J., B. Gaumnitz: 2003, The Impact of Codes of Ethics on Decision Making: Some Insights from Information Economics, The Journal of Business Ethics 48, 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lefebvre M., J. Singh: 1992, The Content and Focus of Canadian Corporate Codes of Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 799–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Loe T., L. Ferrell, P. Mansfield.: 2000, A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business, Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McConnell J., H. Servaes: 1990, Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value, Journal of Financial Economics 27, 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morck R., A. Shleifer, R. Vishny: 1988, Management Ownership and Market Valuation, Journal of Financial Economics 20, 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Myers S. C.: 1977, Determinants of Corporate Borrowing, Journal of Financial Economics 5, 147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pava M., J. Krausz: 1996, The Association Between Corporate Social-Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost, Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 321–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schwartz M. S.: 2005, Universal Moral Values for Corporate Codes of Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics 59, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shleifer A., R. W. Vishny: 1986, Large Shareholders and Corporate Control, Journal of Political Economy 94, 461–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh, J.: 2006, A Comparison of the Contents of the Codes of Ethics of Canada’s Largest Corporations in 1992 and 2003, Journal of Business Ethics 64(1), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stulz, R. M.: 1988, Managerial control of voting rights, Journal of Financial Economics 20, 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Weaver G. R., L. K. Trevino, P. L. Cochran: 1999, Corporate Ethics Practices in the Mid 1990’s: An Empirical Study of the Fortune 1000, Journal of Business Ethics 18(3), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wood, G.: 2000, A Cross Cultural Comparison of the Content of Codes of Ethics: USA, Canada and Australia, Journal of Business Ethics 25, 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada
  2. 2.Political ScienceUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada
  3. 3.Computer ScienceUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada

Personalised recommendations