Ethics, CSR, and Sustainability Education in the Financial Times Top 50 Global Business Schools: Baseline Data and Future Research Directions
- 5.9k Downloads
This paper investigates how deans and directors at the top 50 global MBA programs (as rated by the Financial Times in their 2006 Global MBA rankings) respond to questions about the inclusion and coverage of the topics of ethics, corporate social responsibility, and sustainability at their respective institutions. This work purposely investigates each of the three topics separately. Our findings reveal that: (1) a majority of the schools require that one or more of these topics be covered in their MBA curriculum and one-third of the schools require coverage of all three topics as part of the MBA curriculum, (2) there is a trend toward the inclusion of sustainability-related courses, (3) there is a higher percentage of student interest in these topics (as measured by the presence of a Net Impact club) in the top 10 schools, and (4) several schools are teaching these topics using experiential learning and immersion techniques. We note a fivefold increase in the number of stand-alone ethics courses since a 1988 investigation on ethics, and we include other findings about institutional support of centers or special programs; as well as a discussion of integration, teaching techniques, and notable practices in relation to all three topics.
Keywordsethics education CSR sustainability
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adler P. S. (2002). Corporate Scandals: It’s Time for Reflection in Business Schools. Academy of Management Executive 16:148–149Google Scholar
- Aspen/WRI: 2005, ‘Beyond Grey Pinstripes 2005’. Preparing MBAs for Social and Environmental Stewardship [accessed on 28 June 2006]. The Aspen Institute and the World Resource Institute, http://www.BeyondGreyPinstripes.org
- Alsop, R.: 2003, ‘Right and Wrong: Can Business Schools Teach Students to be Virtuous?’ Wall Street Journal, September, R9.Google Scholar
- AACSB (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business International): 2004, Ethics Education in Business Schools: Report of the Ethics Education Task force to AACSB International's Board of Directors (AACSB, St. Louis, MO)Google Scholar
- Biello, D.: 2005, ‘Best MBA Programs for Social and Environmental Stewardship – Top 30 MBA Programs’, Business Ethics Online 19, 3.Google Scholar
- Bennis W. G., O’Toole J. (2005). How Business Schools Lost Their Way. Harvard Business Review 83(5):96–104Google Scholar
- Ethical Corporation: 2006, ‘Corporate Responsibility and Education’, http://www.ethicalcorp.com, May␣2006.
- Evans, F.J. and J. W Robertson: 2003, ‹Business School Deans and Business Ethics’ AACSB Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
- Evans F. J. and E. Marcal Leah: 2005, ‹Educating for Ethics: Business Deans' Perspectives’, Business and Society Review 110(3), 233–248Google Scholar
- Evans, J. M., L. K. Trevino and G. R. Weaver: unpubished, ‘Who’s in the Ethics Driver’s Seat? Factors Influencing Ethics in the MBA Curriculum.’Google Scholar
- Hartman, L. and E. Hartman: 2005, ‘How to Teach Ethics: Assumptions and Arguments’, Journal of Business Ethics Education 1, 165–212Google Scholar
- Marshall J. D. and M. W. Toffel: (2005), ‹Framing the Elusive Concept of Sustainability: A Sustaibility Hierarchy’, Environmental Science and Technology 39(3), 673–682Google Scholar
- Paine, L. S.: 1988, Ethics Education in American Business schools. (Ethics Resource Center, Washington, DC)Google Scholar
- Russell, J.: 2006, Breaking into the Mainstream. Ethical Corporation Special Report-Corporate Social Responsibility and EducationGoogle Scholar
- Swanson, D. and W. C. Frederick: 2005, ‘Denial and␣Leadership in Business Ethics Education’, in O.␣C.␣Ferrell and R. A. Peterson (eds.), Business Ethics: The␣New Challenge for Business Schools and Corporate Leaders (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY)Google Scholar