Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 80, Issue 2, pp 387–398

Ethics and Religion: An Empirical Test of a Multidimensional Model

  • K. Praveen Parboteeah
  • Martin Hoegl
  • John B. Cullen
Article

Abstract

Although it seems that ethics and religion should be related, past research suggests mixed conclusions on the relationship. We argue that such mixed results are mostly due to methodological and conceptual limitations. We develop hypotheses linking Cornwall et al.’s (1986, Review of Religious Research, 27(3): 266–244) religious components to individuals’ willingness to justify ethically suspect behaviors. Using data on 63,087 individuals from 44 countries, we find support for three hypotheses: the cognitive, one affective, and the behavioral component of religion are negatively related to ethics. Surprisingly, one aspect of the cognitive component (i.e., belief in religion) shows no relationship. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Keywords

religion ethics cross-national study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agle B. R., Van Buren. H. 1999. God and Mammon: The Modern Relationship. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9: 563–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali A., Camp R., Gibbs M. 2000. The Ten Commandments: Perspective, Power and Authority in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 26: 351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelidis J., Ibrahim N. 2004. An Exploratory Study of the Impact of Degree of Religiousness upon an Individual’s Corporate Social Responsive Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 51: 119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagozzi R. P. 1994. Principles of Marketing Research. Cambridge, MA: Blacwell PublishersGoogle Scholar
  5. Barro R. J., McCleary R. M. 2003. Religion and Economic Growth Across Countries. American Sociological Review, 68: 760–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berger, P. L.: 1969, The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Garden City: AnchorGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley D. E. 1995. Religious Involvement and Social Resources: Evidence from the Data Set’ Americans Changing Lives. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34: 259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butterfield K., Trevino L. K., Weaver G. R. 2000. Moral Awareness in Organizations: Influence of Issue-Related and Social Context Factors. Human Relations, 53: 981–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen J., Patricia C., Stephen G. W., Leona S. A. 2003. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edition Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  10. Conroy S. J., Emerson T. L. N. 2004. Business Ethics and Religion: Religiosity as a Predictor of Ethical Awareness among Students. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4): 383–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornwall M., Albrecht S. L., Cunningham P. H., Pitcher B. L. 1986. The Dimensions of Religiosity: A Conceptual Model with an Empirical Test. Review of Religious Research, 27(3): 266–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cullen J. B., Parboteeah K. P. 2005 Multinational Management: A Strategic Approach (3 Edition). Mason, OH: South-Western PublishingGoogle Scholar
  13. Cullen J. B., Parboteeah K. P., Hoegl M. 2004. Cross-national Differences in Managers’ Willingness to Justify Ethically Suspect Behaviors: A Test of Institutional Anomie Theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47: 411–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalai Lama. 1974. The Opening of the Wisdom Eye. Wheaton, IL: Theosophical Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  15. De Jong G. F., Faulkner J. E., Warland R. H. 1976. Dimensions of Religiosity Reconsidered: Evidence from a Cross-Cultural Study. Social Forces, 54(4): 866–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dittes J. E. 1969. Psychology of Religion. In: Gardner Lindzey, Elliot Aronson (Eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology. Reading, Mass: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellison C. G. 1995. Rational Choice Explanations of Individual Religious Behavior: Notes on the Problem of Social Embeddedness. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34: 89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fararo T. J., Skvoretz J. 1986. Action and Institutions, Network and Function: The Cybernetic Concept of Social Structure. Sociological Forum, 1: 219–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Faulkner J. E., De Jong G. F. 1966. Religiosity in 5-D: An Empirical Analysis. Social Forces, 45: 246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Field A. J. 1979. On the Explanation of Rules using Rational Choice Models. Journal of Economic Issues, 13: 49–72Google Scholar
  21. Fisher M. P. 2001. Living Religions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  22. Harris J. R. 1990. Ethical Values of Individuals at Different Levels in the Organizational Hierarchy of a Single Firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 9: 741–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hood R. W., Spilka B., Hunsberger B., Gorsuch R. 1996. The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach. New York: Guildford PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Husted B. W. 2000. The Impact of National Culture on Software Piracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 26: 197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iannacconne, L. R.: 1998, Introduction to the Economics of Religion, Journal of Economic Literature 36, 1465–1496Google Scholar
  26. Kelley J., De Graaf N. D. 1997. National Context, Parental Socialization, and Religious Belief: Results from 15 Nations. American Sociological Review, 62: 639–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khavari K. A., Harmon T. M. 1982. The Relationship between the Degree of Professed Religious Belief and Use of Drugs. International Journal of the Addictions, 17: 847–857Google Scholar
  28. Kidwell J. M., Stevens R. E., Bethke A. L. 1987. Differences in the Ethical Perceptions Between Male and Female Managers: Myth or Reality? Journal of Business Ethics, 6: 489–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ludwig T. M. 2001. The Sacred Paths. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  30. Myers S. M. 2000. The Impact of Religious Involvement on Migration. Social Forces, 79(2): 755–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parboteeah K. P., Bronson J. W. Bronson, Cullen J. B. 2005. Does National Culture Affect Willingness to Justify Ethically Suspect Behaviors? A Focus on the GLOBE National Culture Scheme. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 5(2): 123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parboteeah K. P., Cullen J. B., Lim L. 2004. Formal Volunteering: A Cross-National Test. Journal of World Business, 39: 431–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rest J. R. 1986. Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: PraegerGoogle Scholar
  34. Sadeq A. M. 2002. Waqf, Perpetual Charity and Poverty Alleviation. International Journal of Social Economics, 29: 135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwartz S. H., Huisman S. 1995. Value Priorities and Religiosity in Four Western Religions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(2): 88–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Singh J. 1995. Measurement Issues in Cross-National Research. Journal of International Business Studies, 25: 597–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith H. L., Fabricatore A., Peyrot M. 1999. Religiosity and Altruism among African American Males. Journal of Black Studies, 29: 579–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith R. E., Wheeler G., Diener E. 1975. Faith Without Work: Jesus People, Resistance to Temptation, and altruism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5: 320–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Studenmund A. H. 1992. Using Econometrics: A Practical Guide. New York: Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar
  40. Szwajkowski E. 1992. Accounting for Organizational Misconduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 11: 401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tittle C. R., Welch M. R. 1983. Religiosity and Deviance: Toward a Contingency Theory of Constraining Effects. Social Forces, 61(3): 653–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Turner J. H. 1997. The Institutional Order. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational PublishersGoogle Scholar
  43. Vitell S. J., Paolillo J. G. P. 2003. Consumer Ethics: The Role of Religiosity. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2): 151–162Google Scholar
  44. Voas D., Olson D. V. A., Crockett A. 2002. Religious Pluralism and Participation: Why Previous Research is Wrong. American Sociological Review, 67: 212–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weaver G. R., Agle B. R. 2002. Religiosity and Ethical Behavior in Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 77–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. World Values Study Group. 2000. World Values Surveys and European Values Surveys, 1981–1984 and 1990–1993, 1995–1997 and 1999–2000 (Computer file). Ann Arbor, MI: InterUniversity Consortium for Political and Social ResearchGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Praveen Parboteeah
    • 1
  • Martin Hoegl
    • 1
  • John B. Cullen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ManagementUniversity of Wisconsin - WhitewaterWhitewaterU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations