Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 81, Issue 1, pp 97–115 | Cite as

Fostering Creativity and Innovation without Encouraging Unethical Behavior

  • Melissa S. Baucus
  • William I. NortonJr.
  • David A. Baucus
  • Sherrie E. Human
Article

Abstract

Many prescriptions offered in the literature for enhancing creativity and innovation in organizations raise ethical concerns, yet creativity researchers rarely discuss ethics. We identify four categories of behavior proffered as a means for fostering creativity that raise serious ethical issues: (1) breaking rules and standard operating procedures; (2) challenging authority and avoiding tradition; (3) creating conflict, competition and stress; and (4) taking risks. We discuss each category, briefly identifying research supporting these prescriptions for fostering creativity and then we delve into ethical issues associated with engaging in the prescribed behavior. These four rubrics illustrate ethical issues that need to be incorporated into the creativity and innovation literature. Recommendations for how organizations can respond to the ethical issues are offered based on practices of exemplary organizations and theories of organizational ethics. A research agenda for empirically investigating the ethical impact these four categories of behavior have on organizations concludes the article.

Keywords

ethics ethical organizations creativity innovation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman D. (2004). An Alchemy of Mind: The Marvel and Mystery of the Brain. New York: ScribnerGoogle Scholar
  2. Alencar E. M. L. S., & Bruno-Faria M. F. (1997) Characteristics of an Organizational Environment Which Stimulate and Inhibit Creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(4), 271–281Google Scholar
  3. Amabile T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Anders, G.: 2002, ‹How Intel Puts Innovation Inside’, Fast Company, March: 122Google Scholar
  5. Basadur M. (1995). The Power of Innovation: How to Make Innovation a Way of Life and Put Creative Solutions to Work. London, U.K.: Pitman PublishingGoogle Scholar
  6. Baucus M. S., & Beck-Dudley C. L. (2005). Designing Ethical Organizations: Avoiding the Long-term Negative Effects of Rewards and Punishments. Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baucus M. S., & Dworkin T. M. (1998). An Empirically-based Model of the Wrongful Firing in Violation of Public Policy Process. Group and Organization Management, 23, 347–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulding E. (1964). Further Reflections in Conflict Management. In R. L. Kahn, & E. Boulding (eds.), Power and Conflict in Organizations. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  9. Burns T. & Stalker G. M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: TavistockGoogle Scholar
  10. Caldwell, D. F. and C. A. O’Reilly: 1995, Norms Supporting Innovation in Groups: An Exploratory Analysis, Paper presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Academy of ManagementGoogle Scholar
  11. Calvin W. H. (1996). How Brains Think: Evolving Intelligence, Then and Now. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis S. M., Meyer C., & Davis S. (1999). Blur: The Speed of Change in the Connected Economy. Boston: Little Brown and CompanyGoogle Scholar
  13. deBono E. (1999). Six Thinking Hats. Boston: Back Bay BooksGoogle Scholar
  14. Dollinger M. J. (1999). Entrepreneurship: Strategies and Resources (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  15. Dundon E. (2002). The Seeds of Innovation: Cultivating the Synergy that Fosters New Ideas. New York: AMACOMGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisenhardt K. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fiol C. M. (1996) Squeezing Harder Doesn’t Always Work: Continuing the Search for Consistency in Innovation Research. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1012–1021Google Scholar
  18. Freeman R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Marshfield, MA: PittmanGoogle Scholar
  19. Freiberg K. L., & Freiberg J. A. (1996). NUTS! Southwest Airline’s Crazy Recipe for Business and Personal Success. Austin, TX: Bard PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Gandz J., & Bird F. G. (1996). The Ethics of Empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gardenfors P., & Sahlin N. (1988). Decision, Probability, and Utility. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaynor G. H. (2002). Innovation by Design: What it Takes to Keep your Company on the Cutting Edge. New York: AMACOMGoogle Scholar
  23. Glynn M. A. (1996). Innovative Genius: A Framework for Relating Individual and Organizational Intelligences to Innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1081–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldenberg J., & Mazursky D. (2002). Creativity in Product Innovation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Gomez-Mejia L. R., & Balkin D. B. (1989). Effectiveness of Individual and Aggregate Compensation Strategies. Industrial Relations, 28(3), 431–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hogg M. A. (1992). The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness. New York: Harvester WheatsheafGoogle Scholar
  27. Itami H. (1987). Mobilizing Invisible Assets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Janis, I. L.: 1971, ‹Groupthink’, Psychology Today 5, 6, November: 43–44, 46, 74–76Google Scholar
  29. Kahneman D., & Tversky A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 563–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelley T., & Littman J. (2001) The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO, America’s Leading Design Firm. New York: Currency & DoubledayGoogle Scholar
  31. Kline P., & Saunders B. (1993). Ten Steps to a Learning Organization. Arlington, VA: Great Ocean PublishersGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuratko D. F., & Goldsby M. G. (2004). Corporate Entrepreneurs or Rogue Middle Managers? A Framework for Ethical Corporate Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. LeDoux J. (2002). Synaptic Self: How Our Brains Become Who We Are. New York: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
  34. Leonard D., & Swap W. (2002). How Managers Can Spark Creativity. In F. Hesselbein, R. Johnson (eds.), On Creativity, Innovation and Renewal: A Leader to Leader Guide. San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  35. MacKenzie G. (1998). Orbiting the Giant Hairball: A Corporate Fool’s Guide to Surviving with Grace. New York: Viking PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Mathews M. C. (1988). Strategic Intervention in Organizations. Newbury Park, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
  37. Mauzy J. & Harriman R. (2003). Creativity, Inc.: Building an Inventive Organization. Boston: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  38. McGregor D. (1985). The Human Side of Enterprise. NY: McGraw-Hill IrwinGoogle Scholar
  39. Michalko M. (2001) Cracking Creativity: The Secrets of Creative Genius. Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Michalko M. (1991). Thinkertoys: A Handbook of Business Creativity. Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Miles M. B., & Huberman A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  42. Nolan V. (1989). The Innovation Handbook. NY: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
  43. Norton Jr. W. I., & Moore W. T. (2006). The Influence of Entrepreneurial Risk Assessment on Venture Launch or Growth Decisions. Small Business Economics, 26, 216–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Palich L. E., & Bagby D. R. (1995). Using Cognitive Theory to Explain Entrepreneurial Risk Taking: Challenging Conventional Wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paul R. (1993). Critical Thinking: How to Prepare Students for a Rapidly Changing World. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical ThinkingGoogle Scholar
  46. Perry-Smith J. E., & Shalley C. E. (2003). The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28, 89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rawnsley J. H., & Leeson N. W. (1995). Total Risk: Nick Leeson and the Fall of Barings Bank. New York: HarperCollinsGoogle Scholar
  48. Ricchiuto J. (1997). Collaborative Creativity: Unleashing the Power of Shared Thinking. Akron, OH: Oakhill PressGoogle Scholar
  49. Rickards T. (1993). Creative Leadership: Messages from the Front Line and Back Room. Journal of Creative Behavior, 27(1), 46–56Google Scholar
  50. Robinson, K.: 2001, Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative (Capstone, Oxford, UK)Google Scholar
  51. Robinson A. G., & Stern S. (1997). Corporate Creativity: How Innovation and Improvement Actually Happen. San Francisco: Berrett-KoehlerGoogle Scholar
  52. Schrage M. (2000). Serious Play: How the World’s Best Companies Simulate to Innovate. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  53. Schweiger D. M., Sandberg W.R, & Rechner P. L. (1989). Experiential Effects of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil’s Advocacy, and Consensus Approaches to Strategic Decision Making. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 745–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Senge P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. New York: Currency DoubledayGoogle Scholar
  55. Sitkin S. B., & Pablo A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Solomon R. C. (1992). Corporate Roles, Personal Virtues: An Aristotelean Approach to Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(3), 317–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sutton R. I. (2002). Weird Ideas that Work: 11½ Practices for Promoting, Managing, and Sustaining Innovation. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
  58. Sutton R. I. (2001) The Weird Rules of Creativity. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 94–103Google Scholar
  59. Thomke S. H. (2003). Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  60. Trevino L. K., & Nelson K. A. (2007). Managing Business Ethics (4th Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, IncGoogle Scholar
  61. Tushman M. L. & Smith W. K. (2004). Innovation Streams, Organization Designs, and Organizational Evolution. In M. L. Tushman, P. Anderson (eds.), Managing Strategic Innovation and Change (pp. 2–17). NY: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  62. Utterback J. M. (1994). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar
  63. von Oech R. (1998). A Whack on the Side of the Head: How You can be More Creative. New York: Warner BrothersGoogle Scholar
  64. Waddock S. A. (2001). Leading Corporate Citizens. New York: McGraw-Hill IrwinGoogle Scholar
  65. Wagner III J. A., & Hollenbeck J. R. (2005). Organizational Behavior: Securing Competitive Advantage (5th Ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson South WesternGoogle Scholar
  66. Waters J. A. (1988). Integrity Management: Learning and Implementing Ethical Principles in the Workplace. In S. Srivastva et al. (eds.), Executive Integrity: The Search for High Human Values in Organizational Life (pp. 290–319). San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  67. Weaver K. M. (1993). Two Alternative Approaches to Creating Opportunities for Entrepreneurial Activity: Bridging the Divide between Academics and Entrepreneurs. Journal of Creative Behavior, 27(2), 89–102Google Scholar
  68. Winslow E. K., & Solomon G. T. (1993). Entrepreneurs: Architects of Innovation, Paradigm Pioneers and Change. Journal of Creative Behavior, 27(2), 75–88Google Scholar
  69. Woodman R. W., Sawyer J. E., & Griffin R. W. (1993). Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yin R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2cd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  71. Yukl G. (2006). Leadership in Organizations (6th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice HallGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melissa S. Baucus
    • 1
  • William I. NortonJr.
    • 1
  • David A. Baucus
    • 2
  • Sherrie E. Human
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of ManagementUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleU.S.A.
  2. 2.LouisvilleU.S.A.
  3. 3.Department of ManagementXavier UniversityCincinnatiU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations