Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 76, Issue 2, pp 207–223 | Cite as

Evaluating Strategies for Negotiating Workers’ Rights in Transnational Corporations: The Effects of Codes of Conduct and Global Agreements on Workplace Democracy

  • Niklas Egels-Zandén
  • Peter Hyllman
Article

Abstract

Following the offshoring of production to developing countries by transnational corporations (TNCs), unions and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have criticised working conditions at TNCs’ offshore factories. This has led to the emergence of two different approaches to operationalising TNC responsibilities for workers’ rights in developing countries: codes of conduct and global agreements. Despite the importance of this development, few studies have systematically compared the effects of these two different ways of dealing with workers’ rights. This article addresses this gap by analysing how codes of conduct and global agreements both independently and interactively affect workers’ rights. We do this based on a qualitative study of the Sri Lankan operations of a Swedish TNC in Sri␣Lanka, and on interviews with union and NGO representatives actively involved in codes of conduct and global agreements. Our results indicate that global agreements independently address all the aspects included in codes of conduct, while also addressing additional, more process-oriented aspects of workers’ rights. Hence, on their own, global agreements seem to comprise the superior approach to promoting workers’ rights. Furthermore, our results indicate that promoting codes of conduct has negative interactive effects on global agreements. Based on these results, we argue that the current focus on codes of conduct is counterproductive for the promotion of workers’ rights.

Keywords

code of conduct corporate responsibility global agreement international framework agreement labour practice non-governmental organisation transnational corporation union workplace democracy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the support of Mats Wingborg in collecting data for this study.

References

  1. Ählström, J. and N. Egels-Zandén: 2007, ‚The Processes of Defining Corporate Responsibility: A Study of Swedish Garment Retailers’ Responsibility’, Business Strategy and the Environment (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht S., S. Deutsch: 2002, The Challenge of Economic Democracy: The Case of Sweden, in W. P. Woodworth (ed.), Economic Democracy: Essays and Research on Workers’ Empowerment (Sledgehammer Press, Pittsburgh, PA), pp. 71–92Google Scholar
  3. Anner M., I. Greer, M. Hauptmeier, N. Lillie and N. Winchester: 2006, The Industrial Determinants of Transnational Solidarity: Global Interunion Politics in Three Sectors, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 12(1), 7–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthaud-Day M. L.: 2005, Transnational Corporate Social Responsibility: A Tri-Dimensional Approach to International CSR Research, Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1), 1–22Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein P.: 1976, Necessary Elements for Effective Worker Participation in Decision-Making, Journal of Economic Issues, 10(2), 490–522Google Scholar
  6. Bernstein P.: 1980, Workplace Democratization: Its Internal Dynamics (Transaction Books, New Brunswick, NJ)Google Scholar
  7. Bluestone B. and I. Bluestone: 1992, Negotiating the Future: A Labor Perspective on American Business (Basic Books, New York)Google Scholar
  8. Blum F. H.: 1953, Toward a Democratic Work Process (Harper and Bros, New York)Google Scholar
  9. Bondy K., D. Matten and J. Moon: 2004, The Adoption of Voluntary Codes of Conduct in MNCs: A Three-Country Comparative Study, Business and Society Review, 109(4), 449–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braun R. and J. Gearhart: 2004, Who Should Code Your Conduct? Trade Union and NGO Differences in the Fight for Workers’ Rights, Development in Practice, 14(1–2), 183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broadhurst A.: 2000, Corporations and the Ethics of Social Responsibility: An Emerging Regime of Expansion and Compliance, Business Ethics: A European Review, 9(2), 86–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brunsson N.: 2002, The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations (Liber ekonomi, Malmö)Google Scholar
  13. Burnett, E. and J. Mahon Jr.: 2001, ‚Monitoring Compliance with International Labor Standards’, Challenge March–April, 51–72Google Scholar
  14. Carley M.: 2005, Global Agreements – State of Play, European Industrial Relations Review, 381, 14–18Google Scholar
  15. Carasco E. and J. Singh: 2003, The Content and Focus of the Codes of Ethics of the World’s Largest Transnational Corporations, Business and Society Review, 108(1), 71–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cassell C., P. Johnson and K. Smith: 1997, Opening the Black Box: Corporate Codes of Ethics in Their Organizational Context, Journal of Business Ethics, 16(10), 1077–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chan A.: 1998, Labor Standards and Human Rights: The Case of Chinese Workers Under Market Socialism, Human Rights Quarterly, 20(4), 886–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chan A.: 2000, Globalization, China’s Free (Read Bonded) Labour Market, and the Chinese Trade Unions, Asia Pacific Business Review, 6(3–4), 260–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chan A. and R. J. S. Ross: 2003, Racing to the Bottom: International Trade without a Social Clause, Third World Quarterly, 24(6), 1011–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chan A. and R. A. Senser: 1997, China’s Troubled Workers, Foreign Affairs, 76(2), 104–117Google Scholar
  21. Christerson B. and R. P. Appelbaum: 1995, Global and Local Subcontracting: Space, Ethnicity, and the Organization of Apparel Production, World Development, 23(8), 1363–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cohen-Rosenthal E. and C. E. Burton: 1987, Mutual Gains: A Guide to Union-Management Cooperation (Praeger Publishers, New York)Google Scholar
  23. Compa L.: 2004, Trade Unions, NGOs, and Corporate Codes of Conduct, Development in Practice, 14(1–2), 210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Connor T.: 2004, Time to Scale Up Cooperation? Trade Unions, NGOs, and the International Anti-Sweatshop Movement, Development in Practice, 14(1–2), 61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cooke W. N.: 1991, Labor-Management Cooperation (W.E. Upjohn Institute, Kalamazoo)Google Scholar
  26. Cowton C. J. and P. Thompson: 2000, Do Codes Make a Difference? The Case of Bank Lending and the Environment, Journal of Business Ethics, 24(2), 165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Derber M.: 1970, The American Idea of Industrial Democracy, 1865–1965 (University of Illinois Press, Urbana)Google Scholar
  28. Diller J.: 1999, A Social Conscience in the Global Marketplace? Labour Dimensions of Codes of Conduct, Social Labelling and Investor Initiatives, International Labour Review, 138(2), 99–129Google Scholar
  29. Eade D.: 2004, Editorial Overview, Development in Practice, 14(1–2), 5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eaton A. E.: 1990, The Extent and Determinants of Local Union Control of Participative Programs, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43(5), 604–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Egels-Zandén, N.: 2007, ‚Suppliers’ Compliance with MNCs’ Codes of Conduct: Behind the Scenes at Chinese Toy Suppliers’, Journal of Business Ethics (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  32. Egels-Zandén N. and P. Hyllman: 2006, Exploring the Effects of Union-NGO Relationships on Corporate Responsibility: The Case of the Swedish Clean Clothes Campaign, Journal of Business Ethics, 64(3), 303–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Emmelhainz M. A. and R. J. Adams: 1999, The Apparel Industry Response to ‚Sweetshop’ Concerns: A Review and Analysis of Codes of Conduct, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(3), 51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fairbrother P. and N. Hammer: 2005, Global Unions – Past Efforts and Future Prospects, Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 60(3), 405–431Google Scholar
  35. Florini A.: 2003, Business and Global Governance: The Growing Role of Corporate Codes of Conduct, Brookings Review, 21(2), 4–8Google Scholar
  36. French, J. L. and R. E. Wokutch: 2005, ‚Child Workers, Globalization and International Business Ethics: A Case Study in Brazil's Export-oriented Shoe Industry’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4), 615–640Google Scholar
  37. Frenkel S.: 2001, Globalization, Athletic Footwear Commodity Chains and Employment Relations in China, Organization Studies, 22(4), 531–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Frenkel S. and S. Kim: 2004, Corporate Codes of Labour Practice and Employment Relations in Sports Shoe Contractor Factories in South Korea, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 42(1), 6–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Frenkel S. and D. Scott: 2002, Compliance, Collaboration, and Codes of Labor Practice: The adidas Connection, California Management Review, 45(1), 29–49Google Scholar
  40. Frundt H. J.: 2004, Unions Wrestle with Corporate Codes of Conduct, WorkingUSA, 7(4), 36–69Google Scholar
  41. Gallin D.: 2000, Trade Unions and NGOs: A Necessary Partnership for Social Development (United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva)Google Scholar
  42. Graafland J. J.: 2002, Sourcing Ethics in the Textile Sector: The Case of C&A, Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(3), 282–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Greenberg, E. S.: 1975, ‚The Consequences of Worker Participation: A Clarification of the Theoretical Literature’, Social Science Quarterly September, 191–207Google Scholar
  44. Guillén M., D. Melé and P. Murphy: 2002, European vs. American Approaches to Institutionalization of Business Ethics: The Spanish Case, Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(2), 167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hale A.: 2004, Beyond the Barriers: New Forms of Labour Internationalism, Development in Practice, 14(1&2), 158–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hammer, N.: 2004, ‚International Framework Agreements: Overview and Key Issues’, Working paper presented at the Industrial Relations in Europe Conference, Utrecht 2004Google Scholar
  47. Hathcote J., I. -J. Nam: 1999, Advantages of Sourcing Apparel from China, Taiwan, South Korea and Mexico, International Trade Journal, 13(2), 157–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Healy M. and J. Iles: 2002, The Establishment and Enforcement of Codes, Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1/2), 117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Henrekson, M. and U. Jakobsson: 2002, ‚The Transformation of Ownership Policy and Structure in Sweden: Convergence towards the Anglo-Saxon Model?’ SSE/EFI working paper series in Economics and Finance, vol.␣469Google Scholar
  50. Herbst P.: 1976, Alternatives to Hierarchies (Martinus Nijhoff Social Science Division, Leiden)Google Scholar
  51. Hunnius G., G. D. Carson and J. Case: 1973, Workers’ Control (Vintage, New York)Google Scholar
  52. ICFTU: 2004, Behind the Brand Names – Working Conditions and Labour Rights in Export Processing Zones (ICFTU, Geneva)Google Scholar
  53. Jones M. T.: 2005, The Transnational Corporation, Corporate Social Responsibility and the ‚Outsourcing’ Debate, Journal of American Academy of Business, 6(2), 91–97Google Scholar
  54. Justice D. W.: 2003, Corporate Social Responsibility: Challenges and Opportunities for Trade Unionists, Labour Education, 130, 1–13Google Scholar
  55. Kaptein M.: 2004, Business Codes of Multinational Firms: What Do They Say? Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kathryn G. and M. Miyake: 2001, Business Approaches to Combating Bribery: A Study of Codes of Conduct, Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3/4), 161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kolk A. and R. van Tulder: 2002a, Child Labor and Multinational Conduct: A Comparison of International Business and Stakeholder Codes, Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 291–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kolk A. and R. van Tulder: 2002b, The Effectiveness of Self-Regulation: Corporate Codes of Conduct and Child Labour, European Management Journal, 20(3), 260–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Korpi W.: 1978, The Working Class in the Welfare Capitalism (Prisma, Kristianstad)Google Scholar
  60. Leahy J. T.: 2001, Making Room for Labor in Business Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics, 29(1–2), 33–43Google Scholar
  61. Lee C. K.: 1998, Gender and the South China Miracle: Two Worlds of Factory Women (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)Google Scholar
  62. Lee C. K.: 1999, From Organized Dependence to Disorganized Despotism: Changing Labour Regimes in Chinese Factories, The China Quarterly, 57, 44–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lipschutz R. D.: 2004, Sweating It Out: NGO Campaigns and Trade Union Empowerment, Development in Practice, 14(1&2), 197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Meyer J. W. and B. Rowan: 1977, Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony, The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Michalos A. C.: 1997, Issues for Business Ethics in the Nineties and Beyond, Journal of Business Ethics, 16(3), 219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Montoya I. and A. Richard: 1994, A Comparative Study of Codes of Ethics in Health Care Facilities and Energy Companies, Journal of Business Ethics, 13(9), 713–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Murphy D., D. Mathew: 2001, Nike and Global Labour Practices: A Case Study Prepared for the New Academy of Business Innovation Network for Socially Responsible Business (New Academy of Business, Bristol)Google Scholar
  68. Murphy P. E.: 1995, Corporate Ethics Statements: Current Status and Future Prospects, Journal of Business Ethics, 14(9), 727–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Murray G. and G. Trudeau: 2004, Towards a Social Regulation of the Global Firm? Industrial Relations, 59(1), 15–25Google Scholar
  70. Nijhof A., S. Cludts, O. Fisscher and A. Laan: 2003, Measuring the Implementation of Codes of Conduct: An Assessment Method Based on a Process Approach of the Responsible Organisation, Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1), 65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. O’Rourke D.: 1997, Smoke from a Hired Gun: A Critique of Nike’s Labor and Environmental Auditing in Vietnam as Performed by Ernst & Young (Transnational Resource and Action Center, San Francisco, CA)Google Scholar
  72. O’Rourke D.: 2000, Monitoring the Monitors: A Critque of PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Labor Monitoring (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA)Google Scholar
  73. O’Rourke D.: 2002, Monitoring the Monitors: A Critique of Third-Party Labor Monitoring, in R. Jenkins, R. Pearson and G. Seyfang (eds.), Corporate Responsibility and Labour Rights: Codes of Conduct in the Global Economy (Earthscan, London), pp. 196–208Google Scholar
  74. O’Rourke D.: 2003, Outsourcing Regulation: Analyzing Nongovernmental Systems of Labor Standards and Monitoring, The Policy Study Journal, 31(1), 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Orton D. J. and K. E. Weick: 1990, Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization, Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Pateman C.: 1970, Participation and Democratic Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)Google Scholar
  77. Riisgaard L.: 2005. Industrial Framework Agreements: A New Model of Securing Workers Rights? Industrial Relations, 44(4), 707–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Roberts S.: 2003, Supply Chain Specific? Understanding the Patchy Success of Ethical Sourcing Initiatives, Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2&3), 159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Roman J.: 2004, The Trade Union Solution or the NGO Problem? The Fight for Global Labour Rights, Development in Practice, 14(1&2), 100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schlegelmilch B., J. Houston: 1989, Corporate Codes of Ethics in Large U.K. Companies: An Empirical Investigation of Use, Content and Attitudes, European Journal of Marketing, 23(6), 7–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schurman S. J. and A. E. Eaton: 1996, Labor and Workplace Democracy: Past, Present and Future, Labor Studies Journal, 21(2), 3–26Google Scholar
  82. Schwartz M.: 2002, A Code of Ethics for Corporate Code of Ethics, Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1/2), 27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sethi S. P.: 1999, Codes of Conduct for Multinational Corporations: An Idea Whose Time has Come, Business & Society Review, 104(3), 225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sethi S. P. and O. F. Williams: 2000, Creating and Implementing Global Codes of Conduct: An Assessment of the Sullivan Principles as a Role Model for Developing International Codes of Conduct – Lessons Learned and Unlearned, Business and Society Review, 105(2), 169–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sethi S. P.: 2002, Standards for Corporate Conduct in the International Arena: Challenges and Opportunities for Multinational Corporations, Business and Society Review, 107(1), 20–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Simmons J. and W. Mares: 1983, Working Together (Knopf, New York)Google Scholar
  87. Somers M. J.: 2001, Ethical Codes of Conduct and Organizational Context: A Study of the Relationship between Codes of Conduct, Journal of Business Ethics, 30(2), 186–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tannenbaum A., B. Kavicic, M. Rosner, R. Vianello and G. Weiser: 1974, Hierarchy in Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA)Google Scholar
  89. Taylor T.: 2005, In Defence of Outsourcing, CATO Journal, 25(2), 367–377Google Scholar
  90. Thorsrud E.: 1977, Breaking Down Bureaucracy, in D. W. Vermilye (ed.), Relating Work and Education (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA)Google Scholar
  91. Valor C.: 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship: Towards Corporate Accountability, Business & Society Review, 110(2), 191–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Walker K. F.: 1974, Workers’ Participation in Management: Problems, Practice and Prospects (International Institute for Labor Studies, Geneva)Google Scholar
  93. van Tulder R. and A. Kolk: 2001, Multinationality and Corporate Ethics: Codes of Conduct in the Sporting Goods Industry, Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2), 267–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Weaver G. R.: 1993, Corporate Codes of Ethics: Purpose, Process and Content Issues, Business and Society, 32(1), 44–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Weber M.: 1947, The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (Free Press, New York)Google Scholar
  96. White B. J., B. R. Montgomery: 1980, Corporate Codes of Conduct, California Management Review, 23(2), 80–87Google Scholar
  97. Wills J.: 2002, Bargaining for the Space to Organize in the Global Economy: A Review of the Accor-IUF Trade Union Rights Agreement, Review of International Political Economy, 9(4), 675–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wingborg M.: 2005, Lång väg till självklara rättigheter: Trelleborgs försök att hindra bildandet av en fackförening på Sri Lanka (SwedWatch and Fair Trade Center, Stockholm)Google Scholar
  99. Winstanley D., J. Clark and H. Leeson: 2002, Approaches to Child Labour in the Supply Chain, Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(3), 210–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Witte J. F.: 1980, Democracy, Authority, and Alienation at Work: Workers’ Participation in an American Corporation (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)Google Scholar
  101. Zwerdling D.: 1978, Workplace Democracy (Harper-Colophon, New York)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Business in Society, School of BusinessEconomics and Law at Göteborg UniversityGothenborgSweden
  2. 2.Centre for People and OrganizationStockholm School of EconomicsStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations