Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 80, Issue 1, pp 121–128

Promoting Stewardship Behavior in Organizations: A Leadership Model



This article explores the relational and motivational leadership behaviors that may promote stewardship in organizations. I conceptualize stewardship as an outcome of leadership behaviors that promote a sense of personal responsibility in followers for the long-term wellbeing of the organization and society. Building upon the themes presented in the stewardship literature, such as identification and intrinsic motivation, and drawing from other research streams to include factors such as interpersonal and institutional trust and moral courage, I posit that leaders foster stewardship in their followers through various relational, motivational, and contextually supportive leadership behaviors.

Key Words

courage intergenerational intrinsic motivation leadership stewardship trust 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bandura, A. (1989). Self-regulation of Motivation and Action Through Internal Standards and Goal Systems. In: L. A. Pervin (ed.), Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, L. C. (1986). Reciprocity. New York: Routledge and Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, N. E., & Staw, B. M. (1989). People as Sculptors Versus Sculpture: The Roles of Personality and Personal Control on Organizations. In: M. B. Arthur, Hall D. T., & Lawrence B. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Career Theory, (pp. 232–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University pressGoogle Scholar
  4. Block, P. (1993). Stewardship: Choosing Service Over Self-interest. San Francisco: Berrett-KoehlerGoogle Scholar
  5. Caldwell, C., Bischoff, S. J., & Karri, R. (2002). The Four Umpires: A Paradigm for Ethical Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 36, 153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a Work Organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 580–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donaldson, L., & Davis, J.H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16, 49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  11. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dubin, R. (1982). Management: Meaning, Methods and Moxie. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 372–379. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: PitmanGoogle Scholar
  14. Fox, A. (1974). Beyond Contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations. London: Faber and FaberGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibson, K.: 2000, ‹The Moral Basis of Stakeholder Theory’, Journal of Business Ethics 26, 245–257Google Scholar
  16. Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of its Determinants and Malleability. The Academy of Management Review, 17, 183–211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hambrick, D. C., & Jackson, E. M. (2000). Outside Directors with a Stake: The linchpin in Improving Governance. California Management Review, 42(4), 108–127Google Scholar
  19. Hernandez, M.: 2007, Stewardship: Theoretical Development and Empirical Test of its Determinants. Unpublished dissertation, Duke University, Durham, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  20. Kidder, R. M. (2005). Moral Courage. New York: HarperCollins PublishersGoogle Scholar
  21. Kidder, R. M, and M. Bracy: 2001, ‹Moral Courage: A White Paper’ (Institute for Global Ethics)Google Scholar
  22. Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many Hands Make Light Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawler, E. E. (1996). High Involvement Management. San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and Distrust: New Relationships and Realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mael, F., & Ashforth B. E. (1992). Alumni and their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and Cognition-based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Academy Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2002). Towards a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26, 298–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). No so different after all: A cross-disciplinary view of trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404Google Scholar
  29. Sabel, C. (1993). Learning by Monitoring: The Institutions of Economic Development. In: N. J. Smelser, R. Swedberg (eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology, 137–165. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  30. Schoorman, D., & Mayer, R. (1992). Predicting Participation and Production Outcomes through a Two-dimensional Model of Organizational Commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. New York, NY: Double/Currency BooksGoogle Scholar
  32. Shapiro, S. (1987). Social Control of Impersonal Trust. The American Journal of Sociology, 93(3), 623–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shelp, E. (1984). Courage: A Neglected Virtue in the Patient–Physician Relationship. Social Science and Medicine, 18(4), 351–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sitkin, S. B. (1995). On the Positive Effect of Legalization on Trust. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 5, 185–217Google Scholar
  35. Sitkin, S. B, E. A. Lind, and C. P. Long: 2006, Integrative Leadership (Book in progress, Duke University)Google Scholar
  36. Sitkin, S. B, M. Hernandez, and C. P. Long: 2007, ‹Cultivating Trust in Leaders: Are All Leader Behaviors Equally Influential?’ (Working paper, Duke University)Google Scholar
  37. Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic “Remedies” for Trust/Distrust. Organization Science, 26(4), 367–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sitkin, S. B., & Stickel, D. (1996). The Road to Hell...: The Dynamics of Distrust in an Era of “Quality” Management. In: R. Kramer, & M. Neale (eds.), Trust in Organizations, (pp. 196–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 666–681Google Scholar
  40. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The Psychology of Procedural Justice: A Test of the Group-Value Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 830–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wade-Benzoni, K.A. (1999). Thinking About the Future: An Intergenerational Perspective on the Conflict and Compatibility between Economic and Environmental Interests. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 1393–1405. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wade-Benzoni, K.A. (2002). A Golden Rule Over Time: Reciprocity in Intergenerational Allocation Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1011–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walton, R.E. (1980). Establishing and Maintaining High-Commitment Work Systems. In: J.R. Kimberly, R.G. Miles, & Assocites (Eds.), The Organizational Life Cycle: Issues in the Creation, Transformation, and Decline of Organizations, (pp. 208–290). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  44. Walton, R. E. (1985). From Control to Commitment in the Workplace. Harvard Business Review, 63(2), 76–84Google Scholar
  45. Walton, D. N. (1986). Courage: A Philosophical Investigation. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  46. Wasserman, N. (2006). Stewards, Agents, and the Founder Discount: Executive Compensation in New Ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 960–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Worline, M., Wrzesniewski, A., & Rafaeli, A. (2002). Courage and Work: Breaking Routines to Improve Performance. In: R. G. Lord, R. J. Klimoski, & R. Kanfer (eds.), Emotions in the Workplace: Understanding the Structure and Role of Emotions in Organizational Behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fuqua School of BusinessDuke UniversityDurhamU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations