Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 77, Issue 3, pp 287–301 | Cite as

Fairness, Feelings, and Ethical Decision- Making: Consequences of Violating Community Standards of Fairness

Article

Abstract

In this article, we describe the influence of violations of community standards of fairness (Kahneman, Knetsch, and Thaler, 1986a) on subsequent ethical decision-making and emotions. Across two studies, we manipulated explanations for a common action, and we find that explanations that violate community standards of fairness (e.g., by taking advantage of an in crease in market power) lead to greater intentions to behave unethically than explanations that are consistent with community standards of fairness (e.g., by passing along a price increase). We find that perceptions of justifiability mediate this relationship. We also find that individuals derive significant psychological benefits (greater satisfaction, greater happiness, and reduced anger) from engaging in unethical behavior following perceived violations of fairness.

Keywords

unethical behavior fairness deception emotions community standards justification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams J. S.: 1965, Inequity in Social Exchange. in Berkowitz L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2. (Academic Press, New York), pp. 267–299Google Scholar
  2. Allred K. G.: 1999 Anger and Retaliation: Toward an Understanding of Impassioned Conflict in Organizations. in Bies R. J., R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Shepard (eds.) Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 7. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT)Google Scholar
  3. Baron J.: 1997, The Illusion of Morality as Self-Interest: A Reason to Cooperate in Social Dilemmas. Psychological Science 8: 330–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron R. M., D. A. Kenny: 1986, The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 1173–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry B., R. Oliver: 1996, Affect in Dyadic Negotiation: A Model and Propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67: 127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bazerman M., M. Banaji: 2004, The Social Psychology of Ordinary Unethical Behavior. Social Justice Research 17: 111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bazerman M., G. Loewenstein D. Moore: 2002, Why Good Accountants Do Bad Audits. Harvard Business Review 80: 96–102Google Scholar
  8. Bies R. J.: 1987, The Predicament of Injustice: The Management of Moral Outrage. in Staw B. M., L. L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 9. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 289–319Google Scholar
  9. Bies R. J., D. L. Shapiro: 1987, Interactional Fairness Judgments: The Influence of Causal Accounts. Social Justice Research 1: 199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bies R. J., D. L. Shapiro: 1988, Voice and Justification: Their Influence on Procedural Fairness Judgments. Academy of Management Journal 31: 676–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bies R. J., D. L. Shapiro, L. L. Cummings: 1988, Causal Accounts and Managing Organizational Conflict: Is it Enough to Say it’s not my Fault? Communication Research 15: 381–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bies R. J., T. M. Tripp, R. M. Kramer: 1997, At the Breaking Point: Cognitive and Social Dynamics of Revenge in Organizations. in Giacalone R. A., J. Greenberg (eds.), Antisocial Behavior in Organizations. (Sage, London), pp. 18–36Google Scholar
  13. Binmore K., A. Shaked, J. Sutton: 1985, Testing Noncooperative Bargaining Theory: A Preliminary Study. American Economic Review 75: 1178–1180Google Scholar
  14. Bobocel D. R., A. C. Farrell: 1996, Sex-Based Promotion Decisions and Interactional Fairness: Investigating the Influence of Managerial Accounts. Journal of Applied Psychology 81: 22–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brockner J., R. L. DeWitt, S. Grover, T. Reed: 1990, When it is Especially Important to Explain Why: Factors Affecting the Relationship Between Managers’ Explanations of a Layoff and Survivors’ Reactions to the Layoff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 26: 389–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coughlan R., T. Connolly: 2001, Predicting Affective Response to unexpected outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 85: 211–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conlon D. E., N. M. Murray: 1996, Customer Perceptions of Corporate Responses to Product Complaints: The Role of Explanations. Academy of Management Journal 39: 1040–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Conlon D. E., W. Ross: 1997, Appearances Do Count: The Effects of Outcomes and Explanations on Disputant Fairness Judgments and Supervisory Evaluations. International Journal of Conflict Management 8: 5–31Google Scholar
  19. Folger R.: 1993, Reactions to Mistreatment at Work. in Murnighan J. K. (ed.), Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 161–183Google Scholar
  20. Ford R. C., W. D. Richardson: 1994, Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Journal of Business Ethics 13: 205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilliland S., M. Groth, R. Baker, A. Dew, L. Polly, J. Langdon: 2001, Improving Applicants’ Reactions to Rejection Letters: An Application of Fairness Theory. Personnel Psychology 54: 669–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greenberg J.: 1990, Employee Theft as a Reaction to Underpayment Inequity: The Hidden Cost of Pay Cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology 75: 561–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenberg J.: 1993, Stealing in the Name of Justice: Informational and Interpersonal Moderators of Theft Reactions to Underpayment Inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54: 81–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guth W., R. Schmittberger, B. Schwarz: 1982, An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 367–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hegtvedt K. A., C. Killian: 1999, Fairness and Emotions: Reactions to the Process and Outcomes of Negotiations. Social Forces 78:269–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Homans G. C.: 1974, Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. (Harcourt Brace, New York)Google Scholar
  27. Horvath M., A. M. Ryan, S. L. Stierwalt: 2000, The Influence of Explanations for Selection Test Use, Outcome Favorability, and Self-Efficacy on Test-Taker Perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 83: 310–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hulin C. L.: 1991, Adaptation, Persistence, and Commitment in Organizations. in Dunnette M. D., L. M. Hough (eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 2. (Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA), pp. 445–506Google Scholar
  29. Jones T. M.: 1991, Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review 16: 366–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kahneman D., J. L. Knetsch, R. Thaler: 1986a, Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market. The American Economic Review 76: 728–741Google Scholar
  31. Kahneman D., J. L. Knetsch, R. Thaler: 1986b, Fairness and the Assumptions of Economics. Journal of Business 59:S285–S300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Konovsky M. A., R. Cropanzano: 1991, Perceived Fairness of Employee Drug Testing as a Predictor of Employee Attitudes and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 76:698–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lewicki R. J.: 1983, Lying and Deception: A Behavioral Model. in Bazerman M. H., R. J. Lewicki (eds.), Negotiating in Organizations. (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), pp. 68–90Google Scholar
  34. Lewicki R. J., J. A. Litterer, J. W. Minton, D. M. Saunders: 1994, Negotiation. (Irwin, Boston, MA)Google Scholar
  35. Lewicki R. J., R. Robinson: 1998, Ethical and Unethical Bargaining Tactics: An Empirical Study. Journal of Business Ethics 17:665–682Google Scholar
  36. Loe T. W., L. Ferrell, P. Mansfield: 2000, A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business. Journal of Business Ethics 25:185–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ordonez L, T. Connolly, R. Coughlan: 2000, Multiple Reference Points in Satisfaction and Fairness Assessment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13: 329–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pillutla M., J. Murnighan: 1996, Unfairness, Anger, and Spite: Emotional Rejections of Ultimatum Offers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 68: 208–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pillutla M., J. Murnighan: 2003, Fairness in Bargaining. Social Justice Research 16: 241–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Piron R., L. Fernandez: 1995, Are Fairness Constraints on Profit-Seeking Important? Journal of Economic Psychology 16: 73–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ployhart R. E., A. M. Ryan, M. Bennett: 1999, Explanations for Selection Decisions: Applicants’ Reactions to Informational and Sensitivity Features of Explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology 84: 87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robben H., P. Webley, R. Weigel, K. Waernaeryd, K. Kinsey, D. Hessing, F. Martin, H. Elffers, R. Wahlund, L. Vanlangenhove, S. Long, J. Scholtz: 1990, Decision Frame and Opportunity as Determinants of Tax Cheating: An International Experimental Study. Journal of Economic Psychology 11: 341–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rosenfeld P., R. A. Giacalone, C. A. Riordan: 1995, Impression Management in Organizations: Theory, Measurement, and Practice. (Routledge, London, UK)Google Scholar
  44. Schlenker B. R.: 1980, Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations. (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA)Google Scholar
  45. Schminke M.: 2001, Considering the Business in Business Ethics: An Exploratory Study of the Influence of Organizational Size and Structure on Individual Ethical Predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics 21: 375–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schweitzer M., C. Hsee: 2002, Stretching the Truth: Elastic Justification and Motivated Communication of Uncertain Information. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 25: 185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schweitzer M., L. Ordonez, B. Douma: 2004, The Role of Goal Setting in Motivating Unethical Behavior. Academy of Management Journal 47: 422–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seligman D. A., B. Schwartz: 1997, Domain Specificity of Fairness Judgments in Economic Transactions. Journal of Economic Psychology 18: 579–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sitkin S. B., R. J. Bies: 1993, Social Accounts in Conflict Situations: Using Explanations to Manage Conflict. Human Relations 46: 349–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Skarlicki D. P., R. Folger: 1997, Retaliation in the Workplace: The Roles of Distributive, Procedural and Interactional Justice. Journal of Applied Psychology 82:434–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Steinel W., C. K. W. De Dreu: 2004, Social Motives and Strategic Misrepresentation in Social Decision Making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86:419–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Trevino L.: 1986, Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review 11:601–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Trevino L. K., S. Youngblood: 1990, Bad Applies in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 75:378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tripp T. M., R. J. Bies: 1997, What’s Good about Revenge? The Avenger’s Perspective. in Lewicki R. J., R. J. Bies, B. H. Sheppard (eds.), Research on Negotiations In Organizations. (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 145–160Google Scholar
  55. Tripp T. M., R. J. Bies, K. Aquino: 2002, Poetic Justice or Petty Jealousy? The Aesthetics of Revenge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89:966–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.566 JMHH, OPIMWharton School, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations