Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 75, Issue 2, pp 181–189 | Cite as

Corporate Decisions about Labelling Genetically Modified Foods

  • Chris MacDonaldEmail author
  • Melissa Whellams


This paper considers whether individual companies have an ethical obligation to label their Genetically Modified (GM) foods. GM foods and ingredients pervade grocery store shelves, despite the fact that a majority of North Americans have worries about eating those products. The market as whole has largely failed to respond to consumer preference in this regard, as have North American governments. A number of consumer groups, NGO’s, and activist organizations have urged corporations to label their GM products. This paper asks whether, in such a situation, individual corporations can be ethically required to take such unilateral action. We argue that they cannot. Given the lack of solid evidence for any risk to human health, and the serious market disadvantage almost surely associated with costly unilateral action, no individual company has an ethical obligation to label its GM foods.


Genetically Modified foods labelling self-regulation voluntary corporate social responsibility technology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ag-West Biotech Inc.: 2000, Angus Reid Poll on Acceptance of GM Foods. AGBIOTECH Bulletin, 8(4). Retrieved January 14, 2005, from
  2. Canadian General Standards Board: 2004, Voluntary Labelling and Advertising of Foods that are and are not Products of Genetic Engineering. Retrieved January 14, 2005, from
  3. Chase, S.: 2003, Canadians Want GM Foods Labelled, Poll Finds. Globe and Mail, p. A8. Retrieved January 13, 2005, from
  4. Foss, K.: 2001, ‹Canadians Have Little Taste for GM Food’, Globe and Mail, August 30, A4Google Scholar
  5. Health Canada: 2004, Food Program: Novel Food Decisions. Retrieved January 13, 2005, from http://www.
  6. Health Canada: 2003, Food Program: Frequently Asked Questions Genetically Modified Foods. Retrieved January 13, 2005, from
  7. Ipsos North America: 2001, News Release.
  8. Jackson D. (2000) Labelling Products of Biotechnology: Towards Communication and Consent. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12(3): 319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. National Institute of Nutrition: 2001, Genetically Modified Foods – Opportunities and Challenges. Rapport, 16(2). Retrieved December 15, 2004, from /rap-vol16–3.pdfGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department Of BioethicsDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations