Corporations as Political Actors – A Report on the First Swiss Master Class in Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Andreas Rasche
  • Dorothea Baur
  • Mariëtte van Huijstee
  • Stephen Ladek
  • Jayanthi Naidu
  • Cecilia Perla
  • Esther Schouten
  • Michael Valente
  • Mingrui Zhang
Article

Abstract

This paper presents a report on the first Swiss Master Class in Corporate Social Responsibility, which was held between the 8th and 9th December 2006 at HEC Lausanne in Switzerland. The first section of the report introduces the topic of the master class – ‚Corporations as Political Actors – Facing the Postnational Challenge’ – as well as the concept of the master class. The second section gives an overview of papers written by nine young scholars that were selected to present their research. The brief summary of each paper also includes a summary of comments from the masters, practitioners, and NGO representatives at the event. The third section brings in the perspectives of one master and one NGO representative on the discussed issues. The final section offers a brief wrap-up of the discussed topics and outlines ways to structure future conceptual and empirical research.

Keywords

firms as political actors global governance stakeholder collaboration conflict zones corporate accountability political responsibility NGO legitimacy consumer responsibility hard and soft law human rights 

References

  1. Abbott K., D. Snidal (2001) Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization 54:421–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amnesty International (2003) The Human Rights Responsibilities of Companies; New draft UN Norms Provide Guidelines for Business. Amnesty International UK, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Amnesty International and Pax Christi (1999) Multinationale Ondernemingen + Mensenrechten. Amnesty International, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  4. Argyris C., D. A. Schön (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  5. Anshen M. (1980) Corporate Strategies for Social Performance. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. BBC: 2002, ‚Sudan’s War Forces Oil Company Pull-Out’, <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/ business/ 1879863.stm> Last Accessed: September 2006Google Scholar
  7. Belal A. R. (2002) Stakeholder Accountability or Stakeholder Management: A Review of UK Firms’ Social and Ethical Accounting, Auditing, and Reporting (SEAAR) Practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management: 9(1):8–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banfield J., Haufler V., D. Lilly (2003) Transnational Corporations in Conflict Prone Zones: Public Policy Responses and a Framework for Action. International Alert, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang D., M. Wong (2005) After the Consumer Movement: Toward a New International Labor Activism in the Global Garment Industry. Labor Capital and Society 38(1):126–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clapham A., S. Jerby (2001) Categories of Corporate Complicity in Human Rights Abuses. International and Comparative Law Journal 24:339–349Google Scholar
  11. Clohesy W. W. (2004) Interrogating Human Rights: What Purpose? Whose duty? Business and Society Review 43:43–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cramer J. (2005) Company Learning About Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment 14(4):255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crane A., D. Matten (2004) Business Ethics – A European Perspective. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis K., R. Blomstrom (1971) Business, Society and Environment: Social Power and Social Response 2 edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. de Soysa I. (2000) Ecoviolence: Shrinking Pie, or Honey Pot?. Global Environmental Politics 2(4):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Djelic M.-L., K. Sahlin-Andersson (eds): 2006, Transnational Governance – Institutional Dynamics of Regulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)Google Scholar
  17. Dunfee T. W., T. L. Fort (2003) Corporate Hypergoals, Sustainable Peace, and the Adapted Firm. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 36(2):563–617Google Scholar
  18. Fisher R. J. (1996) Interactive Conflict Resolution. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NYGoogle Scholar
  19. Fort T. L., C. A. Schipani (2002) The Role of the Corporation in Fostering Sustainable Peace. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 35(2):389–435Google Scholar
  20. Fowler A. (2000) Civil Society, NGDOs and Social Development: Changing the Rules of the Game. UNRISD, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  21. Galtung J. (1996) Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Giddens A. (1998) The Third Way. Cambridge, Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilbert D. U., A. Rasche (2007) Discourse Ethics and Social Accountability – The Ethics of SA 8000. Business Ethics Quarterly 17(2):187–216Google Scholar
  24. Göbbels M., J. Jonker 2003, AA1000 and SA8000 Compared: A Systematic Comparison of Contemporary Accountability Standards, Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(1):54–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gunnigham N., P. Gabrosky (1998) Smart Regulation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Habermas J. (1981) The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  27. Habermas J. (1996) Three Normative Models of Democracy. In: S. Benhabib (eds) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 21–30Google Scholar
  28. Habermas J. (2001) The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Habermas J. (2006) The Divided West. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Hart S. (2005) Capitalism at the Crossroads: The Unlimited Business Opportunities in Solving the World’s Most Difficult Problems. Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  31. Held D., M. Koenig-Archibugi (eds) (2005) Global Governance and Public Accountability. Malden, BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  32. Hemmati M. (2002) Multi-Stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability – Beyond Deadlock and Conflict. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Hess D. (1999) Social Reporting – A Reflexive Law Approach to Corporate Social Responsiveness. The Journal of Corporation Law 25(4):42–84Google Scholar
  34. Hess D. (2001) Regulating Corporate Social Performance – A New Look at Social Accounting, Auditing, and Reporting. Business Ethics Quarterly 11(2):307–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hillman A. J., G. D. Keim (2001) Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line?. Strategic Management Journal 22:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Isaacs W. N. (1993) Taking Flight: Dialogue, Collective Thinking and Organizational Learning. Organizational Dynamics 22(2):24–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jungk M. (1999) A Practical Guide to Addressing Human Rights Concerns for Companies Operating Abroad. In: M. K. Addo (eds) Human Rights Standards and the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations. The Hague, Kluwer Law International, pp 171–186Google Scholar
  38. Kant I. (1970) An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment? In: H. Reiss (eds) Kant: Political Writings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp 54–60Google Scholar
  39. Kapelus P. (2002) Mining, Corporate Social Responsibility and the ‚Community’: The Case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi. Journal of Business Ethics 39(3):275–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaptein M., R. Van Tulder (2003) Toward Effective Stakeholder Dialogue. Business and Society Review 108(2):203–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kell G., D. Levin (2003) The Global Compact Network – An Historic Experiment in Learning and Action. Business and Society Review 108(2):151–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kline J. (2005) Ethics and International Business; Decision Making in a Global Political Economy. London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Korten D. C. (1995) When Corporations Rule the World. London, EarthscanGoogle Scholar
  44. Ladek, S.: 2003, The Role of the Private Sector in the Resolution of Violent Conflict, unpublished Master’s Degree Significant Research Paper (American University, Washington, DC)Google Scholar
  45. Leipziger D. (2001) SA 8000. The Definitive Guide to the New Social Standard. London, FT Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  46. Lewis S. (2005) Race Against Time. House of Anansi Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  47. Norris C. (2005) Partnerships for Sustainable Development. The Role of Type II Agreements. In: A. C. Kallhauge, G. Sjöstedt E. Corell (eds) Global Challenges: Furthering the Multilateral Process for Sustainable Development. Greenleaf, Sheffield, pp 210–230Google Scholar
  48. McIntosh M., Thomas R., Leipziger D., G. Coleman (2003) Living Corporate Citizenship – Strategic Routes to Socially Responsible Business. London, FT Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  49. Meidinger E. (2003) Environmental Certification Programs and US Environmental Law: Closer Than You May Think. Environmental Law Reporter 31:162–179Google Scholar
  50. Multinational Monitor: 2006, Untitled. Online: http://www.multinationalmonitor.org/links/scat.php?scat_id = 12, Last Accessed: September 2006Google Scholar
  51. Oetzel, J., K. Getz and S. Ladek: 2007, ‚The Role of Multinational Enterprises in Responding to Violent Conflict: A Conceptual Model and Framework for Research’, American Business Law Journal (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  52. OHCHR: 2005, The Global Compact and Human Rights: Understanding Sphere of Influence and Complicity (Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights, Geneva)Google Scholar
  53. Palazzo G., A. G. Scherer (2006) Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation – A Communicative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 66(1):71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Prahalad C. (2005) The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits. Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  55. Prahalad C., S. Hart (2002) The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Strategy and Business 26:1–14Google Scholar
  56. Rasche A., D. E. Esser (2006) From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability – Applying Habermasian Discourse Ethics to Accountability Research. Journal of Business Ethics 65(3):251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rasche A., D. E. Esser: 2007, ‚Managing for Compliance and Integrity in Practice’, in S. Clegg et␣al. (eds), Business Ethics as Practice (Northampton, Edward Elgar)Google Scholar
  58. Rohitratana K. (2002) SA 8000 – A Tool to Improve Quality of Life. Managerial Auditing Journal 17(1/2):60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ruggie J. (2006) Promotion and Protection of Human Rights: Interim Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises. Commission on Human Rights, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  60. Schiffman L. G., L. L. Kanuk (2000) Consumer Behavior. 7 edn. New York, Prentice HallCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scottish Consumer Council (SCC) (2004) Consuming for Good? The Role of Consumers in Driving Responsible Business (SCC, Edinburgh)Google Scholar
  62. Senge P. M. (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday Currency, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Scherer A.-G., Palazzo G., D. Baumann (2006) Global Rules and Private Actors: Toward a New Role of the Transnational Corporation in Global Governance. Business Ethics Quarterly 16(4):505–532Google Scholar
  64. Scholtens B. (2006) Finance as a Driver of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 68(1):19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith D. (2002) Demonstrating Corporate Values – Which Standard for your Company? London, Institute of Business EthicsGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith N. C. (1990) Morality and the Market: Consumer Pressure for Corporate Responsibility. London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  67. Social Accountability International (SAI) (2001) SA 8000 Guidance Document (New York, SAI)Google Scholar
  68. Soros G. (2002) George Soros on globalization. PublicAffairs, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Sourcewatch: 2006, Untitled. Online: http://www.sourcewatch.org, Last Accessed: September 2006Google Scholar
  70. Stiglitz J. (2006) Making Globalization Work. W.W. Norton & Co., New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Teubner G. (1984) Autopoiesis in Law and Society – A Rejoinder to Blankenburg. Law and Society Review 18(2):291–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Teubner G. (1983) Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law. Law and Society Review 17(2):239–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Teubner, G.: 1983, ‹Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’, Law and Society Review 17(2), 239–285.Google Scholar
  74. United Nations Economic and Social Council: 1996, Consultative Relationship betwee the United Nations and Non-Governmental Organnizations (United Nations, New York).Google Scholar
  75. UNCTAD (2006) World Investment Report. UNCTAD, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  76. Utting, P.: 2005, ‚Rethinking Business Regulation: From Self-Regulation to Social Control’, UNRISD Program Paper TBS-15Google Scholar
  77. Waddel S. (2002) Global Public Policy Networks – Contested Spaces Where the human Spirit Can Triumph. Gan-Net, BostonGoogle Scholar
  78. Ward H. (2003) Legal Issues in Corporate Citizenship. London, IIEDGoogle Scholar
  79. Webb K., A. Morrison 2004 The Law and Voluntary Codes. In: K. Webb (eds) Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation. Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment, Carleton, pp 97–174Google Scholar
  80. Wheeler D., K. McKague, J. Thomson, R. Davies, J. Medalye, M. Prada (2005) Creating Sustainable Local Enterprise Networks. Sloan Management Review 47(1):33–40Google Scholar
  81. Williams A. (2005) Consumer Social Responsibility? Consumer Policy Review, 15(2):34–35Google Scholar
  82. World Bank Group (2002) Large Mines and Local Communities: Forging Partnerships, Building Sustainability. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  83. World Bank Group (1994) Governance – The World Bank’s Experience. World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  84. Young I. M. (2001) Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory 29(5):670–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zürn M. (2004) Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems. Government and Opposition 39(2):260–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Rasche
    • 1
  • Dorothea Baur
    • 1
  • Mariëtte van Huijstee
    • 1
  • Stephen Ladek
    • 1
  • Jayanthi Naidu
    • 1
  • Cecilia Perla
    • 1
  • Esther Schouten
    • 1
  • Michael Valente
    • 1
  • Mingrui Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Logistics and OrganizationHelmut-Schmidt-University Hamburg, University of the Federal Armed ForcesHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Business EthicsUniversity of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland
  3. 3.Copernicus InstituteUtrecht UniversityUtrechtNetherlands
  4. 4.International Solutions GroupAmmanJordan
  5. 5.Department of Law, Queen Mary & Westfield CollegeUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  6. 6.Department of Political ScienceBrown UniversityProvidence, Rhode IslandUSA
  7. 7.Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamNetherlands
  8. 8.Schulich School of BusinessYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  9. 9.School of Labor & Human Resource, RenminUniversity of ChinaBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations