Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 72, Issue 3, pp 293–306 | Cite as

Applying Ethical Theories: Interpreting and Responding to Student Plagiarism

Article

Abstract

Given the tremendous proliferation of student plagiarism involving the Internet, the purpose of this study is to determine which theory of ethical reasoning students invoke when defending their transgressions: deontology, utilitarianism, rational self-interest, Machiavellianism, cultural relativism, or situational ethics. Understanding which theory of ethical reasoning students employ is critical, as preemptive steps can be taken by faculty to counteract this reasoning and prevent plagiarism.

Additionally, it has been demonstrated that unethical behavior in school can lead to unethical behavior in business; therefore, correcting unethical behavior in school can have a positive impact on organizational ethics. To meet this objective, a content analysis was conducted on the written records of students formally charged with plagiarizing at a large West Coast university. Each case was classified according to the primary ethical reasoning that the student used to justify plagiarism. Results indicate that students predominately invoke deontology, situational ethics, and Machiavellianism. Based on these findings, specific recommendations are offered to curb plagiarism.

Keywords

academic dishonesty ethical reasoning history of copyright historic views of plagiarism Internet plagiarism teaching academic integrity theories of ethics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allmon D. E., Page D., Roberts R. (2000). Determinants of Perceptions of Cheating: Ethical Orientation, Personality and Demographics. Journal of Business Ethics 23(4):411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altschuler, G. C.: 2001, January 7, ‚Battling the Cheats’, The New York Times online. Section 4A, p. 15. Retrieved July 20, 2004 from Lexis-Nexis databaseGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson E., Brewer M. B., Carlsmith J. M. (1985). Experimentation and Social Psychology. In: Lindzey J., Aronson E. (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp. 441–486Google Scholar
  4. Ashmore R. B. (1987). Building a Model System. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashworth P., Bannister P. (1997). Guilty in Whose Eyes? University Students’ Perceptions of Cheating and Plagiarism in Academic Work and Assessment. Studies in Higher Education 22(2):187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Auer N. J., Krupar E. M. (2001). Mouse Click Plagiarism: The Role of Technology in Plagiarism and the Librarian’s Role in Combating It. Library Trends 49(3):415–432Google Scholar
  7. Boyer E. L. (1990). Scholarship Revisited: Priorities of the Professoriate. Carnegie Endowment for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  8. Brinkmann J. (2002). Moral Reflection Differences among Norwegian Business Students. A Presentation and Discussion of the Findings. Teaching Business Ethics 6(1):83–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brubaker, H.: 2003, March 26, ‚Big Companies Teach Business Ethics to Employees’, Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, p. 1Google Scholar
  10. Bugeja, M.: 2001, November 26, ‚Collegiate Copycats’, Editor & Publisher. Retrieved May 20, 2002 from ProQuest databaseGoogle Scholar
  11. Cavanagh G., Moberg D., Velasquez M. (1981). The Ethics of Organizational Politics. Academy of Management Review 6(3):363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Center for Academic Integrity (CAI): 2005, CAI Research. Retrieved January 19, 2005 from http://www.academicintegrity.org/cai_research.asp
  13. Center for Academic Integrity (CAI): 2002–2003, CAI Research. Retrieved July 31, 2004 from http://www.academicintegrity.org/cai_research.asp
  14. Center for Academic Integrity (CAI): 1999, CAI Research. Retrieved January 19, 2005 from http://www.academicintegrity.org/cai_research.asp
  15. Christie R., Geiss F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark I. (1996). Taking a Stand. (2 edn) Harper Collins College Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Cole, S. and E. Kiss: 2000, ‚Tips for Discouraging Plagiarism. What Can We Do About Student Cheating? About Campus’. Retrieved September 12, 2004 from http://www.academicintegrity.org/resources_inst.asp
  18. Coleman N., Mahaffey T. (2000). Business Student Ethics: Selected Predictors of Attitudes Toward Cheating. Teaching Business Ethics 4(2):121–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crane F. (2004). The Teaching of Business Ethics: An Imperative at Business Schools. Journal of Education for Business 79(3):149–151Google Scholar
  20. Crown D. F., Spiller M. S. (1998). Learning from the Literature on Collegiate Cheating: A Review of Empirical Research. Journal of Business Ethics 17(6):683–700Google Scholar
  21. De George R. T. (1990). Business Ethics, (3rd edn) MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Did you know? 2004: Turnitin, Research Resources. Retrieved July 16, 2004 from http://www.turnitin.com/research_site/e_what_is_plagiarism.html
  23. Dilevko J., Harris R. M. (1997). Information Technology and Social Relations: Portrayals of Gender Roles in High Tech Product Advertisements. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48(8):718–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Donaldson T. (1989). The Ethics of International Business. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  25. Donaldson T., Dunfee T. W. (1994). Towards a Unified Conception of Business Ethics, Integrative Social Contracts Theory. Academy of Management Review 19(2):252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eble K. E., McKeachie W. J. (1985). Improving Undergraduate Education Through Faculty Development. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  27. Ferrell O. C., Gresham L. G. (1985). A Contingency Model Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision-Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing 49(2):87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fialkoff, F. and E. St. Lifer: 2002, ‚Bringing Order to an Unruly Web’, Library Journal, Spring, 2–5Google Scholar
  29. Flynn, L. J.: 2001, September 10, ‚The Wonder Years: Homework is Free Online’, The New York Times online. Retrieved July 20, 2004 from Lexis-Nexis databaseGoogle Scholar
  30. Frankena W. (1973). Ethics. (2nd edn) Prentice Hall, Englewood NJ.Google Scholar
  31. Galbraith S., Stephenson H. B. (1993). Decision Rules Used by Male and Female Business Students in Making Ethical Value Judgments: Another Look. Journal of Business Ethics 12(3):227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Granitz N. (2003). Individual, Social and Organizational Sources of Sharing and Variation in the Ethical Reasoning of Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 4(2):101–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Groark M., Oblinger D., Choa M. (2001). Term Paper Mills, Anti-plagiarism Tools, and Academic Integrity. EDUCAUSE Review 36(5):40–48Google Scholar
  34. Grover S. L., Hui C. (1994). The Influence of Role Conflict and Self-interest on Lying in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 13(4):293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hair J. F. Jr. (1991). Improving Marketing Education in the 1990s. Marketing Education Review 1(1):23–29Google Scholar
  36. Harris, R.: 2002, ‚Anti-plagiarism Strategies for Research Papers’, Virtual Salt. Retrieved September 12, 2004 from http://www.virtualsalt.com/antiplag.htm
  37. Hasnas J. (1998). The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed. Business Ethics Quarterly 8(1):19–42Google Scholar
  38. Hay D., McCourt Larres P., Oyelere P., Fisher A. (2001). The Ethical Perceptions of Undergraduate Students in Computer Related Situations: An Analysis of the Effects of Culture, Gender and Prior Education. Teaching Business Ethics 5(3):331–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoberman, B.: 1985, February, ‚Translating the Bible’, The Atlantic Monthly, pp. 43–58Google Scholar
  40. Holsti O. R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  41. Hunt S., Vasquez-Parraga A. Z. (1993). Organizational Consequences, Marketing Ethics, and Salesforce Supervision. Journal of Marketing Research 30(1):78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ives B., Jarvenpaa S. L. (1996). Will the Internet Revolutionize Business Education and Research? Sloan Management Review 37(3):33–41Google Scholar
  43. Jennings M. (2004). Incorporating Ethics and Professionalism into Accounting Education and Research: A Discussion of the Voids and Advocacy for Training in Seminal Works in Business Ethics. Issues in Accounting Education 19(1):7–26Google Scholar
  44. Kant I. (1959). Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Bobbs-Merrill, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Kassarjian H. (1977). Content Analysis in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research 4(1):8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kienzler D. S. (2004). Teaching Ethics isn’t Enough: The Challenge of Being Ethical Teachers. The Journal of Business Communication 41(3):292–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kolbe R. H., Burnett M. S. (1991). Content-Analysis Research: An Examination of Applications with Directives for Improving Research Reliability and Objectivity. Journal of Consumer Research 18(2):243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Labeff E. E., Clark R. E., Haines V. J., Diekhoff G. M. (1990). Situational Ethics and College Student Cheating. Sociological Inquiry 60(2):190–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Laczniak G. R., Murphy P. E. (1991). Fostering Ethical Marketing Decisions. The Journal of Business Ethics 10(4):259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lawson R. A. (2004). Is Classroom Cheating Related to Business Students’ Propensity to Cheat in the “Real World”? Journal of Business Ethics 49(2):189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lewis P. V., Speck III H. E. (1990). Ethical Orientations for Understanding Business Ethics. The Journal of Business Communication 27(3):213–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Loe T. L., Ferrell L., Mansfield P. (2000). A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision-Making in Business. Journal of Business Ethics 25(3):185–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Luthar H. K., Karri R. (2005). Exposure to Ethics Education and the Perception of Linkage between Organizational Ethical Behavior and Business Outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics 61(4):353–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mallinger M. (1997). Decisive Decision-Making: An Exercise Using Ethical Frameworks. Journal of Management Education 21(3):411–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mallon T. (1989). Stolen Words: Forays into the Origins and Ravages of Plagiarism. Ticknor & Fields, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Mark, R.: 2004, January, Music Downloading Demand Dramatically Declines. Retrieved September 9, 2004 from http://www.clickz.com/stats/big_picture/applications/print.php/1301_3295201
  57. Mason J. B. (1991). Improving Marketing Education in the 1990s: A Dean’s Perspective. Marketing Education Review 1(1):10–22Google Scholar
  58. Mathison D. L. (1988). Business Ethics Cases and Decision Models: A Call for Relevancy in the Classroom. Journal of Business Ethics 7(2):777–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McCabe D. L. (1992). The Influence of Situational Ethics on Cheating among College Students. Sociological Inquiry 62(3):365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McKenzie, J.: 1998 ‚The New Plagiarism: Seven Antidotes to Prevent Highway Robbery in an Electronic Age. From Now On’, The Educational Technology Journal, 7(8). Retrieved July 31, 2004 from http://www.fno.org/index.html
  61. McLafferty C. L., Foust K. M. (2004). Electronic Plagiarism as a College Instructor’s Nightmare – Prevention and Detection. Journal of Education for Business 79(3):186–189Google Scholar
  62. Mengue B. (1998). Organizational Consequences, Marketing Ethics, and Salesforce Supervision: Further Empirical Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics 17(4):333–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mill J. S. (1861/1957). Utilitarianism. Bobbs-Merrill, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  64. Nickell D., Herzog H. A. Jr. (1996). Ethical Ideology and Moral Persuasion: Personal Moral Philosophy, Gender and Judgments of Pro-and Anti-Animal Research Propaganda. Society and Animals 4(1):53–64Google Scholar
  65. Padgett D. L., Conceicao-Runlee S. (2000). Designing a Faculty Development Program on Technology: If You Build It Will They Come? Journal of Social Work Education 36(2):325–334Google Scholar
  66. Park, E.: 2000, ‚Plagiarism at Oxy’, The Occidental. Retrieved August 1, 2002 from http://www.oxy.edu/∼thepaper/archive/issue000128/stories/news1.htm
  67. Plagiarism and the Internet: 2004, Turnitin, Research Resources. Retrieved July 16, 2004 from http://www.turnitin.com/research_site/e_what_is_plagiarism.html
  68. Plutsky S., Wilson B. A. (2001). Writing Across the Curriculum: College of Business and Economics. Business Communication Quarterly 64(4):26–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Pratt C. B. (1993). Critique of the Classical Theory of Situational Ethics in U.S. Public Relations. Public Relations Review 19(3):219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Preventing Plagiarism: Resources for Educators: 2004, Turnitin, Research Resources. Retrieved July 16, 2004 from http://www.turnitin.com/research_site/e_preventing_p.html
  71. Rand A. (1964). The Virtue of Selfishness: A New Concept of Egoism. New American Library, New York.Google Scholar
  72. Randall M. (2001). Pragmatic Plagiarism: Authorship, Profit, and Power. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
  73. Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  74. Rawwas M. Y., Isakson H. R. (2000). Ethics of Tomorrow’s Business Managers: The Influence of Personal Beliefs and Values, Individual Characteristics and Situational Factors. Journal of Education for Business 75(6):321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rimer, S.: 2003, September 3, ‚A Campus Fad that’s Being Copied: Internet Plagiarism Seems on the Rise’, The New York Times, p. B7Google Scholar
  76. Robertson C., Fadill P. (1999). Ethical Decision-Making in Multinational Organizations: A Culture-Based Model. Journal of Business Ethics 19(4):385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roig, M.: 2001, ‚Plagiarism and Paraphrasing Criteria of College and University Professors’, Ethics and Behavior 11(3), 307–323. Retrieved May 20, 2002 from PsycINFO databaseGoogle Scholar
  78. Ryan, J. J. C. H.: 1998, December, ‚Student Plagiarism in an Online World’, ASEE Prism Magazine, pp. 1–5. Retrieved July 31, 2004 from http://www.asee.org/prism/december/html/student_plagiarism_in_an_onlin.htm
  79. Sims R. L. (1993). The Relationship between Academic Dishonesty and Unethical Business Practices. Journal of Education for Business 68(4):207–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith K. J., Davy A., Rosenberg D. L., Haight G. T. (2002). A Structural Modeling Investigation of the Influence of Demographics and Attitudinal Factors and In-class Deterrents on Cheating Behavior among Accounting Majors. Journal of Accounting Education 20(1):45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Smyth M. L., Davis J. R. (2004). Perceptions of Dishonesty among Two-year College Students: Academic versus Business Situations. Journal of Business Ethics 51(1):63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sokolik, M.: 2000, ‚Designing Writing Assignments’, Writing Across Berkeley, 1(2), 1–2. Retrieved July 20, 2004 from http://www.writing.berkeley.edu/wab/1-2-before.htm
  83. Stevens B. (1996). Using the Competing Framework to Assess Corporate Ethical Codes. The Journal of Business Communication 33(1):71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Swinyard W. R., DeLong T. J., Cheng P. S. (1989). The Relationship between Moral Decisions and Their Consequences: A Tradeoff Analysis Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 8(4):289–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sykes G. M., Matza D. (1957).Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency. American Sociological Review 22(6):664–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. UK Patent Office: 2004, (n. d.). Intellectual Property: A History of Copyright. Retrieved July 20, 2004 from http://www.intellectual-property.gov.uk/std/resources/copyright/history.htm
  87. Vitell S., Grove S. (1987). Marketing Ethics and Techniques of Neutralization. Journal of Business Ethics 6(6):433–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vitell S., Nwachukwa S., Barnes J. (1993). The Effects of Culture on Ethical Decision-Making: An Application of Hofstede’s Typology. Journal of Business Ethics 12(10):753–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Webster R. L., Harmon H. (2002). Comparing Levels of Machiavellianism of Today’s College Students with College Students of the 1960s. Teaching Business Ethics 6(4):435–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. West T., Ravenscroft S., Schrader C. (2004). Cheating and Moral Judgment in the College Classroom: A Natural Experiment. Journal of Business Ethics 54(2):173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zack, I.: 1998, September 16, ‚The Latest Academic Vice: Computer-Assisted Cheating’, The New York Times online. Retrieved July 20, 2004 from Lexis-Nexis databaseGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marketing and Business CommunicationCal State FullertonFullertonUSA

Personalised recommendations