Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 75, Issue 4, pp 381–394

Academic Integrity: The Relationship between Individual and Situational Factors on Misconduct Contemplations

  • Jennifer L. Kisamore
  • Thomas H. Stone
  • I. M. Jawahar


Recent, well-publicized scandals, involving unethical conduct have rekindled interest in academic misconduct. Prior studies of academic misconduct have focussed exclusively on situational factors (e.g., integrity culture, honor codes), demographic variables or personality constructs. We contend that it is important to also examine how␣these classes of variables interact to influence perceptions of and intentions relating to academic misconduct. In a sample of 217 business students, we examined how integrity culture interacts with Prudence and Adjustment to explain variance in estimated frequency of cheating, suspicions of cheating, considering cheating and reporting cheating. Age, integrity culture, and personality variables were significantly related to different criteria. Overall, personality variables explained the most unique variance in academic misconduct, and Adjustment interacted with integrity culture, such that integrity culture had more influence on intentions to cheat for less well-adjusted individuals. Implications for practice are discussed and future research directions are offered.


academic integrity academic culture cheating misconduct personality 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aiken L. S., West S. G. (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  2. Baird J. S., Jr (1980) Current Trends in College Cheating. Psychology in the Schools 17:515–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck L., Ajzen I. (1991) Predicting Dishonest Actions using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Research in Personality 25:285–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolin A. U. (2004) Self-Control, Perceived Opportunity and Attitudes as Predictors of Academic Dishonesty. The Journal of Psychology 138:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowers W. J. (1964) Student Dishonesty and Its Control in College. New York, Bureau of Applied Social Research Columbia UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen J., Cohen P. (1983) Applied Multiple Regression (2nd ed). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJGoogle Scholar
  7. Crown D. F., Spiller M. S. (1998) Learning from the Literature on Collegiate Cheating: A Review of Empirical Research. Journal of Business Ethics 17:683–700Google Scholar
  8. Davis S. F., Grover C. A., Becker A. H., McGregor L. N. (1992) Academic Dishonesty: Prevalence, Determinants, Techniques, and Punishments. Teaching of Psychology 19(1):16–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drake C. A. (1941) Why Students Cheat. Journal of Higher Education 12:418–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ford R. C., Richardson W. D. (1994) Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Journal of Business Ethics 13:205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forsyth D. R., Pope W. R., Mc Millan J. H. (1985) Students’ Reactions after Cheating: An Attributional Analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology 10:72–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gottfredson M. R., Hirschi T. (1990) A General Theory of Crime. Stanford University Press, Stanford CAGoogle Scholar
  13. Hartshorn H., May M. A. (1928) Studies in Deceit. MacMillian, NYGoogle Scholar
  14. Hetherington E. M., Feldman S. E. (1964) College Cheating as a Function of Subject and Situational Variables. Journal of Educational Psychology 55:212–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hogan R., Hogan J. (1995) Hogan Personality Inventory Manual. Hogan Assessment Systems, Tulsa OKGoogle Scholar
  16. Houston J. P. (1983) College Class Room Cheating, Threat, Sex, and Prior Performance. College Student Journal 17:196–204Google Scholar
  17. Jackson D. (1967) Personality Research Form Manual. Research Psychologists Press, Goshen New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Jendreck M. P. (1989) Faculty Reactions to Academic Dishonesty. Journal of College Student Development 30:401–406Google Scholar
  19. Kaufmann J., T. West, S. Ravenscroft and C. B. Shrader: (2005) `Ethical Distancing: Rationalizing Violations of Organizational Norms', Business and Professional Ethics Journal 24(3), 101–134Google Scholar
  20. Karabenick S. A., Srull T. K. (1978) Effects of Personality and Situational Variations in Locus of Control on Cheating: Determinance of the Congruence Effect. Journal of Personality 46:72–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelly J. A., Worrell L. (1978) Personality Characteristics, Parent Behaviors, and Sex of the Subject in Relation to Cheating. Journal of Research in Personality 12:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leming J. S. (1980) Cheating Behavior, Subject Variables, and Components of the Internal–External Scale under High and Low Risk Conditions. Journal of Educational Research 74:83–87Google Scholar
  23. McCabe D. L. (1992) The Influence of Situational Ethics on Cheating among College Students. Sociological Inquiry 62(3):365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCabe D. L. (2005) Promoting Academic Integrity in Business Schools, Professional Development Workshop. Academy of Management, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  25. McCabe D. L., Trevino L. K. (1993) Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences. Journal of Higher Education 64(5):522–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCabe D. L., Trevino L. K. (1997) Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multi-Campus Investigation. Research in Higher Education 38(3):379–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCabe D. L., Trevino L. K., Butterfield K. D. (1999) Academic Integrity in Honor Code and Non-Honor Code Environments: A Qualitative Investigation. The Journal of Higher Education 70(2):211–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCabe D. L., Trevino L. K., Butterfield K. D. (2001) Dishonesty in Academic Environments. Journal of Higher Education 72:29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCabe D. L., Trevino L. K., Butterfield K. D. (2002) Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences on Academic Integrity: A Replication and Extension of Modified Honor Code Settings. Research in Higher Education 43(3):357–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nonis S., Swift C. O. (2001) An Examination of the Relationship between Academic Dishonesty and Workplace Dishonesty: A Multi-Campus Investigation. Journal of Education for Business 77(2):69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ones D. S., Viswesvaran C. (1998). Integrity Testing in Organizations. in Griffin R. W., O’Leary-Kelly A., Collins J. M. (eds.) Dysfunctional Behavior in Organizations: Vol. 2, Nonviolent Behaviors in Organizations. Greenwich CT, JAI PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Ones D. S., Viswesvaran C., Schmidt F. L: 1993, Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Integrity Test Validities: Findings and Implications for Personnel Selection and Theories of Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology (Monograph) 78, 679–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rotter J. B. 1966, ‹Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement’. Psychological Monographs 80 (1, Whole No. 609)Google Scholar
  34. Simon C. A., Carr J. R., McCullough S. M., Morgan S. J., Oleson T., and Ressel M (2004) Gender, Student Perceptions, Institutional Commitments and Academic Dishonesty: Who Reports in Academic Dishonesty Cases? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 29, 75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sims R. L: 1993,The Relationship between Academic Dishonesty and Unethical Business Practices. Journal of Education for Business 68, 207–212Google Scholar
  36. Smyth L. S., Davis J. R. (2004) Perceptions of Dishonesty among Two-year College Students: Academic versus Business Situations. Journal of Business Ethics 51:62–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer L. Kisamore
    • 1
  • Thomas H. Stone
    • 1
  • I. M. Jawahar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Oklahoma in TulsaTulsaUSA

Personalised recommendations