Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 73, Issue 4, pp 347–368 | Cite as

Ethics, CSR, and Sustainability Education in the Financial Times Top 50 Global Business Schools: Baseline Data and Future Research Directions

  • Lisa Jones Christensen
  • Ellen Peirce
  • Laura P. Hartman
  • W. Michael Hoffman
  • Jamie Carrier
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates how deans and directors at the top 50 global MBA programs (as rated by the Financial Times in their 2006 Global MBA rankings) respond to questions about the inclusion and coverage of the topics of ethics, corporate social responsibility, and sustainability at their respective institutions. This work purposely investigates each of the three topics separately. Our findings reveal that: (1) a majority of the schools require that one or more of these topics be covered in their MBA curriculum and one-third of the schools require coverage of all three topics as part of the MBA curriculum, (2) there is a trend toward the inclusion of sustainability-related courses, (3) there is a higher percentage of student interest in these topics (as measured by the presence of a Net Impact club) in the top 10 schools, and (4) several schools are teaching these topics using experiential learning and immersion techniques. We note a fivefold increase in the number of stand-alone ethics courses since a 1988 investigation on ethics, and we include other findings about institutional support of centers or special programs; as well as a discussion of integration, teaching techniques, and notable practices in relation to all three topics.

Keywords

ethics education CSR sustainability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler P. S. (2002). Corporate Scandals: It’s Time for Reflection in Business Schools. Academy of Management Executive 16:148–149Google Scholar
  2. Aspen/WRI: 2005, ‘Beyond Grey Pinstripes 2005’. Preparing MBAs for Social and Environmental Stewardship [accessed on 28 June 2006]. The Aspen Institute and the World Resource Institute, http://www.BeyondGreyPinstripes.org
  3. Alsop, R.: 2003, ‘Right and Wrong: Can Business Schools Teach Students to be Virtuous?’ Wall Street Journal, September, R9.Google Scholar
  4. AACSB (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business International): 2004, Ethics Education in Business Schools: Report of the Ethics Education Task force to AACSB International's Board of Directors (AACSB, St. Louis, MO)Google Scholar
  5. Biello, D.: 2005, ‘Best MBA Programs for Social and Environmental Stewardship – Top 30 MBA Programs’, Business Ethics Online 19, 3.Google Scholar
  6. Bennis W. G., O’Toole J. (2005). How Business Schools Lost Their Way. Harvard Business Review 83(5):96–104Google Scholar
  7. Crane A., Matten D. (2004). Questioning the Domain of the Business Ethics Curriculum. Journal of Business Ethics 54:357–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ethical Corporation: 2006, ‘Corporate Responsibility and Education’, http://www.ethicalcorp.com, May␣2006.
  9. Evans, F.J. and J. W Robertson: 2003, ‹Business School Deans and Business Ethics’ AACSB Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans F. J. and E. Marcal Leah: 2005, ‹Educating for Ethics: Business Deans' Perspectives’, Business and Society Review 110(3), 233–248Google Scholar
  11. Evans, J. M., L. K. Trevino and G. R. Weaver: unpubished, ‘Who’s in the Ethics Driver’s Seat? Factors Influencing Ethics in the MBA Curriculum.’Google Scholar
  12. Hartman, L. and E. Hartman: 2005, ‘How to Teach Ethics: Assumptions and Arguments’, Journal of Business Ethics Education 1, 165–212Google Scholar
  13. Loeb S. E., Ostas D. T. (1996). A Business Ethics Experiential Learning Module: The Maryland Business School Experience. Teaching Business Ethics 1:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Macfarlane B., Spence L. (2003). Redefining the Scholarship of Business Ethics: An Editorial. Journal of Business Ethics 48:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marshall J. D. and M. W. Toffel: (2005), ‹Framing the Elusive Concept of Sustainability: A Sustaibility Hierarchy’, Environmental Science and Technology 39(3), 673–682Google Scholar
  16. Matten D., Moon J. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Education in Europe. Journal of business Ethics 54:323–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paine, L. S.: 1988, Ethics Education in American Business schools. (Ethics Resource Center, Washington, DC)Google Scholar
  18. Rossouw D. (2002). Three Approaches to Teaching Business Ethics. Teaching Business Ethics 6:411–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Russell, J.: 2006, Breaking into the Mainstream. Ethical Corporation Special Report-Corporate Social Responsibility and EducationGoogle Scholar
  20. Sims R. (2000). Teaching Business Ethics: A Case Study of an Ethics Across the Curriculum Policy. Teaching Business Ethics 7:69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sims R., Brinkmann J. (2003). Business Ethics Curriculum Design: Suggestions and Illustrations. Teaching Business Ethics 7:69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Swanson, D. and W. C. Frederick: 2005, ‘Denial and␣Leadership in Business Ethics Education’, in O.␣C.␣Ferrell and R. A. Peterson (eds.), Business Ethics: The␣New Challenge for Business Schools and Corporate Leaders (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY)Google Scholar
  23. Weber J. (1990). Measuring the impact of teaching ethics to future managers. Journal of Business Ethics 9:183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa Jones Christensen
    • 1
  • Ellen Peirce
    • 1
  • Laura P. Hartman
    • 2
  • W. Michael Hoffman
    • 3
  • Jamie Carrier
    • 4
  1. 1.Kenan-Flagler Business SchoolUniversity of North Carolina-Chapel HillChapel HillU.S.A.
  2. 2.DePaul UniversityChicagoU.S.A.
  3. 3.Center for Business EthicsBentley CollegeWalthanU.S.A.
  4. 4.Bentley CollegeWalthanU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations