Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 82, Issue 1, pp 119–130 | Cite as

Galvanising Shareholder Activism: A Prerequisite for Effective Corporate Governance and Accountability in Nigeria

  • Olufemi Amao
  • Kenneth AmaeshiEmail author


Shareholder activism has been largely neglected in the few available studies on corporate governance in sub Saharan Africa. Following the recent challenges posed by the Cadbury Nigeria Plc, this paper examines shareholder activism in an evolving corporate governance institutional context and identifies strategic opportunities associated with shareholders’ empowerment through changes in code of corporate governance and recent developments in information and communications technologies in Nigeria; especially in relation to corporate social responsibility in Nigeria. It is expected that the paper would contribute to the scarce literature on corporate governance and accountability in Africa.


business law corporate governance corporate accountability Nigeria shareholder empowerment and activism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aguilera R. V., A. Cuervo-Cazurra: (2004) Codes of Good Governance Worldwide: What is the Trigger? Organization Studies 25: 415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilera R. V., G. Jackson: (2003) The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants. Academy of Management Review 28(3): 447–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahunwan B.: (2002) Corporate Governance in Nigeria. Journal of Business Ethics 37:269–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amaeshi K. M., B. C. Adi, C. Ogbechie, O. O. Amao: (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in Nigeria: Western Mimicry or Indigenous Influences?. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 24:83–99 (Winter)Google Scholar
  5. Berle A. A., C. G. Means: (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Commerce Clearing HouseGoogle Scholar
  6. Ephraim-Oluwanuga, S.: 2007, ‹Role of Shareholders in Implementing the Code of Corporate Governance’, available at
  7. Etukudo, A.: 2000, ‹Issues in Privatization and Restructuring in Sub-Saharan Africa—Interdepartmental Action Programme on Privatization, Restructuring and Economic Democracy Working Paper IPPRED–5’, available at
  8. European Commission ‹Fostering an Appropriate Regime for Shareholders’ Rights: Second Consultation by the Services of the Internal Market Directorate General’, MARKT/13.05.2005Google Scholar
  9. Fannon L. I.: (2003) Working within Two Kinds of Capitalism: Corporate Governance and Employee Stakeholding: US and EU Perspectives. Oxford-Portland: Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
  10. Gabriel, O. (2006) ‹Bunmi Oni Caught in Financial Numbers Game, How Many more are Out there (1),’ Vanguard Newspapers, December 18, 2006Google Scholar
  11. Guobadia, A.: 2000, ‹Protecting Minority and Public Interests in Nigeria Company Law: The Corporate Affairs Commission as a Corporations Ombudsman’, in F. McMillan (ed.), International Company Law Annual Vol. 1 (Hart Publishing, Oxford-Portland)Google Scholar
  12. Kearins, K.: 1996, ‹Power in Organizational Analysis: Delineating and Contrasting a Foucauldian Perspective’, Electronic Journal of Radical Organizational Theory 2(2) (September 1996), available at Vol2_2_front.asp
  13. Limbs E. C., T. Fort: (2000). Nigerian Business Practices and Their Interface with Virtue Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 26: 169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maasen, G. F. and D. Brown: 2006, ‹The Effectiveness of Shareholders’ Meetings: An Overview of Recent Developments’, in Paul U. Ali and Greg N. Gregoriou International Corporate Governance after Sarbanes-Oxley (Wiley, New Jersey), pp. 223–265Google Scholar
  15. Marcus, D.: 2003, ‹Walking and Talking’, Daily Deal, 7 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  16. McNeil G. I.: (2005) An Introduction to the Law on Financial Investments. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 252–256Google Scholar
  17. Orojo, J. O.: 1992, Company Law and Practice in Nigeria (Mbeyi & Associates, Lagos Nigeria, 3rd edn) Nmehielle, V. O. and E. S. Nwauche ‹External-Internal Standards in Corporate Governance in Nigeria’ GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 115 available at abstract_id=627664
  18. O’ Rourke A.: (2003) A New Politics of Engagement: Shareholder Activism for Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Strategy and Environment 12:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Okike E. N. M.: (2007). Corporate Governance in Nigeria: The Status Quo. Corporate Governance: An International Review 15(2):173–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oyejide, T. A. and A. Soyibo: 2001, ‹Corporate Governance in Nigeria’, Paper Presented at the Conference on Corporate Governance, Accra, Ghana, 29–30 January Google Scholar
  21. Pound J.: (1993) The Rise of the Political Model of Corporate Governance and Corporate Control. New York University Law Review 6(5):1005–1993Google Scholar
  22. Rossouw, G. J.: 2005, ‹Business Ethics and Corporate Governance in Africa’, Business and Society 44(1), 94–106 (p. 97)Google Scholar
  23. Sulaiman T.: 2007, ‹Cadbury Nigeria sued by Investors over Accounting’, The Times, (March, 12 2007), available at
  24. Tanko II, M.: 2004, ‹The Impact of Privitization on Capital Market Development and Individual Share Ownership (October, 3 2004).’ available at 689702, accessed on 21/04/07
  25. Turnbull S.: (1997) Corporate Governance: Its scope, concerns & theories. Corporate Governance: An International Review l.5(4):180–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity CollegeCorkIreland
  2. 2.Warwick Business SchoolCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations