The CSR-Quality Trade-Off: When can Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Ability Compensate Each Other?
- First Online:
This paper investigates under what conditions a good corporate social responsibility (CSR) can compensate for a relatively poor corporate ability (CA) (quality), and vice versa. The authors conducted an experiment among business administration students, in which information about a financial services company’s CA and CSR was provided. Participants indicated their preferences for the company’s products, stocks, and jobs. The results show that for stock and job preferences, a poor CA can be compensated by a good CSR. For product preferences, a poor CA could not be compensated by a good CSR, at least when people thought that CA is personally relevant to them. Furthermore, a poor CSR could be compensated by a good CA for product, stocks, and job preferences.
Keywordsapplicant attitudes consumer attitudes corporate ability corporate social responsibility investor attitudes personal relevance trade-offs
- Anderson N. H. 1981 Foundations of Information Integration Theory. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
- Evans, J. R. and A. Mathur: 2005, ‹The Value of Online Survey’s, Internet Research 15(2), 195–219Google Scholar
- Frank, R. H.: 1996, ‚Can Socially Responsible Firms Survive in a Competitive Environment?’ In J. M. Darley (ed.), Codes of Conduct: Behavioral Research into Business Ethics (Russell Sage Foundation, New York)Google Scholar
- Jaccard J., Turrisi R., Wan C. K. 1990 Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Newbury Park, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
- Jacoby, J. and L. B. Kaplan: 1972, The Components of Perceived Risk. Paper presented at the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer ResearchGoogle Scholar
- James, W. L., B. S. Sonner: 2001, ‚Just Say No to Traditional Student Samples,’ Journal of Advertising Research (September/October): 63–71Google Scholar
- Kent, R. and M. Lee: 1999, ‹Using the Internet for Market Research: A Study of Private Trading on the Internet’, Journal of the Market Reseacrch Society 41(4), 377–385Google Scholar
- Madrigal, R.: 2000, ‚The Role of Corporate Associations in New Product Evaluation’, in S. J. Hoch and R. J. Meyer (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 27 (Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT), pp. 80–86Google Scholar
- Truell, A. D., J. E. Bartlett and M. W. Alexander: 2002, ‹Response rate, Speed, and Completeness: A Comparison of Internet. Based and Mail Surveys’, Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers 34(1), 46–49Google Scholar