Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 82, Issue 1, pp 213–231 | Cite as

A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Fresh Perspective into Theory and Practice

Article

Abstract

Stakeholder theory has gained currency in the business and society literature in recent years in light of its practicality from the perspective of managers and scholars. In accounting for the recent ascendancy of stakeholder theory, this article presents an overview of two traditional conceptualizations of corporate social responsibility (CSR) (Carroll: 1979, ‘A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance’, The Academy of Management Review 4(4), 497–505 and Wood: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, The Academy of Management Review 16(4), 691–717), highlighting their predominant inclination toward providing static taxonomic CSR descriptions. The article then makes the case for a stakeholder approach to CSR, reviewing its rationale and outlining how it has been integrated into recent empirical studies. In light of this review, the article adopts a stakeholder framework – the Ethical Performance Scorecard (EPS) proposed by Spiller (2000, ‘Ethical Business and Investment: A Model For Business and Society’, Journal of Business Ethics 27, 149–160) – to examine the CSR approach of a sample of Lebanese and Syrian firms with an interest in CSR and test relevant hypotheses derived from the CSR/stakeholder literature. The findings are analyzed and implications drawn regarding the usefulness of a stakeholder approach to CSR.

Keywords

corporate social responsibility (CSR) stakeholder theory Lebanese and Syrian context 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abreu R., David F., Crowther D. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility in Portugal Empirical Evidence of Corporate Behavior. Corporate Governance 5(5):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aupperle, E., A. Carroll and Hatfield: 1983, ‘Instrument Development and Application in Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of management Proceedings (August) 369–373.Google Scholar
  3. Brammer S., Millington A. (2003). The Effect of Stakeholder Preferences, Organizational Structure and Industry Type on Corporate Community Involvement. Journal of Business Ethics 45:213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brenner, S. and P. Cochran: 1991, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: Implications for Business and Society Theory and Research’, IABS Proceedings 449–467.Google Scholar
  5. Brickson S. (2007). Organizational Identity Orientation: The Genesis of the Role of the Firm and Distinct Forms of Social Value. Academy of Management Review 32(3):864–888Google Scholar
  6. Carroll A. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review 4(4):497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll A. (1991). The Pyramid Of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons 34:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll A. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility. Business and Society 38(3):268–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll A., Buchholtz A. (2003). Business and Society, Ethics and Stakeholders Management, 5th Edition. Thomson, Mason (Ohio)Google Scholar
  10. Clarkson M. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review 20(1):92–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davenport K. (2000). Corporate Citizenship: A Stakeholder Approach for Defining Corporate Social Performance and Identifying Measures for Assessing It. Business & Society 20(2):210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis K. (1960). Can Business Afford to Ignore Corporate Social Responsibilities?. California Management Review 2:70–76Google Scholar
  13. DeFillipi, R. J.: 1982, ‘Conceptual Framework and Strategies for Corporate Social Involvement Research’, in Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (JAI Press, Connecticut).Google Scholar
  14. De Madariaga G., Valor C. (2007). Stakeholders Management Systems: Empirical Insights from Relationship Marketing and Market Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 71:425–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doh J., Guay T. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility, Public Policy and NGO Activism in Europe and the US: An Institutional Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Management Studies 43:47–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donaldson T. (1982). Corporations and Morality. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, NJGoogle Scholar
  17. Donaldson T., Dunfee T. (1994). Towards a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory. Academy of Management Review 19:252–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foster D., Jonker J. (2005). Stakeholder Relationships: The Dialogue of Engagement. Corporate Governance 5(5):51–57Google Scholar
  19. Frankental P. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility- A PR Invention. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 6(1):18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frederick W. C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2. Business and Society 33(2):150–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publishing, Boston.Google Scholar
  22. Freeman E., Reed L. (1983). Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review 15(3):88–106Google Scholar
  23. Freeman E., Philips R. (2002). Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense. Business Ethics Quarterly 12(3):331–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Friedman M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  25. Galbreath J. (2006). Does Primary Stakeholder Management Positively Affect the Bottom Line?. Management Decision 44(9):1106–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garriga E., Mele D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics 53:51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hawkins D. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Balancing Tomorrow’s Sustainability And Today’s Profitability. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Hemphill T. (2004). Corporate Citizenship: The Case for a New Corporate Governance Model. Business and Society Review 109(3):339–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jamali D., Mirshak R. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: Theory and Practice in A Developing Country Context. Journal of Business Ethics 72: 243–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones M. (1983). An Integrating Framework for Research in Business and Society: A Step Toward the Elusive Paradigm. Academy of Management Review 8:559–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jonker J., Foster D. (2002). Stakeholder Excellence: Framing the Evolution and Complexity of a Stakeholder Perspective of the Firm. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kakabase N., Rozuel C., Lee-Davies L. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Approach: A Conceptual Review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1(4):277–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knox S., Maklan S., French P. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring Stakeholder Relationships and Program Reporting Across Leading FTSE Companies. Journal of Business Ethics 61:7–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee, L.: 1987, ‘Social Responsibility and Economic Performance: An Empirical Examination of Corporate Profiles’, Un-published PhD Dissertation, US International University, San Diego.Google Scholar
  35. Longo M., Mura M., Bonoli A. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Performance: The Case of Italian SMEs. Corporate Governance 5(4):28–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maignan I., Ferrell O., Ferrell L. (2005). A Stakeholder Model for Implementing Social Responsibility in Marketing. European Journal of Marketing 29(9/10):956–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Margolis J., Walsh J. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Revisiting Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48:268–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Matten D., Crane A., Chapple W. (2003). Behind the Mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate Citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics 45:109–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meehan J., Meehan K., Richards A. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: The 3C-SR Model. International Journal of Social Economics 33(5/6):386–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mitchell K., Agle R., Wood D. (1997). Towards a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4):853–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neville, B., S. Bell and G. Whitwell: 2004, ‘Stakeholder Salience Revisited: Toward An Actionable Tool for The Management of Stakeholders’, The Academy of Management Conference, 2004, Best Paper Proceedings (New Orleans).Google Scholar
  42. Norman W., MacDonald C. (2004). Getting to the Bottom of Triple Bottom Line. Business Ethics Quarterly 14(2):243–262Google Scholar
  43. Novak M. (1996). Business a Calling: Work and the Examined Life. The Free Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  44. Oliver C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review 16(1): 145–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Papasolomou-Doukakis I., Krambia-Kapardis M., Katsioloudes M. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Way Forward? Maybe Not!. European Business Review 17(3):263–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Phillips R., Freeman E., Wicks C. (2003). What Stakeholder Theory Is Not. Business Ethics Quarterly 13(4):479–502Google Scholar
  47. Post J. (1978). Corporate Behavior and Change. Reston Publishing Company, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  48. Post E., Preston E., Sachs S. (2002). Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View. California Management Review 45(1):6–28Google Scholar
  49. Pratima B. (2002). The Corporate Challenges of Sustainable Development. Academy of Management Executive 16(2):122–132Google Scholar
  50. Preston L., Post J. (1975). Private Management and Public Policy. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  51. Shepard J., Betz M., O’Connell L. (1997). The Proactive Corporation: Its Nature and Causes. Journal of Business Ethics 16:1001–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simmons J. (2004). Managing in the Post-Managerialist Era: Towards Socially Responsible Corporate Governance. Management Decision 32(3/4): 601–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Snider J., Hill R., Martin D. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A View from the World’s Most Successful Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 48:175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Solomon R. C. (1994). The New World of Business: Ethics and Free Enterprise in the Global Nineties. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., USAGoogle Scholar
  55. Spiller R. (2000). Ethical Business and Investment: A Model for Business and Society. Journal of Business Ethics 27:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Uhlaner L., van Goor-Balk A., Masurel E. (2004). Family Business and Corporate Social Responsibility in a Sample of Dutch Firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11(2):186–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vos J., Achterkamp M. (2006). Stakeholder Identification in Innovation Projects: Going Beyond Classification. European Journal of Innovation Management 9(2):161–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Votaw, D.: 1973, ‘Genius Becomes Rare’, in D. Votaw and S. Sethi (eds.), The Corporate Dilemma: Traditional Values Vs. Contemporary Problems (Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  59. Waddock S. (2004). Parallel Universes: Companies, Academics and the Progress of Corporate Citizenship. Business and Society Review 109(1):5–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wallace S. (2003). Value Maximization and Stakeholder Theory: Compatible or Not? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 15(3):120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Windsor D. (2001). The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 9(3):225–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wood D. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. The Academy of Management Review 16(4):691–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Olayan School of Business - ManagementAmerican University of BeirutBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations