Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 80, Issue 1, pp 5–11 | Cite as

“She did what? There is no way I would do that!” The Potential Interpersonal Harm Caused by Mispredicting One’s Behavior

  • Kristina A. DiekmannEmail author
Article

Abstract

When forecasting their own behavior, people are often inaccurate and tend to predict that they will engage in more socially desirable behavior than they actually do. The problem with inaccurate behavioral forecasts is that they can lead to negative consequences both for the self and for others. One particularly negative consequence may be that such errors can produce overly harsh evaluations and condemnation of others who do not act in a way that most people predict they themselves would act. This paper identifies these common behavioral forecasting errors, why they occur, and the negative interpersonal and unintended, unethical consequences they can have.

Keywords

behavioral forecasting errors misprediction unintended unethical behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alicke M. D. (1993). Egocentric standards of conduct evaluation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 14:171–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker D. D., Terpstra D. E., Larntz K. (1990). The influence of individual characteristics and severity of harassing behavior on reactions to sexual harassment. Sex Roles 22:305–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banaji, M. R., M. H. Bazerman and D. Chugh: 2003, ‹How Unethical are You?’, Harvard Business Review, DecemberGoogle Scholar
  4. Bazerman M. H., Banaji M. R. (2004) The social psychology of ordinary ethical failure. Social Justice Research 17:111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caruso E. M., Epley N., Bazerman M. H. (2006) The costs and benefits of undoing egocentric responsibility assessments in groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91:857–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chugh, D., M. H. Bazerman and M. R. Banaji: 2005, ‹Bounded Ethicality as a Psychological Barrier to Recognizing Conflict of Interest’. In D. A. Moore, D. M. Cain, G. Loewenstein, M. H. Bazerman (eds.), Conflicts of Interest: Challenges and Salutations in Business, Law, Medicine, and Public Policy Google Scholar
  7. Diekmann K. A., Galinsky A. D. (2006) Overconfident, underprepared: Why you may not be ready to negotiate. Harvard Negotiation Newsletter 9:6–9Google Scholar
  8. Diekmann, K. A., A. D. Galinsky, S. D. Sillito and A. E. Tenbrunsel: 2007a, ‹From Behavioral Forecasting Errors to Interpersonal Condemnation’. Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  9. Diekmann, K. A., A. D. Galinsky, A. E. Tenbrunsel and S. D. Sillito: 2007b, ‹The Causes of Behavioral Forecasting Errors: Examples From Two Conflict Situations’. Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  10. Diekmann K. A., Tenbrunsel A. E., Galinsky A. D. (2003) From self-prediction to self-defeat: Behavioral forecasting, self-fulfilling prophecies, and the effect of competitive expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85:672–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dunning D., Meyerowitz J. A., Holzberg A. D. (1989) Ambiguity and self evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57:1082–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epley N., Dunning D. (2000) Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79:861–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Epley N., Dunning D. (2006) The mixed blessings of self-knowledge in behavioral predictions: Enhanced discrimination but exacerbated bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32:641–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Epley, N. and E. M. Caruso: (2004) Egocentric Ethics, Social Justice Research 17, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fiske S. T. (2004) Intent and ordinary bias: Unintended thought and social motivation create casual prejudice. Social Justice Research 17:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Why Didn’t She Just Report Him? The Psychological and Legal Implications of Women’s Responses to Sexual Harassment. Journal of Social Issues 51, 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitzgerald L. F., Swan S., Fischer K. (1995) Why didn’t she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women’s responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51:117–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenwald A. G., McGhee D., Schartz, J. L. K. (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74:1464–1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gruber J. E., Bjorn L. (1982) Blue-collar blues: The sexual harassment of women autoworkers. Work and Occupations 9:271–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gutek B. A. (1985) Sex and the workplace: Impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  21. Liberman N., Trope Y. (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Newby-Clark I. R., Ross M., Buehler R., Koehler D. J., Griffin D. (2000) People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 6:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Osberg T. M., Shrauger, J. S. (1986) Self-prediction: Exploring the parameters of accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51:1044–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Palmer, B.: 2002, `Ten Years Later, Anita Hill Revisits the Clarence Thomas Controversy', Stanford Report, April 2:2002. Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. Rudman L. A. (2004) Social justice in our minds, homes, and society: The nature, causes, and consequences of implicit bias. Social Justice Research 17:129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rudman L. A., Glick P. (2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues 57:743–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sherman S. J. (1980) On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39:211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vallone R. P., Griffin D. W., Lin S., Ross, L. (1990) Overconfident prediction of future actions and outcomes by self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58:582–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Woodzicka J. A., LaFrance M. (2001) Real versus imagined gender harassment. Journal of Social Issues 57:15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.David Eccles School of BusinessUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations