Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 76, Issue 1, pp 55–68 | Cite as

Corporate Identity of a Socially Responsible University – A Case from the Turkish Higher Education Sector

  • M. G. Serap AtakanEmail author
  • Tutku Eker


Facing increased competition, universities are driven to project a positive image to their internal and external stakeholders. Therefore some of these institutions have begun to develop and implement corporate identity programs as part of their corporate strategies. This study describes a Turkish higher education institution’s social responsibility initiatives. Along with this example, the study also analyzes a specific case using concepts from the Corporate Identity and Corporate Social Responsibility literature. The motives leading the university to manage its corporate identity, the social responsibility initiatives in the local and national communities, and the possible benefits of these initiatives for the parties involved are all identified. The major finding is that philanthropy is one of the main elements of Istanbul Bilgi University’s corporate identity program and that the university has altruistic motives for its social responsibility initiatives.


corporate identity corporate social responsibility corporate philanthropy university Turkey 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abratt R.: 1989, ‚A New Approach to the Corporate Image Management Process’. Journal of Marketing Management 5(1):63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert S., D. Whetten: 1985, ‚Organizational Identity’. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7:163–95Google Scholar
  3. Angelidis J., N. A. Ibrahim: 2002, ‚Practical Implications of Educational Background of Future Corporate Executives’ Social Responsibility Orientation’. Teaching Business Ethics, 6:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aupperle K. E., A. B. Carroll, J. D. Hatfield: 2001, ‚An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability’. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2):446–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker M. J, J. M. T. Balmer: 1997, ‚Visual Identity: Trappings or Substance?’. European Journal of Marketing, 31(5/6):336–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balmer, J.M.T.: 1995, ‚Corporate Identity: the Power and the Paradox’, Design Management Journal, Winter, 39–44Google Scholar
  7. Balmer J. M. T., S. A. Greyser: 2003, Revealing the Corporation, Routledge, New York, pp.39Google Scholar
  8. Bernstein D.: 1984, Corporate Image and Reality: A Critique of Corporate Communications. Holt, Rhinehart and Winston Ltd., Eastbourne, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Birkight K., M. M. Stadler: 1986, Corporate Identity, Grundlagen, Funktionen, Fallspielen. Verlag Moderne Industrie, Landsberg an LechGoogle Scholar
  10. Bock B. H., J. Goldschmid, I. M. Millstein, F. M. Scherer: 1984, The Impact of the Modern Corporation. Columbia Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourner I., S. Flowers: 1997, ‚Teaching and Learning Methods in Higher Education: A Glimpse of the Future’. Reflections on Higher Education, 9:77–102Google Scholar
  12. Boyle E.: 1996, ‚An Experiment in Changing Corporate Identity in the Financial Services Industry in the UK’. Journal of Services Marketing, 10(4):55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brigham S.: 1994, 25 Snapshots of a Movement: Profiles of Campuses Implementing CQI. American Association of Higher Education, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Carroll A. B.: 1979, ‚A Three Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance’. Academy of Management Review, 4(4):497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carroll, A.B.: 1991, ‚The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders’, Business Horizons, July/August, 39–48Google Scholar
  16. Christensen L. T, S. Askegaard: 2001, ‚Corporate Identity and Corporate Image Revisited – A Semiotic Perspective’. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4):292–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collins J. C., J. I. Porras: 1991, ‚Organizational Vision and Visionary Organizations’. California Management Review, 37(Fall):30–52Google Scholar
  18. Davis K., R. L. Blomstrom: 1975, Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility, 3rd ed. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. De Keizer, B: 2004, ‚Corporate Social Responsibility at the University of Amsterdam’. paper presented at the University Industry Forum, BonnGoogle Scholar
  20. Dowling G. R.: 1986, ‚Managing Your Corporate Images’. Industrial Marketing Management, 15:109–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Drumwright M. E., P. E. Murphy: 2001, Corporate Societal Marketing, In: Bloom P. N., Gundlach G. T. (eds), Handbook of Marketing and Society, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp.162–183Google Scholar
  22. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‚The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, September 13, 32–33,122–126Google Scholar
  23. Gioia D. A., J. B. Thomas: 1996, ‚Institutional Identity, Image, and Issue Interpretation: Sensemaking During Strategic Change in Academia’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3):370–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gray E.: 1995, ‚Corporate Image as a Strategic Concept’, paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the Association of Management. Vancouver, 13(1):250–257Google Scholar
  25. Hill R. P.: 2004, ‚The Socially Responsible University: Talking the Talk While Walking the Walk in the College of Business’. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Istanbul Bilgi University, Undergraduate Handbook 2004–2005, pp. 5Google Scholar
  27. Jones, R.E.: 1994, ‚A Theory of Firm Philanthropy: The Philanthropic Capacity of the Firm’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, cited in Sanchez (2000)Google Scholar
  28. Kazgan, G., H. Kirmanoglu, C. Celik and A.Yumul: 1999, Kustepe ve Dolapdere Arastirmasi (Research on Kustepe and Dolapdere), (Istanbul Bilgi Universitesi Publications, Istanbul)Google Scholar
  29. Matten, D. and J. Moon: 2005, ‚Implicit’ and ‚Explicit’ CSR: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding CSR in Europe’, Paper presented in Research Seminar of University of London, 16 FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  30. McAlister D. T., L. Ferrell: 2002, ‚The Role of Strategic Philanthropy in Marketing Strategy’. European Journal of Marketing, 36 (5/6):689–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Melewar T. C., E. Jenkins: 2002, ‚Defining the Corporate Identity Construct’, Corporate Reputation Review. 5(1):76–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Melewar T. C., S. Akel: 2005, ‚The Role of Corporate Identity in the Higher Education Sector A Case Study’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal. 10(1):41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miliken F. J: 1990, ‚Perceiving and Interpreting Environmental Change: An Examination of College Administrators’ Interpretation of Changing Demographics’. Academy of Management Journal, 33:42–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Olins W.: 1978, The Corporate Personality: An Inquiry into the Nature of Corporate Identity. Thames and Hudson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Porter M., M. R. Kramer: 2002, ‚The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy’. Harvard Business Review, 12:57–68Google Scholar
  36. Reed D: 2004, ‚Universities and the Promotion of Corporate Responsibility: Reinterpreting the Liberal Arts Tradition’. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2:3–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ries A., J. Trout: 1981, Positioning: The Battle for the Mind. Warner Brooks, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanchez C.: 2000, ‚Motives for Corporate Philanthropy in El Salvador: Altruism and Political Legitimacy’. Journal of Business Ethics, 27:363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmidt K.: 1995, The Quest for Identity – Corporate Identity, Strategies, Methods and Examples. Cassel, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Simon F. L.: 1995, ‚Global Corporate Philanthropy: A Strategic Framework’. International Marketing Review, 12(4):20–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simoes C., S. Dibb, R. P. Fisk: 2005, ‚Managing Corporate Identity: An Internal Perspective’. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(2):153–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tansel A., Gungor, N. D: 2002, ‚Brain drain’ from Turkey: Survey Evidence of Student Non-return’. Career Development International, 8 (2):52–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. The Economist: 2005, ‚The Good Company – A Survey of Corporate Social Responsibility’, January 22–25, 11–18Google Scholar
  44. Van Rekom, J.: 1993, ‚Corporate Identity – Its Measurement and Its Use in Corporate Communications’, Proceedings of the European Marketing Association Conference, 1497–514Google Scholar
  45. Van Riel, C. B.: 1995, Principles of Corporate Communications. Prentice-Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Riel, C. B. M, J. M. T. Balmer: 1997, ‚Corporate Identity: The Concept, Its Measurement and Management’. European Journal of Marketing, 31(5/6):340–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Weenen, H: 2000, ‚Towards a Vision of Sustainable University’. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1(1):20–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. YOK,: 2001, Yuksekogretim Kurumu Faaliyet Raporu (Activities Report of the Council of Higher Education), Council of Higher Education, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  49. Wulfson M.: 2001, ‚The Ethics of Corporate Social Responsibility and Philanthropic Ventures’. Journal of Business Ethics, 29:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationIstanbul Bilgi UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations