Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 80, Issue 1, pp 129–139 | Cite as

Moral Disengagement in Processes of Organizational Corruption

  • Celia Moore


This paper explores Albert Bandura's concept of moral disengagement in the context of organizational corruption. First, the construct of moral disengagement is defined and elaborated. Moral disengagement is then hypothesized to play a role in the initiation of corruption by both easing and expediting individual unethical decision-making that advances organizational interests. It is hypothesized to be a factor in the facilitation of organizational corruption through dampening individuals’ awareness of the ethical content of the decisions they make. Finally, it is hypothesized to contribute to the perpetuation of corruption in organizations, because if individuals who have a greater propensity to morally disengage are more likely to make decisions that advance organizational interests regardless of the ethicality of those decisions, they may also be rewarded for those decisions in terms of organizational advancement. Together these studies form an argument that moral disengagement plays an important role in processes of organizational corruption.


moral disengagement corruption moral awareness unethical decision-making organizational advancement 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aquino, K., A. Reed, II, S. Thau and D. Freeman: 2007, ‹A Grotesque and Dark Beauty: How the Self-Importance of Moral Identity and the Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement Influence Cognitive and Emotional Reactions to War’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43, 385–392Google Scholar
  2. Ashforth B. E., Anand V. (2003) The Normalization of Corruption in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 25:1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura A. (1990a) Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement. in Reich W. (ed.), Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, Ideologies, States of Mind. New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 161–191Google Scholar
  5. Bandura A. (1990b) Selective Activation and Disengagement of Moral Control. Journal of Social Issues 46:27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura A. (1999) Moral Disengagement in the Perpetuation of Inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review 3:193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura A. (2002) Selective Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral agency. Journal of Moral Education 31:101–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bandura A., Barbaranelli C., Caprara G. V., Pastorelli C. (1996) Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71:364–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bandura A., Caprara G. V., Barbaranelli C., Pastorelli C., Regalia C. (2001) Sociocognitive Self-Regulatory Mechanisms Governing Transgressive Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80:125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barnard C. (1938) The Functions of the Executive Cambridge, MA, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Batson C. D., Moran T. (1999) Empathy-Induced Altruism in a Prisoner’s Dilemma. European Journal of Social Psychology 29:909–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baucus M. S. (1994) Pressure, Opportunity and Predisposition: A Multivariate Model of Corporate Illegality. Journal of Management 20:699–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baumeister R. F., Bratslavsky E., Muraven M., Tice D. M. (1998) Ego Depletion: is the Active Self a Limited Resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74:1252–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bligh M. C., Kohles J. C., Meindl J. R. (2004) Charisma Under Crisis: Presidential Leadership, Rhetoric, and Media Responses Before and After the September 11th Terrorist Attacks. The Leadership Quarterly 15:211–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brief A. P., Buttram R. T., Dukerich J. M. (2001) Collective Corruption in the Corporate World: Toward a Process Model. in Turner M. E. (ed.), Groups at Work: Theory and Research. Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum, pp. 471–499Google Scholar
  16. Butterfield K. D., Trevino L. K., Weaver G. R. (2000) Moral Awareness in Business Organizations: Influence of Issue-Related and Social Context Factors. Human Relations 53:981–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Caprara G. V., Capanna C. (2006) Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Civic-Ness. in Zsolnai L. (ed.), Interdisciplinary Yearbook of Business Ethics. New York, Peter Lang, pp. 87–98Google Scholar
  18. Carroll A. B. (1975) Managerial Ethics: A Post-Watergate View. Business Horizons 18(2):75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chugh D., Bazerman M. H., Banaji M. R. (2005) Bounded Ethicality as a Psychological Barrier to Recognizing Conflicts of Interest in Moore D. A., Cain D. M., Loewenstein G., Bazerman M. H. (eds.), Conflicts of Interest: Challenges and Solutions in Business, Law, Medicine, and Public Policy. New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 74–95Google Scholar
  20. Clinard M. B. and R. Quinney: 1973, Criminal Behavior Systems: A Typology, 2nd Edition (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York)Google Scholar
  21. Clinard M. B., Yeager P. C. (1980) Corporate Crime. New York, The Free PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Coleman, J. W.: 1989, The Criminal Elite: The Sociology of White-Collar Crime, 2nd Edition (St. Martin’s Press, New York)Google Scholar
  23. Cyert R., March J. G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  24. Dodd M. E. (1932) For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees? Harvard Law Review 45:1145–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Douglas T. (1995) Scapegoats: Transferring Blame. New York, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Eichenwald K. (1995) Serpent on the Rock. New York, HarperBusinessGoogle Scholar
  27. Festinger L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL, Row, PetersonGoogle Scholar
  28. Gellerman S. W. (1986) Why “Good” Managers Make Bad Ethical Choices. Harvard Business Review 86(4):85–90Google Scholar
  29. Gioia D. A. (1992) Pinto Fires and Personal Ethics: A Script Analysis of Missed Opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics 11:379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harmon-Jones E. (2000) An Update on Cognitive Dissonance Theory, with a Focus on the Self. in Tesser A., Felson R. B., Suls J. M. (eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Self and Identity. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, pp. 119–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hauser, M.: 2006, Moral Minds: How Nature Designed our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong (Ecco Press, New York)Google Scholar
  32. Jackall R. (1988) Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Jeter L. W. (2003) Disconnected: Deceit and Betrayal at WorldCom. Hoboken, NJ, WileyGoogle Scholar
  34. Johns G. (1999) A Multi-Level Theory of Self-Serving Behaviour in and by Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21:1–38Google Scholar
  35. Jones E. E., Pittman T. S. (1982) Toward a General Theory of Strategic Self-Presentation. in Suls J. (ed.), Psychological Perspectives on the Self. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 231–261Google Scholar
  36. Jones J. M. (1991) Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review, 16:366–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelman H. C., Hamilton V. L. (1989) Crimes of Obedience. New Haven, CT, Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Kohlberg L. (1984) Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive Developmental Approach. in Kohlberg L. (ed.), Essays on Moral Development: Vol. 2. The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages. San Francisco, Harper & Row, pp. 170–205Google Scholar
  39. McLean B., Elkind P. (2003) The Smartest Guys in the Room: The Amazing Rise and Scandalous Fall of Enron. New York, PortfolioGoogle Scholar
  40. Messick D. M. (1999) Alternative Logics for Decision Making in Social Settings. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 39:11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mischel W. (1977) The Interaction of Person and Situation. in Magnusson D., Endler N. S. (eds.), Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 333–352Google Scholar
  42. Muraven M., Tice D. M., Baumeister R. F. (1998) Self-Control as Limited Resource: Regulatory Depletion Patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74:774–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Murnighan, J. K., D. A. Cantelon and T. Elyashiv: 2001, ‹Bounded Personal Ethics and the Tap Dance of Real Estate Agency’, in J. A. Wagner, J. M. Bartunek and K. D. Elsbach (eds.), Advances in Qualitative Organizational Research, Vol. 1, (Elsevier/JAI, New York), pp. 1–40Google Scholar
  44. O’Fallon M. J., Butterfield K. D. (2005) A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision Making Literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics 59:375–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rest J. R. (1986) Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory Minneapolis, University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
  46. Robinson S. L., Greenberg J. (1998) Employees Behaving Badly: Dimensions, Determinants, and Dilemmas in the Study of Workplace Deviance. in Cooper C. L., Rousseau D. M. (eds.), Trends in Organizational Behavior. Chichester, England, UK, John Wiley & Son, pp. 1–30Google Scholar
  47. Rogers, M.: 2001, A Social Learning Theory and Moral Disengagement Analysis of Criminal Computer Behavior: An Exploratory Study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Manitoba, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  48. Sackett P. R., DeVore C. J. (2001) Counterproductive Behaviors at Work in Anderson N., Ones D. S., Sinagil H., Viswesvaran C. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, pp. 145–164Google Scholar
  49. Schrager L. S., Short J. F. (1978) Toward a Sociology of Organizational Crime. Social Problems 25:407–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schur E. M., Bedau H. A. (1974) Victimless Crimes: Two Sides of a Controversy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  51. Shah J. Y., Friedman R., Kruglanski A. W. (2002) Forgetting all Else: On the Antecedents and Consequences of Goal Shielding. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 83:1261–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simon H. A. (1957) Models of Man. New York, WileyGoogle Scholar
  53. Sims R. R., Brinkmann J. (2002) Leaders as Moral Role Models: The Case of John Gutfreund at Salomon Brothers. Journal of Business Ethics 35:320–327Google Scholar
  54. Sosik J. J., Avolio B. J., Jung D. I. (2002) Beneath the Mask: Examining the Relationship of Self-Presentation Attributes and Impression Management to Charismatic Leadership. Leadership Quarterly 13:217–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sundaram A. K., Inkpen A. C. (2004) The Corporate Objective Revisited. Organization Science 15:350–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Szwajkowski E. (1985) Organizational Illegality: Theoretical Integration and Illustrative Application. Academy of Management Review 10:558–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tenbrunsel A. E., Messick D. M. (1999) Sanctioning Systems, Decision Frames, and Cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly 44:684–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tenbrunsel A. E., Messick D. M. (2004) Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behaviour. Social Justice Research 17:223–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tetlock P. E. (1986) A Value Pluralism Model of Ideological Reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:819–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tetlock P. E. (2000) Cognitive Biases and Organizational Correctives: Do Both Disease and Cure Depend on the Politics of the Beholder? Administrative Science Quarterly 45:293–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thompson J. D. (1967) Organizations in Action. New York, McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  62. Trevino L. K. (1986) Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review 11:601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1981) The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211:452–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vardi Y., Weitz E. (2004) Misbehavior in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Management. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  65. Vaughn D. (1996) The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA. Chicago, University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  66. Wayne S. J., Green S. A. (1993) The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange on Employee Citizenship and Impression Management Behavior. Human Relations 46:1431–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yeager P. C. (1986) Analyzing Corporate Offenses: Progress and Prospects. in Post J. (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy. Greenwich, CT, JAI, pp. 93–120Google Scholar
  68. Zerbe W. J., Paulhus D. L. (1987) Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception. Academy of Management Review 12:250–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rotman School of ManagementUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations