Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 82, Issue 1, pp 107–118 | Cite as

Organisational Whistleblowing Policies: Making Employees Responsible or Liable?

  • Eva E. TsahuriduEmail author
  • Wim Vandekerckhove


This paper explores the possible impact of the recent legal developments on organizational whistleblowing on the autonomy and responsibility of whistleblowers. In the past thirty years numerous pieces of legislation have been passed to offer protection to whistleblowers from retaliation for disclosing organisational wrongdoing. An area that remains uncertain in relation to whistleblowing and its related policies in organisations, is whether these policies actually increase the individualisation of work, allowing employees to behave in accordance with their conscience and in line with societal expectations or whether they are another management tool to control employees and protect organisations from them. The assumptions of whistleblower protection with regard to moral autonomy are examined in order to clarify the purpose of whistleblower protection at work. The two extreme positions in the discourse of whistleblowing are that whistleblowing legislation and policies either aim to enable individual responsibility and moral autonomy at work, or they aim to protect organisations by allowing them to control employees and make them liable for ethics at work.


whistleblowing moral autonomy ethical distance moral agency 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahrne G.: 1994, Social Organizations: Interaction Inside, Outside and Between Organizations. (Sage, London)Google Scholar
  2. Alford C. F.: 2001, Whistleblowers: Broken Lives and Organizational Power. (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)Google Scholar
  3. Bailey J. J.: 1997, Individual Scapetribing and Responsibility Ascriptions. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnard C. I.: 1938, The Functions of the Executive. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)Google Scholar
  5. Bauman Z.: 1989, Modernity and the Holocaust. (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY)Google Scholar
  6. Bauman Z.: 1993, Postmodern Ethics. (Blackwell, Oxford)Google Scholar
  7. Berry B.: 2004, Organizational Culture: A Framework and Strategies for Facilitating Employee Whistle-Blowing. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 16(1), 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Callahan E. S., Dworkin T. M.: 1994, Who Blows the Whistle to the Media, and Why: Organizational Characteristics of Media Whistleblowers. American Business Law Journal 32(2), 151–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Callahan E. S., Dworkin T. M., Fort T. L., Schipani C. A.: 2002, Integrating Trends in Whistleblowing and Corporate Governance: Promoting Organizational Effectiveness, Societal Responsibility, and Employee Empowerment. American Business Law Journal 40(1), 177–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiasson, M., H. G. Johnson and J. R. Byington: 1995, Blowing the Whistle: Accountants in Industry, CPA Journal (February), 24–27Google Scholar
  11. Chiu R. K.: 2003, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing Intention: Examining the Moderating Role of Locus of Control. Journal of Business Ethics 43, 65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CNIL: 2005, ‹Guidelines Adopted 10 November 2005 for the Implementation of Whistleblowing Systems in Compliance with the French Data Protection Act Of 6 January 1978, as Amended in August 2004, Relating to Information Technology, Data Filing Systems And Liberties’, (CNIL, Paris)Google Scholar
  13. Crittenden P.: 1990, Learning to be Moral: Philosophical Thoughts about Moral Development. (Humanities Press, New Jersey)Google Scholar
  14. De George R. T.: 1992, Agency Theory and the Ethics of Agency. In N. E. Bowie, & E. R. Freeman (eds), Ethics and Agency Theory: An introduction 3 edition. (Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 59–74Google Scholar
  15. Dodson K. E.: 1997, Autonomy and Authority in Kant's Rechtslehre. Political Theory 25(1), 93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dozier J. B., Miceli M. P.: 1985, Potential Predictors of Whistle-Blowing – A Pro-social Behavior Perspective. Academy of Management Review 10(4), 823–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dworkin T.M., Callahan E.S.: 1998, Buying Silence. American Business Law Journal 36(1), 151–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elliston F. A.: 1982, Civil-Disobedience and Whistleblowing – A Comparative Appraisal of 2 Forms Of Dissent. Journal of Business Ethics 1, 23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gordon M. M.: 1988, The Scope of Sociology. (Oxford University Press, New York)Google Scholar
  20. Hassink, H., M. de Vries and L. Bollen: 2007, ‹A Content Analysis of Whistleblowing Policies of Leading European Companies’, Journal of Business Ethics 75(1), 25–44Google Scholar
  21. Hewson, C.: 2005, ‹Whistle While you Work? Germany’, Eversheds HR Euronews (September), 4Google Scholar
  22. Jackall R.: 1988, Moral Mazes. (Oxford University Press, New York)Google Scholar
  23. Jubb P. B.: 1999, Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics 21, 77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaler J.: 2002, Responsibility, Accountability and Governance. Business Ethics: A European Review 11(4), 327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaptein M.: 2002, Guidelines for the Development of an Ethics Safety Net. Journal of Business Ethics 41, 217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keenan J. P.: 1990, Upper-Level Managers and Whistleblowing: Determinants of Perceptions of Company Encouragement and Information about Where to Blow the Whistle. Journal of Business and Psychology 5(2), 223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lovell A.: 2002, Moral Agency as Victim of the Vulnerability of Autonomy. Business Ethics: A European Review 11(1), 62–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. MacIntyre A.: 1984, After Virtue. (University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame)Google Scholar
  29. Martin B.: 2003, Illusions of Whistleblower Protection. UTS Law Review 5, 119–130Google Scholar
  30. Mathews M. C.: 1987, Codes of Ethics: Organizational Behavior and Misbehavior. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 9, 107–130Google Scholar
  31. McKenna R. J.: 2001, Business is the Common Purpose of the Employees. In M. A. Rahim, K. D. Mackenzie, R. T. Golembiewski (eds), Current Topics in Management. Vol. 6. (Elsevier Science, London) pp. 217–245Google Scholar
  32. McKenna R. J., Tsahuridu E. E.: 2001, Must Managers Leave Ethics at Home? Economics and Moral Anomy in Business Organisations. Reason in Practice, The Journal of Philosophy of Management 1(3), 67–76Google Scholar
  33. Mellema G.: 2003, Responsibility, Taint, and Ethical Distance in Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 47, 125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miceli M. P., Near J. P.: 1984, The Relationships among Beliefs, Organizational Position, and Whistle-Blowing Status: A Discriminant Analysis. Academy of Management Journal 27(4), 687–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miceli M. P., Near J. P.: 1985, Characteristics of Organizational Climate and Perceived Wrongdoing Associated with Whistle-Blowing Decisions. Personnel Psychology 38(3), 525–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miceli M. P., Near J. P.: 1989, The Incidence of Wrongdoing, Whistle-Blowing, and Retaliation: Results of a Naturally Occurring Field Experiment. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 2(2), 91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miceli M. P., Near J. P.: 1991, Whistle-blowing as an Organizational Process. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 9, 139–200Google Scholar
  38. Miceli M. P., Near J. P.: 1992, Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees. (Lexington Books, New York)Google Scholar
  39. Miceli M. P., Rehg M., Near J. P., Ryan K. C.: 1999, Can Laws Protect Whistle-Blowers? Results of a Naturally Occurring Field Experiment. Work and Occupations 26(1), 129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nader R., Petkas P. J., Blackwell K. (eds): 1972, Whistle Blowing: The Report of the Conference on Professional Responsibility. (Grossman, New York)Google Scholar
  41. Near J. P., Dworkin T. M.: 1998, Responses to Legislative Changes: Corporate Whistleblowing Policies. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1551–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Near J. P., Miceli M. P.: 1987, Whistle-blowers in Organizations: Dissidents or Reformers? Research in Organizational Behavior 9, 321–368Google Scholar
  43. Nolan.: 1996, Second Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life Cm 3270. (The Stationary Office, London)Google Scholar
  44. OLAF.: 2005, OLAF Manual. (OLAF, Brussels)Google Scholar
  45. Park H., Rehg M. T., Lee D.: 2005, The Influence of Confucian Ethics and Collectivism on Whistleblowing Intentions: A Study of South Korean Public Employees. Journal of Business Ethics 58, 387–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. PCAW: 2004, Speak Up or Pay Up – The New Liability on Employees For Workplace Accidents (Public Concern at Work, Brussels)Google Scholar
  47. Privacy Commission: 2006, ‹Recommendation No. 01/2006 of 29th November 2006’ (Belgian Privacy Commission, Brussels)Google Scholar
  48. Rachels J.: 1997, Can Ethics Provide Answers? And Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham Maryland)Google Scholar
  49. Radin T. J., Werhane P. H.: 1996, The Public / Private Distinction and the Political Status of Employment. American Business Law Journal 34(2), 245–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rashid Z. A., Ho J. A.: 2003, Perceptions of Business Ethics in a Multicultural Community: The Case of Malaysia. Journal of Business Ethics 43, 75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Scott W. G., Hart D. K.: 1980, Organizational America. (Houghton Mifflin, Boston)Google Scholar
  52. Sennett R.: 1998, The Corrosion of Character. (W. W. Norton, New York)Google Scholar
  53. Sims R. L., Keenan J. P.: 1998, Predictors of External Whistleblowing: Organizational and Intrapersonal Variables. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 411–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith H. R., Carroll A. B.: 1984, Organization Ethics: A Stacked Deck. Journal of Business Ethics 3, 95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tavakoli A. A., Keenan J. P., Cranjak-Karanovic B.: 2003, Culture and Whistleblowing. An Empirical Study of Croatian and United States Managers Utilizing Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics 43, 49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Time: 2002, ‹Persons of the Year’, Time (December 30, 2002/January 6, 2003), 36–62Google Scholar
  57. Tippett, E. C.: 2006, ‹The Promise of Compelled Whistleblowing: What the Corporate Governance Provisions of Sarbanes Oxley Mean for Employment Law’ Available at SSRN:
  58. Tsahuridu E. E., McKenna R.: 2000, Moral Autonomy in Organizational Decisions. In A. M. Rahim, Golembiewski R. T., MacKenzie K. D. (eds) Current Topics in Management. Vol 5. (JAI Press, Stamford) pp 167–185Google Scholar
  59. Vandekerckhove W.: 2006, Whistleblowing and Organisation Social Responsibility. (Ashgate, Aldershot/Burlington)Google Scholar
  60. Vandekerckhove W., Commers M. S. R.: 2004, Whistle Blowing and Rational Loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics 53, 225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vaughan D.: 1998, Rational Choice, Situated Action, and the Social Control of Organizations. Law & Society Review 32(1), 23–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vinten G. (ed.) 1994 Whistleblowing: Subversion or Corporate Citizenship? (St. Martin’s Press, New York)Google Scholar
  63. Walton C. C.: 1997, Shriver’s ‹Ethics for Enemies’: Implications for Research. Business Ethics Quarterly 7(4), 151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Waterman A. S.: 1992, The Use of Normative Metatheoretical Values in the Process of Personality Theory Development. In W. M. Kurtines, M. Azmitia, J. L. Gewirtz (eds) The Role of Values in Psychology and Human Development. (John Wiley, New York), pp. 161–179Google Scholar
  65. Werhane P. H.: 1999, Justice and Trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 21, 237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wren T. E.: 1997, Moral Agency. In P. H. Werhane, E. R. Freeman (eds), The Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics. (Blackwell Business, Oxford), pp. 423–426Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolUniversity of GreenwichLondonUK

Personalised recommendations